On 9/4/2024 at 2:05 PM, Captain Monday said:

All of Trump’s relationships are entirely transactional. Is nobodys business but their own. She does not hate him but I doubt they have actually mated physically. Baron was probably conceived by artificial insemination.

 

i wouldn't bet on that.

On 9/4/2024 at 8:58 AM, Lacessit said:

A former White House aide, Anthony Scaramucci, has claimed Melania secretly hopes Harris will defeat Trump.

 

There are plenty of videos of Melania rejecting Trump in public, slapping his hand away, and avoiding his smooching attempts. She has made no secret of how much she despises living in Washington.

 

She avoids the campaign rallies. Bonking Stormy Daniels presumably did not help either.

 

Her lack of support contrasts strongly with Harris and Walz, whose partners are with them on the campaign trail.

 

https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/life/entertainment/2024/09/03/melania-donald-trump-election?

Rubbish

4 hours ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Rubbish

I am simply overwhelmed by the intellectual brilliance of your response.

Have you got past words of two syllables in school yet?

On 9/8/2024 at 6:59 AM, Lacessit said:

I am simply overwhelmed by the intellectual brilliance of your response.

Have you got past words of two syllables in school yet?

Are you smarter than a 5th grader?

16 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Are you smarter than a 5th grader?

I am smarter than some Ph.D's I used to work with.

1 minute ago, Lacessit said:

I am smarter than some Ph.D's I used to work with.

Then act it.

On 9/4/2024 at 5:48 AM, maesariang said:

3 hookers. Are you pro hooker now?

Ahem...considering it's a thread about Melania Trump....

This is an example of what division the Trump  contagion has caused.  End of story.  

 

As for Melania,  sad she used the Einstein visa.  How hypocritical is it for all of maga to be so anti immigration and accept that illegal entry and her parents coming too.   

 

Sad to hear who  Melania really is.  It's revealed in how she  talks to her friend in that recorded phone call.     Just one of trumps many mistakes.    

 

Those 3 Thai women at Sapphire look Devine.    They look plenty legal to ogle at and that's their occupation. Love the 2 natural sets but one has those fake dark eyebrows so the center one gets my vote.  

23 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Then act it.

Are words of two syllables getting to be too much for you?

The current Melania stand-in...Laura Loomer, whom aides are concerned has a "grip" on Trump...

 

 

24 minutes ago, bamnutsak said:

whom aides are concerned has a "grip" on Trump...

They wouldn't know if it grabbed them by the b.

On 9/4/2024 at 10:59 AM, Captain Monday said:

I didn't know that. Interesting. She must be a first tier model then,  I dont begrudge anybody using whatever resources they have to migrate.

 

3rd tier for sure, possibly 2nd, but definitely not 1st tier. Face wise, she's got that squinting look to camouflage her rather small eyes. Which in turn makes her look slutty, okay for a young model but, say, "unbecoming" as she gets older, especially on the Western European circuit.

 

Body wise, she was flat to begin with. Sensibly enough, she rushed to get a boob job as she ventured East to West to jumpstart her modeling career...However she did not take care of her derriere. It has remained flat into the White House days, in spite of the endless hours she had to stand firm on stiletto heels when accompanying Trump through various official ceremonies, masses, etc. Up to the early days of Trump presidency, I was able to catch a YT clip showing Melania doing a "spread" on a French (or German? can't remember which, but they put her on the cover) girlie tabloid. She did okay. with a scarf wrapping/unwrapping  chest/crotch areas, but not up to our "Playmate" standard. That clip has since been taken down. Her wisest move was to migrate, and her biggest benefactor was Epstein, who delivered her to Trump. In that regard, she's got more than just an "Epstein" visa.

 

On 9/4/2024 at 3:03 PM, Cameroni said:

Well the New York jury found him not guilty of rape.

No they didn't. This was not a criminal trial, it was a civil suit. A jury in a civil suit does not find a person guilty or innocent, they decide whether a person is liable or not liable for damages.

 

Also, even though the jury in the case did not find Trump liable for damages related to rape, based on New York's narrow legal definition of the term, the judge who presided over the case wrote in August 2023 that Carroll's accusation of rape was "substantially true".

 

Judge tosses Trump's counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll, finding rape claim is 'substantially true'

3 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

No they didn't. This was not a criminal trial, it was a civil suit. A jury in a civil suit does not find a person guilty or innocent, they decide whether a person is liable or not liable for damages.

 

Also, even though the jury in the case did not find Trump liable for damages related to rape, based on New York's narrow legal definition of the term, the judge who presided over the case wrote in August 2023 that Carroll's accusation of rape was "substantially true".

 

Judge tosses Trump's counterclaim against E. Jean Carroll, finding rape claim is 'substantially true'

 

I have already said above this was a civil trial. As for the jury:

 

The jury reached a unanimous decision on May 9, 2023, after deliberating for less than three hours.[130] Considering the preponderance of the evidence, the jury delivered a verdict that first stated that Carroll had not proven that Trump raped her.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_Carroll_v._Donald_J._Trump

 

The judge's legal acrobatics by referring to other jurisdictions' rape definitions where Trump was not accused, is outrageous in my view. 

 

This case is of course subject to appeal still, so we shall see if this judge's bizarre decision will be brushed aside or not.

 

In any event, this incident happened decades ago, and the method by which the claimant "proved" her allegation of sexual assault is by "outcry witnesses", ie she told her friends after the act, supposedly. They put in witness statements to that effect. Almost impossible for a man then to prove those are lies.

I suspect that she couldn't care less about him, but will probably stick around until the money runs out.

 

It would be interesting to know her take on that Loomer woman, she probably views her as worth a fair bit when the divorce is finally negotiated.