Jump to content

Thailand and Japan to Start First Phase of Bangkok - Chiang Mai Rail Project


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, edwinchester said:

Only another 20 years before we can actually get on a high speed train then.....if the project ever gets started.

Last eight years wasted with virtually nothing done.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, edwinchester said:

Only another 20 years before we can actually get on a high speed train then.....if the project ever gets started.

The suction from the high speed train is intended to draw polluted air from Bangkok northwards to Chieng Mai to share with the impoverished residents of that city.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ourmanflint said:

I wonder why they have changed the route to go via Sukhothtai instead of Uttaradit? Those lines are currently undergoing dual track upgrades so what is the point of that if the high speed is not using them?

TAT wants more tourists in Sukhothai to look at the ruined temples.....

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the UK the high speed train or HS2,is well behind time, phase one was due to finish in 2026, now2029-33, second phase due2032-33 now due 2035-40.

Budget was 55 billon GBP now 72-98 billon GBP.

Let's hope the Thai one will be a bit better managed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kickstart said:

In the UK the high speed train or HS2,is well behind time, phase one was due to finish in 2026, now2029-33, second phase due2032-33 now due 2035-40.

Budget was 55 billon GBP now 72-98 billon GBP.

Let's hope the Thai one will be a bit better managed.

Complete waste of money!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, trainman34014 said:

'High Speed' ?    With 12 Station stops it will never be High Speed but they don't even begin to understand the concept.

Why do you think every train will stop at every station? It makes perfect sense to have stations along the way just like in any other country with high speed rail - it doesn't mean every train will stop at every one.

Edited by josephbloggs
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ourmanflint said:

I wonder why they have changed the route to go via Sukhothtai instead of Uttaradit? Those lines are currently undergoing dual track upgrades so what is the point of that if the high speed is not using them?

Actual high speed rail is apparently elevated as it's not a good idea having them at ground level.

 

IMO, there is no need for a real high speed rail as double tracked would probably give a better cost benefit. High speed only carries passengers, so would it be providing seats at the same meager price, or will it be too expensive for the average rail user to pay?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, ourmanflint said:

I wonder why they have changed the route to go via Sukhothtai instead of Uttaradit? Those lines are currently undergoing dual track upgrades so what is the point of that if the high speed is not using them?

Perhaps because the most people that will want to pay for a ticket will be tourists ( I doubt any current 3rd class passengers will be traveling on it ). Not much in Uttaradit to attract tourists.

 

I wouldn't go on it either as I enjoyed the night train journey in second class sleeper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, PETERTHEEATER said:

The suction from the high speed train is intended to draw polluted air from Bangkok northwards to Chieng Mai to share with the impoverished residents of that city.

Chiang Mai doesn't need to import Bangkok pollution; the fires prroduce deadly smog just fine and locally made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2023 at 2:32 PM, ourmanflint said:

I wonder why they have changed the route to go via Sukhothtai instead of Uttaradit? Those lines are currently undergoing dual track upgrades so what is the point of that if the high speed is not using them?

The high speed...........:w00t:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, pedro01 said:

Will they be using British labor like last time?

With the greatest respect, the early Thai railways were eventually built by the Germans. Reference Google and Wikipedia:

 

In November 1888 the railway engineer de:Karl Bethge (from Krupp) came to Siam and were given these plans by the Siamese government for his assessment. It was agreed to build a route from Bangkok to Saraburi to Korat (Nakhon Ratchasima).

For the full history:-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_transport_in_Thailand

 

Yes, the British were involved in many early discussions but nothing was built, except the start of the Bangkok - Korat Line. However, the Brits were "sacked" for not keeping to contractual agreements and the Germans took over. Another line from Bangkok to Samut Prakan was constructed by Denmark and in 1925 this became only the second electrified railway in South East Asia. (now defunct).  The British built the early railways in India, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya (as known in those days) whilst the French did likewise in Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. During the Second World War the Japanese also built railways in Thailand (including the infamous Death Railway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...