ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant Over Alleged War Crimes

[Evil Penevil]

4 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

Nope, he only requested an arrest warrant for one person when it was presented to the judges to decide. 

 

That's correct.  As Chief Prosecutor for the ICC,  Karim Khan can request a warrant, but only the ICC panel of judges has the power to issue it. Khan was in a bit of a bind when it came to the Oct 7 attacks.  He was forced to request warrants for the leaders of Hamas as well as Israel,   It would be blatantly antisemitic to go after Netanyahu for responding to the Oct. 7 attacks but ignore the Hamas leaders who ordered the terrorist murders of Israelis and non-Israelis.  

 

However, an ICC warrant on a living Hamas leader would put Israel's opponents in a very sticky situation.  South Africa,  the State of Palestine and some other Muslim  and non-Muslim nations which had ratified the Rome Statute would be bound to arrest the Hamas leaders as well as Netanyahu and Gallant.  Obviously those countries weren't going to do that, which would make the ICC warrants an absurd exercise.  How can the State of Palestine or South Africa demand other countries arrest Netanyahu while harboring Hamas leaders with warrants?  There are plenty of Hamas leaders still living who were complicit in the Oct. 7 attacks but it is highly doubtful Khan will request warrants for them.

 

Ironically, South Africa had been trying for seven years to withdraw from the Rome Statute.  In  2015,  South Africa refused to arrest Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir on an ICC warrant during his visit to the country.  Al-Bashir had been accused by the ICC of  genocide,  crimes against humanity and war crimes in Darfur.  In 2023, South Africa renewed its intention of withdrawing from the ICC because of the arrest warrant on Russia's Putin.  Putin was at that time scheduled to visit South Africa for a BRICs summit in August.

https://www.reuters.com/world/africa/south-africa-try-withdraw-icc-again-ramaphosa-2023-04-25/

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-34509342

[placnx]

On 12/2/2024 at 7:42 PM, Bkk Brian said:

Why does being Israeli make it unreliable? Are Israeli facts different? Or is it because they are Jewish? Are Jewish facts less reliable?

 

You are also being plainly dishonest, the link is quite clearly about the recent blockade by Egypt

 

As for US rebuke, it's blame the injured party, i.e. Egypt. Until Israel took over the Philadelphi corridor inviolation of the 1979 treaty, some Palestinians could get out for medical treatment, etc.

 

As for the unreliability of IDF and Israeli government spokesmen, their output has to conform to the narrative that they have been drilling into Israeli heads for years, dehumanizing Palestinians. Similarly, most of the Israeli media, except Haaretz, +972 and a few others, repeat the talking points, just as Nderitu and the Wall Street Journal opinion writers. The Washington Post opinion board also put out the same falsehoods. The Israeli propaganda a/k/a hasbara machine is working overtime. 

[Bkk Brian]

5 minutes ago, placnx said:

As for US rebuke, it's blame the injured party, i.e. Egypt. Until Israel took over the Philadelphi corridor inviolation of the 1979 treaty, some Palestinians could get out for medical treatment, etc.

 

As for the unreliability of IDF and Israeli government spokesmen, their output has to conform to the narrative that they have been drilling into Israeli heads for years, dehumanizing Palestinians. Similarly, most of the Israeli media, except Haaretz, +972 and a few others, repeat the talking points, just as Nderitu and the Wall Street Journal opinion writers. The Washington Post opinion board also put out the same falsehoods. The Israeli propaganda a/k/a hasbara machine is working overtime. 

As for the unreliability of IDF and Israeli government spokesmen, their output has to conform to the narrative that they have been drilling into Israeli heads for years, dehumanizing Palestinians.

 

Absolute unsubstantiated nonsense, your excuse for disregarding credible media. Pathetic

[Evil Penevil]

 

On 12/2/2024 at 7:40 AM, placnx said:

Your source, FDD, or Foundation for Defense of Democracies, i.e. Israel, is hardly reliable.

 

 

5 hours ago, placnx said:

As for the unreliability of IDF and Israeli government spokesmen, their output has to conform to the narrative that they have been drilling into Israeli heads for years, dehumanizing Palestinians. Similarly, most of the Israeli media, except Haaretz, +972 and a few others, repeat the talking points, just as Nderitu and the Wall Street Journal opinion writers. The Washington Post opinion board also put out the same falsehoods. The Israeli propaganda a/k/a hasbara machine is working overtime. 

 

@placnx  What sources do you consider to be reliable on the Israel-Hamas conflict?  What sources do you use to get your information?  Please name any mainstream or alternate media; international organizations (official or NGO);  think tanks; professors and other experts; government spokeman or any other source of information on the conflict you feel is reliable.  

 

Do you believe that the leaders of  Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran are more truthful than Netanyahu?

[Social Media]

A post has been removed contravening community standards

 

9.Links to outside content should always include relevant commentary. Blind links to outside content with no context or explanation may be removed.

[stevenl]

I would trust NGO 's after extensive research. War crimes are a serious issue and the accusations are becoming more and more profound.

 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

[Bkk Brian]

Just now, stevenl said:

I would trust NGO 's after extensive research. War crimes are a serious issue and the accusations are becoming more and more profound.

 

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/amnesty-international-concludes-israel-is-committing-genocide-against-palestinians-in-gaza/

 

 

I bet you would, no evidence of course but yes you trust them. Topic here anyway.

https://aseannow.com/topic/1345458-amnesty-international-its-a-genocide-in-gaza/

 

[Evil Penevil]

In an Opinion piece, the Editorial Board of The Wall Street  Journal does a good job of brushing off the Amnesty International report. Basically, the WSJ says Amnesty had to change the definition of genocie to make the accusation fit.

https://www.wsj.com/opinion/amnesty-international-report-israel-genocide-hamas-gaza-811acf05?page

The Propaganda War on Israel Never Stops

Amnesty International lends its once-good name to the genocide lie.

From the people who brought you “Israeli apartheid” comes another trendy smear: “Israeli genocide.” With a new report Wednesday night, Amnesty International assures its good standing in the anti-Israel herd. The price is to swallow an inversion of reality.

 

 

[placnx]

On 12/4/2024 at 11:27 PM, Evil Penevil said:

 

 

 

 

@placnx  What sources do you consider to be reliable on the Israel-Hamas conflict?  What sources do you use to get your information?  Please name any mainstream or alternate media; international organizations (official or NGO);  think tanks; professors and other experts; government spokeman or any other source of information on the conflict you feel is reliable.  

 

Do you believe that the leaders of  Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran are more truthful than Netanyahu?

First of all, the juxtaposition of Netanyahu with Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran is not the point. More appropriate is the truth that we can see with out own eyes in videos from the crime scenes compared to the denials by Netanyahu et al.

 

I think that reports from BBC and al Jazeera are largely factual, although they may intervew people with bias and sometimes fail to explain the ideologial background of their think tank or NGO. For me, that's not a problem, but can confuse the average viewer.

 

As for your request to name sources, the list is very long for a subject that I have followed since the 1960s.