Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The Project 2025 document has been publish every election year since 1984. It's just updated to reflect current issues. Knowing that the Democrats had taken this document, and created a boogieman narrative hoping it would be their magic silver bullet, It would have been political malpractice for Trump not to have his team read it and provide him key bullet points for answering media questions.

  • Like 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, nattaya09 said:

The Project 2025 document has been publish every election year since 1984. It's just updated to reflect current issues. Knowing that the Democrats had taken this document, and created a boogieman narrative hoping it would be their magic silver bullet, It would have been political malpractice for Trump not to have his team read it and provide him key bullet points for answering media questions.

 

The very people who might have explained that to Trump not only wrote that manifest but they also picked every one of Trump's judges. The epitomy of the deep state but they taught the useful idiots to think the deep state was the other mob. The deep state of the left has no name and no obvious members but the real deep state is named The Federalist Society.

 

On the basis that Trump dutifully nominated all their judge picks what are the odds that Project 2025 wasn't his political manifest all along?

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
25 minutes ago, nattaya09 said:

The Project 2025 document has been publish every election year since 1984. It's just updated to reflect current issues. Knowing that the Democrats had taken this document, and created a boogieman narrative hoping it would be their magic silver bullet, It would have been political malpractice for Trump not to have his team read it and provide him key bullet points for answering media questions.

Political malpractice would have been for him to agree to go down a 900 page rabbit hole with interviewers that hate him. 

 

I’m sure he’s heard the bullet points, but that is likely it. 

Posted
34 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

My observations, he's a very old 79, his cognitive skills are in major decline, he will enact project 2025, and he will not follow up on a lot of his promises.

 

But I'm posting less and less on this forum about Trump, because his followers (now that he's been reelected) prefer to elevate him to the status of a saint, and a do-gooder, and prefer to forget about his lifetime of criminality, moral bankruptcy and malfeasance. 

 

There doesn't seem to be any room for criticism nor acknowledgment of who he truly is on this forum, amongst the majority. 

 

I bet London to a brick Trump hands the presidency to Vance before his term is up.

  • Haha 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I bet London to a brick Trump hands the presidency to Vance before his term is up.


If your future predictions are any indication of your past predictions, it’s time to give up.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, G_Money said:

If your future predictions are any indication of your past predictions, it’s time to give up.

 

If your imagination gets any wilder you should write a book.

Posted
17 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

I bet London to a brick Trump hands the presidency to Vance before his term is up.

We know absolutely nothing about his health, but we do know that based on his state of mind he is in severe decline, and we do know that he has a terrible diet, and he likely never exercises.

 

At the age of 80 he has a one and three chance of not making it to 84. Though I am not fond of him, Vance taking over is a nightmare scenario. Mylie Cyrus and Pauly Shore are more qualified. 

Posted
12 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But fortunately, he's in and your guys are out. Good riddance to bad rubbish

 

Sorry to need to ask, but how many times do you think you can keep pasting this?

Posted

There was one bright point in the election.

 

Democrat Ruben Gallego has been elected Arizona’s first Latino U.S. senator, defeating Republican Kari Lake and preventing Republicans from further padding their Senate majority.

Posted

I think it's important to acknowledge that the majority of people thought that Trump was a better choice, and I certainly saw that. However, that does not mean that he was a good choice, he was a very, very low quality candidate, and he is a very low quality man. And I think he will make a very low quality president, like last time, but worse. He is ALOT older now. 

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
Just now, MeHere said:

 

Sorry to need to ask, but how many times do you think you can keep pasting this?

We had to expect that there would be many that would gloat, for quite some time. Some of us have been fair losers and have admitted how poor the candidate was, and how poor the effort was. Yet many on the other side will continue to gloat and will continue to hate. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
16 hours ago, save the frogs said:

This guy is a genius. 

 

No doubt he has above-average abilities, especially above the average Dem leaders' abilities. 

The question is: is he going to use those abilities for the good of the US?
All his life is testament of the fact that there is only one thing he cares about, and that's himself.

 

Only God knows what a convicted felon might be capable of, given his nearly unlimited powers (i.e. immunity, courtesy of SCOTUS), a cohort of loyal followers executing his orders, and an equally unlimited, immense care for himself only.

 

The name that comes to my mind is Hugo Chavez. A convicted felon himself, he turned Venezuela up-side-down. Unfortunately, not for the best.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 2
Posted
22 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

we do know that based on his state of mind he is in severe decline

 

That's quite a bold claim, and one for which there is no actual evidence. There's only the biased disinformation coming from the losing side.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
57 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

There was one bright point in the election.

 

Democrat Ruben Gallego has been elected Arizona’s first Latino U.S. senator, defeating Republican Kari Lake and preventing Republicans from further padding their Senate majority.


Who is the Senate majority?  Say it.

Posted
1 minute ago, pattayasan said:

 

It will remove her from my TV, that's all I care about.


That’s not the question.

 

While you’re answering who won the Senate majority continue with the House majority.

 

Hint:  R -214 D-205.

 

A clean sweep that will enable Trump to pass his agenda.

 

Now go shed a few tears in your beer.

 


 

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, AndreasHG said:

 

No doubt he has above-average abilities, especially above the average Dem leaders' abilities. 

The question is: is he going to use those abilities for the good of the US?
All his life is testament of the fact that there is only one thing he cares about, and that's himself.

 

Only God knows what a convicted felon might be capable of, given his nearly unlimited powers (i.e. immunity, courtesy of SCOTUS), a cohort of loyal followers executing his orders, and an equally unlimited, immense care for himself only.

 

The name that comes to my mind is Hugo Chavez. A convicted felon himself, he turned Venezuela up-side-down. Unfortunately, not for the best.

 

And the left loved them some Hugo Cavez

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, pattayasan said:

 

I bet London to a brick Trump hands the presidency to Vance before his term is up.

Well that’s good news!

Posted
15 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

He reads a teleprompter like a 5 year old on heroin.

 

You're confused - that's Harris.

Posted
22 minutes ago, mogandave said:

And the left loved them some Hugo Cavez

 

Just like the right loves the KKK and Adolf Hitler.

 

But I think you may agree, not all left-wingers are the same, nor all right-wingers.

Therefore, I only take into account the opinion expressed by decent and intellectually honest people on both sides of the isle. Idiots' and brain-washed people's comments add no value to the conversation.

 

Just like your ungrammatical comment above.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

We know absolutely nothing about his health, but we do know that based on his state of mind he is in severe decline, and we do know that he has a terrible diet, and he likely never exercises.

 

At the age of 80 he has a one and three chance of not making it to 84. Though I am not fond of him, Vance taking over is a nightmare scenario. Mylie Cyrus and Pauly Shore are more qualified. 

 

 State of mind in severe decline? From your rants, I guess yours reached bottom years ago.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

I think it's important to acknowledge that the majority of people thought that Trump was a better choice, and I certainly saw that. However, that does not mean that he was a good choice, he was a very, very low quality candidate, and he is a very low quality man. And I think he will make a very low quality president, like last time, but worse. He is ALOT older now. 

 

How much lower can you get?

  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
17 minutes ago, WDSmart said:

He's going to be a disaster for the USA, IMO. But that's evidently what the majority of the voters want. I'm very, very disappointed in his election. 

I have to agree, especially since his previous 4 years was such a disaster. And he is following such a prosperous and dynamic President. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 hours ago, pattayasan said:

 

I bet London to a brick Trump hands the presidency to Vance before his term is up.

First time he ran he was a narcist and only thought about himself.  Now he will give it to Vance? Is that because he is such a nice guy and thinks  Vance will do a better job? 

 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Chwooly said:

First time he ran he was a narcist and only thought about himself.  Now he will give it to Vance? Is that because he is such a nice guy and thinks  Vance will do a better job?

 

No, because Trump is just the useful idiot for his billionaire backers. I have no doubt who picked Vance and it wasn't Trump in my opinion. Also because Trump won't make it to 82 in a fit cognitive state.

  • Haha 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...