Opinion: What is Donald Trump's mental state?
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
8
Reduced battery life of phone brought to thailand
Turn sync off and auto updates -
5
Did you ever see a success story like this in Thailand?
Success? In a business, capitalist way you are correct!!! amazing, superb, fascinating, great for a young adult, very inspiring. Life success? who knows. happy? who knows? reached enlightenment? 99.999% no way. I would absolutely want his money if he has some. Maybe he has other bad investments. Maybe he bought that Trump coin and lost it all. Nobody knows. I've seen too many rich people destroy families and themselves to claim "success" like the OP implies immediately. But he has done more than most, probably has money which buys opportunity and allows freedom, and I hope he's using it and his company to help others. Ask me again in 10-years. -
22
My UK passport. Where can I get it checked
It is not a "blank page", useable passport pages are numbered and as you say has no official function. I would not see it ever being considered as defaced. Previous passports had the emergency contacts on the inside of the back cover and in one of mine I had 3 emergency contacts and just boldly overwrote the box that had been stamped on the page. I would suggest you complete emergency contact page opposite and then write above what is on the back page "Additional Contact Information" Obviously up to you what makes you feel more comfortable. -
49
President Trump ... accuses court system of blocking him from doing his job
I have shown the guy before, but because it was a 'facebook' link he dismissed it, even though the content was from a congressional hearing. So its not worth my time, but good to see you OAPs backing each other up at least. -
25
Dr Kevin STILLWAGON - I Have an Immune System, No Vaccines Needed
This came today...........https://www.yahoo.com/news/shingles-vaccine-unexpected-effect-heart-193943612.html. -
210
The alarming mental decline of Donald J. Trump -- watch this space
The argument you've shared makes a strong rhetorical appeal but suffers from several logical flaws and biases that weaken its overall persuasiveness. Key issues: 1. Tu Quoque Fallacy (“You too”) The argument essentially says: “If you opposed Biden because of mental decline, you must also oppose Trump for the same reason.” This is a classic tu quoque fallacy, where one attempts to deflect criticism by pointing to a similar flaw in another person. Even if Trump were experiencing mental decline, that wouldn’t retroactively make Biden’s mental acuity less problematic. Each case should be evaluated on its own merits. 2. Unsubstantiated Medical Diagnosis The claim that Trump is “in mental decline” or that it will “never get better” lacks objective medical evidence. It's based on opinion pieces and interpretations of his public behavior—not formal cognitive assessments. Without expert medical evaluation, such claims remain speculative and potentially defamatory. 3. False Equivalence The argument draws an equivalence between Biden’s and Trump’s alleged mental states without providing comparative evidence. It assumes the conditions are the same without data. Mental decline can vary drastically in nature, impact, and context—so it’s not logically valid to assert Trump is “worse” just because he’s “different.” 4. Confirmation Bias and Partisan Framing The argument selectively cites evidence (e.g., one opinion article and unspecified “disastrous performances”) while ignoring alternative interpretations or counterevidence. This shows strong confirmation bias and partisanship, reducing credibility to those seeking objective reasoning. 5. Slippery Slope Claiming Trump’s mental state “will never get better” and that he’ll necessarily cause more damage in four years is a slippery slope assumption. Future outcomes are predicted with certainty without acknowledging variables like health, policy input from advisers, or checks and balances in governance. 6. Begging the Question The argument assumes what it’s trying to prove: that Trump is in mental decline and that it’s harmful. It repeats this assertion rather than proving it with new evidence, creating a circular loop of reasoning. In Summary: While it is reasonable to evaluate a leader's mental fitness, this particular argument relies too heavily on emotional appeals, opinion pieces, and assumed equivalence. A rational analysis would require objective, medically grounded evidence and consistency in evaluating all leaders—not just political opponents.
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now