Six-Year-Old Girl in Critical Condition After Brutal Dog Mauling in Nonthaburi

[digger70]

3 hours ago, sabai-dee-man said:

Standing by for the "there's no such thing as a bad dog" morons...

Not a Bad dog But a Guard dog. 

You visit our place at Night and try to get  Uninvited Inside the Fence 

Our Guard dodg.  (that doesn't hurt a Fly )   Will take a Piece out of you . 

He's not a Bad Dog   He's a Verry good Guard dog .

Oh ,and I don't see myself as a Moron ,But then It takes one to Know one hey. 🙏

[Confuscious]

10 hours ago, Georgealbert said:

Authorities are investigating the incident and considering potential legal action.

 

So, a 6  year young girl is fighting for her life and all the USELESS THAI POLICE is doing is CONSIDERING potential legal action?
Waiting for the girl to file charges against the Pitbull maybe?

Who is going to pay for the hospital bills? 
Who will pay the cosmetic surgery to restore the girl?
Who will pay for the girls trauma, maybe for life?

There should be a law stating that the owners bear FULL RESPONSABILITY for their pets.

Hope the girl has access to a "GoFund.Me" to pay for the hospital bills.

[richard_smith237]

4 hours ago, Kinok Farang said:

My pit bull Fluffy wouldn't harm a fly.Humans on the other hand are all potential victims.

 

No PitBull breed of dog was ever called fluffy !!!...

 

Ripper, Titan, Rambo, Blaze, Fang, Reaper, Viper, Razor, Fang.... Yes...  but never 'Fluffy' !!!! 

 

[Johno57]

5 hours ago, mran66 said:

For dog attacks, change the law so that owner of the dog is responsible for the attacks as if he would have done the attack himself. Maybe people get more careful. 

Another day another dog attacks... if the governmenent had any balls at all they would ban ALL dangerous breeds from thailand and stop those hear from breeding...and of course owner liability would be first priority... but as usual NOTHING...

[Kinok Farang]

8 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

No PitBull breed of dog was ever called fluffy !!!...

 

Ripper, Titan, Rambo, Blaze, Fang, Reaper, Viper, Razor, Fang.... Yes...  but never 'Fluffy' !!!! 

 

Just my feeble attempt at sarcasm and also to show my contempt for these wild animals.

[steven100]

1 hour ago, Georgealbert said:

Da, who has owned the dog since it was a puppy, emphasised that the dog had never shown aggression before. However, she remains baffled as to why it attacked Kaimuk.

F*%$#$$ imbeciles .... 

[steven100]

1 hour ago, Georgealbert said:

UPDATE
Pitbull Attack, Girl Now Out of Danger, Owner Apologises

Picture courtesy of Khoasod.

 

In a shocking incident, a male pitbull attacked 8-year-old “Kaimuk” while she was in her bedroom with her grandmother. The young girl was severely injured, suffering deep bite wounds to her neck and head, and was rushed to the hospital in critical condition. Responders and authorities had initially reported her age incorrectly as 6 years old.

 

On 28 February, Kaimuk’s parents, Mr. Ekachai (37) and Mrs. Priya (34) confirmed that their daughter is no longer in danger after receiving urgent treatment. Initially rushed to Pakkred 2 Hospital, Kaimuk was then transferred to Siriraj Hospital. She is now awake and responsive, able to nod her head in response to questions. 

 

Regarding the legal proceedings, the police have scheduled interviews with both the girl’s family and the pitbull’s owner for further investigation. The family is preparing to seek compensation for medical expenses, travel costs, lost wages, and damages for the trauma caused by the attack.

 

The pitbull’s owner, 23-year-old “Da,” expressed her heartfelt apology, stating that it was never her intention for the dog to escape and cause harm. She explained that the gate was accidentally left open by someone else, which allowed the dog to slip out. Da, who works as an online vendor, promised to take responsibility for the incident but mentioned that her family does not have substantial financial means.

 

Da, who has owned the dog since it was a puppy, emphasised that the dog had never shown aggression before. However, she remains baffled as to why it attacked Kaimuk.

 

In response to the incident, Phongphat Theppathipan, an officer from the Nonthaburi Provincial Livestock Office, recommended that the dog undergo a surgical procedure to remove its canine teeth to prevent further attacks. Additionally, local community members are being consulted to decide whether the dog should be relocated, as there are young children and families living nearby.

 

Surveillance footage from a neighbour’s security camera, reveals the disturbing sounds of a child screaming, followed by frantic cries for help. The pitbull’s owner’s brother ran out to assist, using a piece of wire to force the dog to release the girl.

 

The investigation continues as the local authorities look into the details surrounding this event.

 

 

-- 2025-02-28

 

 

Well,  I am glad she's out of danger of dying.    But this story stinks of Thai wai's and stupidity,  

 

Get that far king  dog away from that place and drown it or whatever.  

 

are these people really so dumb?   

 

will they sit around outside tonight apologizing 20 times with wai's ,    and all will be fine again tomorrow ????????? 

[steven100]

54 minutes ago, jvs said:

Unbeff lievable!

What an absolute stupid recommendation!

Not having k9's does not stop a dog from being dangerous.

they are brain dead. 

[steven100]

so remove it's teeth so if it attacks her again it'll just bruise some and only a bit of blood,  not like before.

 

Haha 

[richard_smith237]

14 minutes ago, Johno57 said:

Another day another dog attacks... if the governmenent had any balls at all they would ban ALL dangerous breeds from thailand and stop those hear from breeding...and of course owner liability would be first priority... but as usual NOTHING...

 

Agreed.... 

 

This will be considered a very unpopular opinion by many... but here goes...

 

1) Ban the breeding of all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' 

2) Only allow trained and licensed owners of dogs considered 'powerful'

3) Remove all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' from their homes and euthanise them

4) Remove all dogs considered 'powerful' from their homes if owners are untrained & unlicensed

5) All other dogs must have a collar with the owners name on them.

6) If a dog (with a collar) is found on the street or on public land - the owner faces a fine

7) If a dog is found without a collar, it is removed and euthanised

 

 

*Dangerous breeds: All Pit Bull breeds, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino, Fila Brasileiro.

*Powerful breeds: Rottweiler, Doberman Pinscher, German Shepherd, Bullmastiff, Cane Corso, Alaskan Malamute, Siberian Husky, Presa Canario, American Bulldog

 

 

 

Not a popular opinion - and I 100% agree, its a horrific solution but its the only solution  that would prevent further attacks on innocent children....   

 

Also ban dogs in Condos... 

Also ban dogs in houses without a resonable garden for them to run in (and that garden must be secure).

 

 

The issue here - this is a brutal first world solution to a third world problem due to carelessness....

[steven100]

2 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Agreed.... 

 

This will be considered a very unpopular opinion by many... but here goes...

 

1) Ban the breeding of all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' 

2) Only allow trained and licensed owners of dogs considered 'powerful'

3) Remove all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' from their homes and euthanise them

4) Remove all dogs considered 'powerful' from their homes if owners are untrained & unlicensed

5) All other dogs must have a collar with the owners name on them.

6) If a dog (with a collar) is found on the street or on public land - the owner faces a fine

7) If a dog is found without a collar, it is removed and euthanised

 

 

*Dangerous breeds: All Pit Bull breeds, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino, Fila Brasileiro.

*Powerful breeds: Rottweiler, Doberman Pinscher, German Shepherd, Bullmastiff, Cane Corso, Alaskan Malamute, Siberian Husky, Presa Canario, American Bulldog

 

 

 

Not a popular opinion - and I 100% agree, its a horrific solution but its the only solution  that would prevent further attacks on innocent children....   

 

Also ban dogs in Condos... 

Also ban dogs in houses without a resonable garden for them to run in (and that garden must be secure).

 

 

The issue here - this is a brutal first world solution to a third world problem due to carelessness....

well Richard,  I agree with all you said but it's pointless us even talking on a forum about it because nothing will change. 

 

I can't believe that idiots recommendation of remove the dogs fangs.   That is just the most pathetic solution anyone could ever come up with.  

[GammaGlobulin]

5 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

its a horrific solution but its the only solution

 

One might even say:

 

The Final Solution

 

 

[GammaGlobulin]

1 hour ago, Georgealbert said:

In response to the incident, Phongphat Theppathipan, an officer from the Nonthaburi Provincial Livestock Office, recommended that the dog undergo a surgical procedure to remove its canine teeth

 

Yes, please do:

 

Remove all of this canine's teeth.

Let it live the rest of its life...gumming its food.

This is the very least that one might do.

 

Better to just donate it to a local zoo.

Allow it to live together with the lions and tigers in the same cages.

 

[richard_smith237]

4 minutes ago, steven100 said:

I can't believe that idiots recommendation of remove the dogs fangs.   That is just the most pathetic solution anyone could ever come up with.  

 

I've heard the phrase from dog owners before.... "Oh, he's harmless, he'll lick you do death".... 

 

[richard_smith237]

1 hour ago, Georgealbert said:

In response to the incident, Phongphat Theppathipan, an officer from the Nonthaburi Provincial Livestock Office, recommended that the dog undergo a surgical procedure to remove its canine teeth to prevent further attacks.

 

Go for it.... So long as they are still attached to the 'head' when they are removed. 

 

 

[jvs]

23 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

Yes, please do:

 

Remove all of this canine's teeth.

Let it live the rest of its life...gumming its food.

This is the very least that one might do.

 

Better to just donate it to a local zoo.

Allow it to live together with the lions and tigers in the same cages.

 

They did not say remove all of this canines teeth.

They mean the four large canines,the two large long teeth,two in the top jaw and two in the lower jaw.

The effect this could have is that the dog feels insecure and there fore will be more prone to attack.

For many dogs attack is the best defense.

 

[GammaGlobulin]

3 minutes ago, jvs said:

They did not say remove all of this canines teeth.

They mean the four large canines,the two large long teeth,two in the top jaw and two in the lower jaw.

The effect this could have is that the dog feels insecure and there fore will be more prone to attack.

For many dogs attack is the best defense.

 

 

I know.

This is why I suggest total removal of this canine's teeth.

 

[Jabberwocky]

What I don't get is why they don't kill the dog on the spot. If you strangle him already, just finish the job. 

[steven100]

I'm done talking  .....   there's no point ....    unless someone's thai wife here contacts the Livestock guy and explains how stupid his ' teeth removal ' recommendation sounds,    nothing will change.    The dog will attack someone in a week, a month, a year,  and it'll be the same stupid Thai moronic discussion.  

 

 

I'm done with talking ...   why waist my finger pressing .. on these idiots  

[Jing Joe]

2 hours ago, andyman57 said:

Never ending, nothing will be done, hope she recovers 🙏 🙏 

    Was lost for minimum words, thanks for yours. Yes T&P for little darling.         😢

[steven100]

15 minutes ago, GammaGlobulin said:

 

I know.

This is why I suggest total removal of this canine's teeth.

 

what a pathetic no common sense suggestion.   I can't believe someone suggestion that to fix this attack.

[GammaGlobulin]

2 minutes ago, steven100 said:

what a pathetic no common sense suggestion.   I can't believe someone suggestion that to fix this attack.

 

Yes.

I totally agree with you.

Teeth extraction is a very dumb suggestion.

I was just, in my normally facetious manner, pointing out the absurdity.

 

[retayl]

5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

In which case I am, according to you, a moron. Thank you for your comment, and have a nice day.

That’s an affirmative. I can confirm you are a moron.

[steven100]

we can say post here until the cows come home....    what's the point   ??  

[Confuscious]

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

 

Agreed.... 

 

This will be considered a very unpopular opinion by many... but here goes...

 

1) Ban the breeding of all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' 

2) Only allow trained and licensed owners of dogs considered 'powerful'

3) Remove all dogs considered 'dangerous breeds' from their homes and euthanise them

4) Remove all dogs considered 'powerful' from their homes if owners are untrained & unlicensed

5) All other dogs must have a collar with the owners name on them.

6) If a dog (with a collar) is found on the street or on public land - the owner faces a fine

7) If a dog is found without a collar, it is removed and euthanised

 

 

*Dangerous breeds: All Pit Bull breeds, Japanese Tosa, Dogo Argentino, Fila Brasileiro.

*Powerful breeds: Rottweiler, Doberman Pinscher, German Shepherd, Bullmastiff, Cane Corso, Alaskan Malamute, Siberian Husky, Presa Canario, American Bulldog

 

 

 

Not a popular opinion - and I 100% agree, its a horrific solution but its the only solution  that would prevent further attacks on innocent children....   

 

Also ban dogs in Condos... 

Also ban dogs in houses without a resonable garden for them to run in (and that garden must be secure).

 

 

The issue here - this is a brutal first world solution to a third world problem due to carelessness....

 

To be fair, small pets are known to also attack people.
Ever past a chihuahua with his barking and showing his teeth to anybody passing near?
I know personally cases where a little "Poodle" attacked people and bit them in the face.
Not less dangerous as a Pitbull.

[Captain Flack]

A post totally changing another posters quote has been removed.

[richard_smith237]

14 minutes ago, Confuscious said:

To be fair, small pets are known to also attack people.
Ever past a chihuahua with his barking and showing his teeth to anybody passing near?

Chihuahua's are evil nasty little b@stards...  yet they can't actually chew off a child's face in a single attack...   And this is why the breeds I mentioned earlier are so dangerous....

 

The power they poses is extreme and their breeding combines to a formidable result - people will argue 'they are ok if they are well trained'...  I'd argue, why do they have to have the violence 'trained out of them'....   'family' Dogs should be saft and sappy by nature... 

 

14 minutes ago, Confuscious said:

I know personally cases where a little "Poodle" attacked people and bit them in the face.
Not less dangerous as a Pitbull.

The poodle is not capable of ripping someones scalp off their scull, or tearing their face off....  a Pit Bull is....    the comparison you make is night and day.

 

A Poodle is not less dangerous as (than a) Pitbull - thats complete delusion. 

 

In the example you use...  a poodle bit someone in the face....   its quite likley that if that dog were a pitbull, it would have ripped off the victims face....  there's a huge difference.