Jump to content

Absolute poverty: UK sees biggest rise for 30 years


Social Media

Recommended Posts

What the article doesn't explain is the figures are household income.

 

The first adult is given a value of 1.0, additional adults and over 14 children 0.5 and children 13 and under 0.3.

Household income is then divided by this figure to try and reflect both the economy of scale of running one family home vs several but also the increased income needs of that home vs a single adult household. Here is a comment from a parent recently surveyed. These are the comments not relayed in the scaremongery articles:

"Our equivalence value is 2.7 so our equivalence income, including both adults and child benefit, is (just) in relative poverty. We actually have a household income which is incredibly healthy for the cheapish area we live in -we are able to overpay the mortgage and have nice but fairly modest holidays. Our income of c. £55k is rightly way way way too high for any support like UC. We do still get CB though."

 

Levels of poverty clearly need to be redefined.

Edited by youreavinalaff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/21/2024 at 10:41 PM, herfiehandbag said:

At the risk of sounding trite, you should not believe everything that you hear on the news regarding Brexit! It was a hard contested political decision. "The establishment", including both major parties, and a large swage of the middle classes, (particularly those in occupations which let us say, were closely bound to the EU) were in favour of remaining. The majority of the  population, as the vote showed, wanted to leave.

 

It divided the country, and the country frankly remains divided. This division is reflected in media portrayal of the matter.

Brexit was pushed behind the scenes by the rich with their money hid in places like the Cayman Islands. The EU was threatening to start looking into these. Thats why they bailed out, leaving the ordinary Brits with no more cheap beer and fags. The only problem I had with the EU was that meat pies had to be sold at a high temperature making them impossible to eat till they cooled down.

  • Confused 2
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   70 million people in the UK , one persons dies of being cold .

That is using one extreme example to portray it as being the norm 


You stated “No , no one dies from the cold these days”.

 

It would only take one ‘example’ of someone flying of cold to prove your categorical statement false.

 

I provided a news article that gave such an example.

 

Perhaps, and it’s just a suggestion, rather than trying to wriggle out of the trap you set for yourself you could learn a bit more about poverty in the UK or at the very least refrain posting obviously incorrect assumptions on your part.

 

 

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, youreavinalaff said:

What the article doesn't explain is the figures are household income.

 

The first adult is given a value of 1.0, additional adults and over 14 children 0.5 and children 13 and under 0.3.

Household income is then divided by this figure to try and reflect both the economy of scale of running one family home vs several but also the increased income needs of that home vs a single adult household. Here is a comment from a parent recently surveyed. These are the comments not relayed in the scaremongery articles:

"Our equivalence value is 2.7 so our equivalence income, including both adults and child benefit, is (just) in relative poverty. We actually have a household income which is incredibly healthy for the cheapish area we live in -we are able to overpay the mortgage and have nice but fairly modest holidays. Our income of c. £55k is rightly way way way too high for any support like UC. We do still get CB though."

 

Levels of poverty clearly need to be redefined.

Can you please provide a link for your statement on basis of calculation and too for the source of the ‘statement’ of a recently surveyed parent that you have quoted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   When  you spend your money on drinking and drugs and then complain because you are hungry

Getting off your trolley on a daily basis is a huge expense , and the money could be better  spent on other things like food and heating  

Or you can come to Thailand as many do and be less broke... and just as drunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You stated “No , no one dies from the cold these days”.

It would only take one ‘example’ of someone flying of cold to prove your categorical statement false.

I provided a news article that gave such an example.

Perhaps, and it’s just a suggestion, rather than trying to wriggle out of the trap you set for yourself you could learn a bit more about poverty in the UK or at the very least refrain posting obviously incorrect assumptions on your part.

Slightly of topic,

When I was a kid we didn't have any central heating, on winter mornings there was ice on the inside of the single glazed windows.

We had a coal fire in the living room, and a paraffin heater in the dining room, both used sparingly in the day/evening.

Xmas day/Boxing day we would have both rooms heated.

None of us died, none of our neighbours died from cold.

If you had a roof over your head, there was no problem.

So why is it a problem now?

 

PS. We weren't poor, it's just nobody back then thought warming your house 24/7 was important.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

Slightly of topic,

When I was a kid we didn't have any central heating, on winter mornings there was ice on the inside of the single glazed windows.

We had a coal fire in the living room, and a paraffin heater in the dining room, both used sparingly in the day/evening.

None of us died, none of our neighbours died from cold.

If you had a roof over your head, there was no problem.

So why is it a problem now?

Well you obviously didn’t die.

 

That you as a child were not aware of people dying of cold is not proof that it never happened.

 

I’ve provided a link to a news article giving a recent example.

 

In incidentally, do you recall the price of coal and oil for your heating back then?

 

Did the price shoot up like it did over the past couple of years?

 

Or were they relatively stable in price and affordable?

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

In incidentally, do you recall the price of coal and oil for your heating back then?

 

Did the price shoot up like it did over the past couple of years?

 

Or were they relatively stable in price and affordable?

Heating your home was a luxury, it wasn't required, so the price of fuel wasn't important.

It was perfectly acceptable to wear 2 jumpers, or your outdoor coat on particularly cold days.

 

What defined poor back then .......

Not having enough food to eat.

Not having anywhere to live.

Not being able to afford new shoes or new school uniforms for your kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2024 at 6:56 PM, Doctor Tom said:

I'm a Brit, and I'm sure that a lot of people agree with that assessment.  Been there and got out. 

I'm also a Brit, else I wouldn't have the passport, but I'm not loathe to point out the failings of the British establishment.

 

Sort of funny, but when I worked in London, I didn't meet many actual Brits, and many/ ? most of our patients were not born in the UK. We even had some that flew in to get free operations on the NHS and went back whence they came after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yep I saw the writing on the wall years ago. Couldn't pay me to live there now. The England of my youth is long gone. Uni in London in the 90s was great, it's a total mess now. A lot of that is due to Khan but also uncontrolled immigration. 

 

As for heating bills a lot of that is due to the green lobby pushing up energy prices with their stupid ideas of net zero etc. I had the police round for burning wood in an open fire in my living room due to smoke coming out of the chimney. 

 

As a landlord I have to comply with lots of stupid rules which pushes up costs which get passed on to my tenants. One of the reasons I love Thailand so much is the lack of political correctness and stupid regulations. 

I wish I had pound for everything e I heard a Brit in Thailand say words to the effect of ‘You couldn’t pay me to live in the UK now’ 

 

Only slope off back home when they are I need if ‘nanny’.

 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I wish I had pound for everything e I heard a Brit in Thailand say words to the effect of ‘You couldn’t pay me to live in the UK now’ 

 

Only slope off back home when they are I need if ‘nanny’.

 

And why not........:intheclub:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

Can you tell the difference when they are tearing down the flag together?

 

Flags? Are you upset about the "England flag" on their new footie kit as well?

 

19 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

I quoted THE OFFICIAL government website (GOV.UK)

 

Yes, I know that's what you did. I was questioning if you COMPREHEND what you posted.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   No , no one dies from the cold these days , Houses are insulated and double glazed 

I often see my poor neighbours with the central heating on and windows open and complain because they cannot pay the heating bills .

   Myself having lived in Thailand for a while , being cold is a luxury and no need for air con 

Just put warm clothes on and sleep with a woolly hat 

 

How about the British pensioners who can't afford to heat their homes, abusing their government bus passes by riding around on heated public transport for free?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Is this that "lifestyle choice" thing again?

My parents chose not to waste money on heating their home much.

And I followed on by choosing not to waste money on heating my homes in the UK much.

And now I choose not to waste money to air condition my home in Thailand.

 

I would have thought this lifestyle would be considered virtuous by modern standards, conserving energy and reducing our carbon footprint.

Edited by BritManToo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

 

   70 million people in the UK , one persons dies of being cold .

That is using one extreme example to portray it as being the norm 

 

Interesting viewpoint?

 

14 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

I often see my poor neighbours with the central heating on and windows open and complain because they cannot pay the heating bills .

 

Is this not "using one extreme example to portray it as being the norm" ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BritManToo said:

What defined poor back then .......

Not having enough food to eat.

Not having anywhere to live.

Not being able to afford new shoes or new school uniforms for your kids.

 

Looks pretty much the same as what defines poor today, no? I mean with food banks, tents on the pavements overnight and the still exorbitant prices for school clothes.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

A lot of that is due to Khan but also uncontrolled immigration. 

 

Oh, so nothing whatsoever to do with about 14 years of the Tories filling THEIR boots then?

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

My parents chose not to waste money on heating their home much.

And I followed on by choosing not to waste money on heating my homes in the UK much.

And now I choose not to waste money to air condition my home in Thailand.

 

 What has that to do with

 

20 hours ago, BritManToo said:

Not sure anyone needs heating, sleeping bags work well even outside in the snow.

 

In the UK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Interesting viewpoint?

 

 

Is this not "using one extreme example to portray it as being the norm" ?

 

   That would depend of how many people leave their windows open and have the heating on .

Whether my neighbours are the norm or an anomaly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

How about the British pensioners who can't afford to heat their homes, abusing their government bus passes by riding around on heated public transport for free?

 

   They are not free bus passes , we pay for those bus passes from our taxes .

People should pay for their own bus passes of they want to ride on public transport .

Younger people who cannot afford a car are paying for older people who can afford a car to also have bus passes .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

They are not free bus passes , we pay for those bus passes from our taxes .

 

Yes, correct, but pensioners have paid their taxes too. Statistically, they have probably contributed more in taxes towards their 'free' bus passes than many younger people "who cannot afford a car" but still "leave their windows open with the central heating on". These work-shy 'youngsters' are also finding it harder to fund their two overseas vacations a year.

 

13 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

People should pay for their own bus passes of they want to ride on public transport .

 

I have a UK bus pass, and I stopped paying UK taxes some time around 1977. But it's OK, I haven't used it yet.

 

14 minutes ago, Nick Carter icp said:

Younger people who cannot afford a car are paying for older people who can afford a car to also have bus passes .

 

The old fogies aren't riding around in subsidised and heated public transport just because they haven't got a car. It's because they can't afford to heat their 2-bedroom semi-detached in Accrington (for example).

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NanLaew said:

 

Yes, correct, but pensioners have paid their taxes too. Statistically, they have probably contributed more in taxes towards their 'free' bus passes than many younger people "who cannot afford a car" but still "leave their windows open with the central heating on". These work-shy 'youngsters' are also finding it harder to fund their two overseas vacations a year.

 

 

 

   The bus passes are paid out from the current taxes , not taxes previously paid . 

The money paid for your bus pass could be used to pay to heat peoples homes 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...