Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

John Bolton Indicted News

Featured Replies

  • Popular Post

 

The DOJ got passed the hard part in a Dem State of Maryland  , the Indictment phase. Onto the Prosecution.

"President Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton was indicted on Thursday for his handling of classified documents by a federal grand jury in Maryland, multiple outlets reported".

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/10/16/john-bolton-trump-national-security-adviser-indicted-justice-department

 

The story is based on a Axios report

  • Replies 143
  • Views 2.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • Hahaha    The irony here is so thick you can cut it with a knife    Add to Letcia James, Comey, J6 as*holes    More to come   Hopefully lessons will be learned

  • In my view people who live in glass houses shouldn’t cast stones ehh Pete….marco….and not to mention Donnie’s stash in the potty at mar a lardo ..real 3 rd world stuff.boltons no fool I’m sure he comp

  • Evidently not. He sent top secret information via unsecured communications and stored docs in his home at same time decrying Trump for doing that.    Trump documents far safer than Bolton's.

Posted Images

  • Popular Post

No mention in Axios report of statute of limitations issues or that Bolton claims documents recovered in search were not classified and that he complied with pre-publication review obligations.

 

The indictment also contends that any possession of classified documents was 'willful' per statute requirement.

 

This story is from reading both the linked report and the @#$%^ indictment.

In my view people who live in glass houses shouldn’t cast stones ehh Pete….marco….and not to mention Donnie’s stash in the potty at mar a lardo ..real 3 rd world stuff.boltons no fool I’m sure he complied with protocols.

  • Popular Post

Easy to get indictments. His defence will start with selective prosecution which will get thrown out and then move to unknowing possession.

6 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

Easy to get indictments. His defence will start with selective prosecution which will get thrown out and then move to unknowing possession.

So what will be his sentence when he is convicted?

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

So what will be his sentence when he is convicted?

He won't be convicted.

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

So what will be his sentence when he is convicted?

It's going to be difficult to get a conviction. If they do he's looking at 15 yrs + as they'll be pushing for espionage and knowingly keeping top secret documents.

  • Popular Post
9 minutes ago, dinsdale said:

It's going to be difficult to get a conviction..

Noted. Also posted above:

 

Easy to get indictments. His defence will start with selective prosecution which will get thrown out ...

 

AI quickie (Gemini)

 

Yes, a criminal indictment for a crime that is difficult to secure a conviction on could be considered vindictive, as this is a key element of a vindictive prosecution claim. While an indictment only means a grand jury found probable cause to proceed, a prosecutor's motive for bringing charges can be scrutinized, particularly if the case lacks strong evidence and appears designed to harass or punish a defendant beyond the actual evidence. 

56 minutes ago, Tug said:

In my view people who live in glass houses shouldn’t cast stones ehh Pete….marco….and not to mention Donnie’s stash in the potty at mar a lardo ..real 3 rd world stuff.boltons no fool I’m sure he complied with protocols.

 

Haha Bolton neocon as*hole going to get exactly what he deserves. He is one of the supreme poster children for uber swamp creatures. 

 

Just like Trump. Let him have his day in court and prove himself. American way.

 

How anyone left or right could defend this jackass beggars belief 

  • Popular Post
11 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

He won't be convicted.

 

Maybe 

 

Maybe not

 

You of all people have no idea. You certainly didn't elaborate 

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Tug said:

boltons no fool I’m sure he complied with protocols.

 

Evidently not. He sent top secret information via unsecured communications and stored docs in his home at same time decrying Trump for doing that. 

 

Trump documents far safer than Bolton's. No one getting into Mar a Lago and then finding their way into random room. 15ft cement wall and the causeway surrounding the villa

3 hours ago, riclag said:

 

The DOJ got passed the hard part in a Dem State of Maryland  , the Indictment phase. Onto the Prosecution.

"President Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton was indicted on Thursday for his handling of classified documents by a federal grand jury in Maryland, multiple outlets reported".

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/10/16/john-bolton-trump-national-security-adviser-indicted-justice-department

 

The story is based on a Axios report

With a vindicative prosecutor you can indict a ham sandwich.

 

8 minutes ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Maybe 

 

Maybe not

 

You of all people have no idea. You certainly didn't elaborate 

Vindictive prosecution.  Easy to prove.

 

There is zero chance this would have happened if Bolton hadn't been a vocal critic of dear leader.

 

Next 

...

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

With a vindicative prosecutor you can indict a ham sandwich.

 

Vindictive prosecution.  Easy to prove.

 

There is zero chance this would have happened if Bolton hadn't been a vocal critic of dear leader.

 

Next 

...

 

Hahaha 

 

The irony here is so thick you can cut it with a knife 

 

Add to Letcia James, Comey, J6 as*holes 

 

More to come

 

Hopefully lessons will be learned but leftists dumb af

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, Tug said:

In my view people who live in glass houses shouldn’t cast stones ehh Pete….marco….and not to mention Donnie’s stash in the potty at mar a lardo ..real 3 rd world stuff.boltons no fool I’m sure he complied with protocols.

Less coherent that usual.

  • Popular Post
12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

With a vindicative prosecutor you can indict a ham sandwich.

 

Like Letitia James and Fanni Willis and Jack Smith?

 

13 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Vindictive prosecution.  Easy to prove.

No it isnt. You cant name more than one criminal case where that allegation has worked.

 

Lucky for Bolton, the Dems arent in Power, otherwise he would be taken out and shot like the Dems say should be done to all Republicans.

  • Popular Post
3 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Less coherent that usual.

 

I dont understand what he just said....I dont think he does either.

  • Popular Post

The full indictment is in this article.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-national-security-advisor-john-bolton-indicted-improper-handling-classified-documents

 

I suggest you read it carefully.

 

No one is above the law.

  • Popular Post
1 hour ago, KhaoHom said:

 

Hahaha 

 

The irony here is so thick you can cut it with a knife 

 

Add to Letcia James, Comey, J6 as*holes 

 

More to come

 

Hopefully lessons will be learned but leftists dumb af

I'm hoping  Jack Smith, will be next!!:smile:

2 hours ago, dinsdale said:

Easy to get indictments. His defence will start with selective prosecution which will get thrown out and then move to unknowing possession.

He will plea. No time, fine, groveling allocution proceedings.

  • Popular Post
13 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

I'm hoping  Jack Smith, will be next!!:smile:

He needs it, he is truly a scumbag.

 

Some, if not all, prosecutors seek justice. Some are just plain vindictive jagoffs that are so evil, they are stuck as prosecutors because the defense bar wont take them.

  • Popular Post
23 minutes ago, Smokey and the Bandit said:

I'm hoping  Jack Smith, will be next!!:smile:

 

Indeed. Plenty of evidence.

 

Need to clean house on FBI as well.

5 hours ago, riclag said:

 

The DOJ got passed the hard part in a Dem State of Maryland  , the Indictment phase. Onto the Prosecution.

"President Trump's former National Security Adviser John Bolton was indicted on Thursday for his handling of classified documents by a federal grand jury in Maryland, multiple outlets reported".

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/10/16/john-bolton-trump-national-security-adviser-indicted-justice-department

 

The story is based on a Axios report

 

Totally biased presentation by the prosecution of 'their' facts to a Grand Jury with no rebuttal from the defence is the hard part????

 

What is this kid on?

 

Grand juries almost always indict. A famous saying goes: “A prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich.”

 

According to federal data, over 99% of cases brought before grand juries result in indictments.

 

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

Less coherent that usual.

 

1 hour ago, blaze master said:

 

I dont understand what he just said....I dont think he does either.

Sorry you 2 are such dullards your Pete hegsetch and trumps cabana boy little Marcos chat on the unsecured app awhile back and your deity’s penchant for storing secrets documents in the potty at his country club….if you don’t get it mehh who cares you both hate democracy anyway.

1 hour ago, Yagoda said:

The full indictment is in this article.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ex-national-security-advisor-john-bolton-indicted-improper-handling-classified-documents

 

I suggest you read it carefully.

 

No one is above the law.

If no one is above the law then why isn’t your deity in the penitentiary?he’s allways found guilty when we can manage to get him in court…..

3 minutes ago, Tug said:

 

Sorry you 2 are such dullards your Pete hegsetch and trumps cabana boy little Marcos chat on the unsecured app awhile back and your deity’s penchant for storing secrets documents in the potty at his country club….if you don’t get it mehh who cares you both hate democracy anyway.

Yearp! Us 2 dumbies Headscrach Pete in the cabana on Marco app under Trumps armpit using classifed as toilet paper mgrnah bllomgpofer Indigo tacomaggot!

 

Takethat you m ingostennerectum!

Bolton is in for some financial trouble, perhaps he can start a go-fund-me account and get the left to pitch in. Anyway that’s the whole point, pushing him through the judicial wringer.

8 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

Yearp! Us 2 dumbies Headscrach Pete in the cabana on Marco app under Trumps armpit using classifed as toilet paper mgrnah bllomgpofer Indigo tacomaggot!

 

Takethat you m ingostennerectum!

Yup no answere just an attempt at a slur mehh who cares you hate democracy.

2 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

Noted. Also posted above:

 

Easy to get indictments. His defence will start with selective prosecution which will get thrown out ...

 

AI quickie (Gemini)

 

Yes, a criminal indictment for a crime that is difficult to secure a conviction on could be considered vindictive, as this is a key element of a vindictive prosecution claim. While an indictment only means a grand jury found probable cause to proceed, a prosecutor's motive for bringing charges can be scrutinized, particularly if the case lacks strong evidence and appears designed to harass or punish a defendant beyond the actual evidence. 

 


Grand Jury Indictments regarding National Security are not easily obtained and in fact very difficult to obtain, and are considered very serious.

 

————-

Per ChatGPT

(selectively edited  🫣)

 

A grand jury indictment for a national security–related offense is extremely serious — among the most serious types of criminal charges in the U.S. legal system.

 

Grand jury indictments in national security cases are not easy to obtain. Here’s a breakdown of how it actually works:

 

⚖️ 1. High Evidentiary Standard

Prosecutors must present sufficient evidence of probable cause that a federal crime was committed and that the accused committed it.

In national security matters, the evidence is often classified or intelligence-derived, meaning it must go through special review channelsbefore being shown to the grand jury.

This extra step makes the process slower and more complex, not easier.

In national security cases, prosecutors are typically very cautious before bringing charges

 

A grand jury indictment means that a group of citizens, after reviewing evidence presented by federal prosecutors, has decided there is probable cause to believe a crime was committed and that the person named in the indictment committed it.

 

In Bolton’s situation, the grand jury indictment is very serious. It represents formal, high-stakes criminal charges with potential major legal consequences. 

3 hours ago, jerrymahoney said:

So what will be his sentence when he is convicted?

He's been indicted which was to be expected and here's what he's charged under the espionage act with:

... eight counts of transmission of national defense information and 10 counts of retention of national defense information.

The indictment alleges Bolton "abused his position" in the first Trump administration by "sharing more than a thousand pages of information about his day-to-day activities as the National Security Advisor including information relating to the national defense which was classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level-with two unauthorized individuals, namely Individuals 1 and 2."

The two were relatives of Bolton's whom he would message and email the information to, although they did not have security clearances, the court filing said.

Bolton, 76, "also unlawfully retained documents, writings, and notes relating to the national defense, including information classified up to the TOP SECRET/SCI level, in his home in Montgomery County, Maryland," the filing said.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/john-bolton-indicted-trump-rcna236983

2 minutes ago, Wanderer555 said:

 

 


Grand Jury Indictments regarding National Security are not easily obtained and in fact very difficult to obtain, and are considered very serious.

 

————-

Per ChatGPT

(selectively edited  🫣)

 

A grand jury indictment for a national security–related offense is extremely serious — among the most serious types of criminal charges in the U.S. legal system.

 

Grand jury indictments in national security cases are not easy to obtain. Here’s a breakdown of how it actually works:

 

⚖️ 1. High Evidentiary Standard

Prosecutors must present sufficient evidence of probable cause that a federal crime was committed and that the accused committed it.

In national security matters, the evidence is often classified or intelligence-derived, meaning it must go through special review channelsbefore being shown to the grand jury.

This extra step makes the process slower and more complex, not easier.

In national security cases, prosecutors are typically very cautious before bringing charges

 

A grand jury indictment means that a group of citizens, after reviewing evidence presented by federal prosecutors, has decided there is probable cause to believe a crime was committed and that the person named in the indictment committed it.

 

In Bolton’s situation, the grand jury indictment is very serious. It represents formal, high-stakes criminal charges with potential major legal consequences. 

 

Grand jury indictments are generally easy to obtain.......however..........

 

In national security cases, prosecutors often hesitate to bring them  — because the implications can be very serious

 

So a very different slant.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.