Do you think Trump will be impeached or forced to resign?

[Opl]

10 hours ago, janclaes47 said:

2020 is still 3 years away, 3 long years of results that no other recent president could achieve.

 

He's unpopular now because the democrats have put all their horses in the race to discredit him, but they will run out of horses soon.

"

“I believe — and you would have to ask those folks who will know the real answer — we have more legislation passed, including the record was Harry Truman a long time ago. And we broke that record, so we got a lot done, Trump said. According to a GovTrack analysis, though, just the opposite is true: Trump has signed the least number of bills of any president since Dwight Eisenhower, who was in office from 1953 to 1961."

http://www.politicususa.com/2017/12/27/trump-lies-accomplishments-turns-responders-event-self-love-fest.html

Edited December 28, 2017 by Opl

[Thakkar]

10 hours ago, janclaes47 said:

2020 is still 3 years away, 3 long years of results that no other recent president could achieve.

 

He's unpopular now because the democrats have put all their horses in the race to discredit him, but they will run out of horses soon.

 

I think this is progress. A Trump supporter finally admits that Trump is indeed unpopular.

 

The stink emanating from Trump isn’t coming from horses, but from the horse manure he’s dishing out.

[Skywalker69]

4 hours ago, Meljames said:

His latest poll numbers were at 32% approval, I doubt 68% of the country are Dems, if they are Dems there won't be any shortage of people to discredit Trump especially since an election is coming up in a few months.

Trump regrets update.

 

https://twitter.com/trump_regrets

[Skywalker69]

Poor Trump Supporters Can’t Figure Out Why the President Helped the Wealthy and Not Them

 

The gullible breed of Americans, who put their faith into a conman to be their president, are now paying the price.  Their case of buyer’s remorse defines the saying, “you’ve made your bed, now lie in it.”

 

http://clearreporter.com/2017/12/26/trump-supporters-wealthy/

[MrPatrickThai]

9 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

Poor Trump Supporters Can’t Figure Out Why the President Helped the Wealthy and Not Them

 

The gullible breed of Americans, who put their faith into a conman to be their president, are now paying the price.  Their case of buyer’s remorse defines the saying, “you’ve made your bed, now lie in it.”

 

http://clearreporter.com/2017/12/26/trump-supporters-wealthy/

Not only off topic(it's about impeachment), but it's the season of goodwill. 

 

Give the guy a break and some time to prove he's a worthy president. 

 

"The gullible breed of Americans"  - how condescending. You are the typical anti-trump supremacist!

Edited December 28, 2017 by MrPatrickThai

[Rimmer]

A profane flame troll post has been removed.

[Skywalker69]

45 minutes ago, MrPatrickThai said:

Not only off topic(it's about impeachment), but it's the season of goodwill. 

 

Give the guy a break and some time to prove he's a worthy president. 

 

"The gullible breed of Americans"  - how condescending. You are the typical anti-trump supremacist!

He has already proven that he is not a worthy president.

[MrPatrickThai]

1 minute ago, Skywalker69 said:

He has already proven that he is not a worthy president.

That's a matter of opinion. IMHO, the alternative should be in jail, as should 2 of the more recent presidents. Are you one the gullible breed that think the Bushes were worthy, ignoring the mass genocide and obvious corrution?  

[riclag]

6 hours ago, Meljames said:

His latest poll numbers were at 32% approval, I doubt 68% of the country are Dems, if they are Dems there won't be any shortage of people to discredit Trump especially since an election is coming up in a few months.

What poll do you use ? Actually ,they have been wrong in the past!

example: 11/8/16

[riclag]

2 hours ago, Skywalker69 said:

Poor Trump Supporters Can’t Figure Out Why the President Helped the Wealthy and Not Them

 

The gullible breed of Americans, who put their faith into a conman to be their president, are now paying the price.  Their case of buyer’s remorse defines the saying, “you’ve made your bed, now lie in it.”

 

http://clearreporter.com/2017/12/26/trump-supporters-wealthy/

I don't think this is a reliable source . When is it bad to get a tax break ?

Also ,For every anti tax bill source, there is one to oppose. 

America's great President is fulfilling  his campaign promises .

The only way you haters of the President  are gonna stop your meltdown is in 2024.

Edited December 28, 2017 by riclag

[Meljames]

48 minutes ago, riclag said:

What poll do you use ? Actually ,they have been wrong in the past!

example: 11/8/16

Rasmussen has him in the best light with 45% approval. That still shoots your theory that his haters are all Democrats. Get over it, his haters are on both sides of the aisle and growing in numbers

[F4UCorsair]

4 minutes ago, hyku1147 said:

 

The pen is mightier than the elephant gun.   All the naysayers in the press assisted in his election by printing trash!!

 

Love it.

[F4UCorsair]

3 minutes ago, Meljames said:

Rasmussen has him in the best light with 45% approval. That still shoots your theory that his haters are all Democrats. Get over it, his haters are on both sides of the aisle and growing in numbers

 

The same people who were wrong in November 2016?   Very likely.

 

The winners are 'over it'....it's the loseers who are still bleating the same trash as they were 18 months back, and continuously since then!!

Edited December 28, 2017 by F4UCorsair

[riclag]

15 minutes ago, Meljames said:

Rasmussen has him in the best light with 45% approval. That still shoots your theory that his haters are all Democrats. Get over it, his haters are on both sides of the aisle and growing in numbers

I never said his haters are all dem's. Have you ever wondered why the establishment(republicans and Dems) hate him other than his lack of prose and his nonsensical wit. They hate him because their gravy train is being side tracked and being exposed.  2020 will be a sad day for the current swamp but not for the message that was heard loud and clear on 11-08-2016.Who said change was gonna be easy lol 

Edited December 28, 2017 by riclag

[Meljames]

5 minutes ago, F4UCorsair said:

 

The same people who were wrong in November 2016?   Very likely.

 

Rasmussen had Trump ahead by 2 or 3 points to beat Clinton. And now they have him steadily dropping in the ratings since the election.

[watcharacters]

On 12/24/2017 at 7:03 PM, EVENKEEL said:

Enslave the working poor and the lazy with affordable big screen TV's and cheap fast food. That's become the American Dream. Without a doubt items would cost more and so........

 

 

 

Lazy and luxury is planet earth's dream.   

 

Ain't going to happen.

[F4UCorsair]

6 minutes ago, Meljames said:

Rasmussen had Trump ahead by 2 or 3 points to beat Clinton. And now they have him steadily dropping in the ratings since the election.

In 2020, Rasmussen will have him 20 to 30 points ahead.

 

If he is still interested at 74, he'll be reelected in 2020.  Taking bets now.

 

As riclag says, those on the gravy train hate him because they may have to find a job.....too bad.   Workers, business people, etc., don't enjoy paying taxes to support those who choose not to work.   It's going to hurt.

Edited December 28, 2017 by F4UCorsair

[EVENKEEL]

3 minutes ago, Meljames said:

Rasmussen had Trump ahead by 2 or 3 points to beat Clinton. And now they have him steadily dropping in the ratings since the election.

Who cares as long as not another Dem is POTUS for a very long time. If Trump doesn't run again we'll have Pence.

[Skywalker69]

57 minutes ago, riclag said:

I don't think this is a reliable source . When is it bad to get a tax break ?

Also ,For every anti tax bill source, there is one to oppose. 

America's great President is fulfilling  his campaign promises .

The only way you haters of the President  are gonna stop your meltdown is in 2024.

 

Quote

When is it bad to get a tax break ?

When it goes to the 1% richest in the US.

[riclag]

4 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

 

When it goes to the 1% richest in the US.

They are the one's who pay the most taxes. Besides, your off topic!

Edited December 28, 2017 by riclag

[Meljames]

5 minutes ago, F4UCorsair said:

In 2020, Rasmussen will have him 20 to 30 points ahead

So nothing to show how great he is today so we'll tell everybody how great he'll be some day. Keep hoping.

[Skywalker69]

14 minutes ago, riclag said:

They are the one's who pay the most taxes. Besides, your off topic!

 

[KhunMhee]

Lets have a look at facts. The GDP is up and he is financially making America great again.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2017/11/08/trumps-economic-scorecard-one-year-post-election/#5318d50e5e85

 

And before you add that's from Obama. No no it's not....

Edited December 28, 2017 by KhunMhee

[landtrout]

1 hour ago, F4UCorsair said:

In 2020, Rasmussen will have him 20 to 30 points ahead.

 

If he is still interested at 74, he'll be reelected in 2020.  Taking bets now.

 

As riclag says, those on the gravy train hate him because they may have to find a job.....too bad.   Workers, business people, etc., don't enjoy paying taxes to support those who choose not to work.   It's going to hurt.

 

    You're on, F4UCorsair.

    Name your stakes, and don't be shy.

      

[Opl]

3 hours ago, KhunMhee said:

Lets have a look at facts. The GDP is up and he is financially making America great again.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckjones/2017/11/08/trumps-economic-scorecard-one-year-post-election/#5318d50e5e85

 

And before you add that's from Obama. No no it's not....

"Trump builds his 2018 political message by rebranding Obama’s economic legacy After disputing economic gains under his predecessor, the president is seizing the same trends as his own. But looking at it coldly and rationally, there is very little the administration can say at this point is really down to them in terms of the economy.”

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/28/trump-message-obama-economy-260858

[KhunMhee]

10 hours ago, Opl said:

"Trump builds his 2018 political message by rebranding Obama’s economic legacy After disputing economic gains under his predecessor, the president is seizing the same trends as his own. But looking at it coldly and rationally, there is very little the administration can say at this point is really down to them in terms of the economy.”

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/28/trump-message-obama-economy-260858

SO a quote from a leftie website is supposed to TRUMP (you see what I did there) an article from Forbes? I do like your looking for proof but lets look at the validity of the source as well. Forbes is in no way bias its facts on how the economy if moving. If you took the time to find the changes he has done economically rather than just hating him for being him (and his big arse mouth) you would see the growth.   

[Skywalker69]

Russian hacker says he can prove Kremlin ordered DNC hack

 

In an interview with an independent Moscow-based television channel, jailed Russian computer hacker Konstantin Kozlovsky said he was ordered by the Kremlin to hack the Democratic National Committee computers during the 2016 presidential campaign, and he can prove it.

 

http://theweek.com/speedreads/745508/russian-hacker-says-prove-kremlin-ordered-dnc-hack

[Andaman Al]

8 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

Russian hacker says he can prove Kremlin ordered DNC hack

 

In an interview with an independent Moscow-based television channel, jailed Russian computer hacker Konstantin Kozlovsky said he was ordered by the Kremlin to hack the Democratic National Committee computers during the 2016 presidential campaign, and he can prove it.

 

http://theweek.com/speedreads/745508/russian-hacker-says-prove-kremlin-ordered-dnc-hack

Sadly after the public revelation, I doubt the poor chap will be around to 'prove it' much longer! I see an accident in the Kitchen or the  prison engineering workshop coming up.

[Skywalker69]

1 hour ago, Skywalker69 said:

Russian hacker says he can prove Kremlin ordered DNC hack

 

In an interview with an independent Moscow-based television channel, jailed Russian computer hacker Konstantin Kozlovsky said he was ordered by the Kremlin to hack the Democratic National Committee computers during the 2016 presidential campaign, and he can prove it.

 

http://theweek.com/speedreads/745508/russian-hacker-says-prove-kremlin-ordered-dnc-hack

"Kozlovsky said he worked with the Russian intelligence agency FSB, and because he was worried his minders might turn on him, he left behind a "poison pill" during the DNC hack — his passport number and other personal information hidden in a .dat file" (also his visa number to Jamaica)

[KhunMhee]

31 minutes ago, Skywalker69 said:

"Kozlovsky said he worked with the Russian intelligence agency FSB, and because he was worried his minders might turn on him, he left behind a "poison pill" during the DNC hack — his passport number and other personal information hidden in a .dat file" (also his visa number to Jamaica)

So a convicted felon says he has proof...... Why do people grasp at straws? Do you not think that there was an investigation into this? How about this wait 4 (well 3 now) years and try again VIA election? That's how these governments run if the party you support does not win going off like a kid in the play ground about it all solves nothing. Put that lost energy into trying to do something when the time comes.