Information Concerning the Budgetary Effects of H.R. 1, as Passed by the Senate on July 1, 2025

As passed by the Senate on July 1, 2025

 

https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61537

 

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

He said an unbiased analysis, not an article titled: "Senate Passes One Big Beautiful Bill Despite One Big Not-So-Beautiful Price Tag"

 

They use the Wharton model.

On 6/30/2025 at 7:18 PM, bubblegum said:

No more food stamps. 10 % of the USA population rely on SNAP.

 

Mind boggling that the "Greatest" country ever, has so many people without food. And now ya'll want to take that away. Making your Government mass murderers in my opinion. Well that actually is the one thing you're good at. Killing people!

Plenty of jobs to be had for the lazy. Go MEGA!

Name 1

18 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Name 1

Ricky 

12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You will not read an unbiased analysis that you do not pay for. You can read the whole thing for free: 

 

 

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1

 

 

 

Thanks.  I MIGHT try to wade through that but honestly I am not expert in economics.  Lot of it probably goes right over my head.  Which is probably true of most of us discussing it in this thread.

 

I suspect a true unbiased source will be difficult to find.  Betting the Trump side has an argument that his bill will spur the economy to much that poor people will actually gain better employment and medical coverage and the income increase will cover the lower tax rates.  And of course his detractors will find anything they can to prove he is starving women, children and aged while increasing the debt.

 

<deleted> up world we live in when you can't trust any resource to actually net it out reasonably.

 

 

 

10 hours ago, jimmybcool said:

 

Thanks.  I MIGHT try to wade through that but honestly I am not expert in economics.  Lot of it probably goes right over my head.  Which is probably true of most of us discussing it in this thread.

 

I suspect a true unbiased source will be difficult to find.  Betting the Trump side has an argument that his bill will spur the economy to much that poor people will actually gain better employment and medical coverage and the income increase will cover the lower tax rates.  And of course his detractors will find anything they can to prove he is starving women, children and aged while increasing the debt.

 

<deleted> up world we live in when you can't trust any resource to actually net it out reasonably.

 

 

 

I'm not going to wade through it either, but you do not need to be any kind of expert to understand it. 

 

Listen to people you think you can trust, and do not believe cr*p that makes no sense. 

26 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I'm not going to wade through it either, but you do not need to be any kind of expert to understand it. 

 

Listen to people you think you can trust, and do not believe cr*p that makes no sense. 

 

Yeah I'm just gonna go with seeing how it turns out.  If the economy booms maybe the naysayers are wrong.  If we tailspin maybe they were right.  Nothing I can do about it anyway.