Let The Fraud Begin

[frank83628]

4 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Nothing. You're a Putin and Trump fanboy. Doesn't get any worse than that.

yeah, exactly , nothing

[Inderpland]

3 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

Yep, much better idea ro elect the allegedly female, Jamaican & /Indian daughter of a marxist to run the country.

 

Those groups have a proven track record of success in running things right?

Riiiiight

 

Who is the real Kamala Harris?

Who is the real Kamala Harris? Someone who would put young Master Wayne over her knees and give him the spanking he so richly deserves (and probably wants).

Edited November 2 by Inderpland

[BruceWayne]

Just now, Inderpland said:

Someone who would put young Master Wayne over her knees and give him the spanking he so richly deserves (and probably wants).

 

 

According to stories from the likes of Willie B rown it's more likely she'd drop to her kness and do what's got her her success so far 

 

 

Anyway, since you asked

 

 

 

 

 

[frank83628]

9 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Just for the record he also boasts of being a Putin supporter, and was one even before the invasion - or in his (hero's) words; 'special military operation.'😄

and?

[Inderpland]

1 minute ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

According to stories from the likes of Willie B rown it's more likely she'd drop to her kness and do what's got her her success so far 

 

 

Anyway, since you asked

 

 

 

 

 

I haven't asked, I just repeated your question. You're confused again.

[BruceWayne]

7 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

and?

 

6 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

I haven't asked, I just repeated your question. You're confused again.

 

 

[Inderpland]

33 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

 

 

 

Kamala Harris; Enjoys a good laugh. Former prosecutor.

Donald Trump; Enjoys grabbing 'em by the p****. Convicted felon, sex offender, traitor.

[Dan O]

1 minute ago, BruceWayne said:

 

To understand Trump is to be aware of sexual selection.

 

He is the embodiment of a male’s sexual ambition. Flashy, confident, wealthy and famous.

 

This is like a perfect plume display of a bird dance in mating rituals. He bases his entire identity around his love of women. He becomes their greatest craving and desires. “But but,” a voice asks, “lot of women seem to hate Trump“

Yes.

 

This is the greatest part of the mating bird display. Hate is a deep emotion and inspiration of emotion is how we gain attention and notice. Women often love men they hate and hate men they love. They are possessed by that singular emotion. Trump love him or hate him is a living embodiment of satisfying female reproductive cravings. The moment that Trump became a “dangerous figure” was the moment that this living symbol of male understanding of female nature wanted power. Male power. He came on the scene triggering feminists because he triggers their sexual indignation. He has them possessed into love or hate groups. He is central to their minds like hypnotized birds before a mating dance. Trump’s showy example of proud male sexuality not only made him wise to ruling crowds but also inspired other men to wake up to sexual truth. Man is different than woman and woman is different to man. Masculine men pull women into their orbit and inspire attraction. This basic understanding of sexual selection is a cure to the sexually fluid confusion of our time.

Thats one of the most outrageously ridiculous posts I've read in a long time. I expect this crap from GG but really its too stupid to entertain any serious consideration unless you were born in 1905 and have a mental capacity to match that age

[FolkGuitar]

6 minutes ago, BruceWayne said:

 

To understand Trump is to be aware of sexual selection.

 

He is the embodiment of a male’s sexual ambition. Flashy, confident, wealthy and famous.

 

This is like a perfect plume display of a bird dance in mating rituals. He bases his entire identity around his love of women. He becomes their greatest craving and desires. “But but,” a voice asks, “lot of women seem to hate Trump“

Yes.

 

This is the greatest part of the mating bird display. Hate is a deep emotion and inspiration of emotion is how we gain attention and notice. Women often love men they hate and hate men they love. They are possessed by that singular emotion. Trump love him or hate him is a living embodiment of satisfying female reproductive cravings.

 

The moment that Trump became a “dangerous figure” was the moment that this living symbol of male understanding of female nature wanted power.

Male power.

 

He came on the scene triggering feminists because he triggers their sexual indignation.

 

He has them possessed into love or hate groups.

 

He is central to their minds like hypnotized birds before a mating dance.

 

Trump’s showy example of proud male sexuality not only made him wise to ruling crowds but also inspired other men to wake up to sexual truth.

Man is different than woman and woman is different to man.

 

Masculine men pull women into their orbit and inspire attraction.

This basic understanding of sexual selection is a cure to the sexually fluid confusion of our time.

 

 

 

Unfortunately, there will be a lot of people who don't realize this is joke.

Wait a minute... You were being serious, weren't you!  Well, reading it was two minutes wasted I'll never get back.

Edited November 2 by FolkGuitar

[bubblegum]

3 hours ago, Yagoda said:

Couldnt prove OJ could they

Taking over the whole forum are you? Nothing better to do all day than sprouting your frustrations

[Yagoda]

51 minutes ago, bubblegum said:

Taking over the whole forum are you? Nothing better to do all day than sprouting your frustrations

There is the ignore list

[bubblegum]

28 minutes ago, Yagoda said:

There is the ignore list

Indeed, thanks.

[TroubleandGrumpy]

4 hours ago, bubblegum said:

If you read this again would you agree it makes no sense at all? 

 

If there was blatant fraud it would be easy to prove no?

Obviously you need educating.  Blatant means - done openly and unashamedly.  It does not mean that the votes can all be checked legally months later - the court cases were 'lost' because there was no serious 'proof' of massive voter fraud, and/or the process was followed, and/or where it was not followed, there was no proof to say that it would have changed the result. Lack of proof is not lack of guilt.

 

You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted.  People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification. 

 

The thing you lefties are not realising/seeing is that the claims are not made against the Officials (mostly - there were some very dubious behaviours). The claims are against random people lodging lots of fake votes that were accepted and counted, as per the then current processes that were made 'flexible' due to Covid.  There is a reason why nearly every State has passed laws changing how votes can be accepted and counted since 2020.  They are not saying officially this means that the 2020 election should be redone, but it clearly shows that the laws were far to weak and the concern was that some people took advantage of that.  There is no doubt those relaxed laws and rules allowed more people to vote, but the question will always remain - were all of that massive increase in total votes legitimate (27 million more than in 2016). 

[TroubleandGrumpy]

4 hours ago, Dan O said:

You are truly delusional.  If by  fraud in 2020 you mean Trump lost the vote then yeah. Only fraud found anywhere is Trump himself.  Their was no and is no proof of anything remotely resembling voter fraud or tampering on any scale that would imply Trump was a winner. I reference his countless lawsuits in multiple states and not winning one case. Its statistically impossible to have fraud on a scale large enough to win or lose an election and it not being detected during his countless lawsuits. You can't explain your rationale in any coherent manner that supports your claims. You are either too ignorant or refuse to acknowledge the facts and that is scary. Are you even a US citizen?

You are beyond delusional mate - you have a hatred towards a politician you have never met that is now living in your head rent free.  

[metisdead]

A post with comments on moderation questioning Asean Now's privacy policy in attempting to name and shame other members in violation of these rules  and the related replies have been removed:

 

13. You will not publicly comment on moderation in an open forum. You will not comment on actions taken by individual moderators or on specific or general policies and issues. You will not post a negative emoticon in response to a public notice made by a moderator. You may send a private message to a moderator to discuss individual actions or you can email support (at) aseannow.com to discuss moderation policy and account suspensions.You will not block communication from moderators or Admin.

Aggression or abuse against moderators is not tolerated, and any such action will be sanctioned.

There is no excuse for abuse.

[Inderpland]

1 hour ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Obviously you need educating.  Blatant means - done openly and unashamedly.  It does not mean that the votes can all be checked legally months later - the court cases were 'lost' because there was no serious 'proof' of massive voter fraud, and/or the process was followed, and/or where it was not followed, there was no proof to say that it would have changed the result. Lack of proof is not lack of guilt.

 

You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted.  People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification. 

 

The thing you lefties are not realising/seeing is that the claims are not made against the Officials (mostly - there were some very dubious behaviours). The claims are against random people lodging lots of fake votes that were accepted and counted, as per the then current processes that were made 'flexible' due to Covid.  There is a reason why nearly every State has passed laws changing how votes can be accepted and counted since 2020.  They are not saying officially this means that the 2020 election should be redone, but it clearly shows that the laws were far to weak and the concern was that some people took advantage of that.  There is no doubt those relaxed laws and rules allowed more people to vote, but the question will always remain - were all of that massive increase in total votes legitimate (27 million more than in 2016). 

Really? Still blabbering about voter fraud in 2020?? How desperate are you poor guys?!😂

[pattayasan]

16 minutes ago, Inderpland said:

Really? Still blabbering about voter fraud in 2020?? How desperate are you poor guys?!😂

 

If they lose this year, how can they concede if they haven't conceded 2020 yet?

[impulse]

Here's thousands of questionable voter registration forms in 3 separate county investigations in Pennsylvania alone.  Harvested by a Soros backed company.

 

The Monroe County Board of Elections in Pennsylvania determined that several voter registration applications and mail-in ballot requests are fraudulent 

 

York County, also located in Pennsylvania, is investigating forms submitted by the FieldCorps subsidiary,

 

Lancaster County, again in Pennsylvania, is also investigating potentially fraudulent registration materials from a “third-party organization” after receiving approximately 2,500 applications in two waves,

 

As FieldCorps faces scrutiny over the allegedly fraudulent voter materials, the company’s website has gone offline.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/01/consulting-firm-that-rakes-in-cash-from-dems-investigated-for-submitting-fraudulent-voter-registration-forms/

 

[Will B Good]

9 minutes ago, impulse said:

Here's thousands of questionable voter registration forms in 3 separate county investigations in Pennsylvania alone.  Harvested by a Soros backed company.

 

The Monroe County Board of Elections in Pennsylvania determined that several voter registration applications and mail-in ballot requests are fraudulent 

 

York County, also located in Pennsylvania, is investigating forms submitted by the FieldCorps subsidiary,

 

Lancaster County, again in Pennsylvania, is also investigating potentially fraudulent registration materials from a “third-party organization” after receiving approximately 2,500 applications in two waves,

 

As FieldCorps faces scrutiny over the allegedly fraudulent voter materials, the company’s website has gone offline.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/01/consulting-firm-that-rakes-in-cash-from-dems-investigated-for-submitting-fraudulent-voter-registration-forms/

 

 

 

that several voter registration applications.....555555555555

[Inderpland]

51 minutes ago, impulse said:

Here's thousands of questionable voter registration forms in 3 separate county investigations in Pennsylvania alone.  Harvested by a Soros backed company.

 

The Monroe County Board of Elections in Pennsylvania determined that several voter registration applications and mail-in ballot requests are fraudulent 

 

York County, also located in Pennsylvania, is investigating forms submitted by the FieldCorps subsidiary,

 

Lancaster County, again in Pennsylvania, is also investigating potentially fraudulent registration materials from a “third-party organization” after receiving approximately 2,500 applications in two waves,

 

As FieldCorps faces scrutiny over the allegedly fraudulent voter materials, the company’s website has gone offline.

 

https://dailycaller.com/2024/11/01/consulting-firm-that-rakes-in-cash-from-dems-investigated-for-submitting-fraudulent-voter-registration-forms/

 

Several voter registration applications......🥱

 

 

[bubblegum]

2 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Obviously you need educating.  Blatant means - done openly and unashamedly.  It does not mean that the votes can all be checked legally months later - the court cases were 'lost' because there was no serious 'proof' of massive voter fraud, and/or the process was followed, and/or where it was not followed, there was no proof to say that it would have changed the result. Lack of proof is not lack of guilt.

 

You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted.  People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification. 

 

The thing you lefties are not realising/seeing is that the claims are not made against the Officials (mostly - there were some very dubious behaviours). The claims are against random people lodging lots of fake votes that were accepted and counted, as per the then current processes that were made 'flexible' due to Covid.  There is a reason why nearly every State has passed laws changing how votes can be accepted and counted since 2020.  They are not saying officially this means that the 2020 election should be redone, but it clearly shows that the laws were far to weak and the concern was that some people took advantage of that.  There is no doubt those relaxed laws and rules allowed more people to vote, but the question will always remain - were all of that massive increase in total votes legitimate (27 million more than in 2016). 

It's actually sad people believe this. Hey I have a nice red bridge for sale goes well with your hat. The call it Golden Gate but in truth it's red. Do me an offer.

[Will B Good]

2 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

Obviously you need educating.  Blatant means - done openly and unashamedly.  It does not mean that the votes can all be checked legally months later - the court cases were 'lost' because there was no serious 'proof' of massive voter fraud, and/or the process was followed, and/or where it was not followed, there was no proof to say that it would have changed the result. Lack of proof is not lack of guilt.

 

You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted.  People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification. 

 

The thing you lefties are not realising/seeing is that the claims are not made against the Officials (mostly - there were some very dubious behaviours). The claims are against random people lodging lots of fake votes that were accepted and counted, as per the then current processes that were made 'flexible' due to Covid.  There is a reason why nearly every State has passed laws changing how votes can be accepted and counted since 2020.  They are not saying officially this means that the 2020 election should be redone, but it clearly shows that the laws were far to weak and the concern was that some people took advantage of that.  There is no doubt those relaxed laws and rules allowed more people to vote, but the question will always remain - were all of that massive increase in total votes legitimate (27 million more than in 2016). 

"Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification".

 

 

And yet.....

 

Voter Signature Verification and Ballot Authentication:

For ballots collected from drop boxes (especially mail-in or absentee ballots), the process includes verifying the voter’s identity. This is often done by matching the signature on the ballot envelope with the signature on file for the voter. If a signature mismatch occurs, many states notify the voter, allowing them to correct (“cure”) the issue so their vote can be counted. In states where voter ID is required for mail-in ballots, ID numbers or additional identifying information may also be verified before processing the vote

[Dan O]

3 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

You are beyond delusional mate - you have a hatred towards a politician you have never met that is now living in your head rent free.  

I believe that it's you who has him living in your head. You've lost touch with fact and given up your moral compass following a POS. You are too ignorant or share common beliefs that are abhorrent for any leader. You really should educate yourself on who Trump has been all his life. Stop being a sheep. You don't need to reply as you've lost the little credibility you may have had so I have no desire to discuss this with you any further

[mogandave]

4 minutes ago, Dan O said:

I believe that it's you who has him living in your head. You've lost touch with fact and given up your moral compass following a POS. You are too ignorant or share common beliefs that are abhorrent for any leader. You really should educate yourself on who Trump has been all his life. Stop being a sheep. You don't need to reply as you've lost the little credibility you may have had so I have no desire to discuss this with you any further

[mogandave]

1 hour ago, Will B Good said:

"Likewise, the process in many States allowed mailed-in ballots and those deposited in ballot boxes to be accepted without  serious verification".

 

 

And yet.....

 

Voter Signature Verification and Ballot Authentication:

For ballots collected from drop boxes (especially mail-in or absentee ballots), the process includes verifying the voter’s identity. This is often done by matching the signature on the ballot envelope with the signature on file for the voter. If a signature mismatch occurs, many states notify the voter, allowing them to correct (“cure”) the issue so their vote can be counted. In states where voter ID is required for mail-in ballots, ID numbers or additional identifying information may also be verified before processing the vote

And in 2020’the rejection rate went from 2-3% to half a percent 

[Gottfrid]

13 hours ago, Yagoda said:

He will claim he didnt know, although if I was his lawyer, Id have him naming names if there were any. Anyone think that he shouldnt be locked up? My opinion is that it should be a Federal Felony with a harsh sentence to discourage such actions, assuming guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/30/chinese-university-of-michigan-college-student-voted-presidential-election-michigan-china-benson/75936701007/

 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/11/01/noncitizen-voting-election-security-voter-fraud/75963501007/

 

Expect the usual: Insults tossed towards me, insults tossed towards Trump, insults tossed  towards the opinion writer, minimization, spin, whateverism, insults towards the US, deflection, Putin and so on..............

No insults needed to be thrown. You have your view, and we must accept that. However, Trump, in my humble opinion is a very dangerous man. I would put him in the same box as Idi Amin, Hitler, Saddam Hussein and so on.......

[kwonitoy]

 

[Captain Monday]

 

 

8 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

 

You are right - No - it is not easy to prove. How would you prove that in an election there was illegal votes accepted and counted.  People's votes are anonymous, so impossible to verify that way. Likewise,

 

 Not sure how much you know about election laws and ballot challenges.  The only thing that is anonymous is who you vote for.
 

Sure States have differences, but did a full read of my County Registrar's website this time. Shocked how much personal information is “public record”  Name, address, telephone number. Whether one voted or not.  
 

The mail in ballots are tracked by bar code.  Drop boxes- Locations are manned by election workers and only available during business hours.  

 

 

[Danderman123]

17 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

I see you are very correct on both counts.  Firstly, there was blatant fraud in 2020, but just like OJ they got away with it because there was no absolute evidence to prove otherwise - being 'not guilty' does not mean they did not do it.  Secondly, yes the insults and soin etc. did occur and is still occuring. 

 

Message to the lefty liberals - Yes Biden was elected POTUS in 2020 - but was it completely fair and all above board - not likely. 

There was plenty of evidence in 2020 - that the election results were relatively accurate, and free of fraud.

 

If there were widespread fraud, it would be easy to prove. But there wasn't. I'll be happy to walk you through the reality, if you don't believe me. Have you ever worked in any aspect of a US election?

 

It's just the case that you don't feel the election was legit because your Dear Leader lost. And, in your mind, Trump is infallible and weighs only 215 lbs.

[Danderman123]

Things you will never see here:

 

A former poll monitor posting here that the 2020 election was stolen.