Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

They argued against locking out tourists based on isolated incidents of misjudgement.

Oops!.. should have been: "They argued against locking non western tourists based on isolated incidents of misjudgement."

Edited by Ben Zioner
Posted
11 hours ago, BangkokReady said:

 

It's true.  It's totally one sided not to prosecute a child who needs to go to the toilet to the same extent as a man who spray paints a wall.  They're exactly the same and to not treat them the same is to show favouritism towards foreigners.  😑🙄

Have more signboards set up at prominent places, where local and foreign visitors can see them. Plus, in at least 3 languages - Thai, English, Chinese, and some other. 

  • Sad 1
  • Agree 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...