Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, riclag said:

I like mostly anybody who exposes the Woke.

I like mostly anyone who exposes DEI.

I like mostly anyone who exposes the Cultural Marxist attempts to Censorship.

I like mostly  anyone who is anti Communist,anti Marxist,anti Socialist.

Most of all I like anyone who likes

Red,white and Blue , Stars and Stripes.

I dont watch Fox News or Jessie but I sure do like what they expose!

 

I asked this before but you never answered - do you have confederate flag pillowcases?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Roo Island said:

I don't agree with that. I regularly check both Faux News and CNN to see what they are reporting. CNN reports on pretty much everything. Faux News doesn't. They lost too many viewers when they correctly called Arizona for Biden.


Is that why I have to keep sending you crime links?

  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Roo Island said:

That would be a first. They're the centerpiece of climate change deniers


You actually watch the View?

 

Turn in your man card, immediately!

  • Love It 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

You should know by now anyone who defends faux will only answer questions in any or all of the following:

(D) eny

(I) gnore

(L) ie

(D) eflect

(O) bfuscate

Accepting truth would mean they would have to admit they were wrong, and heaven forbid THAT should ever happen!

 

 

Post of the day!

  • Confused 1
  • Love It 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

True. And the reason Faux News posts misinformation. Sooooo many fall for it. And actually like it. Shows the intelligence level of their viewers

Yep. We are all drooling idiots, blah blah blah. Meanwhile, you from Oz then? Thats cool, your country does whats its told by a country soon to be run by drooling idiots. Have a great life, I sure am.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

You should know by now anyone who defends faux will only answer questions in any or all of the following:

(D) eny

(I) gnore

(L) ie

(D) eflect

(O) bfuscate

Accepting truth would mean they would have to admit they were wrong, and heaven forbid THAT should ever happen!

 

 

And after these don't work, personal attacks with made up "arguments/facts".

  • Thumbs Up 2
Posted
4 hours ago, impulse said:

Fox anchors would have to move 5 miles to the right (and gain 800 pounds) in order to balance MSDNC's leftists.

 

 

It always amazes me when people hold an opinion such as "I know my source of truth is skewed this way, but some others are skewed even more that way".

 

I read it to really mean "I know I'm stupid, but those over there are more stupid". The common denominator is stupid.

 

That argument goes both ways.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
5 hours ago, save the frogs said:

One of the definitions or characteristics of a "fox" is "trickery and deceit".

 

Fox news. Get it?

 

 

If I do get it, is there a pill for it?

  • Haha 2
Posted

Not long ago we weren't allowed to even mention hunter's laptop. Who was reporting that story first? Sure wasn't CNN. 

 

I catch some left leaning news occasionally. I like a good laugh.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Why single out Fox News?  ALL the so-called "legacy" media outlets are just as guilty!!  There are few that are truly "news," most are purely opinion soapboxes!

Posted
8 minutes ago, Woof999 said:

 

You should have caught the reports about mass election fraud. One of the outdoor broadcasts was from a garden centre opposite a porn shop. Proper funny it was.

Sorry but having a Brit explain funny is funny in itself. Stick with Monty.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Love It 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Dioj said:

Pure lunatic mayhem, lies, propaganda, and conspiracy theories. Lots of middle aged peroxide blond presenters in short dresses and layers of plastic face paint trying to look attractive. It's pretty sickening to think it even has a place in the mainstream. It's basically a live streaming tabloid posing as a form of reality. 

Exactly like CNN and MSNBC, etc., then.

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

Sorry but having a Brit explain funny is funny in itself. Stick with Monty.

 

Apologies. Garden center.

Posted (edited)
8 hours ago, bubblegum said:

After Sean and Tucker the latest star is Walters

"...the latest star is Walters".

Who? Barbara?  Thought she was dead.

Edited by Liverpool Lou
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
8 hours ago, bubblegum said:

After Sean and Tucker the latest star is Walters and after observing him for a while I started to wonder: Do they grow them near area 51 or clone them?

They clone them at the same lab that clones so many AN posters. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, gargamon said:

Yeah, good luck with that. The fact checking includes the talking heads, not just the news station anchors. So faux news is at 58% and CNN is at 22%. I watch CNN regularly and the only false info there is from the Republican pundits who spin their nonsense anywhere that they can.

I watch CNN regularly and the only false info there is from the Democrat pundits who spin their nonsense anywhere that they can.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
Posted

What is more interesting than the bizarre OP is that so many Fox News haters (and chronically lame mockers of others who watch it) are now outing themselves by admitting to watching it.  Either that or, by definition, they're just expressing ignorant, unfounded and unjustifiable opinions without ever watching the channel!   I wonder if any of them will admit from which cable news channels, that are apparently so much better, they get their news?

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
6 hours ago, NanLaew said:
6 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

Next time at least spell check the thread title. Quite humorous, Who is Walters?

 

Jesse Waters, the empty vessel trying to fill the vacuum on Fox

The empty vessel?  There are so many posters here (consistently) making so much noise about Fox and its presenters; what is it that is said about "empty vessels" and "most noise" or does that adage only apply to the enemy?

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The empty vessel?  There are so many posters here (consistently) making so much noise about Fox and its presenters; what is it that is said about "empty vessels" and "most noise" or does that adage only apply to the enemy?

(D)eny

(O)bfuscate

 

2/5 - you can do better than that.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

Exactly like CNN and MSNBC, etc., then.

I'm guessing you've never watched these outlets....just spewing the talking points

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, HappyExpat57 said:
4 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said:

The empty vessel?  There are so many posters here (consistently) making so much noise about Fox and its presenters; what is it that is said about "empty vessels" and "most noise" or does that adage only apply to the enemy?

(D)eny

(O)bfuscate

 

2/5 - you can do better than that.

As could you...what are the daft brackets supposed to indicate?  What did I "(d)eny" or "(o)bfuscate" [sic], exactly?

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...