Jump to content

SURVEY: Time to start impeachment proceedings?


Scott

SURVEY: Time to start impeachment proceedings against Trump?  

225 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Since the release of Mueller's report and his public statement, which of the following most closely fits with your opinion?

 

Please feel free to leave a comment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, berrec said:

OMG the American people had their day in 2016 and voted for a candidate that was not of the typical Washington DC establishment to get the country moving again and take on the swamp and all those blood sucking politicians.

 

He has done what the Americans voters wanted him to do in spite of the deep state attempts to take him out.

 

Facts will always Trump fiction and fake news.

 

Give the guy some credit for his achievements.

 

Mueller’s investigation, a complete hoax fabricated on the insurance policy from the deep state... 

Except for the fact that Trump lost the popular vote by over 3 million.  So one should say that he was put in office by the Electoral College.....but he lost the popular vote.  That’s all I’m sayin’!  ;-)

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Haters gonna hate. 

Too bad there isn't a smidgen of evidence of ANY crime. 

It is a bona-fide witch hunt the likes of which have never been seen before in American politics. 

 

MAGA! ???? 

Love your sense of humour

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bubba45 said:

Yep, the establishment hates him.  How dare someone, not a politician, try to show them up?  And show them up he has.  Despite unprecedented opposition from both sides of the aisle, he's done more in 3+ years than most morons do in eight.  Let's hope he gets another four!   #MAGA

Yes. All those wealthy and powerful people he gave huge tax breaks to hate him. And all the big banks and Wall street investment firms that  now labor under lessened restrictions and are once again to crash the American economy just hate him. Not to mention the most that part of the economy most hugely favored by Trump' tax bill: owners of real estate empires.

Edited by bristolboy
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since impeachment is both a political and a legal action, it is appropriate to take into account the political consequences to the extent that one can foresee them, which many not be much.  But since it is also a legal action, the Dems will be forced in the end to initiate impeachment proceedings or else they will become complicit in Trump's attack on the rule of law.  

 

But since we know that impeachment will not result in Trump's removal from office by the Senate, it is fair to ask why initiate a fight we will lose.  The reason is live testimony before the tv cameras in the Congress.  In the Watergate era, the report of the Special Prosecutor was not made public.  For the public the impeachment of Nixon began with John Dean's testimony to the Ervin committee in which he accused Nixon of crimes he had witnessed.  A string of similar John Dean moments coming from McGahn, Hicks, Mueller, and others is essential to apprise the American public of Trump's extensive criminal activities.  Only then will the process begin.

 

So, Nadler and the other committee chairmen have to use maximum force to prevent Trump from succeeding in suppressing the public testimony.  They should impose $50k fines per day for not answering a subpoena and put in jail those who persist under Congress's inherent contempt powers, which are not subject to a presidential pardon.  They will crack.  Nadler doesn't need to launch an impeachment inquiry in particular to conduct such an investigation.  He can do it right now and should.

 

It now looks like Pelosi's slow-walking of impeachment is actually due to the fact that she doesn't have the votes to pass a motion to launch an impeachment inquiry because the Dems from purple districts are afraid of the backlash.  When public testimony changes public opinion the willingness of Dem reps to go nuclear may change also.

 

By the way, if the House were to pass articles of impeachment I expect McConnell simply to refuse to conduct the required trial in the Senate.  The Constitution specifies that

 

The Senate shall have sole power to try impeachments.

 

But this text does not impose an obligation on the Senate to do so.  When McConnell considers his options to shut down impeachment, refusing the trial affords him the option of squelching public testimony.  So, I think this is the route he will take.  The Dems will howl, but that never bothered him in the past.

 

The goal is to put a Dem in the White House by winning the election rather than trying to get to 67 votes in the Senate.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...