Jump to content

British Embassy statement on income letters: Officials knew about problems in May and say that US nationals will also be affected


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, blackhorse said:

The oz embassy requires no confirmation letters from anyone
You state your income and sign the stat dec. Done deal

Next!

Not any more.

And you ain't Australian anyway..

Edited by Odysseus123
  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

While telling their own nationals where to go at the same time.

The current U.S. response if it does stand sounds the much more reasonable one. 

Issue the REQUIRED letters and say no guarantees, your move Thailand. 

They've never been too bothered about what British people think.

 

If the Thais stop accepting letters which don't offer whatever level of guarantee they deem appropriate in that week then it won't matter if you have a letter or not. This appears to be all about the guarantee, does the US embassy guarantee the income level? I don't think so.

 

Ignoring the issue won't make it go away. The embassy was correct to do this.

  • Like 1
Posted

When it comes to the U.S. Embassy doing the verification or not I seriously doubt if any Embassy can actually take the time to do all the research or verification. As I already posted I would like how many expats regardless of the country the numbers of those having presented a letter and lived here that are causing problems for their government that would cause a Thai official to bring up such a topic unless they are searching for a new source of income? If I was an Ambassador on top of the issue I wouldn't give him the time of the day and respond.

Maybe that same question should be asked to the Chinese Embassy who they seem to go far beyond to kiss their Chinese ass and letting in all the triads investors to buy up all the Condos in Bangkok without enforcing the 51 percent Thai ownership rule. Common sense would tell you there isn't enough Thais that could afford the number of development being built and sold at the prices they are affording.

Posted
2 hours ago, webfact said:

they confirmed that they expect the embassy to verify all sources of income of British Nationals requesting an income letter. 

That's the problem right there. The Thais are quite happy to audit someones bank account merely to issue a six month tourist visa, they're never going to get western embassies to do this.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Jingthing said:

Well they are not stopping the letters immediately and income letters are good for SIX MONTHS after issue so I basically think you're wrong. Plenty of notice in that. But I don't think they should be cutting off the letters at all and also they certainly should not be telling their nationals to try an income method WITHOUT the required letters before Thai immigration has officially changed that requirement. Which they have not. 

They have no choice.

 

I am not British  but have been privately advised that the 'Stat Declaration' is just about finished.

 

Stop blaming any country.

Posted
They have no choice.
 
I am not British  but have been privately advised that the 'Stat Declaration' is just about finished.
 
Stop blaming any country.
Don't tell me.. You married an immigration officer right? Because that's the only way you would know

Why keep spreading BS? what joy does it bring
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

Many using this income letter either didn't have the necessary funds or didn't feel comfortable leaving the funds sit in a Thai bank. I feel Thai banks are safe but they are a little behind recently on raising up the interest rates.  Ally bank now offers 1.9%  on a liquid saving account. Thai banks are giving 1.35% , at most on liquid savings accts.

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, fforest1 said:

The British government does not have time for expats...They are to busy laying out the red carpet and giving loads of benefits to all the new immigrants arriving in England...  

I understand and support your feeling it seems the U.S. was heading the same direction until Trump got elected, I didn't vote for the guy my parents were immigrants but know there are got to be borders and you got to earn what you receive. American politician regardless of the party ever say in front of me or use the word entitlement I will go more than postal on the money f--ker! and that would include Trump!

It seems based on the history of Thai government they are more interest in ending the declaration since it doesn't bring them any money having to use the bank method letter or showing or forcing everyone to open Thai bank accounts and have their pension deposited into their banks is more of the goal or objective.

Edited by thailand49
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

As an American I am cofused?  So The British Embassy is now announcing the future actions of the American Embassy? I have an appointment next to get the Income Affidavit.  Should I cancel my appointment?  

Edited by sqwakvfr
Grammar
  • Haha 2
Posted

This should be fun to watch.  Sorta like a slow-motion train-wreak as the Thai government and the UK/US governments put their retirees into a Catch-22 bind. 
Thai government: "We only accept embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - go home."
UK/US governments: "We will not issue an embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - come home! We'll take good care of you.  Honest."

  • Haha 2
Posted
45 minutes ago, GruenJD said:

I have seen a number of comment posts that seem to think that this mess is all the fault of the British Embassy.  But not exactly. Back in May of this year, Thai Immigration met with representatives of several Foreign Embassies in Bkk. Thai Immigration officials insisted that the Foreign Embassies verify the accuracy of the financial information in the Embassy Income Letter / Sworn Income Affidavit / Statutory Declaration., etc.  This was not a new rule, but as often is the case - it was just not enforced. They had just begun to insist on complying with an old never before enforced rule. 

 

For at least 10-12 years or longer the Foreign Embassies have been proccessing these documents that were to be used in processing "retirement" and "marriage" Extensions of Stay for Expats. But they were in no way verifying the accuracy of the financial content of the submissions Even though the British Embassy did require bank or pension documents, etc. to be presented. However, these documents were never really examined more than in a cursory manner.  At the American Embassy no documents in evidence were never required - ever!

Bottomline to this Thai Immigration Officials had to have known all these years that no validation or verification was being done.  To pretend otherwise is balderdash. Foreign Embassies do not routinely verify, validate or investigate documents - especially repetitive documents as these financial submissions. Most times only the ID of the Signatory is checked and the Expat swears the document is correct and true (at least at the American Embassy - I know first hand).

Embassies do not have an investigative element to verify the content of hundreds and thousands of documents each year.  To do so would be a big burden. 

Thai Immigration instigated this change in rule enforcement.  The Embassies are saying that they cannot be responsible for verification (for reasons stated above) AND had never really been doing anything but stamping documents before with a Notary Stamp to verify ID and Statement of the Signatory.

You are correct but if you can't believe the Embassy who are you going to believe? 

Are any of the foreign Embassy asking or telling the Thai government your stamp is worthless whenever it appears before a foreign Embassy?

 

  • Like 1
Posted
As an American I am cofused?  So The British Embassy is now announcing the future actions of the American Embassy? I have an appointment next to get the Income Affidavit.  Should I cancel my appointment?  
"Yes we are aware that the US embassy will also be stopping their notarised income letter.  Please contact them directly for further information"

I can't see why they would make that up. It's also very strange they would volunteer that information before an announcement
  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, connda said:

This should be fun to watch.  Sorta like a slow-motion train-wreak as the Thai government and the UK/US governments put their retirees into a Catch-22 bind. 
Thai government: "We only accept embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - go home."
UK/US governments: "We will not issue an embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - come home! We'll take good care of you.  Honest."

They weren't confirming anything anyway, Thai immigration are correct, what they now need to do as I said in my previous post is review the whole income proof process as it was not fit for purpose anyway 

Posted
19 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

You seem to missing the point that lots of folks don't have their pension payments deposited into Thai banks for a variety of reasons, and instead have them put into their home country accounts.

 

Lots of entities won't do direct deposits into foreign banks. And, even if the pensioner wants to do the transfer themselves, doing an international wire into Thailand every month just to satisfy Immigration is likely to cost hundreds of dollars in banks fees per year.

Well not actually correct nowadays.  Transfers are very cheap or even free today.  For example using Barclays Bank in the UK with their Internet Banking service you can transfer Sterling direct to your Thai Bank Account for free with just a flat £8 charge levied by the Thai end of the transfer, and this is for whatever amount you want to transfer up to a very high limit I believe that is far in exces than even the highest of normal UK monthly pension income.

 

Yes it used to cost a flat £25 or more plus bank charges this end, but those days have ended now using Internet Banking. With the expanding mainstream banking use of highly efficient Block Chain technology (as used with crypto currencies) money transfers across the World are becoming virtually free and almost instantaneous. 

Posted

The U.S. Embassy has never actually verified income.  I remember the first time I did my income 'verifcation' I brought printouts of my monthly pension income to show the embassy staff and they didn't even glance at it.  They basically just okayed whatever I put as my income on their form.   

  • Like 2
Posted
5 minutes ago, connda said:

This should be fun to watch.  Sorta like a slow-motion train-wreak as the Thai government and the UK/US governments put their retirees into a Catch-22 bind. 
Thai government: "We only accept embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - go home."
UK/US governments: "We will not issue an embassy notarized confirmation of income.  If you don't have 800K to deposit - come home! We'll take good care of you.  Honest."

Yours is a very good post because it is "like a very slow motion train wreck"

 

But don't blame it on the embassies,

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

"...Earlier this week the Canadian Embassy in Bangkok confirmed no change to its current process..."

 

Great to be Canadian, eh?

 

My sympathies to the Brits and the Yanks..

Why ?  Maybe it is time to move on,  and treat this place with the little regard it deserves.   Time to smell some roses elsewhere. 

Edited by yellowboat
  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...