1 minute ago, Photoguy21 said:

She took the word of her lawyer which she should have been advised to plead Not Guilty

The beek who gave her the custodial should be given his P45.

23 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There absolutely are people offering opinions online.

 

Some might even be Barristers.

Some times barristers are "advised" to get a client to plead in a direction that suits the judicial system. It isn't supposed to happen but it does.

23 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not sure on what basis you make that claim.

 

Perhaps non at all beyond being unable to deal with the facts as they are.

Just look at others who have made comments which leave not a lot to the imagination, like the guy indicating what he would like to see to people who reject the influx of illegals and moved his hand across his throat. Not a lot was left to the imagination as to what he was saying yet he got off with a naughty boy admonishment.

23 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not going to waste time looking for stuff on the internet that you claim as the basis of your posts.

 

That’s your job,

I guess you are just a lazy person. Like to criticise but to lazy to find out the fact. Go back to sleep and stay there for the rest of the week.

11 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Just look at others who have made comments which leave not a lot to the imagination, like the guy indicating what he would like to see to people who reject the influx of illegals and moved his hand across his throat. Not a lot was left to the imagination as to what he was saying yet he got off with a naughty boy admonishment.

I have to say I don't really like Ricky Jones but you do yourself no favours when you slant things so ridiculously. He was not "indicating what he would like done to people who reject the influx of illegals". 

In the full speech, and this was covered in court, he was clearly talking about the people who had left NF stickers on trains with razor blades concealed behind them (so whoever removes them gets hurt), and also leaving razor blades between seats.
 

“You’ve got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.  They don’t give a s*** about who they hurt.  They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.”

Please keep things in context. It was not about people who might have legitimate concerns about illegal immigration and want to voice their opinions in a civilised manner and who would be willing to engage in discourse to find a reasonable solution. It was about racists leaving NF stickers with razor blades on trains.

5 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I have to say I don't really like Ricky Jones but you do yourself no favours when you slant things so ridiculously. He was not "indicating what he would like done to people who reject the influx of illegals". 

In the full speech, and this was covered in court, he was clearly talking about the people who had left NF stickers on trains with razor blades concealed behind them (so whoever removes them gets hurt), and also leaving razor blades between seats.
 

“You’ve got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.  They don’t give a s*** about who they hurt.  They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.”

Please keep things in context. It was not about people who might have legitimate concerns about illegal immigration and want to voice their opinions in a civilised manner and who would be willing to engage in discourse to find a reasonable solution. It was about racists leaving NF stickers with razor blades on trains.

So it's now OK to tell crowds to cut the the throats of 'disgusting Nazi fascists'?  That makes it OK does it?

Just now, simon43 said:

So it's now OK to tell crowds to cut the the throats of 'disgusting Nazi fascists'?  That makes it OK does it?

 

 

What a ridiculous comment!

10 minutes ago, simon43 said:

So it's now OK to tell crowds to cut the the throats of 'disgusting Nazi fascists'?  That makes it OK does it?

Read my post again.

37 minutes ago, Photoguy21 said:

Just look at others who have made comments which leave not a lot to the imagination,

 

You don't mean comments like these do you.

 

Jo Brand " Pity it wasn't acid "

 

Labour MP Naz Shah " Those girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity "

 

Apparently nothing wrong with such speech, if you are a lefty.

39 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

I have to say I don't really like Ricky Jones but you do yourself no favours when you slant things so ridiculously. He was not "indicating what he would like done to people who reject the influx of illegals". 

In the full speech, and this was covered in court, he was clearly talking about the people who had left NF stickers on trains with razor blades concealed behind them (so whoever removes them gets hurt), and also leaving razor blades between seats.
 

“You’ve got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.  They don’t give a s*** about who they hurt.  They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.”

Please keep things in context. It was not about people who might have legitimate concerns about illegal immigration and want to voice their opinions in a civilised manner and who would be willing to engage in discourse to find a reasonable solution. It was about racists leaving NF stickers with razor blades on trains.

 

The facts are not important to the frothing at the mouth 'two-tier Kier' crowd!

4 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

 

The facts are not important to the frothing at the mouth 'two-tier Kier' crowd!

 

 

Still, your attempts at sensationalism don' work.

 

 

Must be disappointing being a Starmer fanboy.

27 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Read my post again.

 

 

That would require a skill that has, so far, not been in evidence.

1 hour ago, Photoguy21 said:

Some times barristers are "advised" to get a client to plead in a direction that suits the judicial system. It isn't supposed to happen but it does.

Let’s have some credible evidence to back that up.

1 hour ago, Photoguy21 said:

I guess you are just a lazy person. Like to criticise but to lazy to find out the fact. Go back to sleep and stay there for the rest of the week.

Not at all.

 

I just understand that when you make a claim that Barristers are acting in a particular manner, it is for you to provide credible evidence to substantiate your claim.

29 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

Labour MP Naz Shah " Those girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity "

 

Apparently nothing wrong with such speech, if you are a lefty.

You are either being deliberately dense or you are parroting sensationalism without checking for yourself. Don't worry it is common in your world.

She did not make that as a literal comment. She didn't even make the comment herself. It was a tweet from a parody account that she liked and retweeted. When she realised that morons were (probably deliberately) taking it literally she took it down, a whole 8 minutes after it went up. But people like you still bang on about it and deliberately twist it.

The knuckleheads at "Leave EU" had to pay her damages after calling her a "grooming gangs apologist" based on a parody that was up for eight minutes. Especially bad considering she has worked for more than 20 years on child abuse, violence against women, and grooming, and it is all on record. So, you know, she actually does stuff to protect victims of grooming gangs, unlike people like Yaxley-Lennon who do nothing but jump on bandwagons to whip up the masses for donations. That makes comments like yours even more distasteful and repugnant as she has done more against grooming gangs than all of your heroes put together.

They publicly apologised and accepted Ms Shah was a "vociferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs", and said their post was “ill-judged and untrue”. Maybe you can do the same? Or if not will you admit you have been mislead and genuinely believed what you were told to believe without checking for yourself? Either one of the two would be acceptable.

Just now, josephbloggs said:

You are either being deliberately dense or you are parroting sensationalism without checking for yourself.

 

Right, neither of them actually happened 

 

The only person being dense, is you, yet again.

 

The Ricky Jones video was also a deep fake, to try and discredit lefties.

 

Grow up.

 

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Senior moment Jonny?

 

Go back and check who you were responding to.

 

 

Everyone knows you and brewsterbudgen are the same person.

 

#worstkeptsecret

Just saw tbe Telegraph interview. 

 

This woman has more courage and charisma in her little finger than that drip Starmer has in his whole body.

 

Starmer bullied the wrong one. 

 

Does anyone have any links to donate to her cause?

16 minutes ago, The Cyclist said:

 

Right, neither of them actually happened 

 

The only person being dense, is you, yet again.

 

The Ricky Jones video was also a deep fake, to try and discredit lefties.

 

Grow up.

 

Typical response when challenged with facts, deflect then run away. Never ever ever answer a direct question.

Too much for you to take in, it must be hard to be informed of facts that make you realise you've been duped. I might deflect and run away too if that happened, boo hoo, but then it would never happen as I like to look for context and independently verify things I am told rather than immediately bash my keyboard and make myself look stupid.......as you did.

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Typical response when challenged with facts,

 

You wouldn't know a fact, if it whacked you right between the eyeballs.

 

Off you pop, space cadet.

Just now, The Cyclist said:

 

You wouldn't know a fact, if it whacked you right between the eyeballs.

 

Off you pop, space cadet.

And again. No engagement or debate on the point in hand. Deflect, run away, pop up in a while with more misinformed or deliberately slanted nonsense.

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

I have to say I don't really like Ricky Jones but you do yourself no favours when you slant things so ridiculously. He was not "indicating what he would like done to people who reject the influx of illegals". 

In the full speech, and this was covered in court, he was clearly talking about the people who had left NF stickers on trains with razor blades concealed behind them (so whoever removes them gets hurt), and also leaving razor blades between seats.
 

“You’ve got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.  They don’t give a s*** about who they hurt.  They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.”

Please keep things in context. It was not about people who might have legitimate concerns about illegal immigration and want to voice their opinions in a civilised manner and who would be willing to engage in discourse to find a reasonable solution. It was about racists leaving NF stickers with razor blades on trains.

I agree there are many violent people going around and most have not been arrested. Illegals should be removed from the country. At the end of the day the British people are to be top priority not illegals

1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:

 

You don't mean comments like these do you.

 

Jo Brand " Pity it wasn't acid "

 

Labour MP Naz Shah " Those girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity "

 

Apparently nothing wrong with such speech, if you are a lefty.

Exactly. What happened to Jo Brand? Nothing. You are right if you are on the left you can pretty much say and do as you want without fear of any repercussions.

1 hour ago, The Cyclist said:

 

You don't mean comments like these do you.

 

Jo Brand " Pity it wasn't acid "

 

Labour MP Naz Shah " Those girls should shut their mouths for the sake of diversity "

 

Apparently nothing wrong with such speech, if you are a lefty.

Jo Brand should have been before a judge and the judge should have come down very heavy on her.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s have some credible evidence to back that up.

There are enough transcripts on the internet if you take the time to find, read and understand them.

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Not at all.

 

I just understand that when you make a claim that Barristers are acting in a particular manner, it is for you to provide credible evidence to substantiate your claim.

The legal system is the one to dig them out not me. 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

Everyone knows you and brewsterbudgen are the same person.

 

#worstkeptsecret

If you believe that, take it up with the moderators.

 

Or don’t if you still need covert for you obvious confusion over who it is you are replying to at any one particular moment.

This is outrageous.  Words are violence. 

38 minutes ago, nick supreme said:

This is outrageous.  Words are violence. 

Stick and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me!!

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Everyone knows you and brewsterbudgen are the same person.

 

#worstkeptsecret

In that case are you and @The Cyclist the same?  I suspect so!

 

#worstkeptsecret