Trump: Would be a "great honor" to be jailed for gag order violation

[frank83628]

17 minutes ago, charleskerins said:

How many presidents do you know that engaged in insurrection?  Gag orders  

See, for example, State v Plunkett, 934 P2d 113, 116 (Kan 1997) (upholding termi-

nation of defendants self-representation after he maintained a surly, disrespectful atti- tude throughout the proceeding, became belligerent and used profanity during argument on motions, refused to stand when addressing the court, and stopped answering the judge's questions); People v Davis, 851 P2d 239, 243-44 (Colo App 1993) (upholding exclu- sion of defendant from courtroom after he spat in the prosecutor's face, fought with deputy sheriffs, and physically attacked and shouted obscenities at a prosecution witness).

2 See, for example, Stewart v Corbin, 850 F2d 492, 494-96 (9th Cir 1988) (defendant threatened the trial judge, used abusive language, and intimidated a witness with his conduct).

' Illinoisv Allen, 397 US 337, 343-44 (1970) (holding that constitutionally permissi- ble remedies include binding and gagging the defendant, citing him for contempt, or re- moving him from the courtroom). See also Tanksley v State, 946 P2d 148, 150-51 (Nev 1997) (finding defendant in contempt for talking back and behaving disrespectfully); Scurr,647 F2d at 855 (upholding court order that defendant wear handcuffs and a body belt inside a coat after he assaulted a jailer); Stewart, 20 F3d at 915 (affirming lower court's decision to place defendant in leg irons during trial); Stewart, 850 F2d at 499-500 (affirming decision to gag defendant for repeatedly disobeying court orders and intimi- dating a witness).  Source University of Chicago unbound

1997 is the most recent thing you can find...... so proving the point then...... it's politically motivated as all these Trump things are, Democrat abuse of power to politically attack the current adminst... REGIEMS opponent! 

[charleskerins]

22 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

1997 is the most recent thing you can find...... so proving the point then...... it's politically motivated as all these Trump things are, Democrat abuse of power to politically attack the current adminst... REGIEMS opponent! 

JFC the source is 1999- law is based on precedent            what a waste of time       get lost                    regime?      Babble on like donnie    

 

"You can beat 40 scholars with one fact, but you can’t beat one idiot with 40 facts.”

Edited April 9 by charleskerins
nm

[scottiejohn]

5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm very disappointed in you for that. I thought you were a better person than to want to torture another human being. I'm apparently wrong.

 

Bye.

You seem to be happy enough for Hamas to do it!

[Yellowtail]

Can anyone provide an example of Trump threatening a judge of their families? I can't seem to find one. Please don't just post a link, please cut and paste the quote of Trump making the threat. 

 

I know a lot of leftists threated judges that they don't like, but I only want quotes of Trump threatening a judge. 

 

Thanks!

[Danderman123]

1 hour ago, Yellowtail said:

Can anyone provide an example of Trump threatening a judge of their families? I can't seem to find one. Please don't just post a link, please cut and paste the quote of Trump making the threat. 

 

I know a lot of leftists threated judges that they don't like, but I only want quotes of Trump threatening a judge. 

 

Thanks!

Trump does not directly threaten anyone, that's not his MO.

 

But you knew that before you posted, because you love trolling.

 

Perhaps you can stop trolling long enough to tell us how Trump intimidates his targets and political opponents, what are his techniques?

[Danderman123]

7 hours ago, frank83628 said:

1997 is the most recent thing you can find...... so proving the point then...... it's politically motivated as all these Trump things are, Democrat abuse of power to politically attack the current adminst... REGIEMS opponent! 

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Democratic attack of the current Biden administration? Are you drunk?

Edited April 9 by Danderman123

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

Democratic attack of the current Biden administration? Are you drunk?

no, was typo but too late to edit 

[frank83628]

5 minutes ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump does not directly threaten anyone, that's not his MO.

 

But you knew that before you posted, because you love trolling.

 

Perhaps you can stop trolling long enough to tell us how Trump intimidates his targets and political opponents, what are his techniques?

so if he doesn't directly threaten ,then how does he do it? or could it be just peoples imagination, you know, like 'bloodbath' the other week many here apparently 'knew what he meant', even when proved wrong..... 

[Chomper Higgot]

9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

so if he doesn't directly threaten ,then how does he do it? or could it be just peoples imagination, you know, like 'bloodbath' the other week many here apparently 'knew what he meant', even when proved wrong..... 

In the same way he doesn’t directly ask you to defend him.

 

 

[Yellowtail]

37 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

so if he doesn't directly threaten ,then how does he do it? or could it be just peoples imagination, you know, like 'bloodbath' the other week many here apparently 'knew what he meant', even when proved wrong..... 

dog whistle 

 

 

[thaibeachlovers]

20 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

You sure don't like any criticism of your Master, do you? 

You really do get it wrong, don't you? I've criticized Trump myself.

[thaibeachlovers]

11 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Trump does not directly threaten anyone, that's not his MO.

 

But you knew that before you posted, because you love trolling.

 

Perhaps you can stop trolling long enough to tell us how Trump intimidates his targets and political opponents, what are his techniques?

Ooh! Stones and glasshouses comes to mind over the last two sentences.

 

555555555555

[Yellowtail]

11 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

You really do get it wrong, don't you? I've criticized Trump myself.

It doesn't matter. If you do not want him jailed and his life destroyed, you are a MAGA Trump bootlicker. 

[transam]

On 4/8/2024 at 1:56 PM, Yellowtail said:

Bet you're spanking one out just thinking of it...

What if a she..........😘 

[WDSmart]

On 4/9/2024 at 10:10 AM, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm very disappointed in you for that. I thought you were a better person than to want to torture another human being. I'm apparently wrong.

 

Bye.

Yes, I would not want to torture another human being, but I was referring to Trump.