Jump to content

Health insurance mandatory for long-stay foreigners in Thailand


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, jlwilliamsjr18 said:

This is good for insurance companies, but for people over 65, it's not.  The funds needed 400-800 K is for that purpose.  Why double up.  NOW... it's important to note, equity has to play a role. There are schools and businesses that provide work permits, with no health insurance benefits. This is a fact. How many foreign laborers have health insurance?  Actually quite a few. They fall under the Thai national health insurance.  Why not offer that option to long stay retirees. Of course those who have the resources can pick other options. 

Too much logic. This is Thailand.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, bkk6060 said:

Ask your fellow expat low lifes who have not been paying their hospital bills...

And how many is that? I say it is primarily based on tourists who come and get hurt and then  can't pay. How many articles in the last few months have had a Jane or Ricky got hurt but can't pay their bills on holiday? How many expats have you heard of skipping out? Ofcourse there has to be some, but in all honesty it looks as if they are targeting over 50 retirees as a stick-it-to-ya clearing of the brush again. I myself am included in the over 50 as of now, but not retiree visa. If affordable and reasonable then ok I am fine, but it looks like an over 50 witch hunt of stick-it-to-ya as all foreigners are undesirable. Going to the USA now one requires you to have insurance. Why does Thailand think they are so special? If it does get too ridiculous I might move to Vietnam and then just visit my family here.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
19 minutes ago, 1DegreeN said:

If you follow the link from the longstay.tgia.org page to Viraya Insurance's website - https://www.viriyah.co.th/en/longstay-form.php#.XNoaJ44zZaQ it states that a Long Stay Visa is a 5 year visa - so perhaps this new rule is just for those with Elite visas and those of us on retirement/marriage extensions are covered by the income/money-in-the-bank requirement.

correct and soon to be a requirement for O-A visa obtained in home country

 

Extensions of stay already have their own financial requirements updated recently to include a minimum 12 month Thai bank balance of 400k baht 

 

People are reading too much into this and getting their wires crossed about what is being referred to in this topic

  • Like 2
Posted
48 minutes ago, travelerjim said:

Read again. .it is for those on LONG STAY....O-A and Extensions of Stay for retirement are included.

I must read it again then I was unaware of Extensions of Stay for retirement being mentioned.

I did see something about visas being renewed but I do not know which visas are renewed, thought you had to apply for a new one.

Posted

Something to take into account: the opd coverage is 2,000 bahts per time per day 20 to 40 times per year. It is usually not enough to cover a doctor's visit with some exams. And who goes 20 times per year to a doctor?

Also from my own experience, some insurances are not reliable.I used to get a health insurance from a famous bank and had to stay 3 nights in hospital,with their ok. Just before release, a hospital staff came to inform me that the company requested me to pay first, and "they would see later what they would pay ".

Very,very awkward situation where you are just taken hostage.

I had to pay but needless to say I didn't renew my policy.

There is no way you can sue an insurance company.

Posted
1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

You will get free NHS treatment if you can show that you have returned to the UK to live there.

And I was told that would be after you had returned to the UK for more than six months.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, brewsterbudgen said:

You will get free NHS treatment if you can show that you have returned to the UK to live there.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Correct

Posted

 They think they can do without foreigners. Very low IQ   the country is  in a total mess
 This is a bit over the top. Look to the Thai themselves. Do they have insurance? And with this high coverage? Or is it dual pricing?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, brewsterbudgen said:

You will get free NHS treatment if you can show that you have returned to the UK to live there.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

Yes, but then you don't live in Thailand.

 

I must admit I always had in the back of my mind that if I became seriously ill I could return to the UK or Denmark (where I lived for 20 years) for treatment and then come back to Thailand. Brexit messed up my Denmark plans. 

 

I don't have a home in UK, but I have have a brother I could stay with.

I also have children in Denmark, but I guess it won't be so easy to go there and get free treatment anymore.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Orac said:

 


Yes - the over 50 bit does imply just retirement extensions but not clear if they will include those of us on marriage extensions.


Sent from my iPad using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app

 

The wording seems very clear to me. "The non imm O-A"....

 

Of course they could have stated it wrong, or they could change their minds, or maybe that was not what they meant, or....

 

Based on the wording, I am betting at this point it wont apply to Non-imm O. 

Edited by utalkin2me
Posted

And now watch insurance premiums skyrocket! 

Saw the same thing happen in America. Insurance industry is going to clean up.

Milk them stupid old farangs is now Thailand Policy numero uno.. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Most over 70s can't get health insurance so does this mean a one way ticket back to home country to sleep in a tent? Let's hope things become more clearer in the next few days. Surely if you can show over 400,000 baht in addition to your other funds required to stay in Thailand and you can't get insurance this will be OK? 

Posted
Just now, peter14 said:

 They think they can do without foreigners. Very low IQ   the country is  in a total mess
 This is a bit over the top. Look to the Thai themselves. Do they have insurance? And with this high coverage? Or is it dual pricing?

Thai have free or subsidised medical, why would they need insurance.

Posted
1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

No you don't get my point. 

The amounts are low.

The outpatient requirement is BIZARRE. clearly for the insurance companies.

So you get a policy that excludes all preexisting conditions, most older people have multiple ones, you pay your money, and then you're not really covered.

DUH. 

Exactly,   Mega premiums,  Pre=existing conditions a get out of cover,  SO PAY FOR WHAT  ????  Over age...you are on a mega loser,    As previous stated --what is the 800,000  for  ?????

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, rodknock said:

i am 71 and a couple of quotes were 80,000 to 94,000baht.

this on top of my monthly 65,000baht for immigration

You mix up 2 different amounts, one is yearly, the other monthly.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, malibukid said:

the American government should step up to the plate and extend Medicare coverage to it's citizens abroad.  but as usual they will just throw us under the bus.  thanks to the Republicans. 

Never happen

 

You think the USA will extend coverage to a Junta ruled country?

You think they would trust the Thai billing?

 

I think it would not happen in our lifetime

Posted

I wonder what they will do if you have insurance in your own country but it does not apply internationally. 

 

I suppose they would make you get insurance. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, wwest5829 said:

I, like many expats I meet here from western countries, have moved to Thailand and other countries because we cannot afford to live or live a comfortable middle-class retirement in our own countries. That is the real result of 30-40 years of the economic squeeze on the working middle-class. 

Squeeze, as in a 4 trillion US$ per year health care industry for the US alone.

Posted
12 minutes ago, andygrr said:

So under 50's don't get sick of fall of motorbikes. Leave the long stayers alone who generally don't run away leaving unpaid medical bills and stop letting in tourists with no valid travel insurance they are the ones cost the hospitals. Also cap the charges set by private hospitals.

Their thinking may be the under 50's are on work permits with employer provided health care

 

But if not I would not expect them to be ignored for long...meaning ED visa etc

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

NO

 

Those that think it does are flat wrong....

Correct. Closest US territory would be Guam when I checked.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...