Is it Joe Bidens turn to face JAIL?

[JustAnotherHun]

30 minutes ago, Graemej100 said:

BORING right wing conspiracy crap.

No. Wait.

It is Fox News.  It must be right.

Exactly! Everything that could touch the picture of Saint Joe must be a "conspiracy theory".

The difference betwwen many "conspiracy theories" and the truth is 12 or 15 months.

[Pink Mist]

An off topic video, replies to it, and more off topic posts as well as bickering posts have been removed.  The OP is not about Hunter Biden, nor Donald Trump.

 

9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

 

10. You will not post troll messages. Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing forum members by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other members into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

 

 

[placeholder]

37 minutes ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Exactly! Everything that could touch the picture of Saint Joe must be a "conspiracy theory".

The difference betwwen many "conspiracy theories" and the truth is 12 or 15 months.

Like the 2020 elections being stolen?

[RuamRudy]

Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

 

[pomchop]

14 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

"There could be upwards of 12 Biden family members who benefitted from influence peddling by the president and his son, according to the top Republican on the Oversight Committee.

Chairman James Comer said that there won't be anyone 'left for a Christmas picture' because the 'entire Biden family' is entrapped in the financial enrichment scheme.

There are nine known family members involved in the shady business deals, according to Comer, but he now says there could be at least three more."

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12004863/James-Comer-TWELVE-Biden-family-members-involved-shady-business-deals.html

 

As per my link,  Chinese State Energy HK Limited, a firm affiliated with CEFC China Energy is an example.

 

Of course, it would have been better if you and other forum posters of left field had just explained why all this money was being paid, rather than falsely dismissing the evidence as "Russian disinformation" and now the scramble to cover your rears when your previous conspiracy theory fell apart. 

Appropriate that u have a pic of clarence thomas as your handle.....if you want to complain about massive deception and corruption you might want to start there as there is already a ton of unchallenged evidence that has been released detailing decades of hidden benefits given to thomas as well has his right wing wife, his family and who knows what else an investigation might uncover.....

 

If there is evidence of a biden breaking the law why didn't trumps DOJ and Attorney General convene a grand jury to review the evidence and decide if an indictment was warranted?  Let me guess...because they had no evidence that they felt would stand up to a grand jury's inspection and didn't want to appear to be fools if the grand jury failed to indict.....if comer has any real evidence then he should ask the DOJ to take a look and determine if a grand jury should be asked to review it.  Throwing accusations around by republicans and right wing media is just so much hot air unless and until a grand jury says their is sufficient real evidence to indict.

 

But repubs continue to beat the same old drum of hunter and hillary and others to include the BIG LIE that the 2020 election was rigged when it has been verified over and over that it is a LIE.....how many more lies do the republicans want to perpetuate and get their brain dead followers to buy hook line and sinker?  If you have evidence then let's see it.  If not then it is merely political BS.

 

Comer sure likes to use the word "could" a lot in his accusations which SHOULD indicate that he is not at all sure about his accusations.  I suppose I "could" win the lottery tonight or I "could" have been the boston strangler or I "could" have been a world class athlete  but there is a big difference between COULD and DID that most rational people understand.

[Mac Mickmanus]

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Like the 2020 elections being stolen?

I didn't like it at all, no .

[placeholder]

3 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

I didn't like it at all, no .

And I didn't like the way Game of Thrones ended. But the difference between you and me is that I know what is fantasy and what isn't.

[stevenl]

1 hour ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Exactly! Everything that could touch the picture of Saint Joe must be a "conspiracy theory".

The difference betwwen many "conspiracy theories" and the truth is 12 or 15 months.

The difference is Democrats will accept it if Biden broke the law 

[pomchop]

7 hours ago, stevenl said:

The difference is Democrats will accept it if Biden broke the law 

What a crock.  If you have any evidence of a crime by Biden then after he leaves office he can and should be indicted...trump was not indicted while in office as it was determined that a sitting POTUS can not be indicted. 

 

Meantime since leaving office little donnie is up to his eyeballs in indictments /trials and possibly many more indictments on the way.  Thus far there has been nothing but a bunch of right wing hot air and accusations against Biden. 

 

If there was any real evidence then why didn't the trump DOJ and attorney general indict biden during the four years they had ?  Answer:  Because they did not have any significant evidence that would have resulted in an indictment by a grand jury that unlike trumpers require hard facts and not right wing BS.  The DOJ and attorney general would  have been shown to be right wing hacks if their evidence was insufficient to convince a grand jury that a crime had been committed.

[Scott]

Off-topic post reported and removed.

 

[EVENKEEL]

Could be nothing, could be something, just have to wait for the investigation to determine that. Everyone in the biden fan club needs to be patient.

[stevenl]

2 hours ago, pomchop said:

What a crock.  If you have any evidence of a crime by Biden then after he leaves office he can and should be indicted...trump was not indicted while in office as it was determined that a sitting POTUS can not be indicted. 

 

Meantime since leaving office little donnie is up to his eyeballs in indictments /trials and possibly many more indictments on the way.  Thus far there has been nothing but a bunch of right wing hot air and accusations against Biden. 

 

If there was any real evidence then why didn't the trump DOJ and attorney general indict biden during the four years they had ?  Answer:  Because they did not have any significant evidence that would have resulted in an indictment by a grand jury that unlike trumpers require hard facts and not right wing BS.  The DOJ and attorney general would  have been shown to be right wing hacks if their evidence was insufficient to convince a grand jury that a crime had been committed.

And I thought my post was basic and easy to understand.

[placeholder]

31 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Could be nothing, could be something, just have to wait for the investigation to determine that. Everyone in the biden fan club needs to be patient.

Because it's the "biden fan club" members who are rushing to judgement? Your post is just another comment from an alternative universe. 

[earlinclaifornia]

4 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Because it's the "biden fan club" members who are rushing to judgement? Your post is just another comment from an alternative universe. 

Not only that we are not even alarmed, so inferring we need to be patient is absurd. 

[EVENKEEL]

5 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Because it's the "biden fan club" members who are rushing to judgement? Your post is just another comment from an alternative universe. 

You do want a complete investigation into the biden cabal, don't you? Be patient, 

[earlinclaifornia]

4 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

You do want a complete investigation into the biden cabal, don't you? Be patient, 

Quote

You did read the part where it says the investigation has been on going for five years

 

[placeholder]

6 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

You do want a complete investigation into the biden cabal, don't you? Be patient, 

What evidence do you have that I am not being patient? You've got nothing.

Whereas the right wingers here have already jumped to conclusions and offer dubious conspiratorial characterizations like the "biden cabal". Clearly, you're just another conspiracy theorist.

[EVENKEEL]

14 minutes ago, earlinclaifornia said:

 

Don't you want a thorough investigation? Could the walls be closing in on biden?

[placeholder]

12 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Don't you want a thorough investigation? Could the walls be closing in on biden?

And how do you know that there hasn't been a thorough investigation?

[EVENKEEL]

Just now, placeholder said:

And how do you know that there hasn't been a thorough investigation?

Because it's not over with, but please correct me if the investigation is over and biden has been cleared.

[SunnyinBangrak]

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

And how do you know that there hasn't been a thorough investigation?

because I refuse to accept the biden family got paid all this money for absolutely no reason.

[Tug]

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

Could be nothing, could be something, just have to wait for the investigation to determine that. Everyone in the biden fan club needs to be patient.

Yup some how I don’t think the Biden’s are to worryed

[placeholder]

33 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Because it's not over with, but please correct me if the investigation is over and biden has been cleared.

I wasn't aware that the Justice Dept is conducting an ongoing investigation of this matter.

[placeholder]

15 minutes ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

because I refuse to accept the biden family got paid all this money for absolutely no reason.

Once again, as has repeatedly been pointed out to you, just because some foreign business people believe that, as in their countries, family connections count in government decisions, that doesn't mean that it's the case. It may have been sleazy for some Bidens to trade on that belief, but that doesn't mean it's criminal. And your bad faith in commenting on this is exemplified by your constant use of the phrase the "biden family.". Some Bidens does not equal the Biden family.

[metisdead]

Some more off topic posts bringing Trump and his family into the topic have been removed as this topic is about:

 

Is it Joe Bidens turn to face JAIL?

[ozimoron]

16 hours ago, JustAnotherHun said:

Exactly! Everything that could touch the picture of Saint Joe must be a "conspiracy theory".

The difference betwwen many "conspiracy theories" and the truth is 12 or 15 months.

Conspiracy theories involve a lot of people over a long period of time and are well known. Real conspiracies involve few people over a short period of time and are secret. No conspiracy theory has ever been proved right. Ever. Name one that has.

[EVENKEEL]

30 minutes ago, ozimoron said:

Conspiracy theories involve a lot of people over a long period of time and are well known. Real conspiracies involve few people over a short period of time and are secret. No conspiracy theory has ever been proved right. Ever. Name one that has.

Why are you guiding posters down the rabbit hole of off topic, only trolls do that.

[ozimoron]

4 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Why are you guiding posters down the rabbit hole of off topic, only trolls do that.

I'm explaining why the conspiracy theories against Joe are all false. You got evidence to the contrary, spring it.

[radiochaser]

22 hours ago, earlinclaifornia said:

Waiting: 

White House counsel spokesman Ian Sams dismissed the allegations as "unfounded and politically motivated".

He added: "For going on 5 years now, Republicans in Congress have been lobbing unfounded politically-motivated attacks against [President Biden] without offering evidence for their claims. Or evidence of decisions influenced by anything other than U.S. interests."

Of course he said that.   It's what he gets paid to do!

[candide]

4 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Because it's not over with, but please correct me if the investigation is over and biden has been cleared.

Investigation on what? An"allegation of allegation", as Chomper calls it?