Jump to content

Pita admits transferring 42,000 iTV shares to other family heirs


Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Bucko? Very respectful for the most popular politician in Thailand now, the choice of the people. 

Populism tends to have a very short fashion. 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted

Amazing Thailand and amazing jumping to conclusions and speculation. Best to keep an on the news but remember so much of this news is directly controlled by military or in their pockets.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
4 hours ago, proton said:

Breaking news, Army admits owning Tv and radio stations and the government news networks and controlling fm radio from Mcot at Rachada, they missed that out of the 'constitution' though ????

Hell, yeah.....????! Right on brother. (Or sister!)

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

In his Facebook post today (Tuesday), Pita claims that the shares he inherited do not have any economic value

case closed

  • Like 1
Posted

looks like Pita did exactly the right thing. I think anywhere in the world so long as it's only family members that benefit from illicit schemes and not the politician him/herself it's all fine. Powerfull politicians enriching family members is in fact the international GOLD STANDARD of honesty and fairness and in no way suggest corruption. 

  • Haha 2
Posted
12 hours ago, connda said:

Sort of after the fact. 

Pita claims that, in the 2022 balance sheet of iTV, which was submitted to the Department of Business Development for consideration, there was a suspicious change in the core business of iTV, from finance to TV and media advertising, despite the fact that iTV has ceased to be a media firm.

Due to these unusual occurrences, he said he decided to consult other heirs and decided to divide the shares among them, adding that the share transfer was not done with the intention to escape accountability.

 

Might be a tricky situation now?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 hours ago, owl sees all said:

I understood that he told the appropriate authorities before the Move Forward was registered as a party.

You mean the appropriate authorities that were appointed by the Junta Gang? 

  • Like 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, zzaa09 said:

You mean the appropriate authorities that were appointed by the Junta Gang? 

I understand that he was quite open about it and was told it was of no consequence.

 

Maybe it was thought that his party would flop. Different story now.

  • Like 1
Posted

I think he needs a better legal team. The issue should have been well-foreseen and dealt with before the election. 

Easy enough as the shares were practically worthless. 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...