Jump to content

UK on track to become one of Europe's worst hit in COVID-19 pandemic


Recommended Posts

Posted
12 hours ago, CharlieH said:

This is not correct the article clearly states the care homes etc are included

 

" including a fast-rising toll in care homes"

 

Read the article again. The 20,000+ is hospitals only.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, flossie35 said:

Read the article again. The 20,000+ is hospitals only.

Not correct, "deaths from COVID-19 had already topped 20,000 by April 17, including a fast-rising toll in care homes". What is confusing is that now these numbers are only up to April 17, when about the same numbers have been released for later, but only for hospital deaths.

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

From the OP:

 

“According to figures released by the health ministry on Monday, 21,092 people had died in hospitals across the United Kingdom after testing positive for COVID-19.”

 

Also refer my post at #30.

Yes, that's what confusing, they're throwing around numbers for hospital deaths up until recently, and numbers for combined deaths till April 17.

  • Like 2
Posted
13 hours ago, baansgr said:

Probably more to do with no inbound flight restrictions and tens of thousands of people from anywhere in the world arriving everyday without so much as a temperature check...UK has always like importing goods but that's taking it too far....not to mention all the lefty students haveing booze parties with cuddles galore plastered all over Facebook.

Too late on everything.wouldn't mind they had Italy as a example .other countries couldn't believe why uk took so long was it a lazy government or stupid 

  • Like 2
Posted
12 minutes ago, Gilltom said:

Too late on everything.wouldn't mind they had Italy as a example .other countries couldn't believe why uk took so long was it a lazy government or stupid 

It was not laziness, it was a deliberate policy to perform a herd immunity experiment.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It was not laziness, it was a deliberate policy to perform a herd immunity experiment.

And to try and protect the economy. 

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, stevenl said:

EU has nothing to do with this.

I'm sorry.

 

I misread Europe as the EU.

 

14 hours ago, Phulublub said:

One of us is misreading this....the UK may be leaving the EU, it will remain as part of Europe.

 

The bigger - and much more important error is that UK recorded covid deaths at 20,000+ are ONLY those who die in hospital.  All those in Care Homes and the wdier community are not (yet) included.

 

PH

 

Sorry, my bad

 

It was me misreading Europe as the EU.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Well done new zealand. They had complete lockdown and have beaten the virus and are opening up.

 

Those pesky kiwis do it again. Always ahead.

  • Like 2
Posted

That's indeed horrible figures. 

However I wonder that nobody asks WHY???? 

There are a lot of reasons for it as

1. A stupid PM, not capable to      manage UK

2. No money for NHS

3. Sent nurses and doctors back their home country

are there more reasons? ????

  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
Posted

Herd immunity, foot and mouth, all indicative of Tories propensity to cull. Good job Jabba the hut and Darth Vader got Covid as otherwise we'll all be for the chop!

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

The reason the UK has been so badly affected by CV 19 is because it has one of the highest, if not the highest density of populations in Europe. England has by far the largest population of the nations who make up the UK and of those nations England has also been the most affected by the virus.

 

From the U.K. Population (2020) - Worldometer 

 

"England has become the most crowded major nation in Europe, official figures have revealed. The number of people living in England has overtaken the population density of Holland, which has traditionally been the most densely-populated major nation on the continent"

 

Thanks solely to its totally irresponsible immigration policies over the last 70 years.

Ignoring your last paragraph, your opinion without any support, the rest of your argument could be correct. If so, there should be much higher infection rate in London, Birmingham etc than outside of the cities. You have any numbers to support your contention?

  • Like 1
Posted

During WWII US service men destined for stationing in UK as part of their indoctrination were told that "Britain" is very densely populated. 

 

This is not news.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

Unsurprisingly,  considering the slow reaction.

On a par with the US for poor preparations.

It was not a slow reaction, it was a deliberate policy to allow the virus to spread in the UK.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

A direct consequence of allowing the virus to spread in a callous herd immunity experiment.

 

Would never have been allowed in a socialist people's republic. Just look at how well North Korea and Venezuela are doing. 

 

Power to the people!

  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...