Pollution levels in Chiang Mai have had "no effect on tourism", says tourist chief

[webfact]

Picture: Thai Rath

 

Thai Rath reported from Thailand's northern capital of tourism Chiang Mai where they said levels of PM 2.5 (particulate matter) in the air from the burning of fields since the start of February had been causing concern about the effect on tourist arrivals.

 

The area has bounced back after the pandemic but the local tourism industry chief Phallop Sea-jew was unconcerned about the pollution.

 

Picture: Thai Rath

 

He said that the fluctuating levels of pollution were within the 50-100 micrograms per cubic meter of air and were within acceptable limits.

 

No tourists had cancelled because of the air quality, he ascertained.

 

-- © Copyright  ASEAN NOW 2023-02-24

 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

 

The most versatile and flexible rental investment and holiday home solution in Thailand - click for more information.

 

Get your business in front of millions of customers who read ASEAN NOW with an interest in Thailand every month - email [email protected] for more information

[JoePai]

But they will not return as they will all be dead 

[soi3eddie]

How would he even know the reasons for cancellation? Most Thais and expats are aware of the annual burning season and bad air quality so will likely not book in the first place. I've met many expats over the years who leave their Chiang Mai homes for southern beaches at this time. If he is talking about Chinese cancellations, then air quality probably not so different to their home cities. 

 

[LaosLover]

True, if you want to eat at a decent restaurant on a Saturday night, you need to reserve around Thursday. A lot of people come up from Bangkok to party in Nimman these days.

[Yorkshire Tea]

50 minutes ago, webfact said:

He said that the fluctuating levels of pollution were within the 50-100 micrograms per cubic meter of air and were within acceptable limits.

No they're not!

[ikke1959]

They don't mention it ...... The tourists will find out when they arrive, so no cancellations needed....

[TheFishman1]

[Tarteso]

4 hours ago, webfact said:

He said that the fluctuating levels of pollution were within the 50-100 micrograms per cubic meter of air and were within acceptable limits

False.  Fibber … Liar!

 

[hotchilli]

6 hours ago, webfact said:

Thai Rath reported from Thailand's northern capital of tourism Chiang Mai where they said levels of PM 2.5 (particulate matter) in the air from the burning of fields since the start of February had been causing concern about the effect on tourist arrivals

Sack all those in charge and install people who will make the difference.

[hotchilli]

6 hours ago, webfact said:

He said that the fluctuating levels of pollution were within the 50-100 micrograms per cubic meter of air and were within acceptable limits.

 

No tourists had cancelled because of the air quality, he ascertained.

So lets keep the pollution levels as they are, keep the present number of tourists and do nothing instead of cleaning up the air, marketing how clean CM is and get more tourists in?

Such backward thinking.

[robertson468]

Phallop Sea-jew clearly has no idea, or doesn't want to know about the causes of cancer, as long as the money is coming in.  Health and Safety Course would stand him (and many others in positions of responsibility) in good stead.

[cardinalblue]

He is in complete denial, liar about numbers and want to see his interview surveys that he is not doing…

 

a bad experience is told to 10 friends…once these blind Asian golf packages end in March, the numbers will drop significantly 

 

thailand has had 2 days since the first of the year under 50….most over 100 and recently over 150 meaning last 2 weeks 

 

if he was educated on facts, WHO recommends under 25….thailand own artificial number (not based on science) but on marketing is under 50 which CM doesn’t meet 95% of the time between Feb and May

 

lsst year was an aberration…why? Because it rained a lot during this time frame…

 

The current gov policy is to rely on rain to clear the air…just pathetic

[RichardColeman]

The issue is not tourists coming but those coming , never coming again due to pollution and the lost revenue of those that wont come as they here of it from the people poised by it that did come

[Venom]

All's good in Cha-am. It's a lovely day for a run on the beach. ???? 

 

 

[still kicking]

9 hours ago, Tarteso said:

False.  Fibber … Liar!

 

An AQI under 50 means that the air quality is good. At this low AQI level, a person can spend time outdoors and air pollution will pose very little risk to their health.

[still kicking]

7

GoodGood: Air quality is considered satisfactory, and air pollution poses little or no risk

0-50

 Good

50-100

 Moderate

100-150

 Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups

150-200

 Unhealthy

200-300

 Very Unhealthy

300-500

 Hazardous

Click for more information on the AQI colors and scale

Updated on Friday 23:00

Primary pollutant: pm10

CurrentPast 48 hours dataMinMax

PM2.5 AQI

4312

PM10 AQI

7220

O3 AQI

15730

NO2 AQI

117

Temp.

191430

Pressure

101410071015

Humidity

301374

Wind

4311

[still kicking]

That was for the city I live 

[still kicking]

59 minutes ago, still kicking said:

An AQI under 50 means that the air quality is good. At this low AQI level, a person can spend time outdoors and air pollution will pose very little risk to their health.

We have a level of 7 where I live 

[Yorkshire Tea]

On 2/24/2023 at 11:14 PM, still kicking said:

An AQI under 50 means that the air quality is good. At this low AQI level, a person can spend time outdoors and air pollution will pose very little risk to their health.

You're confusing AQI & pm2.5 concentration ????

[still kicking]

4 hours ago, Yorkshire Tea said:

You're confusing AQI & pm2.5 concentration ????

The 2.5 pm concentration in my city was 7

[MrJ2U]

It's pretty polluted anyplace in Thailand at the moment. 

 

At least Chiang Mai is a pleasant place to be despite the horrendous air quality compared to somewhere in Issan.

[puck2]

Is there no free place in the mental home for this man?

Officials are payed for working, not for advertising nonsense.

[PoorSucker]

On 2/24/2023 at 4:06 PM, robertson468 said:

Phallop Sea-jew clearly has no idea, or doesn't want to know about the causes of cancer, as long as the money is coming in.  Health and Safety Course would stand him (and many others in positions of responsibility) in good stead.

Almost 50% of the general population in Thailand will die with at least traces of asbestos in their lungs, based on one recent study.

[TheAppletons]

"High pollution levels in Thailand’s northern city of Chiang Mai and surrounding provinces are keeping tourists away and alarming locals, with the government on Monday, April 10, urging residents to avoid outdoor activities.

 

Chiang Mai, known for its scenic mountainous views, temples and chic cafés, received 10.8 million visitors in pre-pandemic 2019, but hotel bookings in the city have dropped to 45% occupancy, the Thai Hotel Association Northern Chapter president Phunut Thanalaopanich told Reuters on Monday.

 

That is far short of the 80% to 90% expected ahead of this week’s Thai New Year holidays, known as Songkran."

 

https://www.cnn.com/travel/article/thailand-air-pollution-tourism-intl-hnk/index.html

[mania]

On 2/23/2023 at 4:10 PM, webfact said:

No tourists had cancelled because of the air quality, he ascertained.

Not with the expensive cancellation policies of most airlines but watch next time if they return

He seems to forget most book 6+ months ahead for better fare prices.

Cancellation or changes are costly & many falsely assumed the government would crack down or address the problem

 

They know better now ????