1 hour ago, Deputy7 said:

He never chickens out! She is to stupid to be in a debate, he’s not wasting his time!  Watch FoX news will you?

I can't quite tell, is this sarcasm or just a very lowbrow post?

2 hours ago, Deputy7 said:

He never chickens out! She is to stupid to be in a debate, he’s not wasting his time!  Watch FoX news will you?

Thank you for my laugh of the day..well done.

Posts using derogatory and toxic nicknames or intentional misspelling of people’s names will be removed. If you don’t want your post to be removed, spell people’s names correctly, this applies to both sides of the political debate.

13 minutes ago, candide said:

Ok. However, Trump now claims she said the laptop was from Russia, which she didn't.

i have heard him say 60 minutes need to apologise. he didn't mention Russia, it was more of a blanket statement due to the hostility last time,

 

is there video footage of him saying this?  a written article claiming he did,  from an 'anonymous source' is not acceptable 

2 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Of cause you have to come with yet another conspiracy.

prove it wrong then

On 10/8/2024 at 8:49 PM, Hanaguma said:

I have to admit, the interviewer did a much better job than I expected. He asked good questions, even pushed back on occasion at the word salads he was confronted with.  

This interview should confirm that she is in no way Presidential material.  There were no 'gotcha' questions, no interruptions from an angry journalist. Yet she could not answer the most basic and obvious questions with any level of detail or effect. An absolute lightweight in far over her head.

4 hours ago, frank83628 said:

i have heard him say 60 minutes need to apologise. he didn't mention Russia, it was more of a blanket statement due to the hostility last time,

 

is there video footage of him saying this?  a written article claiming he did,  from an 'anonymous source' is not acceptable 

“They said the laptop from hell was from Russia, and I said, ‘It wasn’t from Russia. It was from Hunter,’” he added. “And I never got an apology.”

https://www.aol.com/trump-demands-apology-60-minutes-012114104.html

 

Trump lying, as usual! 😃

I’ve been enjoying all of her interviews the view 60 minutes Howard stern the other woman on (were is daddy or something like that) then on the Colbert show she did just fine.now were is trump?I know he’s a laying eggs in the hen house lmao 🤣 buck buck bugek!!buck buck lol 😝!

10 hours ago, bubblegum said:

Of cause you have to come with yet another conspiracy.

And the conspiracy was?

 

 

2 hours ago, Tug said:

I’ve been enjoying all of her interviews the view 60 minutes Howard stern the other woman on (were is daddy or something like that) then on the Colbert show she did just fine.now were is trump?I know he’s a laying eggs in the hen house lmao 🤣 buck buck bugek!!buck buck lol 😝!

If those 'interviews' were fine, then America is in trouble. She was fed the questions in advance and STILL couldn't give coherent answers. Even the simplest question from Colbert, like "how are you different from President Biden?", she fell back on her usual mishmash of 'ambitions...dreams...aspirations..." and could not actually say anything.

 

I am actually becoming convinced that she is not terribly clever or quick witted.  God knows it hurts to say this, but I am nostalgic for the days of Hillary Clinton. I disagreed with her about just about everything, but there was no denying she was very intelligent and well prepared. 

17 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

If those 'interviews' were fine, then America is in trouble. She was fed the questions in advance and STILL couldn't give coherent answers. Even the simplest question from Colbert, like "how are you different from President Biden?", she fell back on her usual mishmash of 'ambitions...dreams...aspirations..." and could not actually say anything.

 

I am actually becoming convinced that she is not terribly clever or quick witted.  God knows it hurts to say this, but I am nostalgic for the days of Hillary Clinton. I disagreed with her about just about everything, but there was no denying she was very intelligent and well prepared. 

I didn’t have any problem understanding her now trump on the otherhand……which is a moot point anyway because he is a pathological liar 🤥…..naa she will be just fine and keep in mind she will have an excellent team with her.

1 minute ago, Tug said:

I didn’t have any problem understanding her now trump on the otherhand……which is a moot point anyway because he is a pathological liar 🤥…..naa she will be just fine and keep in mind she will have an excellent team with her.

People said the same about Biden, "dont worry, he will have a good team". We can see how that turned out. Wars, inflation, and an obviously unfit man 'in charge'. 

 

Well, Americans don't want to vote for a team that will cover up the infirmities of the President.  They don't want a cabal of deep state apparatchiks to make the decisions..  Saying that Kamala will have an excellent team is not a compliment- it is actually a way to cover her obvious weaknesses.  

15 hours ago, frank83628 said:

prove it wrong then

Doesn't work that way Frank. You are the one bringing it up, you prove it.

4 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

was fed the questions in advance and

Prove it pls.

5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

People said the same about Biden, "dont worry, he will have a good team". We can see how that turned out. Wars, inflation, and an obviously unfit man 'in charge'. 

 

Well, Americans don't want to vote for a team that will cover up the infirmities of the President.  They don't want a cabal of deep state apparatchiks to make the decisions..  Saying that Kamala will have an excellent team is not a compliment- it is actually a way to cover her obvious weaknesses.  

While Trump will have what? Every single one of the (small pool of) talented and experienced people he got for his administration left and became highly critical of him. That's unprecedented in history, and if that doesn't tell you something about Trump's lack of fitness I really don't see what it would take.

8 hours ago, Tug said:

I’ve been enjoying all of her interviews the view 60 minutes Howard stern the other woman on (were is daddy or something like that) then on the Colbert show she did just fine.now were is trump?I know he’s a laying eggs in the hen house lmao 🤣 buck buck bugek!!buck buck lol 😝!

Wherever he is it's way past his jail time!

5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

If those 'interviews' were fine, then America is in trouble. She was fed the questions in advance and STILL couldn't give coherent answers. Even the simplest question from Colbert, like "how are you different from President Biden?", she fell back on her usual mishmash of 'ambitions...dreams...aspirations..." and could not actually say anything.

 

I am actually becoming convinced that she is not terribly clever or quick witted.  God knows it hurts to say this, but I am nostalgic for the days of Hillary Clinton. I disagreed with her about just about everything, but there was no denying she was very intelligent and well prepared. 

Hillary was really good. Most candidates make you cringe a bit but not Hillary. Never understood the hate. It seemed like Trump said to hate so they hate. 

7 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

While Trump will have what? Every single one of the (small pool of) talented and experienced people he got for his administration left and became highly critical of him. That's unprecedented in history, and if that doesn't tell you something about Trump's lack of fitness I really don't see what it would take.

Matters jack sh!t. What matters most is performance. He performed well as president. Kamala has been a disaster as VP. I can't see her in a meeting with Xi or Putin or Kim and being anything but incompetent.

'

“We do a lot of these beautiful rallies, and it’s so great,” the former president said in Reading, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday. “We never have an empty seat, never have, look at it.”

Just one problem: While the sections closest to the stage were packed with MAGA faithful, there were plenty of empty seats toward the back of the venue ― and observers began sharing images of them on social media almost immediately.

 

'So Humiliating': Trump's Big Rally Boast Painfully Falls Apart In Real Time

 

 

3 minutes ago, Fat is a type of crazy said:

Hillary was really good. Most candidates make you cringe a bit but not Hillary. Never understood the hate. It seemed like Trump said to hate so they hate. 

Fair point. For her, I think the fact that she represented what everyone thought were the worst aspects of Official Washington, and the people were hungry for an outsider. I think she was also a bit p!ssed off at being spurned in 2008 when Obama was selected by the DNC.  And it showed in how she campaigned, as if she were, of course, the logical next choice, especially against Trump. That sense of entitlement to the job rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. 

 

There was no Cult of Trump at that time, but he represented a breath of fresh air to a lot of folks.

2 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

Matters jack sh!t. What matters most is performance. He performed well as president. Kamala has been a disaster as VP. I can't see her in a meeting with Xi or Putin or Kim and being anything but incompetent.

Harris has been a disaster as VP?? a VP is a political 'ghost', with few duties outside of staying alive and no real power.

And I can't see Trump in any meeting with Xi or Putin where he isn't completely manipulated and outplayed - just like the first time around.

2 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Harris has been a disaster as VP?? a VP is a political 'ghost', with few duties outside of staying alive and no real power.

And I can't see Trump in any meeting with Xi or Putin where he isn't completely manipulated and outplayed - just like the first time around.

According to President Biden, she was there every step of the way, involved in every decision, the last person to leave the room.  Basically a shadow president.  So now she has to own that. It is the fundamental problem with her campaign. She is trying to campaign as a change agent, when in fact she is the incumbent and represents the current government. She's been in office 1400 days and hasn't solved the problems she complains about. Doesn't say much for her competence.

On 10/8/2024 at 9:29 PM, Hanaguma said:

I consider Trump better based on past performance. That is the standard metric when looking at a job seeker.

Another metric is no criminal record.

23 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

'

“We do a lot of these beautiful rallies, and it’s so great,” the former president said in Reading, Pennsylvania, on Wednesday. “We never have an empty seat, never have, look at it.”

Just one problem: While the sections closest to the stage were packed with MAGA faithful, there were plenty of empty seats toward the back of the venue ― and observers began sharing images of them on social media almost immediately.

 

'So Humiliating': Trump's Big Rally Boast Painfully Falls Apart In Real Time

 

 

are you sure about that?

 

 

 

Just now, Hanaguma said:

Fair point. For her, I think the fact that she represented what everyone thought were the worst aspects of Official Washington, and the people were hungry for an outsider. I think she was also a bit p!ssed off at being spurned in 2008 when Obama was selected by the DNC.  And it showed in how she campaigned, as if she were, of course, the logical next choice, especially against Trump. That sense of entitlement to the job rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. 

 

There was no Cult of Trump at that time, but he represented a breath of fresh air to a lot of folks.

And that fresh air turned into a fetid odour quickly.

 

FWIW, I think HC would have been a better president than Presidents Obama and Biden ever was/is (no need to mention Trump). She certainly had Putin's number. He absolutely hated her (unlike a certain someone), and to me that's a big positive.
She had/has a bit of steel in her, a bit like the old witch herself, Maggie Thatcher.

 here is Butler.

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

And that fresh air turned into a fetid odour quickly.

 

FWIW, I think HC would have been a better president than Presidents Obama and Biden ever was/is (no need to mention Trump). She certainly had Putin's number. He absolutely hated her (unlike a certain someone), and to me that's a big positive.
She had/has a bit of steel in her, a bit like the old witch herself, Maggie Thatcher.

That's reasonable. I can get behind.... most of that. 

 

And obviously better than Harris, should she win the election. Don't you agree?

18 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

According to President Biden, she was there every step of the way, involved in every decision, the last person to leave the room.  Basically a shadow president.  So now she has to own that. It is the fundamental problem with her campaign. She is trying to campaign as a change agent, when in fact she is the incumbent and represents the current government. She's been in office 1400 days and hasn't solved the problems she complains about. Doesn't say much for her competence.

Again, she has been the VP and contrary to what President Biden might have said I do not believe she had much of a say in things.

I'm not saying she's a good candidate, she might even be a poor one. But compared to Trump there's absolutely no comparison - none.

5 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

are you sure about that?

 

 

 

Yes, You posting a random vid from Twitter posted by a loony election denier doesn't change anything. Just like cloud seeding technology didn't create and control any hurricane,

4 minutes ago, Hanaguma said:

That's reasonable. I can get behind.... most of that. 

 

And obviously better than Harris, should she win the election. Don't you agree?

Would I take HC over Harris? Absolutely.