Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A post with unattributed content that was copy and pasted from some site without providing any link to the source of information has been removed:

  • Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to a mainstream media source.
Posted
1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

You are not wrong. His closer was magnificent and he clearly won that exchange.

 

The problem was the 40 minutes or so before that he was always goaded by the moderators to talk about his own record, by Harris too, and he  did so. He should have done more of what he did at the end. Point out that Harris had been in the white House for almost 4 years and done none of the things she talked about.

It’s always somebody else’s fault.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 9/13/2024 at 11:35 AM, EVENKEEL said:

Put the citizens out of work with lower wages. People evicted to make room for the Haitians who bring in higher gov assistance. Crime. Why don't you go live there and report back.

Seems some prefer to live away from the country they profess to love so much.

sarcasm alert!

  • Confused 1
Posted
39 minutes ago, mdr224 said:

From what i understand of the debate, it was a complete waste of time for everyone watching. My time is more valuable than that

I agree, but I managed to use the time to clean my wardrobe while listening in case anything interesting came up- it didn't.

Posted
2 hours ago, mdr224 said:

Do most black people even know that harris is not black? No, and the dems would like to keep it that way

To be fair she is as black as Obama, and most thought he was black.

I never read anyone else pointing out only half black.

  • Sad 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Pot kettle etc.

 

:coffee1:

Not really. Mrd 224 hasn't watched the debate but still feels the need to post about it.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Not really. Mrd 224 hasn't watched the debate but still feels the need to post about it.

He's not the only one that feels a need to post about things they apparently know little about, apart from guessing. That includes the ones that ascribes the same motive for supporting Trump to every one of those that do. Deplorables anyone?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Despite fact checking Trump, erroneously at times especially on the crime stats comment by ABC, Kamala lied incessantly never once fact checked by ABC moderators. So it can be said Kamala is her own best fact checker so often illuminating, fully on display for all to see, her proclivity for outright pathological lying.

Soldier on, the cackling lying dunce.

 

 

  • Sad 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

He's not the only one that feels a need to post about things they apparently know little about, apart from guessing. That includes the ones that ascribes the same motive for supporting Trump to every one of those that do. Deplorables anyone?

Lol, opinions about reasons can not be compared to having an opinion about something you didn't even watch.

  • Like 1
  • Love It 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Lol, opinions about reasons can not be compared to having an opinion about something you didn't even watch.

Am i wrong though? It doesnt seem anyone has any takeaways from the debate other than that kamala won. Ok..won what? People still dont know her policies

Posted
51 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Taylor Swift endorsement by actually saying, "I don't think anyone is going to be influenced by a billionaire celebrity".

 

Of course they will, the 9 to 17 year olds demographic perhaps....oh but wait, they can't vote. LOL. It's all desperation by the fake Kamala campaign.

You go a big fat NOTHING there, as usual.

 

It seems JD has shutdown Walz's obsession with painting JD as as weird....LOL

Walz seems sorely lacking in brain cognition compared to JD Vance, but nah Walz is just plain dumb, dumber than most, which is normal for Kamala and her team, and....all their supporters.

 

"Vance then proceeded to lay out how it is Walz who signed a bill putting feminine hygiene products in boys' bathrooms in Minnesota public schools, Walz (and Harris) who supports child drag shows and transgender surgeries for children, and Walz who has evinced a bizarre obsession with communist China. Since then, the “weird” attacks have noticeably died down."

 

https://archive.ph/bWFtp#selection-1955.0-1955.360:~:text=Vance then proceeded,noticeably died down

 

JDVance_townhall.thumb.jpg.2a17218689809aafec7104f9ad0c969a.jpg

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 9/14/2024 at 8:17 AM, earlinclaifornia said:

An emailed threat said bombs had been planted in the homes of Springfield´s mayor and other city officials, said Karen Graves, a city spokesperson. A second email said that bombs would be detonated at locations including Springfield City Hall, a high school, a middle school, two elementary schools, a local office of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles and a licensing bureau.

 

Losing a debate at the cost of MAGA hyjacking 

Terriorist wanting to kill children. MAGA

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-13848891/Bomb-threats-close-schools-offices-Trump-spread-false-rumors-Haitians-Ohio.html

 

someone isnt happy about the 1000's if migrants flowing into Springfields population due to the mess of Biden/Harris border, yet is Trumps fault?

 

some mental gymnastics needed to come up with that

 

the daily mail is the printed version of cnn, with some celeb gossip added in.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Didn't take you long to get your facts wrong. First of all, Taylor Swift's audience isn't composed much of tweens or teenagers. If you actually listened to her music you would know it's not aimed at them.

image.png.f8c57a1e6c7d9aeb4876801d727cb155.png

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1372971/taylor-swift-fans-by-generation/

 

And then there's this:

Taylor Swift drove 405,999 visitors to vote.gov in 24 hours after Kamala Harris endorsement

Taylor Swift's post endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for the White House on Tuesday drove 405,999 users to visit the site vote.gov over the course of the following day, a sign of the potential effect her decision to speak out could have on November's election.

Vote.gov is run by a federal agency known as the General Services Administration, in partnership with the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. The site includes information about how to register to vote and cast a ballot, and directs users to state sites where they can register.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/taylor-swift-kamala-harris-endorsement-vote-gov/

should that not be classed as interfering in the election?

 

Didn't take you long to get your facts wrong. First of all, Taylor Swift's audience isn't composed much of tweens or teenagers. If you actually listened to her music you would know it's not aimed at them.

 

you listen then?

  • Confused 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

should that not be classed as interfering in the election?

 

Maybe not, but you can bet the farm they'd be investigating Musk or Rogan if they drove that much traffic to the website.  Or maybe put them on the terror watchlist, like they did to Tulsi.  (If they haven't already for Musk or Rogan.  The difference is Musk and Rogan probably don't fly commercial like Gabbard)

 

  • Confused 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...