Jump to content

Transgender Fencer Sparks Controversy with Prestigious Win on Women’s Team


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, James105 said:

 

No, there does not.  Stonewall started this grift when they realised that attaining equality for gay and lesbian people wasn't good for business and needed a perpetual business model.   Pitting transgenders against women is the almost perfect grift as it is a dispute that can never be settled as to give more rights to one you have to take away from another.   

 

The only way this grift ends is when we go back to the good old days and stop pretending that men can actually become women.  

Salary and benefits is driving this.

Posted

I fully support any man's right to live as a woman, dress as a women, etc, but it is a nonsense to ever believe that they ARE a woman.

 

They will always be a man acting the part of a woman, unless science invents a way to change chromosomes.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted

I see the usual brigade are out in droves, pearl clutching to the extremee whilst conveniently ignoring the FACT that many, many sports to include althletics, swimming, rugby, cricket, cycling, rowing and tennis already ban trans althletes. There are a few outlier sports (and I'd include fencing as outlier) that are still trying to work out what to do but I think the majority of sports where 'women who used to be men' is considered an advantage have already adressed the subject and acted appropriately.  

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/transgender-athletes-ban-rules-olympics-b2529369.html

  • Agree 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

I see the usual brigade are out in droves, pearl clutching to the extremee whilst conveniently ignoring the FACT that many, many sports to include althletics, swimming, rugby, cricket, cycling, rowing and tennis already ban trans althletes. There are a few outlier sports (and I'd include fencing as outlier) that are still trying to work out what to do but I think the majority of sports where 'women who used to be men' is considered an advantage have already adressed the subject and acted appropriately.  

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/transgender-athletes-ban-rules-olympics-b2529369.html

My input is more related to the activity than the gender issue per se. Regarding fencing the sometimes advantages imparted by the male physique in sports activities are much less pronounced with the possible exception of fencing with the cutlass.  Innate strength is considerably less important than speed and agility when engaging with foil or epe’e. In fact too vigorous “thrashing about” can result in scoring deficit.

In my growing-up home town we had a former Olympic fencing coach ( Mr. Jones) and I joined the fencing club at my undergraduate university, so I do have some insight. The “swashbuckling” scenes in films can be faves or vast disappointments when choreographed by subject inexperienced “action” directors.

Posted
2 hours ago, mokwit said:

Why can't they recognise they have an unfair advantage and have the decency not to compete in womens sports - or is that what it is really about?

Have you ever read or seen or heard of a trans walk away from taking advantage of someone who is not a trans? 

Their competing against a weaker sex gives them the unfair advantage to win as shown in this OP. 26th place against men. 1st place against women.. 

Posted
3 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

I used to fence competitively - got through to the British Army finals one year, got beaten spectacularly by someone who was in the British Olympic Squad, so that is another story.

 

But of course this bloke won, (and yes he is a bloke, no matter how he dresses or identifies), twice the size, twice the reach and twice the strength. A complete nonsense.

 

Chap needs a haircut too!

I might question your assertion of “twice” in every metric. On what do you base this? I am nearly twice my wife’s weight but certainly not twice her height, my reach is about 125% of hers, not 200%, and though we have not made any attempt to quantify it I am pretty sure I am not ( any longer ) twice as strong.

In my college fencing days I was pretty regularly beaten by smaller, female fencers.

.

Just saying I think it is an area where the usual genetic disparity does not confer undue advantage, similar to the way I have seen  some opinions that women can be superior pilots, e.g.

Posted
1 hour ago, digger70 said:

What Idiots let them Wannabe women compete in a All women's  sport events . 

What is this world coming too.

Another one with lack of reading comprehension.
They are not allowed to compete 'in a All women's  sport events' as mentioned in my previous post.

Posted
6 hours ago, WDSmart said:

I don't believe in any delusional God, Buddha, etc., but dividing the human race (and other animals) up into just two genders doesn't seem to work for a small percentage of the population. How we deal with that and treat them is the topic. Rather than deny they exist, I would rather see them accommodated in some way, not just excluded. 

It’s the like of you that has created this problem. Where does it stop? I’m a convicted mass murderer who identifies as a squirrel? I’m living long enough to understand that give somebody an excuse and they will take it. Get real. We are doing enough to destroy this earth without having at last count 34 different variations. There are thugs walking the streets while an Irish school teacher has spent 6 months in jail for refusing to use trans gender weird and wonderful pronouns for one of his students. They exist nowhere but in their own confusion and your wokeness. 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
53 minutes ago, Nip said:

It’s the like of you that has created this problem. Where does it stop? I’m a convicted mass murderer who identifies as a squirrel? I’m living long enough to understand that give somebody an excuse and they will take it. Get real. We are doing enough to destroy this earth without having at last count 34 different variations. There are thugs walking the streets while an Irish school teacher has spent 6 months in jail for refusing to use trans gender weird and wonderful pronouns for one of his students. They exist nowhere but in their own confusion and your wokeness. 

If you are going to fight this battle then may I suggest you at least get your facts straight - 'The case has been widely reported in the US and elsewhere, with some reports incorrectly suggesting Burke has been jailed for not using gender-neutral pronouns.' In fact he hasn't 'spent 6 months in jail for refusing to use trans gender weird and wonderful pronouns', he 'has spent 11 days in prison for ignoring a court order to stay away from the school.'    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/sep/15/irish-teacher-jailed-contempt-of-court-after-refusing-student-pronouns

 

You are like many on here who come on to this topic spewing absolute nonsense and false equivalences (squirrels indeed) because it fits with your miopic view on a complex and thought provoking issue. For us that live in Thailand, we see trans females all the time and it just simply isn't a problem to call them she if that's their preference because for the most part they look far more 'she' than 'he'. Live and let live I say and if it's not doing anyone any real harm (and no they shouldn't compete as women in sports) then what's the real issue other than the false indignation of people like you.  

  • Thanks 2
Posted
9 hours ago, georgegeorgia said:

Another transphobic man , you continue to wax lyrical the transphobic hate , 

trans men competing in womans sport as a pretend female are cheats

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Posted
16 hours ago, Kwaibill said:

I might question your assertion of “twice” in every metric. On what do you base this? I am nearly twice my wife’s weight but certainly not twice her height, my reach is about 125% of hers, not 200%, and though we have not made any attempt to quantify it I am pretty sure I am not ( any longer ) twice as strong.

In my college fencing days I was pretty regularly beaten by smaller, female fencers.

.

Just saying I think it is an area where the usual genetic disparity does not confer undue advantage, similar to the way I have seen  some opinions that women can be superior pilots, e.g.

 

I was beginning to think your were going to say your penis isn't twice the size of your wife's.

Posted
23 hours ago, loong said:

When will common sense prevail against woke idiots??????

My wife who is sympathetic to the Trans community just figured out what all the fuss is about in the west!

They/ thems participation in sports under a different gender !

Now I don’t like, she says!

Posted
1 hour ago, riclag said:

My wife who is sympathetic to the Trans community just figured out what all the fuss is about in the west!

They/ thems participation in sports under a different gender !

Now I don’t like, she says!

I bet that in Thailand katoeys don't participate in female sports.

  • Agree 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I bet that in Thailand katoeys don't participate in female sports.

First thing she said , katoeys not play sports with ladies!

 

I knew someday my wife would see 

the difference between Thailands Trans and the radical western version 

controversy ,the Woke left are pushing!

4 years it took but she finally came around! 555

 

Posted
13 hours ago, JonnyF said:

If this continues the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts.

 

I know it's a crazy idea, but there should be a category for real women where they can compete on a level playing field. You know, like there always was before the Woke mind virus started to spread. 

As already mentioned althletics, swimming, rugby, cricket, cycling, rowing and tennis already ban trans althletes so not sure how 'the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts.'

Posted
4 hours ago, riclag said:

My wife who is sympathetic to the Trans community just figured out what all the fuss is about in the west!

They/ thems participation in sports under a different gender !

Now I don’t like, she says!

As already mentioned althletics, swimming, rugby, cricket, cycling, rowing and tennis already ban trans althletes. Which sports are you and your wife concered about?

Posted
44 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

As already mentioned althletics, swimming, rugby, cricket, cycling, rowing and tennis already ban trans althletes so not sure how 'the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts.'

 

So you agree that biological men should not compete against biological women in sport.

 

Good to see I'm winning hearts and minds.

 

Like drugs bans they should retrospectively retract any medals won by blokes in skirts competing against women and update the silver medalists to gold.  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/14/2024 at 6:18 AM, flyingtlger said:

They should ONLY allow transgenders to compete against other transgenders.....

Exactly. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

So you agree that biological men should not compete against biological women in sport.

 

Good to see I'm winning hearts and minds.

 

Like drugs bans they should retrospectively retract any medals won by blokes in skirts competing against women and update the silver medalists to gold.  

What I am agreeing to is the problem has been viewed, considered and in the vast majority of sports, sorted. Of course biological men shouldn't compete as women in women sports but you (like many on this forum) continue with your nonsense that 'the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts' when that clearly isn't the case. You use the subject as some sort of imaginary hammer to get 'back at the wokes' when in reality it's a non-subject only now used as a dog-whistle to the likes of you.
 

You are not winning any 'hearts and minds' because you agenda is so obvious as to be laughable.
 
 

Posted
30 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

What I am agreeing to is the problem has been viewed, considered and in the vast majority of sports, sorted. Of course biological men shouldn't compete as women in women sports but you (like many on this forum) continue with your nonsense that 'the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts' when that clearly isn't the case. You use the subject as some sort of imaginary hammer to get 'back at the wokes' when in reality it's a non-subject only now used as a dog-whistle to the likes of you.
 

You are not winning any 'hearts and minds' because you agenda is so obvious as to be laughable.
 
 

 

Unfortunately for you the facts do not support your narrative.

 

https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/un-study-reveals-transgender-athletes-have-won-nearly-900-medals-in-womens-competitions-united-nations-sports-lgbt-gender-identity-title-ix-athletics

 

That's almost 900 medals that should have been won by women in women's sports that have in fact been stolen by men.  So almost 900 women have lost out due to this woke aberration.    Do you think the medals should be stripped from the men who "won" them and given to the women who should have won them?

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, johnnybangkok said:

What I am agreeing to is the problem has been viewed, considered and in the vast majority of sports, sorted. Of course biological men shouldn't compete as women in women sports but you (like many on this forum) continue with your nonsense that 'the majority of champions in women's sports will be blokes in skirts' when that clearly isn't the case. You use the subject as some sort of imaginary hammer to get 'back at the wokes' when in reality it's a non-subject only now used as a dog-whistle to the likes of you.
 

You are not winning any 'hearts and minds' because you agenda is so obvious as to be laughable.
 
 

 

Nice dodge.

 

The only reason this nonsense is gradually stopping is because of people like me are calling it out relentlessly using straight honest language. 

 

I will continue to call it out as it is still far more prevalent than you wish to admit.

 

But let's call it "your truth" so we can all get along with no hurty words x

Posted
1 hour ago, James105 said:

 

Unfortunately for you the facts do not support your narrative.

 

https://kfoxtv.com/news/nation-world/un-study-reveals-transgender-athletes-have-won-nearly-900-medals-in-womens-competitions-united-nations-sports-lgbt-gender-identity-title-ix-athletics

 

That's almost 900 medals that should have been won by women in women's sports that have in fact been stolen by men.  So almost 900 women have lost out due to this woke aberration.    Do you think the medals should be stripped from the men who "won" them and given to the women who should have won them?

I’m not sure this is the big “gotcha” moment you think it is.
The operative paragraph in your article states “These defeats occurred in over 400 competitions in 29 sports, though authors did not specify specific events, levels of competition or time periods.”

Again I will reiterate that the MAIN sports that concern most people (athletics, swimming, gymnastics, cycling, rowing, tennis etc) are already covered but as I have also stated, there are still outlier sports (fencing obviously being one) that haven’t addressed the problem YET. 
So unless you can mention a particular sport or event, then my facts certainly support my narrative. 
And once again I’ll also CLEARLY state, I don’t think that trans women should be allowed to compete in women’s sports. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...