Just now, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Your Thai friend can call to see if she's working today.

Not a bad idea, but there's no need. She's already told me she's taking a day off today.

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

I'm not paying Phuket girl a "salary".

She gets an allowance.

You need to look up these terms up in a dictionary. Different things.

Same same...but... different 😊

Remember that you wrote earlier, "full time position" and various other phrases that indicated that it was a position of employment. Check your own statements.

'Allowance' and 'Salary' are interchangeable for when it comes your situation.

You interviewed for a job. That's what that is.

The Book of Cameroni Chapter 7–11

For she shall take thy heart as one taketh a strong signal, full bars of love and trust only to vanish into the night like Wi-Fi in a storm. Fool! She was never 10G she was 2G at best.... slow, unreliable, and always dropping when thou needest her most.

8 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Don't think there's many women that care about the age or shape of the men they have sex with.

Sure, they'll all bang a young fit guy 1x or 2x, but it's not essential for LTRs.

Depends on their level of desperation. It's not for nothing that you found yourselves in a place where bargains can be struck.

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Not a bad idea, but there's no need. She's already told me she's taking a day off today.

...or tomorrow...or the day after...

17 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Depends on their level of desperation.

No it does not depend on "their level of desperation". Research has shown that women who seek short term affaris do screen more for good looks. So it depends on their intention.

Women who seek an LTR screen less for good looks and look more at provider capacity.

35 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

Because Brady is handsome, fit, a sports celebrity and exceedingly rich?

He'd be the best option for 99% of women on the planet.

There is great truth in this statement, my friend.

That doesnt matter if you are not there for your girl, so many things that makes a man the best option, but you only focus on your beliefs what is a best man for a woman.

22 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

that indicated that it was a position of employment.

Indeed a romantic relationship is very analogous to an employment relationship.

However, if you look up "allowance" and "salary" in a dictionary I think you'll find out what the difference is.

Just now, Hummin said:

That doesnt matter if you are not there for your girl,

That's Gisele Bundchen's narrative, that she was neglected because Brady focused on football.

Maybe there is some truth to that.

19 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

...or tomorrow...or the day after...

All depends on if she can get a punter for the day. Otherwise she will have to work tonight

16 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

No it does not depend on "their level of desperation". Research has shown that women who seek short term affaris do screen more for good looks. So it depends on their intention.

Women who seek an LTR screen less for good looks and look more at provider capacity.

But yours didn't, did she? According to you, her previous employers were "obese and decrepit old men". So was she looking for a short term affair with you or an LTR? Take your time...

I asked you before...what would it take for you to indulge a female equivalent of those men? You would have to be quite desperate for funds to even consider it, wouldn't you?

So was your girl desperate for funds, is she just attracted to unattractive old men or is she so 'disgusting' that she doesn't care with whom she sleeps, as long as they give her money? Take your time...

Can you imagine the scene on introducing your new squeeze to The Firm?

"Hey everyone! Look what I found on the Internet after leaving my wife and kids. She has virtually no education, has two kids and has been on the carousel with men forty years her senior, but she's fun and great at sex."

Parents calling the local mental asylum....again. Rest of family planning an 'intervention'...

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

I have found this to be the case, the older the men get they basically resign themselves to women cheating on them. And I understand why of course.

However, I've had this happen, BKK girl cheated. And it completely changed the relationship, even after we got friendly again. Obviously the massive distrust is there, if she did that. The resentment is there. The lack of respect rears its ugly head.

I really couldn't live with it. I'm glad things with BKK girl will end. Because she is a cheater. It's too much for a relationship to carry, I would think the majority of relationships would collapse under the weight of cheating.

Do you really know why women cheat? It has nothing to do with the man. How old he is, young, fit or fat, rich or poor. It has everything to do with the cheater and their mental state. This is why trust is always number one in a relationship. When you put money in front of that, it shows how little that person cares about a relationship and only what they can gain by it.

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Absolutely. I love doing that. But nothing can substitute real experience. Which is why one needs to take advice from men who've had only one or two long relationships with a grain of salt. They don't have experience. "Oh not true, I've a relationship of 18 years" "Yes, you have that with one woman". However, there are men who have experience with a great number of women.

It's the old apple analogy. A man who has an apple for the first time says it's the greatest fruit ever. But only a man who's hand countless apples, red, green, yellow, Gala, Pink Lady, etc, can truly judge the quality of an apple.

I think as the weaker sex it is usually true that they lie a lot more than men. A lot. Men also lie of course, but women, my God.

Being the "weaker"? sex doesn't mean they will lie more. Men actually lie more than women on average, and for different reasons.

Experience with a lot of women helps, but it also depends on what type of women they were. P4P aren't normal thinking, and anyone can have them for cash, which doesn't translate into a normal man-woman relationship but just a transaction for sex, where emotions aren't near as involved as in a normal relationship. A man who's been with a few long term can have a lot more experience than one with many more of the short term. There is a lot of difference in a long term versus short term relationship as far as sharing, trust, shared times, finances and their burdens, children and in effect, bonding.

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

That's Gisele Bundchen's narrative, that she was neglected because Brady focused on football.

Maybe there is some truth to that.

She cheated for the same valid reasons all cheat. Low self esteem and a need to feed that ego. There are reasons one will use, such as disconnection, abuse, neglect, intolerance, finance worries, lack of communication and boredom, but all of them can be traced back still to the cheater. If you're unhappy, you enlist a counselor. if the other party won't go, you leave.

7 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Being the "weaker"? sex doesn't mean they will lie more. Men actually lie more than women on average

A new poll suggests that women are twice as likely to lie as men

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/05/women-lie-untruths-human

7 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

A new poll suggests that women are twice as likely to lie as men

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jun/05/women-lie-untruths-human

Written likely by a misogynist. Most polls stay the same over time, as human nature doesn't change.

8 minutes ago, fredwiggy said:

Written likely by a misogynist. Most polls stay the same over time, as human nature doesn't change.

Yes, it was that well known misogynist insurance company Privilege in the UK.

Around 2,000 people were questioned for the poll commissioned by insurance company Privilege.

And it turns out that the fairer sex are the biggest fibbers of all. According to a survey, a shocking four in five women tell lies on a daily basis.

Some women even admit to doing so as many as 30 times a day – the equivalent of twice every waking hour, a survey has revealed.

This compares with two out of five men who said they tended to tell lies every day.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3110136/Women-tell-fibs-men-honestly-Four-five-say-tell-lie-daily-basis.html

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

Yes, it was that well known misogynist insurance company Privilege in the UK.

Around 2,000 people were questioned for the poll commissioned by insurance company Privilege.

And it turns out that the fairer sex are the biggest fibbers of all. According to a survey, a shocking four in five women tell lies on a daily basis.

Some women even admit to doing so as many as 30 times a day – the equivalent of twice every waking hour, a survey has revealed.

This compares with two out of five men who said they tended to tell lies every day.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3110136/Women-tell-fibs-men-honestly-Four-five-say-tell-lie-daily-basis.html

And other studies have shown that men lie more, and for different reasons. This one is recent.........https://www.mastermindbehavior.com/post/lying-statistics-facts Selfish lies being one. Narcissism has always been higher in men, hence more lying in them.This is another from a very unbiased long term website on health.......https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8982912/#S8

Just stumbled on this. Won’t pretend to have read it all but in summary I believe:

Boy meets New girl

Boy decides he loves New girl

Boy likes playing games so invites Old girl to visit

New girl upset and disappears

If New girl had any sense she’d have stayed gone but she’s a gold digger / prostitute so takes Boy back (at least until something better comes along)

Boy will only be with (pay) New Girl if he can snoop on her phone and control her movements

What a healthy relationship! Wish you both well! 🤣

39 minutes ago, Chalky0w said:

Just stumbled on this. Won’t pretend to have read it all but in summary I believe:

Boy meets New girl

Boy decides he loves New girl

Boy likes playing games so invites Old girl to visit

New girl upset and disappears

If New girl had any sense she’d have stayed gone but she’s a gold digger / prostitute so takes Boy back (at least until something better comes along)

Boy will only be with (pay) New Girl if he can snoop on her phone and control her movements

What a healthy relationship! Wish you both well! 🤣

Nice to have AI to clean up your grammar mistakes and polish the text a bit.

It has been a chaotic thread, filled with repeated negativity, harsh language, and even demeaning descriptions of people.

How did we get here? How did we become so rude and insensitive, often without a second thought for the human beings behind the screen—people who are simply trying to live and survive in a difficult world full of temptations and risks?

The internet was meant to make us better: a worldwide web designed for communication, understanding, and learning.

Yet this isn’t limited to this space alone. Across every platform, people gather and are given the opportunity to share their thoughts—but too often, empathy is left behind.

40 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Nice to have AI to clean up your grammar mistakes and polish the text a bit.

It has been a chaotic thread, filled with repeated negativity, harsh language, and even demeaning descriptions of people.

How did we get here? How did we become so rude and insensitive, often without a second thought for the human beings behind the screen—people who are simply trying to live and survive in a difficult world full of temptations and risks?

The internet was meant to make us better: a worldwide web designed for communication, understanding, and learning.

Yet this isn’t limited to this space alone. Across every platform, people gather and are given the opportunity to share their thoughts—but too often, empathy is left behind.

You don't understand this?

The Internet is not 'real life'. That's the point of it. It's literally just real time impulses in reaction to what you perceive from reading. In effect, you are doing it to yourself.

Whereas in 'real life' there is so much more to consider. You might see the emotional state of the person and decide that the direct approach might not be appropriate at that time. Via chat, that element is missing, so you just tell it as it is and let the cards fall as they will. The truth matters. Why? Because those are the beacons that tell us the location of our fellow human beings. Then we can choose to get closer or to move away. All part of the human experience. If you cannot cope with that, the problem is within you.

We are all feeling our way around our world. Some create routines for the illusion of stability. Other thrive on chaos. Others can seemingly stay balanced in almost every given situation.

So don't sweat it, learn to deal with it. The better you do, the better you can cope with whatever comes your way.

Then you can better control yourself, in order to demonstrate empathy or whatever else is needed, in 'real life' or via Social Media.

4 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

Internet is not 'real life'. That's the point of it. It's literally just real time impulses in reaction to what you perceive from reading. In effect, you are doing it to yourself.

You're assuming what we experience is real, and we're not living in a matrix type simulation.

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

You're assuming what we experience is real, and we're not living in a matrix type simulation.

No... that, is nonsense.

26 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

You don't understand this?

The Internet is not 'real life'. That's the point of it. It's literally just real time impulses in reaction to what you perceive from reading. In effect, you are doing it to yourself.

Whereas in 'real life' there is so much more to consider. You might see the emotional state of the person and decide that the direct approach might not be appropriate at that time. Via chat, that element is missing, so you just tell it as it is and let the cards fall as they will. The truth matters. Why? Because those are the beacons that tell us the location of our fellow human beings. Then we can choose to get closer or to move away. All part of the human experience. If you cannot cope with that, the problem is within you.

We are all feeling our way around our world. Some create routines for the illusion of stability. Other thrive on chaos. Others can seemingly stay balanced in almost every given situation.

So don't sweat it, learn to deal with it. The better you do, the better you can cope with whatever comes your way.

Then you can better control yourself, in order to demonstrate empathy or whatever else is needed, in 'real life' or via Social Media.

No problem to understand it, and sometimes interesting to copy and paste texts in to AI and got them analyzed. Have you tried to do it with som of your own text in contexts to what you answer ? :D it is interesting

1 minute ago, Hummin said:

No problem to understand it, and sometimes interesting to copy and paste texts in to AI and got them analyzed. Have you tried to do it with som of your own text in contexts to what you answer ? :D it is interesting

No, I have not and have no current interest in doing so. Why? Because AI is not experiencing the same mortal pressures as humans in real time and so has no impulse to respond in the way we do. You for instance, will respond differently to someone else, with exactly the same input.

So AI's perspective of what I write, is just another perspective. I prefer interacting with people, in real time. So much more stimulating, than sitting at home, playing with Generative AI.

2 hours ago, Chalky0w said:

Just stumbled on this. Won’t pretend to have read it all but in summary I believe:

Boy meets New girl

Boy decides he loves New girl

Boy likes playing games so invites Old girl to visit

New girl upset and disappears

If New girl had any sense she’d have stayed gone but she’s a gold digger / prostitute so takes Boy back (at least until something better comes along)

Boy will only be with (pay) New Girl if he can snoop on her phone and control her movements

What a healthy relationship! Wish you both well! 🤣

I can summarise even more succinctly:-

She's a slag, he's a knob.

43 minutes ago, FrankieGoesToHolly said:

No... that, is nonsense.

Newton's law disagrees.

7 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Newton's law disagrees.

Demonstrate.

8 minutes ago, Keeps said:

I can summarise even more succinctly:-

She's a slag, he's a knob.

But it takes all sorts to make the world go around.

Do foxes know they are foxes? Do they look at dogs and think, "yuk!....look how they suck up to humans...disgusting!"

It just stimulation, of a sort. Sometimes we'll agree, sometimes we'll feel disgusted and even outraged. We are doing it to ourselves, so that's okay. We aren't hurting anyone, it's just a game.