Jump to content

UK Pensions (2018)


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, evadgib said:

They are opposing it on the basis there are possibly 3 million extra voters and the extra costs and strain on resources. Where is the huge extra cost? You can enrole online and I guess there will be some small extra cost every X years around election time. Hardly a show stopper based on the fact that they could afford to spend over 9mil on their Brexit propaganda through everyone's door.

 

Den 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, denby45 said:

They are opposing it on the basis there are possibly 3 million extra voters and the extra costs and strain on resources. Where is the huge extra cost? You can enrole online and I guess there will be some small extra cost every X years around election time. Hardly a show stopper based on the fact that they could afford to spend over 9mil on their Brexit propaganda through everyone's door.

 

Den 

The consortium say the case is waiting to pass through the House of Lords.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know if anyone noticed but pensioners allowance for the current financial year went up by I think 650 pounds so all pleased with that but next year there is no increase, that's for basic tax payers. It seems the new PM will increase the allowance for high income payers so I and I am sure many will await the new Chancellor's Autumn Statement hoping we have not been forgotten, we lower paid basic tax payers. Never liked Hammond or Osborne both could easily have a received a large wet fish to the head for their concern!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

theoldgit

 

I was going to make the same point. It appears that they are allowing for the possibility of new reciprocal agreements. Includng one with Thailand?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, billzant said:

theoldgit

 

I was going to make the same point. It appears that they are allowing for the possibility of new reciprocal agreements. Includng one with Thailand?

The issue is that reciprocal agreements are not one dimensional. They are not solely about pension uprating but cover the whole aspect of Social Security .

The last time Thailand requested such an agreement the UK rejected it on the basis that Thailands SS was not comparable to the Uk.

Posted
5 hours ago, cleopatra2 said:

The issue is that reciprocal agreements are not one dimensional. They are not solely about pension uprating but cover the whole aspect of Social Security .

The last time Thailand requested such an agreement the UK rejected it on the basis that Thailands SS was not comparable to the Uk.

If HMG rolls over in relation to Brits in the EU post Brexit they won't have a leg to stand on re Brits living in the RotW.

  • Like 2
Posted

I see a Gov think tank is recommending a rise in retirement age to 70 by 2028, and 75 by 2038.  

 

You have to laugh, if it happens it would mean I've been bounced up twice!  It's just random chance, but I don't think today's pensioners realize they've lived in a golden age.

 

  • Like 1
Posted

I think you'll find that the cut off dates for receiving your pension at 67 have already been fixed.

 

Any further increase would be for those born at a later date.

 

Not 100% but I believe the cut off for 67 years old was being born before 1st April 1970. That date rings a bell as I only made it by a couple of weeks.

Posted
On 8/21/2019 at 9:51 AM, sandyf said:

Nothing new there. I paid 49 complete years and one incomplete year of about 4 months, from April till my 65th birthday in August.

Yes, but at least you got to retire at 65. 

 

Imagine now having to wait another 5 years, and even 10.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
5 hours ago, mommysboy said:

Yes, but at least you got to retire at 65. 

 

Imagine now having to wait another 5 years, and even 10.

 

 

What happened to me is irrelevant.

You stated in a previous post "There is now the real prospect ..............", the prospect has not just arisen, it has been around for a long time.

When the 2016 reforms were first proposed it was fairly obvious the the governments intention was to push people down the route of providing their own pension. When my son started work about 10 years ago I said to him he should be thinking about providing for his retirement but he just shrugged it off.

There are some on this forum enjoying occupational/private pensions that have been quite critical of people of my age not doing more to provide for the future when pensions were reformed in the 80's. I am quite prepared to admit they were right and the younger generations need to wake up to current reality rather than what may or may not happen.

 

It doesn't take much working out. The new state pension is around £8767 a year and yet the government tells visa applicants they need £18,600 a year to live on. Even if the pension age remained at 65 what you would get would be inadequate without some personal provision. Tell people they have to wait a bit longer and you enhance the incentive to increase that provision.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, sandyf said:

t doesn't take much working out. The new state pension is around £8767 a year and yet the government tells visa applicants they need £18,600 a year to live on. Even if the pension age remained at 65 what you would get would be inadequate without some personal provision. Tell people they have to wait a bit longer and you enhance the incentive to increase that provision.

They tell applicants they need 18,600 pounds for two people to live on, the pension only covers one person.

If your foreign wife had her own pension of 8,700 pounds there would hardly be any problem.

 

Anyway, hardly worthwhile a Brit man saving for a pension these days, his wife will get half of it when she divorces him.

Posted
40 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

They tell applicants they need 18,600 pounds for two people to live on, the pension only covers one person.

If your foreign wife had her own pension of 8,700 pounds there would hardly be any problem.

 

Anyway, hardly worthwhile a Brit man saving for a pension these days, his wife will get half of it when she divorces him.

I thought it fairly obvious that "visa applicants" would mean 2 people, not being specific, just an indication of disparity. If you want to be more specific the married state pension is £13,436.

I wasn't aware that foreign pensions were considered as allowable income, not that it matters no real relationship to UK pensions.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

They tell applicants they need 18,600 pounds for two people to live on, the pension only covers one person.

If your foreign wife had her own pension of 8,700 pounds there would hardly be any problem.

 

Anyway, hardly worthwhile a Brit man saving for a pension these days, his wife will get half of it when she divorces him.

My ex wife got none of my pensions.

 

Everything else, yes, but not my pensions.

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...