14 hours ago, BKKKevin said:

I would like to know why this forum allows these false MAGA circle jerk threads?… 

Because there are enouth DTDS thready thelat have to endure. 10 fold actually 

3 minutes ago, still kicking said:

Guess what: Donald Trump likes fast food 

 

So do 93yos 

4 minutes ago, frank83628 said:

Because there are enouth DTDS thready thelat have to endure. 10 fold actually 

They will never learn. 

7 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

...and if the price of straightening out Trump and Vance is more war and more Ukranians dying, so what.  At least Zelensky could look tough for his fanboys in Europe.  

 

NOT a great attitude for the leader of a country desperate for assistance. 

While trump and vance have a good attitude towards a country  that has been invaded by another world leader with an impeccable attitude. 

 

always amazed at how conservative middle American can be - I've been to weddings and conferences over the years and appalled at how drably people dress - everyone in monochrome suits and fibreglass hair and teeth.

18 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

Nice try. First, Churchill was a military veteran, Zelensky is not. Second, this unknown photo was NOT taken at a formal meeting between heads of state. For those, Churchill dressed appropriately. Third, this was NOT Churchill's dailly attire. Zelensky seems enamored with appearing like a tough guy.

 

A boilersuit wasn't a military uniform, it was a military style uniform.

 

You don't know what Zelensky's daily attire is. You only know what he wears to the office from the publicity photos.

 

When Churchill traveled to Washington in 1942, his attire was a mix of the so-called Siren Suit and a Naval Peacoat, devoid of badges and rank.

 

Why does the American President continuously try and pretend to be a baseball player wearing a cheap hat? After he stepped out of the Oval Office, he reached right away to pop on tha $4.99 plus tax hat.

 

And if wearing slovenly dress at a formal meeting between heads of state, why does  the President seem enamoured with appearing like a double glazing salesman in a cheap suit?

 

 

An undone jacket while inspecting the guard is the height of insult.

 

King Charles shows how to wear a suit.

 

 

Rental tux. LOL

 

 

Savile Row wool versus Sears polyester

 

 

Terrible shoulder pads, befitting of a Bangkok tailor with Gerald Ratner cufflinks

 

 

After 78 years, he still can't tie a knot properly

 

 

Gah, navy jacket, black trousers.

 

 

 

 

Or maybe it doesn't really matter how terrible his suits are or that he apparently can't dress himself.

 

5 hours ago, still kicking said:

Guess what: Donald Trump likes fast food 

 

 

Why the silver spoon? A metaphor? Normal people dip the KFC in the gravy, and a wood spork for the coleslaw/beans side Plus a pile of salt and pepper sachets, not fancy shakers. And who takes a knife and fork to the KFC?

 

5 hours ago, frank83628 said:

You lied purposely, not all of Ukraine at all stop lying and spreading misinformation from your cult media

 

 

Think you are the one telling fibs.

8 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

To repeat... yes, Churchill wore a siren suit at times during the war. But he didnt wear it when meeting Stalin or Roosevelt in formal settings, did he? He was couth enough to dress for the occasion. 

 

He had sveral siren suits made up, modeled on a bricklayers out, some in velvet, some even pinstripe. He used to like wearing them before the war, as bricklaying was a hobby of his. It was not military attire, but his attempt to show solidarity with ordinary people on the Home Front.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

He's also turn up in a dressing gown

 

 

Meeting Stalin at the Kremlin in 1942

 

 

 

 

Churchill did wear his Siren suit when meeting the President in the Whitehouse. Cameras weren't allowed in. We know because the press photographers were out on the lawn, when Churchill came out to walk Rooselvelt's dog , Fala, accompanied by a naval aid, captured by Life magazine

 

 

While he recognised the utiity of the suit to galvanize opinion during the Battle of Britain, he continued to wear them throughout the war and even kept wearing them after the war.

15 hours ago, Dan O said:

He didn't come to ask for money he was invited to discuss the "peace agreement" that wasnt.

 

 

Exactly. Zelensky received a formal invite. He recounted the journey took 12 hours by train across Ukraine, followed by an 11 hour flight.

 

The furore over a deal worth half a trillion dollars to the United States was not because he wore a Fruit of the Loom sweatshirt. Many commentator on this forum remark that the United States is effectively bankrupt, when speaking in support of the current American President's policies.

9 hours ago, Hellfire said:

You must be the quintessential Trump voter.

With the title used by the poster, it would seem they aren't too sure. 

Just a troll. 

Next time maybe Zelenskyy will borrow a suit from Elon, since Elon doesn't seem to wear any he owns, even in the Oval Office.

 

Zelenskyy might also bring along a kid to wipe boogers on the Resolute Desk, too, as that seems to be a MAGA tribute.

 

The planned and rehearsed attack on Zelenskyy is funny, given Zelenskyy was the only real man in the entire room. The loud mouth fat guy would disgrace his Depends if he ever went through what Zelenskyy must endure back home under constant threat of assassination.

1 hour ago, MicroB said:

 

 

Exactly. Zelensky received a formal invite. He recounted the journey took 12 hours by train across Ukraine, followed by an 11 hour flight.

 

The furore over a deal worth half a trillion dollars to the United States was not because he wore a Fruit of the Loom sweatshirt. Many commentator on this forum remark that the United States is effectively bankrupt, when speaking in support of the current American President's policies.

Morally bankrupt, absolutely.

21 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Morally bankrupt, absolutely.

Yes the left is. War mongers and childish cartoon lovers. Sad.

2 hours ago, MicroB said:

 

 

Exactly. Zelensky received a formal invite. He recounted the journey took 12 hours by train across Ukraine, followed by an 11 hour flight.

 

The furore over a deal worth half a trillion dollars to the United States was not because he wore a Fruit of the Loom sweatshirt. Many commentator on this forum remark that the United States is effectively bankrupt, when speaking in support of the current American President's policies.

Then he insults the top two guys and proves he is a little man playing celebrity instead of ending the war. They used to be part of Austria and Poland. They are Slavs. He is a celebrity war monger hailed by the left. Orange man bad here's a cartoon. 

Gets very obvious that this forum is infested with old leftish people who live mainly under a stone. You can see this with all the things taking place, similar to covid etc. Their opinions are worthless, they dislike facts and truths ec. Well, it is going to be a tough few years to come for you type of guys then.

42 minutes ago, Walker88 said:

Next time maybe Zelenskyy will borrow a suit from Elon, since Elon doesn't seem to wear any he owns, even in the Oval Office.

 

Zelenskyy might also bring along a kid to wipe boogers on the Resolute Desk, too, as that seems to be a MAGA tribute.

 

The planned and rehearsed attack on Zelenskyy is funny, given Zelenskyy was the only real man in the entire room. The loud mouth fat guy would disgrace his Depends if he ever went through what Zelenskyy must endure back home under constant threat of assassination.

The fat ginger guy wouldn't be anywhere near the area Zelensky needs to be, ginger's  heal spurs wouldn't allow it. 

 

 

 

If Trump had been President in 1940 -

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkcsKuMKooo&ab_channel=LedByDonkeys

23 hours ago, josephbloggs said:

 

Awwww, are you upset he didn't dress nice for Trump? At least his clothes fit him unlike Trump's ridiculous suits.

Trump ties sweep the floor. Saves on cleaning costs.

3 minutes ago, jayboy said:

If Trump had been President in 1940 -

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkcsKuMKooo&ab_channel=LedByDonkeys

Small things engage small minds

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Small things engage small minds

 

Truth hurts, huh/

12 minutes ago, jayboy said:

 

Truth hurts, huh/

Where is the truth? You must be clueless about Lend Lease. Nuff said.

Just now, theshu25 said:

And 3999 of the idiots posts were an absolute waste of time.

I think you're being generous.

24 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

Where is the truth? You must be clueless about Lend Lease. Nuff said.

 

I sat an examination on US-UK relations in WW2 in my finals at Cambridge University.

 

i don't know what point you are making so I will make it for you.The Lend Lease example is in fact interesting and it demonstrates that the wartime relationship between FDR and WSC was often far from chummy.The US squeezed the UK with outrageous terms for financial/military support before Pearl Harbor.Loans were still being paid off by the UK until very recently.WSC and FDR were both aristocrats and men of enormous charisma/stature unlike Trump/Vance, but perhaps there was more in common with the Ukraine situation than people like me like to think.The US and probably all great powers are driven by self interest not sentiment.As Charles de Gaulle pointed out, The State is a cold monster, ie only acts in its own interests.Finally FDR and the US were not keen on imperialism (unless it was their own) and resented American blood/treasure being spent to save the British Empire.

 

 

1 hour ago, Harrisfan said:

Small things engage small minds

And you had to pass comment, so what does that indicate? 

Just now, Artisi said:

And you had to pass comment, so what does that indicate? 

As did you 

28 minutes ago, jayboy said:

 

I sat an examination on US-UK relations in WW2 in my finals at Cambridge University.

 

i don't know what point you are making so I will make it for you.The Lend Lease example is in fact interesting and it demonstrates that the wartime relationship between FDR and WSC was often far from chummy.The US squeezed the UK with outrageous terms for financial/military support before Pearl Harbor.Loans were still being paid off by the UK until very recently.WSC and FDR were both aristocrats and men of enormous charisma/stature unlike Trump/Vance, but perhaps there was more in common with the Ukraine situation than people like me like to think.The US and probably all great powers are driven by self interest not sentiment.As Charles de Gaulle pointed out, The State is a cold monster, ie only acts in its own interests.Finally FDR and the US were not keen on imperialism (unless it was their own) and resented American blood/treasure being spent to save the British Empire.

 

 

Soviet loans written off in 1971. Was Trump leader then?

13 hours ago, Cameroni said:

Of course Volodymyr also looks fetching dancing in high heels, please note this is NOT AI but real footage:

 

 

Thats because he was a actor before getting into politics. Dont be a numbskull

3 minutes ago, Harrisfan said:

As did you 

No second prizes today - sorry.