Jump to content

Health insurance mandatory for long-stay foreigners in Thailand


webfact

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Searat7 said:

I cannot believe the number of mindless postings on this thread debating the meaning of renewal vs. extension of stay . Enough!


Sent from my iPad using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

Since stay or go for many and the happiness and security of thousands of lives depend on the meaning of the word perhaps you could clarify the definition as meant by the two Thai people who have been translated and quoted.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, marcusarelus said:

Easy way to find out.  Call him up and ask him if he meant extension.  

Some here are totally sure, not up to them to call the guy as there is no reason to.

 

On the other hand the skeptics/the ones in panic, should.

 

Even take the necessary steps to get an insurance now.


The price to pay to be suspicious.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, luckyluke said:

Some here are totally sure, not up to them to call the guy as there is no reason to.

 

On the other hand the skeptics/the ones in panic, should.

 

Even take the necessary steps to get an insurance now.


The price to pay to be suspicious.

Journalists should not be skeptics and trust everything and everyone and not ask for clarification of dubious words and meanings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, marcusarelus said:

Journalists should not be skeptics and trust everything and everyone and not ask for clarification of dubious words and meanings.

You misunderstand the role of the modern journalist. Nowadays someone takes the press release issued by a company/politician and simply regurgitates it.  It cuts down on the need for human intervention, also known as "cost savings". A true journalist is more conscientious and not only sometimes alters the order of the sentences in the press release but even adds a few words of their own. This is known as "adding value"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^^

That's up to them, each in particular.
Maybe in this case it was so clear in the mind of  the journalist that he was convinced that further questions weren't necessary.

On the other hand each reader may have his own interpretation and act ( or not) accordingly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, nongsung said:

I’m already very edgy regarding the 800.000 /400.000 rule because I think it is not fair when you compare it with monthly 65.000THB.

So why don't you use the 65'000B income method rather that the 800'000B in bank method? :ermm:

Many people on this forum not stopping to say that retirees "now have to keep 800'000B in the bank" when in fact it's only one of 3 options to get extension.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Pattaya46 said:

So why don't you use the 65'000B income method rather that the 800'000B in bank method? :ermm:

Many people on this forum not stopping to say that retirees "now have to keep 800'000B in the bank" when in fact it's only one of 3 options to get extension.

Unfortunately I have no 65.000THB per month (yet). At the end of this year one pension kicks in but that will be lower than 65K. How much lower I don’t know yet. Still money will be locked up then. Then in 2021 another pension starts and then, only then I should be able to use the 65K option (or whatever the new requirements are then)

Edited by nongsung
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pattaya46 said:

"now have to keep 800'000B in the bank" when in fact it's only one of 3 options to get extension.

Correct, I personally can not put 800000 in a Thai bank account.

But I still can use a Letter of Income, which I do.

I also transfer more than the equivalent of 65000 per month to Thailand, bur I don't use this option for my extension, as I don't have to.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just wondering what percentage of those Farang not paying their hospital bills actually have AO Visas or even O Visas??
My guess it's probably mostly tourists that don't pay their Medical bills so they haven't thought this through much.

Or maybe they have just get the Farang retirees to foot the bill for the Tourist Farang.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ivor bigun said:

All this bickering ,ime right your wrong,no ime right your wrong.
Just say my dads bigger than your dad,and leave it at that.
Your acting like kids anyway.

Sent from my SM-A720F using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

Don't know what you are talking about.  I'm just trying to motivate someone to get a simple answer to a big question - will extensions be forced to have out patient 40k insurance.  It is quite important to me and my family.  I don't know why all the hoopla about such a simple request. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, marcusarelus said:

Don't know what you are talking about.  I'm just trying to motivate someone to get a simple answer to a big question - will extensions be forced to have out patient 40k insurance.  It is quite important to me and my family.  I don't know why all the hoopla about such a simple request. 

No one knows for sure but some say they do. hence the hoopla

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was always a requirement that a _resident_ in Thailand has a valid health insurance. The only thing new is: now they put it on the visa requirements. Guess why they do that? Because you guys ignore the law and have no health insurance ... super simple. But again: it is the Thais fault ...

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On this very moment the requirements for a O-A visum on the Royal Thai Embassy do not note the mandatory health insurance?

What will happen if one request a O-A visa tomorrow with all other documents without the insurance?

See copy

 

2. Required Documents

- Passport with validity of not less than 18 months

- 3 copies of completed visa application forms

- 3 passport-sized photos (3.5 x 4.5 cm) of the applicant taken within the past six months

- A personal data form

- Confirmed ticket paid in full

- A copy of bank statement showing a deposit of the amount equal to and not less than 800,000 Baht or an income certificate (an original copy) with a monthly income of not less than 65,000 Baht, or a deposit account plus a monthly income totalling not less than 800,000 Baht

- In the case of submitting a bank statement, a letter of guarantee from the bank (an original copy) is required.

- An English Extract from the birth registration (verification shall be valid for not more than three months and should be notarised by notary organs or the applicant’s diplomatic or consular mission)

- An English Extract from the register of population (verification shall be valid for not more than three months and should be notarised by notary organs or the applicant’s diplomatic or consular mission)

- A letter of verification issued from the country of his or her nationality or residence stating that the applicant has no criminal record (verification shall be valid for not more than three months and should be notarised by notary organs or the applicant’s diplomatic or consular mission)

- A medical certificate issued from the country where the application is submitted, showing no prohibitive diseases as indicated in the Ministerial Regulation No.14 (B.E. 2535) (certificate shall be valid for not more than three months and should be notarised by notary organs or the applicant’s diplomatic or consular mission)

Consular officers reserve the rights to request additional documents as deemed necessary.

In the case where the accompanying spouse is not eligible to apply for the Category ‘O-A’ (Long Stay) visa, he or she will be considered for temporary stay under Category ‘O’ visa.  A marriage certificate must be provided as evidence and should be notarised by notary organs or by the applicant’s diplomatic or consular mission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Enki said:

It was always a requirement that a _resident_ in Thailand has a valid health insurance. The only thing new is: now they put it on the visa requirements. Guess why they do that? Because you guys ignore the law and have no health insurance ... super simple. But again: it is the Thais fault ...

But are we residents, or are we visitors with an extension to stay, only good for a year? If we are residents why can't we buy into the same insurance scheme available to other Thai residents ?

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Marius Brok said:

...

What will happen if one request a O-A visa tomorrow with all other documents without the insurance? 

The requirement won't take effect until 1 July at the earliest. So you can apply now without it. We don't even know for sure yet whether it will actually take effect in July, but definitely not right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personal experience from a "Trip" last night... 

 

Tripped coming out of the BTS & banged my head (lots of blood), trip to Sukumvit hospital, no passport no questions/checks on insurance, just treated & guided to the cashier on exit (15K paid on my credit card).

 

Head hurts like a bitch this morning & despite me repeatedly telling them "No Stitches" I can feel where they've given me 2-3 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, sirineou said:

But are we residents, or are we visitors with an extension to stay, only good for a year? If we are residents why can't we buy into the same insurance scheme available to other Thai residents ?

You can buy private health insurance just like Thais.  And being a resident is not the same as being a citizen.  However, Thai citizens have no need to buy private health insurance because as Thai citizens they are covered for free under the Thailand national health program/30 baht program.  Now many Thais do buy extra private health insurance to supplement their 30 baht program coverage, but they are just doing that because they don't want to deal with the 30 baht program or don't like govt hospital...that's OK....it's their choice if they want to pay out of pocket for private insurance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Mike Teavee said:

Personal experience from a "Trip" last night... 

 

Tripped coming out of the BTS & banged my head (lots of blood), trip to Sukumvit hospital, no passport no questions/checks on insurance, just treated & guided to the cashier on exit (15K paid on my credit card).

 

Head hurts like a bitch this morning & despite me repeatedly telling them "No Stitches" I can feel where they've given me 2-3 

 

Probably needed stitches to securely hold the GPS transmitter in case you skipped out without payment.    But getting the transmitter removed will cost another 15K but prepaid.  ????

 

Seriously, hope you get well soon.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Mike Teavee said:

Personal experience from a "Trip" last night... 

 

Tripped coming out of the BTS & banged my head (lots of blood), trip to Sukumvit hospital, no passport no questions/checks on insurance, just treated & guided to the cashier on exit (15K paid on my credit card).

 

Head hurts like a bitch this morning & despite me repeatedly telling them "No Stitches" I can feel where they've given me 2-3 

 

Jut to point out a few stitches usually cost around 250bht in Thailand.

You've been well overcharged.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pib said:

Probably needed stitches to securely hold the GPS transmitter in case you skipped out without payment.    But getting the transmitter removed will cost another 15K but prepaid.  ????

 

Seriously, hope you get well soon.

Very expensive 2/3 stitches ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2019 at 5:42 PM, marcusarelus said:

"Current holders of this visa will have to produce proof of their health insurance for visa renewal"

 

Visa renewal = Extension.

I don't understand how any current holder of a Non-Imm OA would need to renew anything, other than his Permission to Stay Stamp by doing a Visa Run. That was my thought, using the Visa in it's last month or so after July, one may be asked wrt Medical Insurance at the border/airport.

 

The Visa renewal=Extension is conjecture. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2019 at 7:23 PM, Jingthing said:

Yes, we have not seen any press release that explicitly suggests or hints that extensions for people that started with an O visa (rather than an O-A) may be under this new requirement.

And that would be silly. An extension of the Permission to Stay for 12 months has the same terms and conditions irrespective of the original Visa. In fact the requirement simply states a Non-Imm O Visa. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does only these nations is acceptable for O-A visa type:

(1) Japanese (2) Australia (3) Kingdom of Denmark (4) Republic of Finland

(5) Republic of France (6) Federal Republic of Germany (7) Republic of Italy (8) Kingdom The Netherlands

(9) The Kingdom of Norway (10) The Kingdom of Sweden (11) Swiss Confederation

(12) United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (13) Canada and (14) United States of America?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2019 at 8:13 PM, marcusarelus said:

I think the point is the guy said renew an O-A visa.  So either you think he knows absolutely nothing or he meant extension.  Which is the more likely state of absence knowledge of Visas?

As Mr Nattawuth is from the Health Service Support Department that is quite possible on the subject of Visas, Renewals, Extensions etc. It is hardly intuitive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

I don't understand how any current holder of a Non-Imm OA would need to renew anything, other than his Permission to Stay Stamp by doing a Visa Run. That was my thought, using the Visa in it's last month or so after July, one may be asked wrt Medical Insurance at the border/airport.

 

The Visa renewal=Extension is conjecture.

Correct.  The statement  "The requirement applies to all new applicants for one-year non-immigrant O-A visas, and for those applying to “renew” their one-year permits-to-stay, Dr Natthawut Prasertsiripong, Chief of the MoPH Department of Health Service Support said.

 

Makes no sense unless renew means extension now does it?
 

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...