In a dramatic revelation, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew, faces allegations of witnessing the torture of a young girl using electric shocks. The accusation, emerging from the Epstein files, claims the event occurred in the mid-1990s at Frogmore Cottage, Windsor.

Get the latest headlines in your email

The FBI report from July 2020 suggests Andrew was present with Ghislaine Maxwell during the incident. Despite these serious claims, Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing. The accusations surface amid his recent eviction from Royal Lodge, intensifying public scrutiny of his past.

Reports indicate an anonymous tip led to these revelations, alleging other men were also present during the torture. The Epstein files, newly released, connect Andrew to this disturbing event but do not independently verify wrongdoing.

Surrey Police are urging the public to provide information about historical human trafficking and sexual assault cases in the area during the same period. However, they emphasize that these appeals are unrelated to the electric shock allegations.

The police have reviewed their records for any prior reports of such incidents, finding none. A spokesperson stressed their commitment to investigating new leads and urged individuals with information to come forward.

These allegations form part of a broader investigation into historic abuses, with Surrey Police coordinating with national agencies to pursue any credible new evidence. The force is committed to examining all information thoroughly and neutrally.

As investigations continue, this development adds to the challenges facing Andrew, who has repeatedly asserted his innocence regarding any allegations linked to Epstein and Maxwell.

The police call for objective assessment and further public aid in providing information is crucial in addressing these serious allegations. The unfolding situation underscores the complexities and sensitivities involved in such historic cases.

Key Takeaways

• Andrew faces allegations of witnessing torture.

• Surrey Police seek public information on related cases.

• Investigations remain open and ongoing.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?

  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 18 Feb 2026

View full article

Prosecutors need solid evidence not text. Photos and videos of the royal formerly known as Prince will be irrefutable evidence. His face, his naked body, lying on top of a child.

Positivity shocking report!

A vague, unsupported report. Personally I don't believe a word of it.

I have never liked Prince Andrew. I have always seen him as entitled, grasping, and overbearing.

That said, what we are seeing now feels less like accountability and more like a ritualised witch hunt.

The endless stream of poorly written tabloid pieces adds nothing of substance.

It is simply the same old material reheated and served again, stripped of context and dressed up as revelation.

More tittle tattle from those with an anti monarchy agenda.

And exactly what what the motivation behind this alleged torture??? And who are the others onlooking? And who applied the torture? And why was the "girl" who may well be a woman tortured anyway? Without motive, the case collapses.

Even if this were true, electrode "torture" is standard BDSM consensual practice. Enough to drive the sheeple into a frenzy though. The sheeple never really had sex worth mentioning, in fact they never had a life. Yet the sheeple want the "elites" to have had sex with "children", preferably before torturing the latter and eating them in satanic cannibalistic rituals. This tells us more about the sheeple's hidden fantasies than about the elites'.

He has a slap-worthy face.

Breaking news is that he has just been arrested and taken into custody by police.

And he still gets food and lodging paid for by the taxpayers!!!

3 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

Breaking news is that he has just been arrested and taken into custody by police.

And he still gets food and lodging paid for by the taxpayers!!!

He has indeed been arrested, but only "on suspicion of misconduct in public office ..."

No indication (at this point) of it being connected to any torture allegations.

Although, "Watch this space," as they say.

Perfect time to get rid of 'em all. Time for a republic.

4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

More tittle tattle from those with an anti monarchy agenda.

Takes the public gaze away from Starmer?

5 minutes ago, John Drake said:

Perfect time to get rid of 'em all. Time for a republic.

A silly idea. Cost too much and risk getting a British Trump.

If it works don't fix it.

They keep picking on him! Poor guy

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

They keep picking on him! Poor guy

I assume that’s meant humorously. The arrogant, corrupt, entitled POS deserves everything that’s coming to him.

16 hours ago, retayl said:

I assume that’s meant humorously. The arrogant, corrupt, entitled POS deserves everything that’s coming to him.

Andrew has clearly been chosen as an easy target fall guy to distract from the misdeeds of others.

2 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Andrew has clearly been chosen as an easy target fall guy to distract from the misdeeds of others.

I don’t think the Met Police are particularly bothered about the whitewash going on in DC.

I suspect that the King will not object to Randy Andy's prosecution as it will take the pressure off. I can't see Andrew getting more than a slap on the wrist.

There are no more sexual revelations as far as one can tell, which don't get any better or worse than that brief appearance with a 17-year-old which is the icon of the entire scandal as far as more or less verified images go.

The basis of the arrest is "misconduct in public office" but it is unclear what this really means. Is the corruption or espionage or whatever the hell that is supposed to be really so bad either that it justifies this kind of scandal or is it another stand-in for persecuting teensex when they couldn't dredge up anything sexual they could actually charge?

16 minutes ago, JackGats said:

There are no more sexual revelations as far as one can tell, which don't get any better or worse than that brief appearance with a 17-year-old which is the icon of the entire scandal as far as more or less verified images go.

The basis of the arrest is "misconduct in public office" but it is unclear what this really means. Is the corruption or espionage or whatever the hell that is supposed to be really so bad either that it justifies this kind of scandal or is it another stand-in for persecuting teensex when they couldn't dredge up anything sexual they could actually charge?

I can't stand the guy, but this sounds like a witch hunt.

The arrest of Prince Andrew for sharing information and the criminal charge against a Norwegian previous prime minister and a diplomat for corruption, is just proxy allegations for sex-crimes that the police want to believe but do not have any form of evidence for. Proxy charges for non-existent sex crimes.

On 2/19/2026 at 1:31 PM, unblocktheplanet said:

And exactly what what the motivation behind this alleged torture??? And who are the others onlooking? And who applied the torture? And why was the "girl" who may well be a woman tortured anyway? Without motive, the case collapses.

Torture is it's own reward for sadists

There is hardly any substance to the Epstein scandal. The blackmail operation didn't happen, there was no organized provision of girls to famous men, and it's dubious whether Andrew is even "guilty" of seeing a 17-year-old escort since Virginia Guiffre is so unreliable prosecutors wouldn't even have anything to do with her for the Maxwell trial. They did one interview with her and realized she can't keep a coherent story of any kind of victimization.

On 2/20/2026 at 2:34 PM, retayl said:

I don’t think the Met Police are particularly bothered about the whitewash going on in DC.

Met Police are nowhere near this. To controversial. They are letting county plod do their dirty work here.

1 hour ago, JackGats said:

There is hardly any substance to the Epstein scandal. The blackmail operation didn't happen, there was no organized provision of girls to famous men, and it's dubious whether Andrew is even "guilty" of seeing a 17-year-old escort since Virginia Guiffre is so unreliable prosecutors wouldn't even have anything to do with her for the Maxwell trial. They did one interview with her and realized she can't keep a coherent story of any kind of victimization.

Yes, absolutely. There were no Epstein Files for awhile. Then they had to manufact one so they spent a few days writing all those e-mails. I mean there was one, then there was not, then it reappeared again. Giuffre seem to have a long history of abuse starting with her father. I don't think she made things up but there are contradictions about what she says. She was 16 years old when she got involved with Ghislaine and Epstein, so in many countries that is considered normal for a girl to be used and abused by a hairy Jew and his hairy girlfriend running a blackmail operation. Now when we are talking about 14, 13, 12, and younger being abused, that is a different story. I am sure those girls would enjoy being "shocked" with 500 000 watts. What a pleasure!

17 hours ago, VocalNeal said:

Met Police are nowhere near this. To controversial. They are letting county plod do their dirty work here.

For reasons of location he was arrested by the Thames Valley Police but the Met (and also the Essex force) are currently investigating. Please stand corrected.

Lord Mandelson under investigation over allegations he shared market-sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein. Sources say no suspicion of sex crimes. Exactly what I thought: proxy charges for non-existent sex crimes.

Sharing "sensitive information" means some kind of insider trading. Insider trading is how leaders in the US congress get rich. Pelosi comes to mind. All of a sudden this becomes a big thing when the name "Epstein" crops up in some email.