webfact Posted December 3, 2013 Posted December 3, 2013 RICE-PLEDGING SCHEMENACC to probe more officialsThe NationBANGKOK: -- The National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) panel probing alleged irregularities in the rice-pledging scheme has decided to interrogate more officials and people involved in the programme after deciding it does not have enough evidence to substantiate corruption allegations.The panel said it had not yet found evidence to determine whether rice trading between Thai and Chinese government representatives was carried out under an official government-to-government scheme.Facing investigation are Manat Soiploy, former director-general of the Department of Trade; former deputy commerce minister Poom Sarapol; Guangdong Stationery & Sporting Goods Import & Export Corp; Hainan Grain & Oil Industrial Trading Company; Siam Indica Co Ltd; and people linked to that company.The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price.However, the Customs Department reported that from August 2011 to June this year, Thailand exported 375,000 tonnes of rice to China from the total of 4.8 million tonnes that it is supposed to hand over to China under the contract.-- The Nation 2013-12-04
Popular Post jaidam Posted December 3, 2013 Popular Post Posted December 3, 2013 Siam Indica Co Ltd. For those with a short memory that is the revered Arisman's and his wife's company. 9
Popular Post PaullyW Posted December 3, 2013 Popular Post Posted December 3, 2013 (edited) Yes, we know already. You guys will 'setup some committees' and 'probe' and 'urge' and maybe even 'investigate'. And, somehow either 1) nobody or 2) whatever the opposing party/faction (by name, seems like at least 2 of the companies in the article being investigated are foreign or linked to foreign trade?) will be found to have been involved in any sort of corruption. Despite the entire country and culture being one that approves of corruption. Why pretend guys? The Thais already know they are corrupt, and surely you can't convince foreigners otherwise. Edited December 3, 2013 by PaullyW 5
Popular Post ChrisY1 Posted December 4, 2013 Popular Post Posted December 4, 2013 Too many "notables" (lightly used) within these companies to enable the NACC to conduct any legitimate investigations....let alone come up with indictable findings! Whatever....the NACC is managed by the ruling party....so maybe enough said! 6
NongKhaiKid Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 Too many "notables" (lightly used) within these companies to enable the NACC to conduct any legitimate investigations....let alone come up with indictable findings! Whatever....the NACC is managed by the ruling party....so maybe enough said! You have got it as nothing and no one here is truly independent so the result is decided in advance. 2
Thai at Heart Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 How are they planning to probe companies in China?
ramrod711 Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 Even if the commission found irregularities and reccomended charges, red shirts would just surround the court, threaten and intimidate. Rule of law has eroded to a very dangerous level.
Popular Post JRSoul Posted December 4, 2013 Popular Post Posted December 4, 2013 Why doesn't the NACC start at the top? Check which cabinet ministers, PTP MPs, and members of their families have profited from this failed and hugely expensive policy through direct ownership or company shares of businesses involved in rice growing, rental of rice-growing land, or storage of rice. While profiting from a government policy is not a crime, failing to declare a conflict of interest and recusing yourself from any vote or decision most certainly is. I have deliberately left out milling because there is nothing in the policy that would explicitly profit millers. however, I have included land rental and storage because any reasonable person should have been able to see that this policy would increase demand, and hence prices, for both; and because no measures were taken in the policy to reduce profiteering. I'm sure government members found guilty will come up with one of the two standard responses - "I was just following orders" or "It was nothing personal, just business." BTW dismissal, fines and incarceration are common in western democracies for failure to declare conflicts of interest. For the Shinawatras and their string of political parties, it is business as usual. 3
worgeordie Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 I am sure they will not probe too far up the ladder,if anyone is found to blame it will be the underlings,small fry,as usual. regards Worgeordie
i claudius Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 I cannot understand why they set up these investigations ,Thailand is "the hub" of them ,there is no corruption here. we all know it.
ginjag Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 PROBE ???? Not have to probe too far or you will damage the rectum. 1
kingalfred Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 (edited) If the so called "poor rice farmers "who this scheme was set up to help ,used some brain matter they would deduce that their wonderful government have "screwed them"along with 3% of the countrys economy.Yingluck was on Al Jazeeera news 2 days ago and still praising her scheme.And to think she was a "business woman" in a previous incarnation. http://m.aljazeera.com/story/ 201312284319234. Go to 17 .15s in the video. Edited December 4, 2013 by kingalfred
PeterSmiles Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The panel said it had not yet found evidence to determine whether rice trading between Thai and Chinese government representatives was carried out under an official government-to-government scheme. In any civilized not corrupt country that would only require to pick up the phone and ask for the documents to be sent over. The fact that NACC is not able to determine that in less than 24 hours says it all. 1
spirit47 Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 I don't understand, how this rice pledging sheme should work for the poor farmers in Isaan. They have only one harvest a year, here in the middle they have 3 harvest a year.
Popular Post rubl Posted December 4, 2013 Popular Post Posted December 4, 2013 Corruption? Of course not. We just lost 60% of the THB 660 billion spent, that's all. Nothing to worry about 3
slapout Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The evidence of corruption have been presented several times for the nation/government to see, by the government bean counters/turned whistle blowers the opposition, farmers, etc. The NACC in all of their posturing, seem unable to understand a P&L statement, in the most basic form, what constitues corruption, and/or thef, etc.. It appear there is a real communication problem between reality, their job description and what the protestors/opposition are demanding from thepresent and future governments as a whole.
Nickymaster Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 (edited) The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price. Here it is guys! Thailand sold rice to other governments below market price.........and somebody must have received the difference between selling price and market price... Edited December 4, 2013 by Nickymaster
rubl Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price. Here it is guys! Thailand sold rice to other governments below market price.........and somebody must have received the difference between selling price and market price... Now please pay attention, I'll only say this once: It's the difference between pledge price and selling price can counts 1
SOTIRIOS Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 ...and erase all traces that remain..... ...the report was issued...rejected.......the investigator was ridiculed, threatened...you name it..... ...so we will have 'an acceptable version' now....so long after the fact.........
kingalfred Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price.[/ Here it is guys! Thailand sold rice to other governments below market price.........and somebody must have received the difference between selling price and market price... Now please pay attention, I'll only say this once: It's the difference between pledge price and selling price can counts yes
EyesWideOpen Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 At one level I almost admire this rice scheme..... First make promises to the red buffaloes that you will give them more money for their rice, thus getting Thaksin/clone elected. Then basically loot the entire program to the tune of endless billions of baht to enrich the insiders. The people at the top getting rich from this must be laughing their ass off on the way to go Ferrari shopping, as this was a win win for them.... Meanwhile it is just dawning on the rice farmers the level of destruction this has caused to their industry...... 1
Nickymaster Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price. Here it is guys! Thailand sold rice to other governments below market price.........and somebody must have received the difference between selling price and market price... Now please pay attention, I'll only say this once: It's the difference between pledge price and selling price can counts No. It's the difference between pledge price + all associated costs (storage rent, computer systems, transport etc etc etc) AND selling price that will establish it's total loss. To be fair, any kind of farmer's support system would incur losses. This government has chosen for pledging, others might prefer to give money directly to the farmers. The big question is were is the corruption in this scheme and why is so much money being lost on it. One very easy way is looking at selling vs market price.
jaidam Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 The NACC panel said the G2G trading was believed to have caused losses to the rice-pledging scheme because rice would be sold at less than the market price. Here it is guys! Thailand sold rice to other governments below market price.........and somebody must have received the difference between selling price and market price... Now please pay attention, I'll only say this once: It's the difference between pledge price and selling price can counts No. It's the difference between pledge price + all associated costs (storage rent, computer systems, transport etc etc etc) AND selling price that will establish it's total loss. To be fair, any kind of farmer's support system would incur losses. This government has chosen for pledging, others might prefer to give money directly to the farmers. The big question is were is the corruption in this scheme and why is so much money being lost on it. One very easy way is looking at selling vs market price. Quite correct, but you forget to mention the "opportunity cost". That is to say what could the "missing" 600 billion baht have been better spent on. Such as 20,000 top rate hospitals and 10,000 schools with the best teachers money can hire, and still have change left over to buy every rot E-tan driver a Ferrari.
Ricardo Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 How are they planning to probe companies in China? Very diplomatically, if they wish to ship the rest of the rice contracted-for, or get the freight-line from Southern-China down to Singapore, with associated 'fees' & 'commissions'.
Dogmatix Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 This could potentially result in an indictment of Yingluck as chairman of the Rice Pledging Committee, even tho she attend the meetings. That would mean automatic suspension from duty.
MaiChai Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 Thai rice is like London water; its been through the 'system' 10 times before its finally released! 1
tomacht8 Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 " does not have enough evidence"How much evidence they need then?Hurry up please!And please do not tell me, that in this 687.000.000.000 Baht heist on the public finances, everything was correct!?Really no corruption?No one has cheated? No people have exchanged large amounts baht for hard currency in the Chinese money dealers shops?Popular're the big 500 Euro bills.A suitcase with 40 Kilos is around 20 Mio Euros, that is now 860 Mio Baht.Not enough evidence?And this writes The National Anti-Corruption Commission of Thailand.It is depressing.
ratcatcher Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 What in 'tarnation is a company like this doing in the rice trading business? http://www.cccme.org.cn/shop/cccme2099/index.aspx 2
tomacht8 Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 What in 'tarnation is a company like this doing in the rice trading business? http://www.cccme.org.cn/shop/cccme2099/index.aspx Agree, more then dubios. Looks more like a letter box entity. Number Of Employees:50-100 .....Christmas Decorations?...
ratcatcher Posted December 4, 2013 Posted December 4, 2013 (edited) Siam Indica Co Ltd. For those with a short memory that is the revered Arisman's and his wife's company. Read further and learn.These guys are up to their scrawny necks in this crap. Mr Warong said his own investigation found there were alleged irregularities in the rice deal with China. GSSG Import & Export Corp, a China-based trading firm, which bought rice from Thailand, was represented by a man who authorised a resident of Phichit's Bang Mun Nak district to sign the rice deal on his behalf, said the Democrat MP. The man was an assistant of Pheu Thai Party MP Rapeepan Pongruangrong, wife of red-shirt leader Arisman Pongruangrong, he said. The plot thickens. http://assistamerica.countrywatch.com/rcountry.aspx?vcountry=170&topic=CBWIR&uid=6067023 Someday this will all be on show. Edited December 4, 2013 by ratcatcher
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now