Jump to content

Thailand reports daily record of over 2,000 COVID-19 cases, 4 new deaths


Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

You have problems with understanding? I say that if local transmissions is high, then liberal entry restrictions are reasonable. This means that if the infection rate in country is high already, there is little point to tight control the bring-in cases. This factor will be minor compared to local transmission.

 

Seems maths and science are not Your stong side, man ????

Oh ye have no true understanding Sir of my background, but that does not matter.  What you are proposing will just allow the numbers to blossom upwards and for the deaths to skyrocket more.  I guess you would be happy with that just so you could conduct business.  On your way lad times a wasting, Government House awaits your presence in front of the CCSA since you have a clear plan for opening up the country 100% so money can be made.

 

This post contains a smattering of sarcasm, mixed with a smattering of truth.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Nismooo said:

Do you really think you would make up for that by opening up the borders? No

 

I am not talking on opening the borders to mass tourism at this stage. I am talking about opening for business travellers first.

Many businesses are suffering - quarantine requirement is a barrier. If no travel, no contracts and no jobs - that's simple. Factories are shutting down.

 

International arrivals come with test certificate, and now also with vaccination. Risk is low comared to local tranmisions and illegal migrations.

The government should not try to eliminmate all cases, this is practically impossible. They should try to mitigate the situation.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

You have problems with understanding? I say that if local transmissions is high, then liberal entry restrictions are reasonable. This means that if the infection rate in country is high already, there is little point to tight control the bring-in cases. This factor will be minor compared to local transmission.

 

Seems maths and science are not Your stong side, man ????

I think I get it, its called adding fuel to the fire right?

  • Haha 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

Exaclty, no control over migrants, and no testing for them. This is confirmed by December spike of infections.

Was that migrants or was it the Thai's returning from Mynmar?

Posted
Just now, Bkk Brian said:

Was that migrants or was it the Thai's returning from Mynmar?

Both. But the problem is the same - low control over the border.

People just ignore entry measures as they are too complicated.

Posted
1 hour ago, Marvin Hagler said:

I do really think the government have no real idea what the situation is or how to manage it. 

That's what happens when you appoint generals and not experts in positions

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Amdesign said:

Accept vaccinated travellers with tests, without quarantine. Risk is marginal, as from the statistics above. Start from business travellers first.

 

All variants will be here anyway. Thailand is not a island. People cross the border in jungle, hundreds of them every day. Due to severe enty restrictions migrants enter illegally, thus out of any control. Reducing the restrctions would allow to regain the control, this is quite clear...

 

This virus with its variants will stay and will not go away for years. Economics is of not less importance than health concerns.

 

Quarantine is essential, not testing. Testing 3 days before travel can't stop covid entering a country. Covid can be undetectable up to 6 days after infection. Thailand's quarantine successfully stopped a dozen cases of the UK variant before it snuck in from Cambodia.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

 I guess you would be happy with that just so you could conduct business. 

 

The money from business are needed to survide in the COVID crisis. For a person it does not matter if they die from the virus or from starving.

Thus, someone should understand and manage the risks in reasonable way.

 

Those who used to spend all time drinking in bar are only concerned about alcohol sales ban... ????

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Amdesign said:

Both. But the problem is the same - low control over the border.

People just ignore entry measures as they are too complicated.

Either way whats needed now is a full lockdown. You talk about risk management, there you have it, contain the risk as soon as possible to get it over with as soon as possible, in tandem with the vaccines so we can get out of this mess. Forget vigilante border controls, it would be perfect but not in the corruption fueled border control police.

Posted (edited)

Today's English language televised COVID update from the government runs about 17 minutes.

 

04-23-21i.jpg.30894d731fa7cbc30a31b71155dd6b48.jpg

 

https://www.facebook.com/thailandprd/videos/582090193183940/

 

And, the 20+ pages of presentation slides used by the Ministry of Public Health today in their daily briefing can be found here:

 

https://www.facebook.com/informationcovid19/posts/311247777160220

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Posted
2 minutes ago, rabas said:

Thailand's quarantine successfully stopped a dozen cases of the UK variant before it snuck in from Cambodia.

Shame quarantining and testing did not stop Thais exporting it to Laos then. works both ways

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, rabas said:

 

Quarantine is essential, not testing. Testing 3 days before travel can't stop covid entering a country. Covid can be undetectable up to 6 days after infection. Thailand's quarantine successfully stopped a dozen cases of the UK variant before it snuck in from Cambodia.

You think of few possible cases, but not of risk management. 0.38% of al lcases are from international arrivals. This is very low risk compared to the local transmission.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Either way whats needed now is a full lockdown.

Lockdown is only needed if medical facilities are not sufficient to cover heavy cases. This is basic, from risk management side.

They need to look at infection rate per 100,000 population. In EU, if say 50 for 100,000 they impose a lockdown.

Edited by Amdesign
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

So your answer is to just throw caution to the wind, open up the borders

...

workers upon arrival and ensure they had no contact with others.

Tell this to factories which have closed down, and families left without income...

Test on arrival will help to bring illegal migration under control, and allow businesses to function.

  • Sad 1
Posted
Just now, Bkk Brian said:

You are wrong, lockdown is needed to avoid the hospitals being overwhelmed. 

 

This is basic risk management.

 

 

This is exactly what I am saying.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

I am not talking on opening the borders to mass tourism at this stage. I am talking about opening for business travellers first.

Many businesses are suffering - quarantine requirement is a barrier. If no travel, no contracts and no jobs - that's simple. Factories are shutting down.

 

International arrivals come with test certificate, and now also with vaccination. Risk is low comared to local tranmisions and illegal migrations.

The government should not try to eliminmate all cases, this is practically impossible. They should try to mitigate the situation.

 

Didnt Europe already try this? How did that work?

 

Also Thailand does not have the same resources as the european countries. 

 

I must agree to disagree with you on that one. 

 

”Test certificates”, well.

Everyone entering Thailand since October have had a so called ”negative test certificate”. Then why is it that there has been around 10-20 covid cases reported in quarantine basically every single day since then? The only time those numbers went down was after 1st April...

 

Vaccines, yes ok but do they work against the new mutations? Do they prevent people from spreading the virus? I can not say for sure, so why take the risk until we know more? Last time i checked people were getting vaccinated in other countries even before the new outbreak in Thailand anyway. 

 

Illegal immigrants, i can not comment on that though since i dont know enough about it unfortunally. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

The money from business are needed to survide in the COVID crisis. For a person it does not matter if they die from the virus or from starving.

Thus, someone should understand and manage the risks in reasonable way.

 

Those who used to spend all time drinking in bar are only concerned about alcohol sales ban... ????

So now you believe I sit in a bar all day drinking, what next, are you going to say I am a Sexpat.  If you believe this then you are truly deceived by your own mindset in believing your view is correct.  The Thai Government does believe they are managing the risks in an acceptable way.  I just do not agree with their testing philosophy.  Never sat in a bar in my life, successfully ran my own company as a CEO, but do to covid I closed up, laid off my employee's, gave them severance packages which were generous, and moved into retirement 100%.  Some of us made wise decisions while others did not and therefore finances matter more to others.  Enjoy your day, stay safe.

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Amdesign said:

You think of few possible cases, but not of risk management. 0.38% of al lcases are from international arrivals. This is very low risk compared to the local transmission.

I understand risk and probability well. We are discussing the introduction of a new dangerous variant. It does not come from local cases.

 

Lets look at real data.  12 times the UK variant tried to enter the country through quarantine since December. (see GISAID, Thailand sequences all cases in quarantine). All were stopped. Then one case  snuck in from Cambodia.  Without quarantine the UK wave would have hit long ago.

Edited by rabas
  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, ThailandRyan said:

 Never sat in a bar in my life, successfully ran my own company as a CEO, but do to covid I closed up, laid off my employee's, gave them severance packages which were generous, and moved into retirement 100%. 

This is the difference between us. We did not close down, did not kick the staff out and my people are getting salries. And we keep paying taxes here, thus supporting the country. But some reasonable management from governemnt is needed to help the businesses...

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
1 minute ago, rabas said:

I understand risk and probability well. We are discussing the introduction of a new dangerous variant. It does not happen from local cases.

 

Lets look at real data.  12 times the UK variant tried to enter the country through quarantine since December. (see GISAID, Thailand sequences all cases in quarantine). All were stopped. Then one case  snuck in from Cambodia.  Without quarantine the UK wave would have started long ago.

I could agree with that. But the variants will be here anyway, by illegal crossing. They are already here.

And look - the UK arrivals are not in 14 days quarantine list, though African are. UK arrival can quarantine 7 or 10 days...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...