Jump to content

No increase for Thai based UK Pensioners: vote here to get this changed


webfact

Recommended Posts

Wanting a increase is the least of many UK applicants for a state pension .

I have been waiting nine months for a application to be finalized.

I leave you to decide how I think about the UK state pension system

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, itsari said:

Wanting a increase is the least of many UK applicants for a state pension .

I have been waiting nine months for a application to be finalized.

I leave you to decide how I think about the UK state pension system

 

The problem seems to be one hears nothing in the interim..... first I knew was when money was deposited, and some days later I got some paperwork in the mail. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I won't be old enough to claim my pension for 11 years, in very happy with it. I'll get the full pension despite only having worked for 4 years. 

This, as well as my Thai pension will be very welcome. 

I was surprised to hear that I had my contributions paid by the govt. when I was at school for a couple of years, at uni for 5 years and when unemployed. 

They allowed me to pay 10 years of class 2 contributions, at once for 66,000 baht, and I pay about 6,000 baht a year to them. 

I chose to move here and accept the conditions. Too many entitled people here wanting their cake and eat it too. 

 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, itsari said:

Wanting a increase is the least of many UK applicants for a state pension .

I have been waiting nine months for a application to be finalized.

I leave you to decide how I think about the UK state pension system

 

Forgot to mention.....

Only indication I had that things might be in progress, was the rather prompt return of my birth certificate......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jacko45k said:

Forgot to mention.....

Only indication I had that things might be in progress, was the rather prompt return of my birth certificate......

I received my birth certificate back promptly . Only mail i have had from them in the nine month wait .

I have called them a number of times which has been helpful as there are two other countries that have or had a social agreement with the UK . Australia has no longer a social agreement with the Uk since  2013 . My argument is that I worked in Australia well before the law change . Therefore the time in Australia has to be paid . Time will tell if I am right on that one . 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neeranam said:

Most Pensioners in Asia want renunciation, not fun. 

 

 

Weird comment. The marketing slogan for Philippines is "it's more fun in the Philippines". Renunciation? What planet are you on? In any case, it's a Catholic country, so for sure, if that's what they want, there's plenty on offer here.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jacko45k said:

Forgot to mention.....

Only indication I had that things might be in progress, was the rather prompt return of my birth certificate......

I did the claim online, no birth certificate (or any other documentation) required.

Can't imagine why so many people choose to make stuff difficult for themselves.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Neeranam said:

I chose to move here and accept the conditions. Too many entitled people here wanting their cake and eat it too. 

........people who worked all their lives, paid full UK PAYE taxes and 40 years NI contributions......those people?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Although I won't be old enough to claim my pension for 11 years, in very happy with it. I'll get the full pension despite only having worked for 4 years. 

This, as well as my Thai pension will be very welcome. 

I was surprised to hear that I had my contributions paid by the govt. when I was at school for a couple of years, at uni for 5 years and when unemployed. 

They allowed me to pay 10 years of class 2 contributions, at once for 66,000 baht, and I pay about 6,000 baht a year to them. 

I chose to move here and accept the conditions. Too many entitled people here wanting their cake and eat it too. 

 

You won't get the full state pension.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

I did the claim online, no birth certificate (or any other documentation) required.

Can't imagine why so many people choose to make stuff difficult for themselves.

The online option is not available for claims made for non-residents. If I recall access to the online form is not possible from overseas.

Edited by jacko45k
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Webfact thanks for posting the link - I've voted and I guess many others have too . .

 

From the UK Govt website :-

 

"The policy on uprating UK state pensions for overseas residents is that the annual index-linked increases are paid outside the UK where there is a legal requirement to do so. Examples of this are where UK State Pension recipients are living within the European Economic Area or where there is a reciprocal agreement between the UK and the host country that provides for uprating of the UK State Pension.

Around 510,000 recipients of the UK State Pension living overseas do not get State Pension increases – 84% of those live in Australia, Canada and New Zealand
."

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/estimated-costs-of-uprating-state-pension-in-frozen-rate-countries/estimated-costs-of-uprating-state-pension-in-frozen-rate-countries

I guess that's the answer. In the link they estimate the cost of correcting this gross injustice at GBP630 million in 2022/23.  

(I still pay tax in the UK btw). Pay up you tight sods !!

 

 

Edited by TorquayFan
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2022 at 5:59 AM, Gottfrid said:

Just to skip the petition. Sure, British pensioners are not a strain on health care or other services. However, they neither inject their money in the country that gives it to them. So, there we have the reason. And then, crying about a raise of 5,55 pound per week? That´s not very sophisticated. That´s not to be called a raise. Such things are know under the name of weekly disgraces.

They "injected" their money when paying NI contributions, just like anybody else.

 

It's not about a single increase of 5 pounds a week, you also need to consider the pensioners who have had no increases for decades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, TorquayFan said:

Webfact thanks for posting the link - I've voted and I guess many others have too . .

 

From the UK Govt website :-

 

"The policy on uprating UK state pensions for overseas residents is that the annual index-linked increases are paid outside the UK where there is a legal requirement to do so. Examples of this are where UK State Pension recipients are living within the European Economic Area or where there is a reciprocal agreement between the UK and the host country that provides for uprating of the UK State Pension.

Around 510,000 recipients of the UK State Pension living overseas do not get State Pension increases – 84% of those live in Australia, Canada and New Zealand
."

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/estimated-costs-of-uprating-state-pension-in-frozen-rate-countries/estimated-costs-of-uprating-state-pension-in-frozen-rate-countries

I guess that's the answer. In the link they estimate the cost of correcting this gross injustice at GBP630 million in 2022/23.  

(I still pay tax in the UK btw). Pay up you tight sods !!

 

 

Suggests to me the Kiwis, Ozzies and Canadians have some form of grassing up agreement with HM gov. How the hell would the latter know that 428,400 (510,000*84%) UK pension claimants were living in those 3 countries? And how much is HM gov saving annually via this infamous chicanery? 

 

Sure, while I'm abroad I don't contribute to the UK economy - my income is too low to pay income tax - but then neither do I take out what I would be entitled to were I to stay in the UK. Free NHS, bus pass, £200 winter fuel, TV licence, prescriptions etc etc. Probably turns out those 510,000 people are saving the government billions every year. <deleted> baffles brains I'm afraid. I think they tried to justify it once but can't recall their reasoning.

 

£630,000,000 to rectify, amongst 510,000? How do they work that out? The 2.5% annual rise, which on a full pension equals about £4.50 pw, would cost them ~100m UKP.

 

AND as a final kick in the nuts, they'll tax it if you go over your allowance on your taxable income.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2022 at 6:42 PM, Baht Simpson said:

To my mind there is no real excuse for denying expats any increases. It's discrimination pure and simple and the only reason they've done it is because they can get away with it. 

 

It's not a gift from the government it's a contract between government and the people, who contribute via National Insurance and Income Tax for a certain specified number of years to qualify for the agreed pension plus any relevant increases. Those increases are then arbitrarily taken away based solely on residency and not contribution or need. 

 

There is no moral excuse for this.

Totally agree.

When I wrote to the DWP to ask why, they sent a link to the gov. pension rules, aka small print, that had never, prior to the internet, been made readily available to contributors, nor was it ever optional for UK employees and businessmen.

When I asked again for justification, guess what?, no reply.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2022 at 7:08 PM, hughrection said:

Invest 60 GBP a month into what exactly to give you a livable return in say 15 years from now!

Fine, if you can live on 4 - 8 pounds a week. Do the calculations and see the futility of your suggestion, considering annuity returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

Why not?

 

How much is the full pension per week?

 

image.png.8b4333e781a178f417b2ef24504e4caa.png

You, from your own post, have no more than 16 years of NI contributions......you need to have paid 35 years for a full pension.........you will only receive £82.10

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/25/2022 at 7:33 PM, Will B Good said:

Anyone know?

 

I still have property back in the UK......if I 'live in it' for 30 days a year I understand I am still resident in the UK and therefore entitled to annual pension increases......correct????

To be deemed normally resident, you have to live there 6 months of the year.

 

However, before I departed, I looked into the benefits of becoming non-resident, in particular respect to CGT avoidance, from the potential sale of my properties in UK, in the days before that loophole was sidelined.

I found that if you have any item of clothing held in any UK property, be it your own or someone elses, and you visit that property and stay overnight / one night, you are automatically deemed resident for tax purposes. Maybe that's changed now, I've not bothered to check since there's no benefit whatsoever from declaring non-resident.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Will B Good said:

........people who worked all their lives, paid full UK PAYE taxes and 40 years NI contributions......those people?

Can live like a king here in a 2 bedroomed house for 100 quid a month, eating out every day. What can 800 quid get in the UK? Maybe a bedsit for 100 quid a week and certainly not going out too much.  Why moan about 5 quid increase? Chances are that we'll only get on average 5 years of paid pensions anyway, which is reaching 72 years old. Really, there are other better things to moan about. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Will B Good said:

You, from your own post, have no more than 16 years of NI contributions......you need to have paid 35 years for a full pension.........you will only receive £82.10

Where is that 16 years figure from? 

I have more like 25 years paid already and will keep paying yearly to get the required 35. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tofer said:

To be deemed normally resident, you have to live there 6 months of the year.

I think that is you are found to have property abroad.

 

3.2 Second automatic UK test

You’ll be UK resident for the tax year if you have, or have had, a home in the UK for all or part of the year and the following all apply:

  • there is or was at least one period of 91 consecutive days when you had a home in the UK
  • at least 30 of these 91 days fall in the tax year when you have a home in the UK and you’ve been present in that home for at least 30 days at any time during the year
  • at that time you had no overseas home, or if you had an overseas home, you were present in it for fewer than 30 days in the tax year
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...