2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

...and then he was assassinated.

I'm not sure if that meme is quoting anything that JFK actually did say, but if it's true, then Trump is obviously trying to avoid that bullet.

As a senator, running for president in 1960:

Page 571

https://books.google.co.th/books?id=5iswSYsA7eYC&pg=PR3&hl=th&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q&f=false

2 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Why did Trump have underage girls at Mar-a-Lago in the first place?

crickets....

You only have to be 14 to work legally in Florida.

And of course, guests have children.

The clown king is scared to death of inflation and he sees that the war is not going as planned, none of his goals were achieved and now he's going to do a withdrawal and try to create a story about how the war was a success and yet none of the aims were achieved. Zero Don! Just another in the incredibly long list of your failures.

On Friday evening, as he headed to Florida, Mr. Trump seemed to be designing that much-discussed exit. But he clearly has not yet decided whether to take it.

And there is mounting evidence — average gas price approaching $4 a gallon, infrastructure in ruins across the Persian Gulf, a decimated Iranian theocracy digging in and American allies at first rebuffing and now struggling with demands to patrol hostile waters — that the repercussions of Mr. Trump’s excursion may outlast his interest in it.

As always, Mr. Trump’s messaging is inconsistent, which his critics cite as evidence that he entered this conflict with no strategy and his followers cheer as strategic ambiguity.

Hours later, perhaps sensitive to a Republican base understandably nervous about the political effects, he posted on his social media site that “we are getting very close to meeting our objectives as we consider winding down our great Military efforts in the Middle East.”

But his latest list of those objectives left out a few of his previous goals and watered down others. He made no mention of defeating the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which appears to remain in power, along with Mojtaba Khamenei, who has succeeded his father as supreme leader, though he has yet to be seen or heard in public. Mr. Trump also omitted any message to the Iranian people, whom he told only three weeks ago: “When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take.”

The White House has since said that the president does not expect a surrender announcement from Iran, but that Mr. Trump will determine when Iran has “effectively surrendered.”)

Huh? Goalposts being shifted once again Don?

Mr. Trump’s second surprise was his sudden need for allies. He didn’t imagine it at the beginning of the conflict, the defense minister of one Gulf nation said recently, because he thought the war would be short. But patrolling the strait, and other checkpoints, appears to be a task that could last months or years.

His third surprise was the absence of any uprising among either the Revolutionary Guards or ordinary Iranians. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the Oval Office this past week “we are seeing defections at all levels as they’re starting to sense what’s going on with the regime.” But American and European intelligence officials say they have no evidence of such defections — even after Israel targeted, and eliminated, Iran’s supreme leader, its top security and intelligence chiefs and many top military officials. More lies.

Military historians will be dissecting this conflict for a long time. But for now it is clear that Iran is a different kind of challenge. Mr. Trump started using the word “excursion” to suggest this is just a short trip, a brief diversion. But there is no real end in sight.

Hey Mr. Numbskull, an excursion for most people is a trip to the Bahamas.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/21/us/politics/trump-iran-offramp.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

19 hours ago, chickenslegs said:

Who should we believe: The President Of the United States of America, or the mad Mullah of Iran?

That would have been an easy decision in any other era - now it's 50/50 at best (IMO).

I would believe anyone but Trump, I would believe Miley Cyrus over Trump, I would believe the Mad Mullah over Trump, I would believe Xi over Trump.

Trump has shown us hundreds upon hundreds of times that he never tells the truth, that everything that comes out of his mouth is a fabrication, and that he has no qualms about making stuff up, so why would I believe him? Ever?

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

I would believe anyone but Trump, I would believe Miley Cyrus over Trump, I would believe the Mad Mullah over Trump, I would believe Xi over Trump.

Trump has shown us hundreds upon hundreds of times that he never tells the truth, that everything that comes out of his mouth is a fabrication, and that he has no qualms about making stuff up, so why would I believe him? Ever?

Like all Trump obsessed haters, you believe anyone that speaks against Trump.

You now support Iran over the United States, because of your hate for Trump.

No matter how you look at it a US withdraw from Iran is a good thing for the world.

Trump's goals were never going to be achieved, and as usual the US Military and Trump did a terrible job of planning, and the public uprising never happened, the Republican guards were never taken out, the nuclear materials were never found, and Trump's war with Iran was a total and complete failure, of massive, epic and historic proportions.

Disaster Don once again has caused huge amount of worldwide chaos unnecessary inflation tremendous fear and panic for absolutely nothing in return. I know it's difficult for a lot of his followers to admit that the man is a failure, but I think it's time to man up and come clean, and make a statement that this street garbage is nothing but malignant tumor on the face of America.

If Trump had any dignity at all he would resign in disgrace.

3 hours ago, boganJoe said:

If it was pure poll-chasing, he'd have done the Biden route: more pallets of cash and weak red lines.

More propaganda distortion from you!

Quote

Two separate agreements in the fall allowed Iran to access up to $16 billion of its previously frozen assets, including a reported $10 billion as the result of an extension of a Trump-era waiver that allows Iran to access funds for humanitarian purposes. 🤣

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/posts-misrepresent-unfreezing-of-16-billion-in-iranian-funds

5 hours ago, BLMFem said:

OK Pete, time to call Fox.

It's so obvious! Trump is laying ground for blaming someone else for this fiasco! 🤣

21 minutes ago, candide said:

More propaganda distortion from you!

Quote

Two separate agreements in the fall allowed Iran to access up to $16 billion of its previously frozen assets, including a reported $10 billion as the result of an extension of a Trump-era waiver that allows Iran to access funds for humanitarian purposes. 🤣

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/posts-misrepresent-unfreezing-of-16-billion-in-iranian-funds

So more pallets of cash and weak red lines from Biden, thanks!

As always, you have nothing.

3 hours ago, boganJoe said:

Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago years earlier for hitting on underage girls there.

Who said that? Trump! 😂

Of course, it's not true! 🤣🤣

Your deflection is a complete fail!

Epstein Bombshell: Donald Trump 'Never Asked' Disgraced Financier to Leave Mar-a-Lago, Unredacted Docs Claim

https://www.aol.com/articles/epstein-bombshell-donald-trump-never-172618371.html

12 minutes ago, candide said:

Who said that? Trump! 😂

Of course, it's not true! 🤣🤣

Your deflection is a complete fail!

Epstein Bombshell: Donald Trump 'Never Asked' Disgraced Financier to Leave Mar-a-Lago, Unredacted Docs Claim

https://www.aol.com/articles/epstein-bombshell-donald-trump-never-172618371.html

Your article is a complete fail.

Like all leftists, you only read the headline. "Bombshell" indeed.

You still have nothing

24 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So more pallets of cash and weak red lines from Biden, thanks!

As always, you have nothing.

It's you who has nothing, as usual!

No pallet of cash from the US, it's a lie! 🤣

The money, accumulated under Trump's waiver, was in SK, Qatar and Oman. It could only be accessed for humanitarian purpose (food, medecine, etc..). Most of it had not been disbursed.

https://www.factcheck.org/2024/05/posts-misrepresent-unfreezing-of-16-billion-in-iranian-funds

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Your article is a complete fail.

Like all leftists, you only read the headline. "Bombshell" indeed.

You still have nothing

Blah blah! You have nothing! 🤣

(Unless you can show evidence that Trump broke relations with Epstein after he recruited Guiffre at MAL)

16 minutes ago, candide said:

Who said that? Trump! 😂

Of course, it's not true! 🤣🤣

Your deflection is a complete fail!

Epstein Bombshell: Donald Trump 'Never Asked' Disgraced Financier to Leave Mar-a-Lago, Unredacted Docs Claim

https://www.aol.com/articles/epstein-bombshell-donald-trump-never-172618371.html

Oh, the author looks really unbiased:

9 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

Oh, the author looks really unbiased:

More deflection from you!

https://abcnews.com/US/epstein-files-questions-swirl-redacted-2009-email-subject/story?id=130036353

Any reliable source confirming Trump's claim that he kicked Epstein from MAL after he recruited Guiffre? 😀

13 minutes ago, candide said:

More deflection from you!

https://abcnews.com/US/epstein-files-questions-swirl-redacted-2009-email-subject/story?id=130036353

Any reliable source confirming Trump's claim that he kicked Epstein from MAL after he recruited Guiffre? 😀

How would it be confirmed one way or another?

The first article you linked to did not confirm it, and now you link to another article that confirms nothing. No doubt there are hundreds of articles with headlines pretending they confirm it.

There is no evidence that Trump was having sex with minors, much less that Trump is a pedophile.

Again, the Biden DOJ had the files for four years and did not find anything on Trump,

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

How would it be confirmed one way or another?

The first article you linked to did not confirm it, and now you link to another article that confirms nothing. No doubt there are hundreds of articles with headlines pretending they confirm it.

There is no evidence that Trump was having sex with minors, much less that Trump is a pedophile.

Again, the Biden DOJ had the files for four years and did not find anything on Trump,

So there's no evidence that Trump kicked Epstein out of MAL because he recruited Guiffre. We can agree on that

1 minute ago, candide said:

More deflection blah blah from you! 😄

More trolling blah blah blah from you!

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and found nothing on Trump.

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

You only have to be 14 to work legally in Florida.

And of course, guests have children.

Wow, it's a kiddy fiddlers paradise then. No wonder Epstein managed to get off the hook for banging 14-year-olds back around 2005. No wonder Trump built his gilded bolt-hole there.

5 hours ago, NanLaew said:

Why did Trump have underage girls at Mar-a-Lago in the first place?

crickets....

Oof, your comment is dumber than a participation trophy at a spelling bee. Let's dissect it with actual Florida law instead of whatever fever-dream logic you, the UNINFORMED Trump hater is huffing.

The ages, straight from Florida statutes (no spin):

Sexual consent age in Florida: 18. Full stop. Under 18? You can't legally consent to sex with anyone. There is a narrow "Romeo & Juliet" carve-out: 16- or 17-year-olds can hook up with someone 16 to 23 without it being a felony. But anyone 24+ touching a 16- or 17-year-old? That's a second-degree felony.

Under 16? Even stricter statutory rape territory. Ignorance of age is no defense. Period.

Legal employment (child labor) age in Florida: 14. (this is where you fail and stumble like a true ignoramus)

Minors 14 / 15 can work in non-hazardous jobs (spa attendant, server, caddy, front desk, exactly the kind of roles at a private club like Mar-a-Lago). 16 and 17 year-olds have basically no restrictions except hazardous stuff (no heavy machinery). Federal FLSA and Florida law both green-light this. Resorts, hotels, and country clubs hire teens all the time and it's been standard for decades. Recent tweaks under DeSantis just made it easier for 14 and 15 year-olds in certain non-hazardous gigs.

So you being ti uniformed hater you are screams "Why did Trump have underage girls at Mar-a-Lago in the first place?!" like it's some Epstein-level gotcha… then immediately admits the distinction they just tried to weaponize: "employing underage people who may be underage for consent purposes but not for employment are two very different things."

Listen and pay attention, that's literally the law. Florida lets you hire a 14-year-old to fold towels or serve cocktails at a luxury club, but you can't touch them until they're 18. That's not a "gotcha”, that's the entire point of having two separate ages. One is about paying teenagers minimum wage for summer jobs. The other is about protecting them from adults. Businesses have been doing the former for 100+ years without it being a sex-crime conspiracy.

Your comment is the intellectual equivalent of:

Congrats, genius. You've discovered child labor laws. Mar-a-Lago isn't running a daycare or a brothel; it's a private club that, like every other high-end Florida resort, hires local teens for entry-level work.

"Underage girls" in a workplace context = legal summer job. "Underage girls" in a sexual context = felony. The fact that you had to immediately clarify the distinction proves your own smear collapses the second anyone checks the statute.

Next time try a real scandal instead of this "teens exist near Trump therefore pedo" copium. Florida law already drew the line for you—try reading it before posting.

https://criminaldefenseattorneytampa.com/sexually-motivated-crimes/age-of-consent/

https://www.flsenate.gov/PublishedContent/Session/2012/InterimReports/2012-214cj.pdf

https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0794/Sections/0794.05.html

https://www.maralagoclub.com/terms-of-service

https://www2.myfloridalicense.com/child-labor/faqs/

36 minutes ago, candide said:

agree on that

U want to agree on only what little songs of Trump delusion are playing between your ears being another Trump-hater special: zero evidence, maximum cope.

Candide drops this gem (while linking some AOL “bombshell” that apparently only he read): “So there’s no evidence that Trump kicked Epstein out of MAL because he recruited Giuffre. We can agree on that:”

Candide, we can not agree on that, because actual facts, court records, and Trump’s own repeated public statements say otherwise. The evidence exists and that you’re JUST pretending it doesn’t)

• Trump himself said it multiple times, on the record. In July 2025 he explained the ban exactly as “Epstein stole people that worked for me… He stole her [Giuffre].” He described warning Epstein, Epstein doing it again, and Trump throwing him out as “persona non grata.” Same story he’s told for years: Epstein was poaching young female spa workers from Mar-a-Lago.

• Giuffre’s own sworn deposition confirms the recruitment happened at Mar-a-Lago. She was 16, working as a locker-room/spa attendant in summer 2000 when Ghislaine Maxwell approached her right there in the club and lured her away to “give massages” for Epstein. That’s not speculation, that’s page-after-page court testimony.

• Giuffre’s lawyer Bradley Edwards (who represented multiple victims) put it in a 2009 court filing: Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” Edwards has also said publicly that Trump cooperated with the investigation and gave him useful information.

Timeline checks out: Giuffre recruited ~2000; Trump cuts Epstein off around 2004 / 2007 (exact year varies slightly by source, but the ban is undisputed). Other contemporaneous accounts say Epstein was hitting on young girls or members’ daughters at the club, same “creep” behavior that got him 86’d.

So yeah, there is evidence, Trump’s own words + the victim’s sworn account + her lawyer’s filing + 15+ years of consistent reporting from WaPo, NPR, BBC, AP, Politico, etc. The only people claiming “no evidence” are the ones who read a single AOL headline and declared victory while ignoring everything else.

But up rolls candide with “we can agree there’s no evidence” the same way flat-earthers say “we can agree NASA is lying.”

You’re not debating facts, you’re speed running denial while linking an article whose own title you didn’t bother to fact-check against Trump’s direct quotes or Giuffre’s deposition.

Pro tip (u sure need them): When the guy who actually banned Epstein says out loud “I threw him out because he kept stealing my underage spa girls, including the one who became the most famous accuser,” and the court records back it up, maybe don’t announce “no evidence” like it’s a mic drop. That’s not skepticism; that’s just plugging your ears and yelling “Trump said it so it’s fake!”

Next time try reading the primary sources instead of the clickbait. The evidence isn’t hiding, it’s been public for years. You just don’t like what it says.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-epstein-stole-young-women-from-mar-a-lago-spa-including-virginia-giuffre

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/29/nx-s1-5484136/trump-jeffrey-epstein-mar-a-lago-ghislaine-maxwell

Trump says Epstein 'stole' young women from his Mar-a-Lag...

Trump told reporters his falling out with Epstein was due to the disgraced financier poaching his employees.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/29/trump-epstein-virginia-giuffre

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/29/politics/epstein-trump-falling-out-analysis

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/29/trump-epstein-virginia-giuffre-mar-a-lago-spa/

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

More trolling blah blah blah from you!

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and found nothing on Trump.

More broken record trolling deflection from you! 😂

On 3/23/2026 at 4:06 AM, BLMFem said:

Talk? The last time the Iranians talked to the Americans they used it as a ploy to kill the Iranian leadership.

Do you really think they'd trust them a second time??🤣

The talks: Jared probably called some Iranian buddy to see if he could get Iran to give him a few billion if he would beg ivana to beg daddy to grow a brain.

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

More trolling blah blah blah from you!

The Biden DOJ had the unredacted files for four years and found nothing on Trump.

All explained in the following links, although posting them is a waste of time, since MAGA won't read anyway.

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU00/20260211/118951/HHRG-119-JU00-20260211-SD013.pdf

Trump reverses course on Epstein files

Though Trump campaigned last year on the promise he would immediately release the Epstein

files if he won the presidency, he switched his narrative earlier this year. Since then, he has

received pressure from both sides of the aisle to release the files.

As public pressure mounted, Trump questioned the political rationale for renewed interest in

releasing the files.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/8/6/fact-check-did-democrats-take-action-over-epstein-case-transparency

Fact check: Did Democrats take action over Epstein case transparency?

1 hour ago, boganJoe said:

Oof, your comment is dumber than a participation trophy at a spelling bee. Let's dissect it with actual Florida law instead of whatever fever-dream logic you, the UNINFORMED Trump hater is huffing.

The ages, straight from Florida statutes (no spin):

Sexual consent age in Florida: 18. Full stop. Under 18? You can't legally consent to sex with anyone. There is a narrow "Romeo & Juliet" carve-out: 16- or 17-year-olds can hook up with someone 16 to 23 without it being a felony. But anyone 24+ touching a 16- or 17-year-old? That's a second-degree felony.

Under 16? Even stricter statutory rape territory. Ignorance of age is no defense. Period.

Legal employment (child labor) age in Florida: 14. (this is where you fail and stumble like a true ignoramus)

Minors 14 / 15 can work in non-hazardous jobs (spa attendant, server, caddy, front desk, exactly the kind of roles at a private club like Mar-a-Lago). 16 and 17 year-olds have basically no restrictions except hazardous stuff (no heavy machinery). Federal FLSA and Florida law both green-light this. Resorts, hotels, and country clubs hire teens all the time and it's been standard for decades. Recent tweaks under DeSantis just made it easier for 14 and 15 year-olds in certain non-hazardous gigs.

So you being ti uniformed hater you are screams "Why did Trump have underage girls at Mar-a-Lago in the first place?!" like it's some Epstein-level gotcha… then immediately admits the distinction they just tried to weaponize: "employing underage people who may be underage for consent purposes but not for employment are two very different things."

Listen and pay attention, that's literally the law. Florida lets you hire a 14-year-old to fold towels or serve cocktails at a luxury club, but you can't touch them until they're 18. That's not a "gotcha”, that's the entire point of having two separate ages. One is about paying teenagers minimum wage for summer jobs. The other is about protecting them from adults. Businesses have been doing the former for 100+ years without it being a sex-crime conspiracy.

Your comment is the intellectual equivalent of:

Congrats, genius. You've discovered child labor laws. Mar-a-Lago isn't running a daycare or a brothel; it's a private club that, like every other high-end Florida resort, hires local teens for entry-level work.

"Underage girls" in a workplace context = legal summer job. "Underage girls" in a sexual context = felony. The fact that you had to immediately clarify the distinction proves your own smear collapses the second anyone checks the statute.

Next time try a real scandal instead of this "teens exist near Trump therefore pedo" copium. Florida law already drew the line for you—try reading it before posting.

https://criminaldefenseattorneytampa.com/sexually-motivated-crimes/age-of-consent/

https://www.flsenate.gov/PublishedContent/Session/2012/InterimReports/2012-214cj.pdf

https://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0794/Sections/0794.05.html

https://www.maralagoclub.com/terms-of-service

https://www2.myfloridalicense.com/child-labor/faqs/

So it really IS a kiddy fiddler's paradise. Thanks for taking the very, very long-winded way around confirming it.

No need to thank me for the triggering.

1 hour ago, boganJoe said:

U want to agree on only what little songs of Trump delusion are playing between your ears being another Trump-hater special: zero evidence, maximum cope.

Candide drops this gem (while linking some AOL “bombshell” that apparently only he read): “So there’s no evidence that Trump kicked Epstein out of MAL because he recruited Giuffre. We can agree on that:”

Candide, we can not agree on that, because actual facts, court records, and Trump’s own repeated public statements say otherwise. The evidence exists and that you’re JUST pretending it doesn’t)

• Trump himself said it multiple times, on the record. In July 2025 he explained the ban exactly as “Epstein stole people that worked for me… He stole her [Giuffre].” He described warning Epstein, Epstein doing it again, and Trump throwing him out as “persona non grata.” Same story he’s told for years: Epstein was poaching young female spa workers from Mar-a-Lago.

• Giuffre’s own sworn deposition confirms the recruitment happened at Mar-a-Lago. She was 16, working as a locker-room/spa attendant in summer 2000 when Ghislaine Maxwell approached her right there in the club and lured her away to “give massages” for Epstein. That’s not speculation, that’s page-after-page court testimony.

• Giuffre’s lawyer Bradley Edwards (who represented multiple victims) put it in a 2009 court filing: Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” Edwards has also said publicly that Trump cooperated with the investigation and gave him useful information.

Timeline checks out: Giuffre recruited ~2000; Trump cuts Epstein off around 2004 / 2007 (exact year varies slightly by source, but the ban is undisputed). Other contemporaneous accounts say Epstein was hitting on young girls or members’ daughters at the club, same “creep” behavior that got him 86’d.

So yeah, there is evidence, Trump’s own words + the victim’s sworn account + her lawyer’s filing + 15+ years of consistent reporting from WaPo, NPR, BBC, AP, Politico, etc. The only people claiming “no evidence” are the ones who read a single AOL headline and declared victory while ignoring everything else.

But up rolls candide with “we can agree there’s no evidence” the same way flat-earthers say “we can agree NASA is lying.”

You’re not debating facts, you’re speed running denial while linking an article whose own title you didn’t bother to fact-check against Trump’s direct quotes or Giuffre’s deposition.

Pro tip (u sure need them): When the guy who actually banned Epstein says out loud “I threw him out because he kept stealing my underage spa girls, including the one who became the most famous accuser,” and the court records back it up, maybe don’t announce “no evidence” like it’s a mic drop. That’s not skepticism; that’s just plugging your ears and yelling “Trump said it so it’s fake!”

Next time try reading the primary sources instead of the clickbait. The evidence isn’t hiding, it’s been public for years. You just don’t like what it says.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-says-epstein-stole-young-women-from-mar-a-lago-spa-including-virginia-giuffre

https://www.npr.org/2025/07/29/nx-s1-5484136/trump-jeffrey-epstein-mar-a-lago-ghislaine-maxwell

Trump says Epstein 'stole' young women from his Mar-a-Lag...

Trump told reporters his falling out with Epstein was due to the disgraced financier poaching his employees.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/29/trump-epstein-virginia-giuffre

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/04/trump-banned-jeffrey-epstein-from-mar-a-lago-for-hitting-on-girl.html

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/29/politics/epstein-trump-falling-out-analysis

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/07/29/trump-epstein-virginia-giuffre-mar-a-lago-spa/

Proper triggered. You must be tired dear. Take a Bex and a good lie down.

Even Trump's masters, Israel, aren't aware of any talks going on. They must be really secret, NOT?

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/iran-strikes-persist-even-trump-074627465.html

(Bloomberg) -- Israeli officials said the country will persist with strikes against Iran even as US President Donald Trump claimed talks are underway to end the conflict, further unsettling energy and financial markets.

Defense Minister Israel Katz said the campaign, now in its 25th day, would continue “at full intensity,” while Energy Minister Eli Cohen said Trump’s comments should be taken “slowly.” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asked close confidant Ron Dermer to monitor any US-Iranian negotiations to make sure the country’s interests are upheld, an Israeli official said.

A very old saying in courtrooms for decades applies very well to Trump and his involvment with Epstein and the many public statements made by Trump about "inspecting" young girls in dressing rooms of pagents , grabbing em by the pxxxy, hanging with the "great guy" epstein for decades but somehow zero knowledge or involvment in Epstein constantly having hundreds or thousands of very young gals available....But Trump saw no evil heard no evil . So of course millions of documents videos audios statements by victim which no doubt would clear trump of any and all allegations MUST be covered up by Trump at all costs even as much as invading other countries and opening a very dangerous can of worms in the middle east....Never has an innocent man been so afraid of what is hidden in the files.

"If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it is probably a duck"

14 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Proper triggered. You must be tired dear. Take a Bex and a good lie down.

Oh look, another keyboard warrior dropping the classic "Proper triggered. “You must be tired dear". Take a Bex and a good lie down.”

Mr/Mrs NanLaew (triggered version), that's not the clever mic-drop you think it is. That's the exhausted 1960s Australian housewife special, a cup of tea, a headache powder, and a nap because the actual argument is too hard.

You're not 'owning' anyone. You're just admitting you’ve got nothing. No facts, no counter to the hearsay email, no explanation why a lawyer's second-hand summary in a 2009 settlement chat magically disproves everything else on record. Just vintage condescension and a patronizing 'dear' to signal you're above it all while contributing less than the Bex powder itself (which, fun fact, was eventually banned for destroying people's kidneys and kind of like what this reply does to any hope of intelligent discussion from you)

Next time someone brings receipts about the Epstein files, club policies, or the actual lack of any criminal link, try engaging with the substance instead of cosplaying a sassy nanna who ran out of arguments in 1975.

"Proper triggered"? Nah. Properly empty. Go have that lie down since you clearly need it after straining so hard to say absolutely nothing.

1 hour ago, boganJoe said:

Giuffre’s lawyer Bradley Edwards (who represented multiple victims) put it in a 2009 court filing: Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago “because Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.”

Interesting. In which court filling? My AI cannot find it. Google cannot find it.