Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Was travelling to Phitsanulok the other day over the mountains Cow kau. Two very small bikes going hell for leather. I was doing at least 110-120kmh and these things past me like I was standing still. One was an old Yamaha Spark....a Yamaha Click type bike and a Honda Sonic. I think they are a 110 2 stroke. Absolute maniacs these two. Weaving in and out of speeding traffic. They were travelling downhill even faster. Both had those stupid bicycle rims too....must be rated about 50kmh.

 

How do they get these things going so fast? My first thought was nitrous but they were travelling fast over extended periods, not just short bursts. I don't even like driving a Honda Wave over 60km an hour they are just too light and flighty. How these guys had any control over these with the little cheese cutter wheels I will never know. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Kenny202 said:

One was an old Yamaha Spark....a Yamaha Click type bike and a Honda Sonic. I think they are a 110 2 stroke.

All three bikes you mention are 4-stroke.

Spark 135cc

Sonic 125cc

papa had a Spark would show 13o++.

Sonics are very prone to tuning.

Yamaha Click?

very rare.

  • Like 2
Posted
23 minutes ago, papa al said:

Yamaha Click?

very rare.

He said a 'Yamaha Click type bike' Papa. Probably a GT125. They look very similar.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

It's easy to understand why 80% of RTA deaths are young males on motorcycles.

The good news, if there was any, was that his head was firmly encompassed in his helmet so easy to pick up.  Horrific but that's how it is in these circumstances.  

Posted
20 minutes ago, Moonlover said:

He said a 'Yamaha Click type bike' Papa. Probably a GT125. They look very similar.

Was a Spark. Theyre a Yamaha right? I mentioned Click because it looked like that sort of bike. Older spark too

  • Confused 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, KhunBENQ said:

My Google says:

Sonic 150 cc (at least since 2018).

6-speed, 132 km/h max (one video says so)

 

When you watch it until the end you can see the guy saying" reu hoksip..That's 160 km/h..

 

  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Isaanbiker said:

When you watch it until the end you can see the guy saying" reu hoksip..That's 160 km/h..

 

164kmh - very impressive. 
Disappointing lack of ‘skid gear’ (leathers).

 

On the Op: if he was going 120km and the scooters passed him so quickly how did her observe them for so long? 
 

They pass, they’re gone - it’s a 5-10 second thing before they’re out of sight if they are going so fast. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

164kmh - very impressive. 
Disappointing lack of ‘skid gear’ (leathers).

 

On the Op: if he was going 120km and the scooters passed him so quickly how did her observe them for so long? 
 

They pass, they’re gone - it’s a 5-10 second thing before they’re out of sight if they are going so fast. 

Very impressive are his rear brakes. They don't exist and it would be too much weight. It's frightening on such a thingy to ride 164.

 

  It's even on my 1100 cc bike pretty fast. 

  • Like 1
Posted

These bikes especially Honda Sonic can go extremely fast if they are modified correctly. Sadly it is youth culture and many of them get killed.

Posted
1 hour ago, richard_smith237 said:

How much do the rear brakes benefit stopping when at speed?

 

I have always figured nearly all the stopping power comes from the front brake, while obviously using both rear and front brake improves stopping distance. 

I guess it varies from bike to bike... I reckon about 90% front, 10% rear. 

That depends on if it's a rear brake with a disc and pads or one with a drum and shoes.  

 

I teach my students about brakes because too many of them crash on scooters with two brake levers. On these scooters, the front disc brake might deliver 65 to 75 %, and the rear drum does "the rest."

 

  If it's raining and you pull the front brake only, the front tire will slip away, and you crash.

 

Unfortunately, it is one of the causes of too many motorbike accidents nationwide.  

 

And many of them end deadly because people don't wear helmets. 

 

  Most riders don't even know what lever is for what brake.

 

 In countries where people have to make a real driver's license, they will learn that, but not here.


Neither the students know how their motorbike brakes work, nor do their teachers.

 

It should be part of the Thai curriculum to teach them safely on bikes. It's not enough to say TIT!

 

  

 

  

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

It's what young men - and some women do.

It's what I did at that age.

The amount of risk you are willing to accept changes with your age.

Youth has a much higher threshold.

And reading some of the posts here some members sure seemed to live a Namby Pamby Life - now and in their youth

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Isaanbiker said:

That depends on if it's a rear brake with a disc and pads or one with a drum and shoes.  

 

I teach my students about brakes because too many of them crash on scooters with two brake levers. On these scooters, the front disc brake might deliver 65 to 75 %, and the rear drum does "the rest."

 

  If it's raining and you pull the front brake only, the front tire will slip away, and you crash.

 

Unfortunately, it is one of the causes of too many motorbike accidents nationwide.  

 

And many of them end deadly because people don't wear helmets. 

 

  Most riders don't even know what lever is for what brake.

 

 In countries where people have to make a real driver's license, they will learn that, but not here.


Neither the students know how their motorbike brakes work, nor do their teachers.

 

It should be part of the Thai curriculum to teach them safely on bikes. It's not enough to say TIT!

 

The above bike is for racing. Racing like 100% acceleration or 100% braking.

I had a Honda VFR400 with very good front disc brakes. When braking hard it was almost useless to use the rear brake because the rear wheel often didn't even touch the ground. That's racing...

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

How much do the rear brakes benefit stopping when at speed?

 

I have always figured nearly all the stopping power comes from the front brake, while obviously using both rear and front brake improves stopping distance. 

I guess it varies from bike to bike... I reckon about 90% front, 10% rear. 

It's generally reckoned that between 60/40% and 70/30% is the appropriate balance between front and rear braking effort. The purpose of having balanced braking is to reduce the risk of the rear wheel lifting  off and destabilizing the bike. It's the reason why I like Honda's combi braking system, although an experienced rider knows what pressure to apply almost by instinct.

 

There is, of course also a legal reason for front and rear brakes, in that all motor vehicles must have 2 independent braking systems.

 

Drag racers, of course, don't need to be street legal, so they can dispense with the rear brake to keep the weight down.

Posted
11 hours ago, torturedsole said:

Nice lad but speed kills.

Stupidity  kills speed  doesnt  or we'd all be dead right now, every plane you fly on or  planet  you  live on is speeding

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, canthai55 said:

And reading some of the posts here some members sure seemed to live a Namby Pamby Life - now and in their youth

and  many of  those  youths are  now dead

  • Confused 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...