What is Trump really trying to tell us in his latest speech?

[mogandave]

10 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Amazing how we carefully ignore the issue of illegal migrant crime. But it can't be concealed from the public, and they demonstrated what they want done about it.

Yeah, it was: “What border problem?” right up until the day after the election, now it was a four year fiasco. 

 

They lie like you and I breathe.

[candide]

25 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Yep. But liberals have no sense of humor when it comes to politics. And Trump must be demonized. It's religion, so what can you do, except try to spin it as a sinister threat and throw out red herrings.

 

Fortunately, the end of leftist censorship seems drawing to a close.

 

 

 

Trump exposed the truth! Eh eh!

"I won the 2020 election", "they are eating pets", etc....😃

[Gottfrid]

20 hours ago, uncletiger said:

So what exactly is he trying to communicate with this statement?

Simply answer. Total BS as usual.

[BigStar]

6 hours ago, Hummin said:

Single minded people do not have fo ability to even make a good discussion, it's 3 words battle, the same words over and over again and again.

 

Hitler, fascist, psychopath? True. Probably should give those up. Didn't work.

 

6 hours ago, Hummin said:

Hateful and seduced by a convicted old man. Sad

 

Hateful and seduced by the DNC and their donors to believe the propaganda lie that Trump was convicted. Pathetic. No wonder you're so misguided. He's a defamation suit going against the media on that point. 🙂

 

 

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, BigStar said:

 

Hitler, fascist, psychopath? True. Probably should give those up. Didn't work.

 

 

Hateful and seduced by the DNC and their donors to believe the propaganda lie that Trump was convicted. Pathetic. No wonder you're so misguided. He's a defamation suit going against the media on that point. 🙂

 

 

 

Why should the DNC believe 12 jurors?

[BigStar]

6 hours ago, Hummin said:

except wanted to change the constitution and take seat before the of 20 January.

 

No.🤣

 

Now, the Dems wanted to get rid of the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, end the filibuster (now they've done a 180 on that, ha ha), pay off student loans illegally, and illegally take Trump off the ballot--to mention a few things. But off-topic. 🙂 

[Hummin]

Just now, BigStar said:

 

No.🤣

 

Now, the Dems wanted to get rid of the Electoral College, pack the Supreme Court, end the filibuster (now they've done a 180 on that, ha ha), pay off student loans illegally, and illegally take Trump off the ballot--to mention a few things. But off-topic. 🙂 

One thing only, No matter which side, two wrong doesn't make one right

[BigStar]

Just now, Hummin said:

One thing only, No matter which side, two wrong doesn't make one right

 

Happily, Trump's done no wrong according to the evidence presented in the topic.

[BigStar]

16 minutes ago, candide said:

Trump exposed the truth! Eh eh!

"I won the 2020 election", "they are eating pets", etc....😃

 

He's entitled to that opinion. No lib complained when Hillary said the same thing and continues to say it. Stacy Abrams, no problem. Bob Casey at present, no problem. Goes on and on. Just another tired talking point. Trump won.

 

 

It's amazing the number of what libs called "lies" turned out to be true--while pumping out their own lies. You remember when you sucked this right up:

 

[BigStar]

15 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Why should the DNC believe 12 jurors?

 

They do. You're too ignorant to discuss the topic, as you often are.

[pattayasan]

1 minute ago, BigStar said:

 

They do. You're too ignorant to discuss the topic, as you often are.

 

Why shouldn't they? You tell us.

[BigStar]

20 hours ago, Elkski said:

Does Trump ever make any sense?  

 

Yes. Often.

[mogandave]

21 minutes ago, pattayasan said:

 

Why should the DNC believe 12 jurors?

It will be either dropped or overturned 

[mogandave]

4 minutes ago, BigStar said:

 

Yes. Often.

They hear or read an out of context clip and regurgitate it as fact. 

 

In all fairness, most of them are not able to think for themselves, so they just believe what their dear leaders tell them. 

 

T

[candide]

1 hour ago, BigStar said:

 

He's entitled to that opinion. No lib complained when Hillary said the same thing and continues to say it. Stacy Abrams, no problem. Bob Casey at present, no problem. Goes on and on. Just another tired talking point. Trump won.

 

 

It's amazing the number of what libs called "lies" turned out to be true--while pumping out their own lies. You remember when you sucked this right up:

 

Lame false equivalence. Hillary was a whiner, but she's not been making for 4 years the ridiculous claim election had been rigged by massice fraud!

After all lawsuits failed, all recounts failed, and all GOP-led audits failed, Trump has been still lying about it 🤣

 

Do you see Harris claiming that there had been massive fraud and that she actually won the 2024 election? Is she plotting fake electors list? Do you think she will organise a "stop the steal" protest and send a mob to the Capitol?

[Yellowtail]

2 hours ago, candide said:

Does your comment changes what Trump is and what he has done? No!

He's still talking B.S., as the OP shows once more! 😃

What has he done, the bookkeeping misdemeanor? 

[Yellowtail]

Just now, candide said:

Lame false equivalence. Hillary was a whiner, but she's not been making for 4 years the ridiculous claim election had been rigged by massice fraud!

After all lawsuits failed, all recounts failed, and all GOP-led audits failed, Trump has been still lying about it 🤣

 

Do you see Harris claiming that there had been massive fraud and that she actually won the 2024 election. Is she plotting fake electors list? Do you think she will organise a "stop the steal" protest and send a mob tot he Capitol?

Hillary tried to get electors to flip and she's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years. She thinks the election was stolen, Trump thinks the election was stolen 

[candide]

1 minute ago, Yellowtail said:

Hillary tried to get electors to flip and she's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years. She thinks the election was stolen, Trump thinks the election was stolen 

Fake MAGA news again, and you know it. Stop trolling!

It's not Hillary who tried to flip electors. Actually, she got less delegates because of this attempt. 😃

[Yellowtail]

1 minute ago, candide said:

Fake MAGA news again, and you know it. Stop trolling!

It's not Hillary who tried to flip electors. Actually, she got less delegates because of this attempt. 😃

So she had others they tried to flip electors on her behalf, yes? I do not remember any outrage from her or the left in general. 

 

In any event, she's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years.

 

Hillary thinks the election was stolen; Trump thinks the election was stolen.

 

Same same

 

[jas007]

I'm not going to read this entire thread but there's a lot of chatter on the internet about a "secret" Tump has about the election, including something about the Brunson case.  

 

 

[candide]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

So she had others they tried to flip electors on her behalf, yes? I do not remember any outrage from her or the left in general. 

 

In any event, she's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years.

 

Hillary thinks the election was stolen; Trump thinks the election was stolen.

 

Same same

 

So you acknowledged you posted fake news. Fine.

 

But you go on with a ridiculous false equivalence. Hillary never claimed election had been rigged because of massive voter fraud. She didn't plot fake electors lists and did not benefit from the faithless electors' attempt.

 

The aim of the faithless electors was not to elect her. None of them voted for Clinton. Out of 10 faithless electors, 8 were Dems who wanted to flip to Kasich, Powel or Sanders. Only 2  were Republicans and voted  Kasich or Paul.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

 

Hillary was a whiner, I agree with it.

[Yellowtail]

Just now, candide said:

So you acknowledged you posted fake news. Fine.

 

But you go on with a ridiculous false equivalence. Hillary never claimed election had been rigged because of massive voter fraud. She didn't plot fake electors lists and did not benefit from the faithless electors' attempt.

 

The aim of the faithless electors was not to elect her. None of them voted for Clinton. Out of 10 faithless electors, 8 were Dems who wanted to flip to Kasich, Powel or Sanders. Only 2  were Republicans and voted  Kasich or Paul.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

 

Hillary was a whiner, I agree with it.

She's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years.

 

Do you not remember Russian interference and the whole Russian collusion idiocy?

 

Hillary thinks the election was stolen; Trump thinks the election was stolen.

 

Wikipedia. Hilarious, 

[frank83628]

20 hours ago, candide said:

Trump did what he did. The "weaponized DOJ" is just another ridiculous MAGA conspiracy theory! 😀

BS if it is. I am looking forward to some payback for those actually guilty of corruption, insider trading, 'donations' or whatever else they're involved in, and i can guarantee it's more than inflating a property value for a loan!!

[candide]

5 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

She's been calling Trump illegitimate for eight years.

 

Do you not remember Russian interference and the whole Russian collusion idiocy?

 

Hillary thinks the election was stolen; Trump thinks the election was stolen.

 

Wikipedia. Hilarious, 

Clutching at straws after being proven wrong about the faithless electors. 😀

 

Hillary never claimed the count was rgged, she never plotted fake electors' list, and she never organised a "stop the steal" protest and sent a mob to the Capitol. Oh, and she never called a SoS to find her 11,700 votes.

 

If you want to claim that the votes of the faithless electors were not what is written in the wikipedia article, feel free to correct those facts with another source! 😀

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faithless_electors_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

[candide]

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

BS if it is. I am looking forward to some payback for those actually guilty of corruption, insider trading, 'donations' or whatever else they're involved in, and i can guarantee it's more than inflating a property value for a loan!!

Even when they win, MAGAs cannot help evoking lame conspiracy theories! 😀

[frank83628]

2 minutes ago, candide said:

Even when they win, MAGAs cannot help evoking lame conspiracy theories! 😀

what conspiracy..... what goes around comes around, i guarantee those top dems have more to hide than Trump ever did.

trump was a private citizen until 2015, they were not. 

[candide]

14 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

what conspiracy..... what goes around comes around, i guarantee those top dems have more to hide than Trump ever did.

trump was a private citizen until 2015, they were not. 

You guarantee... 😃

[frank83628]

14 minutes ago, candide said:

You guarantee... 😃

yep, Pelosi's salary is what under 200k, yet she's worth how many millions, Biden, Clintons, are you saying all that wealth is 100% legit.

 

there is even a website that tracks Nancys trading. 

[candide]

24 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

yep, Pelosi's salary is what under 200k, yet she's worth how many millions, Biden, Clintons, are you saying all that wealth is 100% legit.

 

there is even a website that tracks Nancys trading. 

More attempted intrusion by the MAGA alternate universe

Into reality.....  😃

[blaze master]

31 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

yep, Pelosi's salary is what under 200k, yet she's worth how many millions, Biden, Clintons, are you saying all that wealth is 100% legit.

 

there is even a website that tracks Nancys trading. 

 

Total coincidence her husband bought 1mn just a few weeks before subsidy vote by Congress on chips.