16 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

I loved Musk's reply to Gavin Newsom, who professed outrage Musk would post a parody of Harris. Newson threated to pass a law immediately to make use of a voice in a parody illegal. Musk replied that he checked with the world reknown authority Professor Suggon Deeznutz and was told that parody is still legal in America. It's in that video above, absolutely hilarious.

yeah, wants to ban humour and satire! i saw it, haha 

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

just because something you don't like is posted it doesn't automatically mean it hate speech or misinformation. did you see Zuckerberg admitted to suppressing the Biden Laptop story and some covid related information, both were labelled 'misinformation' back then, so who gets to stay what is hateful and what is misinformation?

  there are already rules in place with regards to hate speech,, do you even use X?  remember when the bbc reporter said pretty much what you just did and musk wiped the floor with him, he couldn't give 1 example and i doubt you could either, you are just 'useful idiot' parroting  msm talking points and buzz words

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1256962409047546&aggr_v_ids[0]=1256962409047546&notif_id=1724863273031586&notif_t=watch_follower_video_explicit&ref=notif

Come on. It's well known X is a source of misinformation and hatred. It's well known Musk is a nutter. So yes, these are things I don't like. Weak minds fall for it.

 

Facebook isn't a good source for reliable news either.

14 minutes ago, watthong said:

 

 

 

Trump does that all the times. For example, making funny face  and laughing along with the audience laughing at himself at the UN. Or playing geriatric, "Horrible questions, didn't say hello or ask how are you, so rude..." at the NABJ Con. All MAGA playbook.

 trump reacted to the comment, the others laughed at trumps reaction, that is simple to see. i don think you know what was said either, and due to that your narrative falls flat on its face.

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

 trump reacted to the comment, the others laughed at trumps reaction, that is simple to see. i don think you know what was said either, and due to that your narrative falls flat on its face.

Normally, he walks out when the going gets tough. Very thin skinned as he has admitted

1 minute ago, Roo Island said:

Come on. It's well known X is a source of misinformation and hatred. It's well known Musk is a nutter. So yes, these are things I don't like. Weak minds fall for it.

 

Facebook isn't a good source for reliable news either.

show some proof then....you can't, you are just repeating what you have read..... post some misinformation and hate, back up your claim or it BS remember!!

 

do you even use X  ? i very much doubt it

 

Facebook might not be your source for news but 'younger' people use it daily for news and information, so they are spreading misinformation to potentially 4 billion users (X 300 million ish)

1 minute ago, frank83628 said:

show some proof then....you can't, you are just repeating what you have read..... post some misinformation and hate, back up your claim or it BS remember!!

 

do you even use X  ? i very much doubt it

 

Facebook might not be your source for news but 'younger' people use it daily for news and information, so they are spreading misinformation to potentially 4 billion users (X 300 million ish)

Ya make it too easy!  😆

 

https://apnews.com/article/disinformation-musk-x-twitter-european-union-9f7823726f812bb357ee4225b884354f

 

Musk’s X is the biggest purveyor of disinformation, EU official says

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

show some proof then....you can't, you are just repeating what you have read..... post some misinformation and hate, back up your claim or it BS remember!!

 

do you even use X  ? i very much doubt it

 

Facebook might not be your source for news but 'younger' people use it daily for news and information, so they are spreading misinformation to potentially 4 billion users (X 300 million ish)

Now prove me wrong.

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

show some proof then....you can't, you are just repeating what you have read..... post some misinformation and hate, back up your claim or it BS remember!!

 

do you even use X  ? i very much doubt it

 

Facebook might not be your source for news but 'younger' people use it daily for news and information, so they are spreading misinformation to potentially 4 billion users (X 300 million ish)

X scraps tool to report electoral fake news - researchers

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66944123

 

 

On 8/27/2024 at 12:12 PM, theblether said:

 

Hail, the arrogance that saw Clinton defeated. 

He destroyed his GOP rivals on the debate stage. 

Humiliated "cos you'd be in jail" and defeated Clinton. 

Biden had to drop out the Presidential race after his Trump "I don't know what he said and I don't he knows either." debate. 

Now up against Harris - who Tulsi obliterated in forty seconds. 

Do not be overconfident about Harris in a debate against Trump. 

In fact, do not be confident at all. 

 

Yes, one should not be over confident.   However, you interpret according to your personal bias.

The fact is that VP Harris has been trained at  staying on point and in delivering the facts in a manner that a group of typical voters can understand. Juries are picked from voter registration lists.  As a senator, VP Harris had experience in talking to a wide cross section of Americans and with political adversaries.  Former president Trump is a salesman, and arguably was a very good one at that and a master of self promotion.  Unfortunately for him, his style is very 1980's/ 1990's and has not kept pace with cultural changes in the USA. All Harris has to do is to rattle off her points in a digestible manner and to build her case. Trump will do himself in with his bluster. If set up right, Trump will be like Captain Queeg addressing the court martial hearing in the Caine Mutiny.

14 minutes ago, Roo Island said:

X scraps tool to report electoral fake news - researchers

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-66944123

 

 

that isn't proof , that is an article saying it has, an article written after musk took over twitter. an article i very much would have been written before and  from the bbc, well known for being left bias, show me hatew speech and misiformation from your  X feed. 

On 8/26/2024 at 11:08 PM, RSD1 said:

Looks like

Looks like Looks like Looks like 

2 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

that isn't proof , that is an article saying it has, an article written after musk took over twitter. an article i very much would have been written before and  from the bbc, well known for being left bias, show me hatew speech and misiformation from your  X feed. 

Post something that says X doesn't support misinformation.  credible sources only

6 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Looks like Looks like Looks like 

 

Not good to stutter. ..What happened to your Uncle Trump ABC blocks?

16 minutes ago, Patong2021 said:

 

 

The fact is that VP Harris has been trained at  staying on point and in delivering the facts in a manner that a group of typical voters can understand. 

 

Yes, especially when she annnounced that the US had a deep and lasting alliance with the republic of North Korea. We all understood she's an incompetent embarassment.

 

 

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Yes, especially when she annnounced that the US had a deep and lasting alliance with the republic of North Korea. We all understood she's an incompetent embarassment.

 

 

The Washington Examiner? Horrible media outlet. Sad you fall for the misinformation

10 minutes ago, watthong said:

 

Not good to stutter. ..What happened to your Uncle Trump ABC blocks?

 

What happened to Trump backing out of the debate?

 

Not good to bs.

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

What happened to Trump backing out of the debate?

 

Not good to bs.

He didn't back out. Just threatening to. As usual

2 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Kamala's Greatest hits of Stupidity proves she can't and is amusing to boot.

It’s hard to imagine she’s going to mess up in the debate. Since she started running for president she hasn’t made any notable gaffs or errors. She’s been right on point so far. And I think she will be very prepared for what could prove to be the debate of her life. Also, I find it hard to believe that Trump would really be able to corner her. He seems like the more likely participant in the debate to do something to his own determent. He’s not known for having grace under pressure. 

 

On the subject of stupid moves, Trump seems to have made a few big ones since she started running for president. There was the whole race question about Kamala that was quite embarrassing for him, then onto “black jobs”, etc. Then he made those controversial comments soon after that about wounded veterans. 
 

Given the above, I think the chances of Trump causing more problems for himself during the debate seem far greater than it going the other way. Thus, it could end up being a bad showing for him. He would probably be better off to avoid it completely. 
 

1 hour ago, Roo Island said:

My identity is stolen’: Photos of European influencers used to push pro-Trump propaganda on fake X accounts

https://www.cnn.com/2024/08/28/europe/fake-maga-accounts-x-european-influencers-intl-cmd

 

"Would You Support Trump Being The President forever? 1 wonder if you all support Trump for president just like me," @Luna_2K24 posted on July 29, sharing a beach selfie in a white bikini and asking her followers to respond with an American flag emoji if they agreed. The post was viewed by around 54,000 people

 

 But Luna isn't real. The photos of the smiling brunette posted periodically on @Luna_2K24's timeline are of Debbie Nederlof, a German fashion influencer who lives across the Atlantic and won't be voting in the US presidential election in November. When CNN reached out to the 32-year-old, a trained optician and single mother who is working two jobs - as a social media manager at an engineering firm and as a model to raise money for her child - she was angry and frustrated that her face was being used to push pro-Trump propaganda on x.

 

Oh dear, now we know why poor Trump has to go back to hawking on line his digital Trump cards collection. I remember the Fake Elvis was my favorite, though seemed to have sold out.

 

Second favorite, the John Travolta  "Staying Alive" strut (how apt...) is still available. I'm going to put that one in my shopping cart anyway, as" There comes a time one should feel empathy for one's opponent," according to Lao Tzu, "the Art of War." (Though "And be clement, make it swift" seems to be the underlined message...)

 

1 hour ago, frank83628 said:

 trump reacted to the comment, the others laughed at trumps reaction, that is simple to see. i don think you know what was said either, and due to that your narrative falls flat on its face.

 

Seemed like there are more than just hearing impairment on your part. Cognitive testing is highly recommended. ( And not the type "Camera, man, woman, thing...") 

 

 

3 hours ago, Patong2021 said:

 

Yes, one should not be over confident.   However, you interpret according to your personal bias.

The fact is that VP Harris has been trained at  staying on point and in delivering the facts in a manner that a group of typical voters can understand. Juries are picked from voter registration lists.  As a senator, VP Harris had experience in talking to a wide cross section of Americans and with political adversaries.  Former president Trump is a salesman, and arguably was a very good one at that and a master of self promotion.  Unfortunately for him, his style is very 1980's/ 1990's and has not kept pace with cultural changes in the USA. All Harris has to do is to rattle off her points in a digestible manner and to build her case. Trump will do himself in with his bluster. If set up right, Trump will be like Captain Queeg addressing the court martial hearing in the Caine Mutiny.

 

I watched Harris as a senator and that led me to tipping her as a Presidential candidate. I was shocked at her poor performance in the hustings. 

 

I'm of the belief that you did not watch one moment of Harris when she was a Senator as your description of her is clearly made up in your head. 

18 hours ago, gargamon said:

You misspelled that. It's “duh“!

What the !!

I dont even know or interacted with you! 

Help is needed don't breed for god's sake! 

Trump has to debate, since he is behind in the polls.

 

So, this topic is much Ado about nothing.

3 hours ago, theblether said:

 

I watched Harris as a senator and that led me to tipping her as a Presidential candidate. I was shocked at her poor performance in the hustings. 

 

I'm of the belief that you did not watch one moment of Harris when she was a Senator as your description of her is clearly made up in your head. 

I'm of the belief there are plenty of posters on here that exaggerate Harris's flaws, due to a mix of racism and misogyny.

I also believe those who support a 78 yo felon in cognitive decline, are seriously <deleted> in the head.

There's no guarantee Trump won't become doolally in the next four years.

14 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Now,  zero for infinity plus four. 

 

Although I do agree,  Walz WILL come tumbling down. Down to defeat after Vance exposes his totalitarian beliefs and BS.

 

 

If something happened to Harris, Walz would step in. IMO he's the kind of father figure Americans would want in a crisis. A safe pair of hands

 

If something happened to Trump, Vance would step in. A far right nutter who would divide Americans even further than Trump has.

 

Gerald Ford had two would-be female assassins. They'd be lining up around the block for Vance.

 

Be careful what you wish for.

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

I also believe those who support a 78 yo felon in cognitive decline, are seriously <deleted> in the head.

 

 

Case in point: defense of Trump being laughed at at the UN...

 

9 hours ago, frank83628 said:

 trump reacted to the comment, the others laughed at trumps reaction, that is simple to see. i don think you know what was said either, and due to that your narrative falls flat on its face.

 

 

2 hours ago, Lacessit said:

If something happened to Harris, Walz would step in. IMO he's the kind of father figure Americans would want in a crisis. A safe pair of hands

 

If something happened to Trump, Vance would step in. A far right nutter who would divide Americans even further than Trump has.

 

Gerald Ford had two would-be female assassins. They'd be lining up around the block for Vance.

 

Be careful what you wish for.

Entirely possible. Trump is old.  But if he is elected and cannot serve his full term, then Vance will step in.  And do a very good job. He is used to dealing with crisis and coming through successfully.  

14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Chickening out. Rules were changed for Trump and Biden. Biden's gone. Kamala INSISTED they keep the rules the same. Trump agreed. 

 

Now chicken-Harris wants to change the rules, because she's terrified. 

 

And Trump has not pulled out. Do you have anything supporting your claim that he did? 

 

I thought not. 

Noone except pu##y conservatives are afraid of Trump. 

15 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Trump has agreed. It is a lie that he has pulled out. 

His own words were that he was and now changed his position. Stop trying to be a revisionist and exclude his demented bs and rhetoric. He's just a bs blowhard struggling to stay relevant in the face of his disintegrating life and popularity amidst his legal troubles. If you follow him like a puppy then don't complain about where you end up

4 minutes ago, Dan O said:

Noone except pu##y conservatives are afraid of Trump. 

Noone? 

 

By pu##y conservatives do you mean the never-Trumpers? 

 

Harris is a pu##y Marxist and she seems to be afraid of Trump. Otherwise, why would she be so desperate to change the rules she previously insisted on? 

 

And why will she only agree to one debate when Trump wants three? Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken  Chicken