itsari Posted Tuesday at 08:41 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:41 AM Just now, itsari said: Many add words in English spelt Thai words without any repercussions. Kowjai? What's good for the ganda is good for the goose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticky Rice Balls Posted Tuesday at 08:43 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:43 AM 4 hours ago, Gottfrid said: Drinking with a prostitute is not. it will end in tears... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 08:47 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:47 AM 46 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: I take gratification in commenting accurately. Self recommendation is no recommendation. Bye Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NanLaew Posted Tuesday at 08:48 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:48 AM 8 hours ago, soalbundy said: What's the difference between that and a bar beer except for the mattresses. BYOM ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 08:49 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 08:49 AM 49 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: I take gratification in commenting accurately. Self recommendation is no recommendation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted Tuesday at 09:32 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:32 AM After the raid the police got them down and banged them up I suppose 🤔 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gottfrid Posted Tuesday at 09:42 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:42 AM 57 minutes ago, Sticky Rice Balls said: it will end in tears... Why, I had the time of my life doing that in some clubs in Stockholm when younger. Never went to more than socialize with a drink or two. After that hitting the nightlife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 09:46 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 09:46 AM 1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said: Neither working in a beer bar, nor the bar accepting a bar fine for their staff leaving work, is illegal. Not according to the letter of the law but the bar fine is like a brothel fee, and the 'staff' are prostitutes so let's keep it real and see it as it is. If the shagging took place on the premises it would be breaking the law, the fact that it doesn't circumvents the law, that's the only difference to a fully blown brothel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Zioner Posted Tuesday at 10:05 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 10:05 AM 22 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Additionally, officers discovered condoms and lubricants Never take a condom to Nana Plaza. But, but, butt. but money could a solid proof too.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 10:44 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 10:44 AM 1 hour ago, NanLaew said: BYOM ? Instagram shorthand for what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverpool Lou Posted Tuesday at 11:57 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 11:57 AM 2 hours ago, soalbundy said: 4 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said: Neither working in a beer bar, nor the bar accepting a bar fine for their staff leaving work, is illegal. Not according to the letter of the law Really? Please quote the letter of the law (section of the Criminal Code) that makes working in a beer bar, or the bar accepting a fee for taking an employee out of work, illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverpool Lou Posted Tuesday at 12:06 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:06 PM 2 hours ago, soalbundy said: If the shagging took place on the premises it would be breaking the law, the fact that it doesn't circumvents the law, that's the only difference to a fully blown brothel. Exactly, that's why beer bars are legal and are not brothels. Taking a girl out of a bar, for whatever purpose, is not "circumventing any law", there is no applicable law to circumvent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 12:08 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:08 PM Just now, Liverpool Lou said: Really? Please quote the letter of the law (section of the Criminal Code) that makes working in a beer bar, or the bar accepting a fee for taking an employee out of work, illegal. You've obviously misunderstood me, no, it is not illegal according to the letter of the law, I thought I had made that plain. As far as I'm concerned there is only a thin line dividing brothels and bar beers, I personally have nothing against either, I have never been in a brothel but have spent many hilarious hours in bars and enjoyed the experience. I've never paid a bar fine, I always arranged a meeting place with a woman the next day in the early afternoon, it always went well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proton Posted Tuesday at 12:12 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:12 PM 9 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said: In Thailand it's not a crime to have drinks with prostitutes! But it is if they admit to paying them for sex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proton Posted Tuesday at 12:17 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:17 PM 4 hours ago, itsari said: From the way I read the report is that the men were drinking with the prostitutes in the floor above the bar. I was saying if that is the case in many European countries the men would be prosecuted for soliciting to buy sex but not here in Thailand it seems it's illegal to pay for sex on the premises or off them. If a women is employed in a bar and a bar fine is paid for the purposes of prostitution it could be argued the bar owner is a pimp, also illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 12:27 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:27 PM 2 minutes ago, Liverpool Lou said: Exactly, that's why beer bars are legal and are not brothels. Taking a girl out of a bar, for whatever purpose, is not "circumventing any law", there is no applicable law to circumvent. The circumvented law against prostitution, it is promoting prostitution but since nothing can be proved nothing is done about it. I find it hypocritical to prosecute someone for providing rooms when everyone knows the bar girl is going to a room somewhere else, the paid sex still takes place, the bar owner takes his cut and is now a legal pimp without consequences. Just legalize the whole thing with taxation and health care plus regular testing for STD's. How it is now is just a charade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liverpool Lou Posted Tuesday at 12:30 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 12:30 PM 16 minutes ago, proton said: 9 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said: In Thailand it's not a crime to have drinks with prostitutes! But it is if they admit to paying them for sex That depends where the activity takes place, taking one home and having sex there is not a crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 01:24 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:24 PM 5 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said: Seems that neither do you, itsari, regarding soliciting. In Thailand you are possibly correct. I am comparing Thai law to many European countries law if you take the trouble to read. You obviously do not understand who is held accountable for there actions in soliciting for sex services in many countries on Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 01:29 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:29 PM 59 minutes ago, soalbundy said: The circumvented law against prostitution, it is promoting prostitution but since nothing can be proved nothing is done about it. I find it hypocritical to prosecute someone for providing rooms when everyone knows the bar girl is going to a room somewhere else, the paid sex still takes place, the bar owner takes his cut and is now a legal pimp without consequences. Just legalize the whole thing with taxation and health care plus regular testing for STD's. How it is now is just a charade. The law needs to follow the Nordic countries in making the customers responsible for their actions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 01:45 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 01:45 PM Just now, itsari said: The law needs to follow the Nordic countries in making the customers responsible for their actions. Oh isn't that a little strict? Men's brains are 24/7 do it, do it, do it. Womens brains are, what do I get out of it? so we meet in the middle with some crispy bank notes, she pretends to enjoy the process and you end up feeling somehow cheated by the comedy but you did it. A British police superintendent once said a brothel is as essential to a city as a sewage works. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 02:03 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:03 PM 15 minutes ago, soalbundy said: Oh isn't that a little strict? Men's brains are 24/7 do it, do it, do it. Womens brains are, what do I get out of it? so we meet in the middle with some crispy bank notes, she pretends to enjoy the process and you end up feeling somehow cheated by the comedy but you did it. A British police superintendent once said a brothel is as essential to a city as a sewage works. Some what a uncaring response to a problem that many European countries want to resolve by making the customers more responsible for there actions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 02:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:07 PM 19 minutes ago, soalbundy said: Oh isn't that a little strict? Men's brains are 24/7 do it, do it, do it. Womens brains are, what do I get out of it? so we meet in the middle with some crispy bank notes, she pretends to enjoy the process and you end up feeling somehow cheated by the comedy but you did it. A British police superintendent once said a brothel is as essential to a city as a sewage works. Perhaps your Uk police officer you quote is as bad as the customers for prostitution that want immunity from prosecution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proton Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:11 PM 1 hour ago, Liverpool Lou said: That depends where the activity takes place, taking one home and having sex there is not a crime. it is according to the suppression of prostitution act 1996, it does not depend where it takes place Section 5. Any person who, for the purpose of prostitution, solicits, induces, introduces herself or himself to, follows or importunes a person in a street, public place or any other place, which is committed openly and shamelessly or causes nuisance to the public, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding one thousand Baht. Section 6. Any person who associates with another person in a prostitution establishment for the purpose of prostitution of oneself or another person shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month or to a fine not exceeding one thousand Baht or to both. Section 11. Any person who is the owner, supervisor or manager of a prostitution business or a prostitution establishment, or the controller of prostitutes in a prostitution establishment shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of three to fifteen years and to a fine of sixty thousand to three hundred thousand Baht. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 02:17 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:17 PM Just now, itsari said: Some what a uncaring response to a problem that many European countries want to resolve by making the customers more responsible for there actions What actions would they be? You are going to give a hypocritical woke answer that makes no sense aren't you......mostly life is easier when you accept the world as it is, platitudes are hideous little lies. Even women find male feminists a little creepy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Tuesday at 02:31 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 02:31 PM 7 minutes ago, itsari said: Perhaps your Uk police officer you quote is as bad as the customers for prostitution that want immunity from prosecution Why should anyone be prosecuted for having natural urges or to want to profit from them. What right does anyone have to say a women can't sell her sexuality, you aren't being forced to buy her. A man's desire is private, the state shouldn't be interfering with his natural urges, he is paying for sex for reasons that don't concern the state. The law doesn't stop prostitution it drives it underground where the state can't control the health issues or profit from taxation. It will end like prohibition.....stopping people from drinking alcohol, that caused the mafia. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PingRoundTheWorld Posted Tuesday at 03:25 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 03:25 PM Odd that they were specifically targetted. It doesn't sound like anyone was trafficked or exploited or underage. There's literally thousands of such establishments in Thailand. Must've pissed someone off or neglect to pay up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsari Posted Tuesday at 10:10 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 10:10 PM 7 hours ago, soalbundy said: Why should anyone be prosecuted for having natural urges or to want to profit from them. What right does anyone have to say a women can't sell her sexuality, you aren't being forced to buy her. A man's desire is private, the state shouldn't be interfering with his natural urges, he is paying for sex for reasons that don't concern the state. The law doesn't stop prostitution it drives it underground where the state can't control the health issues or profit from taxation. It will end like prohibition.....stopping people from drinking alcohol, that caused the mafia. If a woman is open to a criminal prosecution for receiving money for sex in Thailand, don't you think the man should be at least be treated the same for paying the woman for sex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soalbundy Posted Wednesday at 12:41 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 12:41 AM 2 hours ago, itsari said: If a woman is open to a criminal prosecution for receiving money for sex in Thailand, don't you think the man should be at least be treated the same for paying the woman for sex? I've made it clear that I don't think either of them should be prosecuted, the state is playing the 'moral police' card which causes pimps to come out of the wood work to get customers for her for a large fee, other crimes follow from that, every time the state interferes unforeseen consequences follow, people don't want to be controlled. Why should a man be prosecuted for following his natural urges if it harms nobody. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewsterbudgen Posted Wednesday at 05:43 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:43 AM 15 hours ago, proton said: it is according to the suppression of prostitution act 1996, it does not depend where it takes place Section 5. Any person who, for the purpose of prostitution, solicits, induces, introduces herself or himself to, follows or importunes a person in a street, public place or any other place, which is committed openly and shamelessly or causes nuisance to the public, shall be liable to a fine not exceeding one thousand Baht. Section 6. Any person who associates with another person in a prostitution establishment for the purpose of prostitution of oneself or another person shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one month or to a fine not exceeding one thousand Baht or to both. Section 11. Any person who is the owner, supervisor or manager of a prostitution business or a prostitution establishment, or the controller of prostitutes in a prostitution establishment shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of three to fifteen years and to a fine of sixty thousand to three hundred thousand Baht. You're quoting the "law" but nothing you have quoted says that it is illegal to pay someone for sex, other than in public or in a brothel. Section 11 also applies to the owner of controller of the prostitutes and NOT the customers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
proton Posted Wednesday at 05:45 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 05:45 AM Just now, brewsterbudgen said: You're quoting the "law" but nothing you have quoted says that it is illegal to pay someone for sex, other than in public or in a brothel. Section 11 also applies to the owner of controller of the prostitutes and NOT the customers. Read the whole law, being a prostitute or paying one or pimping one out is illegal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now