Jump to content

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records


Recommended Posts

Posted

“Pundits have been speculating that Trump would be charged with lying about the hush money payments to illegally affect an election, and that theory rests on controversial legal issues and could be hard to prove,” Roiphe told The Times.

“It turns out the indictment also includes a claim that Trump falsified records to commit a state tax crime. …That’s a much simpler charge that avoids the potential pitfalls.”

 

https://www.rawstory.com/this-surprise-allegation-could-spell-trouble-for-trump-heres-why/

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Isn't it a bit funny that after years of trying to put Mr Trump behind bars they come up with money paid to a porn star. So now the media can concentrate on this instead of the other more important issues plaguing the country like immigration, homelessness and drugs. 

You forgot to include insurrection on your list.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Salerno said:

Does this pic from his arrival at Trump Towers look like a happy man without a care in the world waving to his "fans" or a worried man realising his history is starting to catch up with him? 

918db83b-5063-4cca-bcc2-aa2113c3071b.jpg

he looks like a thalidomide victim offering a nazi salute

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Pink Mist said:

You should really do more research.  It rises to the level of a felony in New York when you falsify those records to conceal the crime committed.  Which Donald Trump did by allegedly having the payments marked as other than what they were actually for.  

 

https://thehill-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/thehill.com/business/3934284-what-is-falsifying-business-records-we-break-down-the-trump-34-count-indictment/amp/?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM%3D#amp_tf=From %1%24s&aoh=16806665663558&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fbusiness%2F3934284-what-is-falsifying-business-records-we-break-down-the-trump-34-count-indictment%2F

 

New York law states that falsifying business records rises to a felony when an individual's “intent to defraud includes an intent to commit another crime or to aid or conceal the commission thereof.”

Even if you are right, felony charges have a time limit of 5 years and this happen 7 years ago. So why go after Trump now? are all you Dems. scared he will win in 2024? Or are you just full of hate?

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

Just like GOP House, instead of other more important issues plaguing the country is concentrating on Fox's shopping list of grievances like Biden laptop, impeaching Fauci and Mayorkas, DOJ/FBI bias and the Afghan withdrawal you mean?

Yes all the above and much much more.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Yes all the above and much much more.

How can the media concentrate and report on other more important issues plaguing the country when you acknowledge that half of the Govt i.e. the House is doing the opposite.

 

All the media doesn't make things up like Fox et alia.

 

But obviously you would not know that if you only watch Fake Fox News.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Even if you are right, felony charges have a time limit of 5 years and this happen 7 years ago. So why go after Trump now? are all you Dems. scared he will win in 2024? Or are you just full of hate?

I guess that was a rhetorical question at the end.

  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

Even if you are right, felony charges have a time limit of 5 years and this happen 7 years ago. So why go after Trump now? are all you Dems. scared he will win in 2024? Or are you just full of hate?

Maybe because he couldn't be prosecuted for 4 of those years and it takes time to build a case. Most of the time was involved in the witnesses making the decision to squeal once their gravy train had come to a halt. The dems are definitely not afraid of Trump running, the last elections proved that emphatically.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

From the top of World news subforum.

 

Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.

 

Do you understand what "must" means?

Wow, here you are lecturing others on producing links. I'm flabbergasted. Can I remind you of this every time you fail to do that? Oh wait, I already have, dozens of times.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, LosLobo said:

How can the media concentrate and report on other more important issues plaguing the country when you acknowledge that half of the Govt i.e. the House is doing the opposite.

 

All the media doesn't make things up like Fox et alia.

 

But obviously you would not know that if you only watch Fake Fox News.

 

Did you know that the judge worked for VP Harris's daughter? so he should have excused himself?

  • Sad 2
  • Love It 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...