Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Did Yaxley Lennon ‘Out’ Himself?

Featured Replies

  • Author
9 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Dog ate my homework🤣

The dog ate the evidence to back up your claims.

  • Replies 55
  • Views 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • brewsterbudgen
    brewsterbudgen

    He's not the brightest biscuit in the barrel. 🤣

  • Chomper Higgot
    Chomper Higgot

    Again more nonsense. His name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, it’s the name he gave in court when asked to state his name. Had he given any other name he would have been committing the crime of ‘perjury’,

  • SunnyinBangrak
    SunnyinBangrak

    So, intentially mis-naming/doxing somebody due to being consumed with hatred for them(in this case due to him being factually correct on the rape gangs and the lefts vile failed attempt to cover it up

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In short (pun intended) he’s a detestable wee scroat.

Its just unacceptable these days to mock people because of their size .

Just as its unacceptable to abuse people because of their sexuality . So what if Tommy was gay ?

Who cares ?

  • Author
4 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Its just unacceptable these days to mock people because of their size .

Just as its unacceptable to abuse people because of their sexuality . So what if Tommy was gay ?

Who cares ?

I don’t care one iota if Yaxley-Lennon is gay.

I’m entitled to my opinion that he’s a detestable wee scroat.

His criminal record alone raises questions as to why anyone would look up to him.

25 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I don’t care one iota if Yaxley-Lennon is gay.

I’m entitled to my opinion that he’s a detestable wee scroat.

His criminal record alone raises questions as to why anyone would look up to him.

He was commenting on dating sites that advertise "no age limits"

He was publicising websites which quite possibly could be sites for pedos to meet children .

Tommy opposed those websites .

Do you support Tommy in exposing those sort of websites ?

  • Author
  • Popular Post
55 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

He was commenting on dating sites that advertise "no age limits"

He was publicising websites which quite possibly could be sites for pedos to meet children .

Tommy opposed those websites .

Do you support Tommy in exposing those sort of websites ?

What he’s doing is playing whataboutary in his defense of Musk providing software to users in the UK which has been used by perverts to create child pornography and AI generated pornographic and violent images of real women.

He’s done so by broadcasting what the algorithm feeds him in his personalized recommendations.

He provides absolutely no evidence that adverts fed to him by the algorithm are fed to minors.

I absolutely support measures to hold internet service providers and tech companies accountable for providing service to generate and/or distribute child pornography, and pornography/ violent images of anyone, be that AI generated or other forms of abuse such as ‘revenge porn’.

Musk is providing software and media platforms that have been used for these obscene crimes.

The wee scroat Yaxley Lennon is defending him.

Incidentally, I also absolutely support the outlawing of tech companies profiling minors on the basis of their Internet usage.

If children are being fed porn or other harmful content then the tech companies need to be held to account.

The wee scroat Yaxley-Lennon is not backing regulation of big tech.

  • Author
16 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

So why did you start a thread focusing on the gay aspect?

Seems to me an incident of cyber bullying based upon presumed sexuality. By any chance are you suppressing some desires best not mentioned aloud in polite society? You would not be the first.

Or perhaps a thread about a guy jumping on a bandwagon, defending big tech against government regulation over the provision of software functions used to create and distribute child pornography and other harmful content, while exposing the fact he himself has been profiled by the algorithm.

19 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

Seems to me an incident of cyber bullying based upon presumed sexuality. By any chance are you suppressing some desires best not mentioned aloud in polite society? You would not be the first.

Is that you attempting to engage in the cyber bullying you refer to?

I suggest you round up some helpers, you’re not up to the job.

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Or perhaps a thread about a guy jumping on a bandwagon, defending big tech against government regulation over the provision of software functions used to create and distribute child pornography and other harmful content, while exposing the fact he himself has been profiled by the algorithm.

Is that you attempting to engage in the cyber bullying you refer to?

I suggest you round up some helpers, you’re not up to the job.

I am only pointing out that it is not very nice of you or "progressive" to obsess on one person's sexuality. As a compassionate and empathetic person, I do try to see these things from other people's perspectives and invite you to be more understanding of these differences. 🙂

  • Author
31 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

I am only pointing out that it is not very nice of you or "progressive" to obsess on one person's sexuality. As a compassionate and empathetic person, I do try to see these things from other people's perspectives and invite you to be more understanding of these differences. 🙂

I’m not obsessing, as I say I don’t give an iota what Yaxley-Lennon gets up to online, so long as he’s not grifting, hate mongering, perverting the course of justice or stalking and defaming schoolboys.

If he provides a few chuckle moments like the one reported in the linked article, then I’m good with that too.

4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Utter nonsense.

Yaxley-Lennon is a convicted fraudster, violent thug, a racist and a grifter.

In short (pun intended) he’s a detestable wee scroat.

What’s this codswallop claim of a ‘rightwing conspiracy theory’?

I checked on Google about Yaxley-Lennon. He obviously had a few passport issues!

For example, he tried to enter the US illegally, using a friend's passport. Our MAGA (and assimilated) posters should love love that! 🤣

BBC News
No image preview

EDL leader Stephen Lennon jailed for false passport offence

The leader of the English Defence League is jailed for 10 months for using someone else's passport to travel to the USA.

.

10 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not obsessing, as I say I don’t give an iota what Yaxley-Lennon gets up to online, so long as he’s not grifting, hate mongering, perverting the course of justice or stalking and defaming schoolboys.

If he provides a few chuckle moments like the one reported in the linked article, then I’m good with that too.

Tommy was exposing a website that seemed to be adverting underage sexual services .

Your side suggesting that Tommy was gay caused him to remove that exposure and the website to remain active .

I don't agree with ridiculing people about their height/sexuality .

You must have had a great laugh laughing at Jimmy Somerville , the small gay man

  • Author
27 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Tommy was exposing a website that seemed to be adverting underage sexual services .

Your side suggesting that Tommy was gay caused him to remove that exposure and the website to remain active .

I don't agree with ridiculing people about their height/sexuality .

You must have had a great laugh laughing at Jimmy Somerville , the small gay man

My side?

I have absolutely no idea who the person or persons are who pointed out what Yaxley-Lennon had inadvertently revealed.

I like Jimmy Summerville, he’s a fabulous musician, he’s not a convicted fraudster, he’s not a grifter, a thug or a hate monger, he’s definitely not a wee scroat.

So no Nick, I don’t as you imagine, laugh at Jimmy Summerville, I like him, he’s a braw gadgie.

  • Author
43 minutes ago, candide said:

I checked on Google about Yaxley-Lennon. He obviously had a few passport issues!

For example, he tried to enter the US illegally, using a friend's passport. Our MAGA (and assimilated) posters should love love that! 🤣

BBC News
No image preview

EDL leader Stephen Lennon jailed for false passport offence

The leader of the English Defence League is jailed for 10 months for using someone else's passport to travel to the USA.

.

Yep.

A low life.

Tommys reply.....................

IT’S TIME TO ADDRESS THE TROLLS

I love living in their heads rent free.

I get sent all sorts of things to post from many people, from many different backgrounds and orientations, things like this gay love advert on YouTube with ‘No Age Limit’.

So rather than address the fact YouTube is actually advertising ‘no age limit gay sex’ that minors have access to, they would sooner post about whatever appears in my feed or whatever people send to me TO DISTRACT AND TROLL.

I don’t give a <deleted>, trolls will always troll. You are all so predictable, you all like to steer a narrative rather than address the actual issue.

Because you are pro child mutilating pro child abusing ******s

You are degenerate and EVIL.

And I will continue exposing your EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy.

Just so you all know, I get adverts on YouTube to donate to the building of a new mosque, I get adverts asking me to donate to Gazans in Palestine.

Do you think I want to donate to the building of new mosques, or donate to well fed plump Gazans who have not been genocided?

Of course not!!!!

But they appear in my feeds regardless.

Why?

Because I research whats going on in the world, the algorithm thinks that’s what I want to see as an advertisement.

That’s what algorithms do.

If any of you think I want to donate to the building of a new command and control centre (a mosque) you are obviously RETARDED.

But trolls generally are RETARDED.

Have fun with this post you left wing wet wipes

  • Author
7 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Tommys reply.....................

IT’S TIME TO ADDRESS THE TROLLS

I love living in their heads rent free.

I get sent all sorts of things to post from many people, from many different backgrounds and orientations, things like this gay love advert on YouTube with ‘No Age Limit’.

So rather than address the fact YouTube is actually advertising ‘no age limit gay sex’ that minors have access to, they would sooner post about whatever appears in my feed or whatever people send to me TO DISTRACT AND TROLL.

I don’t give a <deleted>, trolls will always troll. You are all so predictable, you all like to steer a narrative rather than address the actual issue.

Because you are pro child mutilating pro child abusing ******s

You are degenerate and EVIL.

And I will continue exposing your EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy.

Just so you all know, I get adverts on YouTube to donate to the building of a new mosque, I get adverts asking me to donate to Gazans in Palestine.

Do you think I want to donate to the building of new mosques, or donate to well fed plump Gazans who have not been genocided?

Of course not!!!!

But they appear in my feeds regardless.

Why?

Because I research whats going on in the world, the algorithm thinks that’s what I want to see as an advertisement.

That’s what algorithms do.

If any of you think I want to donate to the building of a new command and control centre (a mosque) you are obviously RETARDED.

But trolls generally are RETARDED.

Have fun with this post you left wing wet wipes

When posting long and drawn out statements made by Yaxley-Lennon on this forum, do you think his use of the term “retarded” is acceptable language?

How about his statement ‘EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy’?

Are we still pretending he’s not a homophobic hate monger?

  • Author
22 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

So what if he is gay? He has not attacked the gay community.

Seems to me that you are indulging in a bit of online bullying, some good old gay bashing.

You were saying:

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

When posting long and drawn out statements made by Yaxley-Lennon on this forum, do you think his use of the term “retarded” is acceptable language?

How about his statement ‘EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy’?

Are we still pretending he’s not a homophobic hate monger?

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

When posting long and drawn out statements made by Yaxley-Lennon on this forum, do you think his use of the term “retarded” is acceptable language?

How about his statement ‘EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy’?

Are we still pretending he’s not a homophobic hate monger?

Not words that I would use .

But, you are ridiculing/abusing people for being gay whilst also defending the LBTG corner in the same thread .

Its unclear what side you bat for

6 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Not words that I would use .

But, you are ridiculing/abusing people for being gay whilst also defending the LBTG corner in the same thread .

Its unclear what side you bat for

Think you're talking to a fat blue haired nose ringed post wall woman.

So not batting for any side, though might have been a catcher 30 years back.

  • Author
23 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Not words that I would use .

But, you are ridiculing/abusing people for being gay whilst also defending the LBTG corner in the same thread .

Its unclear what side you bat for

Let’s look at the words you do choose to use:

“Its unclear what side you bat for”

A curious turn of phrase.

And earlier:

17 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Would you lose respect for Tommy if he came out as a bender ?

‘Bender’? Also a curious and offensive phrase to choose.

  • Popular Post
6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Let’s look at the words you do choose to use:

“Its unclear what side you bat for”

A curious turn of phrase.

And earlier:

‘Bender’? Also a curious and offensive phrase to choose.

Was you upset and offended by the word "bender" ?

Were your feelings hurt ?

Odd that you were abusing a person for being gay and then get upset by the word Bender

3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Tommys reply.....................

IT’S TIME TO ADDRESS THE TROLLS

I love living in their heads rent free.

I get sent all sorts of things to post from many people, from many different backgrounds and orientations, things like this gay love advert on YouTube with ‘No Age Limit’.

So rather than address the fact YouTube is actually advertising ‘no age limit gay sex’ that minors have access to, they would sooner post about whatever appears in my feed or whatever people send to me TO DISTRACT AND TROLL.

I don’t give a <deleted>, trolls will always troll. You are all so predictable, you all like to steer a narrative rather than address the actual issue.

Because you are pro child mutilating pro child abusing ******s

You are degenerate and EVIL.

And I will continue exposing your EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy.

Just so you all know, I get adverts on YouTube to donate to the building of a new mosque, I get adverts asking me to donate to Gazans in Palestine.

Do you think I want to donate to the building of new mosques, or donate to well fed plump Gazans who have not been genocided?

Of course not!!!!

But they appear in my feeds regardless.

Why?

Because I research whats going on in the world, the algorithm thinks that’s what I want to see as an advertisement.

That’s what algorithms do.

If any of you think I want to donate to the building of a new command and control centre (a mosque) you are obviously RETARDED.

But trolls generally are RETARDED.

Have fun with this post you left wing wet wipes

Thanks for proving that he is a nasty wee scroat. What a hateful man

2 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

Thanks for proving that he is a nasty wee scroat. What a hateful man

You are criticising him for dislike people who are abusing him ?

Your side can give Tommy untold abuse and he shouldnt reply ?

22 hours ago, DonniePeverley said:

6% of the UK follow Islam ... many of the 93% thick Brits (not all) believe that the 6% are to blame for their life problems. Not energy companies making huge profits, not the inequality in wealth, not the rampant corruption with our money, not the state of the health system - but the 6% (most of whom are like us all good apples and a few bad apples). He's living it up as a career. What's his job by the way ?

Last i saw on X he was donning around in muslim majority Dubai a few weeks back. Thought he didn't like muslims or Sharia Law? You'd think he'd boycott with anything out there.

Knob.

1 hour ago, Nick Carter icp said:

You are criticising him for dislike people who are abusing him ?

Your side can give Tommy untold abuse and he shouldnt reply ?


What are you talking about?

Nothing nasty or hateful here?

Because you are pro child mutilating pro child abusing ******s

You are degenerate and EVIL.

And I will continue exposing your EVIL LGBTQ+ degeneracy.

Or here (but I know you will back him for this)

Do you think I want to donate to the building of new mosques, or donate to well fed plump Gazans who have not been genocided?

Of course not!!!!

Or here:

If any of you think I want to donate to the building of a new command and control centre (a mosque) you are obviously RETARDED.

But trolls generally are RETARDED.

He's a nasty, hateful little thug. And a massive hypocrite.

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:


What are you talking about?

Nothing nasty or hateful here?

He's a nasty, hateful little thug. And a massive hypocrite.

You seem to have misunderstood my post .

Read my post again

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.