On 5/7/2025 at 10:01 AM, dinsdale said:

Just another daily thread from an anti-Trumper. Talk about mental decline. Why? Why everyday? Do you get some bizarre dopamine hit for these ridiculous threads. It's just pitiful. Grow up.

He's still crying in his cornflakes that Hillary lost.

4 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It's an well established fact that Russia has helped Trump in all his elections. That is no hoax. The controversies are about collusion and whether the help made enough difference to help him win the two (not three) times that he did.

And the “well established “ proof of your so called “well established “ facts is where???

1 hour ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

And the “well established “ proof of your so called “well established “ facts is where???

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

Russian interference in the 2024 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

 

 

Russian Interference in U.S. Elections

2016 Presidential Election

Intelligence Findings: U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win. This included hacking Democratic emails and spreading disinformation.

Senate Report: A Senate panel reported that the Trump campaign had regular contact with Russian intelligence and expected to benefit from Russian assistance, particularly through the release of hacked emails.

Mueller Investigation: The Mueller report found extensive Russian interference, including a social media campaign favoring Trump and hacking operations targeting the Clinton campaign.

2020 Presidential Election

Continued Interference: Intelligence officials reported that Russia was again attempting to influence the 2020 election, this time to support Trump's reelection. Tactics included spreading disinformation and attempting to undermine confidence in the electoral process.

Social Media Activity: Russian-linked accounts were found to be active on social media, using tactics similar to those in 2016 to sow division and support Trump.

2024 Presidential Election

Ongoing Influence Operations: Reports indicated that Russia continued its influence operations into the 2024 election cycle, aiming to support Trump and undermine his opponents. This included spreading misleading narratives about candidates.

4 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

Russian interference in the 2020 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

Russian interference in the 2024 United States elections - Wikipedia

 

 

 

Russian Interference in U.S. Elections

2016 Presidential Election

Intelligence Findings: U.S. intelligence agencies concluded that Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered a campaign to interfere in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump win. This included hacking Democratic emails and spreading disinformation.

Senate Report: A Senate panel reported that the Trump campaign had regular contact with Russian intelligence and expected to benefit from Russian assistance, particularly through the release of hacked emails.

Mueller Investigation: The Mueller report found extensive Russian interference, including a social media campaign favoring Trump and hacking operations targeting the Clinton campaign.

2020 Presidential Election

Continued Interference: Intelligence officials reported that Russia was again attempting to influence the 2020 election, this time to support Trump's reelection. Tactics included spreading disinformation and attempting to undermine confidence in the electoral process.

Social Media Activity: Russian-linked accounts were found to be active on social media, using tactics similar to those in 2016 to sow division and support Trump.

2024 Presidential Election

Ongoing Influence Operations: Reports indicated that Russia continued its influence operations into the 2024 election cycle, aiming to support Trump and undermine his opponents. This included spreading misleading narratives about candidates.

Wikipedia???

 

No wonder you make the false claims you make.

 

You are aware anyone can write anything on Wikipedia.

5 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Wikipedia???

 

No wonder you make the false claims you make.

 

You are aware anyone can write anything on Wikipedia.

Waste of time trying to respond to hardcore maga cultists.

6 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

Wikipedia???

 

No wonder you make the false claims you make.

 

You are aware anyone can write anything on Wikipedia.

 

But you can also read the sources on those pages. The first link alone cites over 600 sources. Unless you are prejudiced, I'll give you 10 days for a source by source riposte. And its not true that "anyone can write anything" on Wikipedia.

 

While there is no block, in the main, to stop particular pages being edited, some pages are restricted to only registered users editing them. For instance, go try and change the age on the Holucaust and see how long your beliefs will be allowed to stand. There are Editorial policies. Articles must be unbiased and present all significant viewpoints fairly. Information must be backed by reliable, published sources (books, academic journals, mainstream media). No original research. So your charge is comlete and utter bilge.

7 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

But you can also read the sources on those pages. The first link alone cites over 600 sources. Unless you are prejudiced, I'll give you 10 days for a source by source riposte. And its not true that "anyone can write anything" on Wikipedia.

 

While there is no block, in the main, to stop particular pages being edited, some pages are restricted to only registered users editing them. For instance, go try and change the age on the Holucaust and see how long your beliefs will be allowed to stand. There are Editorial policies. Articles must be unbiased and present all significant viewpoints fairly. Information must be backed by reliable, published sources (books, academic journals, mainstream media). No original research. So your charge is comlete and utter bilge.

You have proven nothing.  As usual.

3 minutes ago, MicroB said:

 

But you can also read the sources on those pages. The first link alone cites over 600 sources. Unless you are prejudiced, I'll give you 10 days for a source by source riposte. And its not true that "anyone can write anything" on Wikipedia.

 

While there is no block, in the main, to stop particular pages being edited, some pages are restricted to only registered users editing them. For instance, go try and change the age on the Holucaust and see how long your beliefs will be allowed to stand. There are Editorial policies. Articles must be unbiased and present all significant viewpoints fairly. Information must be backed by reliable, published sources (books, academic journals, mainstream media). No original research. So your charge is comlete and utter bilge.

The politics of the maga cult and related post truth, post facts movements now infecting the world is about not even caring to hear about anything that refutes their delusions. On the "Russia hoax" thing, they are really absurd. For them it's all or nothing because dear leader Trump says it's all or nothing. But there are multiple LAYERS.

 

Broadly:

 

That Russia helped -- FULLY PROVEN 

 

Collusion  -- not proven but suspicious evidence does exists of very many contacts between Trump operatives and Russian operatives. Trumpists can say it didn't happen but it's like if you're judged innocent in a trial it doesn't necessarily mean you're innocent, it just means that guilt wasn't proven.

 

Determinative of election results -- There isn't really any way of proving that. So it is weak to assert that it did.

 

 

15 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Waste of time trying to respond to hardcore maga cultists.

Please, continue with your nonsense.

 

 

I originated one non-political topic on Wikipedia years back. It was torn to shreds by the what-about-this? brigade and -- as a total novice -- the topic only was out of purgatory because a bunch of Wikipedia editing experts came to my rescue.

1 hour ago, Jingthing said:

The politics of the maga cult and related post truth, post facts movements now infecting the world is about not even caring to hear about anything that refutes their delusions. On the "Russia hoax" thing, they are really absurd. For them it's all or nothing because dear leader Trump says it's all or nothing. But there are multiple LAYERS.

 

Broadly:

 

That Russia helped -- FULLY PROVEN 

 

Collusion  -- not proven but suspicious evidence does exists of very many contacts between Trump operatives and Russian operatives. Trumpists can say it didn't happen but it's like if you're judged innocent in a trial it doesn't necessarily mean you're innocent, it just means that guilt wasn't proven.

 

Determinative of election results -- There isn't really any way of proving that. So it is weak to assert that it did.

 

 

So the only people you can get to believe your nonsense is one of your own.

 

No one else believes a word you say.

 

Speaking of cults , why do yours all look the same?

 

 

17 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

So the only people you can get to believe your nonsense is one of your own.

 

No one else believes a word you say.

 

Speaking of cults , why do yours all look the same?

 

 

Now your diety Donald is saying he and putin have warm relations…..that’s akin to having Jeffery dalhamer inviting you over for dinner….fact is montie your boy is aging out just like Biden did….with one very important difference…..Biden had a good team backing us up.this (administration) is a full blown clown car.

On 8/16/2025 at 8:56 AM, bamnutsak said:

trump appears to have difficulty walking in a straight line.

 

Is this"the weave"? Or a demonstration for those who escape from Alligator Auschwitz?

 

Serpentine.

 

https://www.the-express.com/news/us-news/180506/donald-trump-struggles-to-walk

 

 

And he looked sad, weak, lost during his comments. And the excessive sniffing is back, maybe they gave him too much of a bump?

 

 

 

Addled by Adderall.

56 minutes ago, Tug said:

Now your diety Donald is saying he and putin have warm relations…..that’s akin to having Jeffery dalhamer inviting you over for dinner….fact is montie your boy is aging out just like Biden did….with one very important difference…..Biden had a good team backing us up.this (administration) is a full blown clown car.

Keep telling yourself this along with your leftist buddies.

 

Trump is the Alpha Male in charge.  Never forget that.

 

Comparing him to Biden confirms your stupidity.

 

 

9 hours ago, Jingthing said:

It's an well established fact that Russia has helped Trump in all his elections. That is no hoax. The controversies are about collusion and whether the help made enough difference to help him win the two (not three) times that he did.

As a major recipient of Big Pharma, the results drastically affect your cognitive abilities.

1 hour ago, Felton Jarvis said:

Addled by Adderall.

And AI

 

Why can’t the clip be shown in real time?  Not as dramatic?

 

So another words.  Fake as the left.

 

I can post Bidens stumbling, falling, tripping and falling asleep at meetings all on REAL TIME.  No need to doctor the results.

1 hour ago, Tug said:

Now your diety Donald is saying he and putin have warm relations…..that’s akin to having Jeffery dalhamer inviting you over for dinner….fact is montie your boy is aging out just like Biden did….with one very important difference…..Biden had a good team backing us up.this (administration) is a full blown clown car.

 Can another leftist decipher this code talk into comprehensive English?

 

Or am I asking too much for one day?

24 minutes ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

And AI

 

Why can’t the clip be shown in real time?  Not as dramatic?

 

So another words.  Fake as the left.

 

I can post Bidens stumbling, falling, tripping and falling asleep at meetings all on REAL TIME.  No need to doctor the results.

Here you go. I fixed it. Now you can see it is perfectly straight. In no way does he look like a drunk (I know he doesn't drink).

So, now what do you say? He's just trying not to wear out the centre of the carpet?

 

 

The politics of the woke leftist cult and related post truth, post facts movements now infecting the world is about not even caring to hear about anything that refutes their delusions. On the "Russia hoax" thing, they are really absurd. For them it's all or nothing because arch enemy Trump says it's all or nothing. But there are multiple LAYERS.

Broadly:

That Russia helped -- FULLY DEBUNKED

Collusion  -- not proven but suspicious ONLY TO LEFTISTS evidence exists of very A FEW contacts between Trump supported and Russian citizens.  Leftists say it happened, and they don't care that you're judged innocent in a court of law, leftists only care about power, and they just keep lying and lying and lying and lying and lying and lying. 

Determinative of election results -- As long as the left wins, anything goes. 

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Here you go. I fixed it. Now you can see it is perfectly straight. In no way does he look like a drunk (I know he doesn't drink).

So, now what do you say? He's just trying not to wear out the centre of the carpet?

 

 

And who gives a rats ass in the big picture?  Only the leftist nutters care.  Because they have nothing else because Trump is doing an outstanding job bringing Europe to the White House and progressing towards peace. 

The left can’t stand that Trump will most likely facilitate peace in Ukraine.  You/they would much rather continue with war.

 

So you pull out this weak as Fuc- video.  Weak, really weak.  It defines you and the left.  Most non USC’s  BTW, that post here.  Of all people.

 

Now here is some Fuc—- up videos.

 

Do your research before you open your trap.

 

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

The politics of the woke leftist cult and related post truth, post facts movements now infecting the world is about not even caring to hear about anything that refutes their delusions. On the "Russia hoax" thing, they are really absurd. For them it's all or nothing because arch enemy Trump says it's all or nothing. But there are multiple LAYERS.

Broadly:

That Russia helped -- FULLY DEBUNKED

Collusion  -- not proven but suspicious ONLY TO LEFTISTS evidence exists of very A FEW contacts between Trump supported and Russian citizens.  Leftists say it happened, and they don't care that you're judged innocent in a court of law, leftists only care about power, and they just keep lying and lying and lying and lying and lying and lying. 

Determinative of election results -- As long as the left wins, anything goes. 

Are you ok? Need a hug?

3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Are you ok? Need a hug?

You definitely need one.  I proved my point.

 

You as well as the other leftists prove nothing.

3 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Are you ok? Need a hug?

No thanks fluffer, I'm exit only. 

1 minute ago, ThreeCardMonte said:

And who gives a rats ass in the big picture?  Only the leftist nutters care.  Because they have nothing else because Trump is doing an outstanding job bringing Europe to the White House and progressing towards peace. 

The left can’t stand that Trump will most likely facilitate peace in Ukraine.  You/they would much rather continue with war.

 

So you pull out this weak as Fuc- video.  Weak, really weak.  It defines you and the left.  Most non USC’s  BTW, that post here.  Of all people.

 

Now here is some Fuc—- up videos.

 

 

 

 

 

Interesting, someone posting a video of Trump wobbling around and you say it is doctored as it is sped up. I slowed it down for you, and now you say "leftist leftist blah blah blah" and that "weak videos" define the left etc etc. Then you post some videos of Biden being wobbly - what a hypocrite!!

Yes, he was wobbly too, we all laugh at your country because the best two people you can come up with are old, wobbly, probably borderline senile morons. Both of them. But it is so amusing that you get so riled for anyone pointing it out and all you can do is attack Biden in response, it is quite pathetic. Don't you have a stronger comeback than just attacking Biden (who I don't care about anyway)? Is the Biden attack the only defense you have?

 

Quote

Do your research before you open your trap.

?????

Do some research in to how to slow down videos? No need, I work in post production, it's easy for me. DaVinci Resolve version 20.0.6, retime using Optical Flow for frame processing to avoid jittery frames. You're welcome.

What research would you like me to do exactly? I just countered your claim of the video being doctored, nothing more, nothing less. And it sent you in to a little hissy fit.

1 minute ago, josephbloggs said:

Interesting, someone posting a video of Trump wobbling around and you say it is doctored as it is sped up. I slowed it down for you, and now you say "leftist leftist blah blah blah" and that "weak videos" define the left etc etc. Then you post some videos of Biden being wobbly - what a hypocrite!!

Yes, he was wobbly too, we all laugh at your country because the best two people you can come up with are old, wobbly, probably borderline senile morons. Both of them. But it is so amusing that you get so riled for anyone pointing it out and all you can do is attack Biden in response, it is quite pathetic. Don't you have a stronger comeback than just attacking Biden (who I don't care about anyway)? Is the Biden attack the only defense you have?

 

?????

Do some research in to how to slow down videos? No need, I work in post production, it's easy for me. DaVinci Resolve version 20.0.6, retime using Optical Flow for frame processing to avoid jittery frames. You're welcome.

What research would you like me to do exactly? I just countered your claim of the video being doctored, nothing more, nothing less. And it sent you in to a little hissy fit.

If that’s all you got, that’s all you got.

 

Nothing of substance.

 

Carry on.

10 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

No thanks fluffer, I'm exit only. 

I've noticed, it's where most of your posts come from.

19 hours ago, armagetiton said:

Trump and ONLY President Trump can and will make this peace deal possible. Hard to handle for you haters.  Trump is the GOAT and it gets you cranked completely sideways with envy and hate. Go ask NATO boss what he thinks and has to say about this. Mental decline is evident on those who doubt the abilities and success of the leader and peace maker in the free world. Remember that Trump is responsible for this and so much more and YOU and the others are going to have your sanity tested DAILY. It's glorious to watch the liberal meltdowns.

 

 

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/nato-secretary-general-trump-is-amazing-his-criticism-of-nato-was-right/ar-AA1KLmXc

 

 

The NATO boss and all the other leaders are playing the game......the want this war over and done with......and if means a bit boot licking they'll do it.

 

Don't kid yourself........... they feel nothing but total distaste having to deal with him

More signs of dementia...😅

"His Brain Is Mush": People Can't Believe Donald Trump's Latest Incoherent Rant On Live Television

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/brain-mush-people-cant-believe-225840047.html

 

2 minutes ago, candide said:

More signs of dementia...😅

"His Brain Is Mush": People Can't Believe Donald Trump's Latest Incoherent Rant On Live Television

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/brain-mush-people-cant-believe-225840047.html

 

This time for sure, yes? 

any reports detailing Trumps decline despite his obvious superior high intensity intellectual skills especially compared to the too mentally unfit Biden to face indictment for espionage? Oh well, didn't expect so, in the mean time, bust out a turd sandwich haters and dwell and remain fixated on your misery! 

 

https://nypost.com/2025/08/19/opinion/michael-goodwin-trumps-unique-talents-make-him-a-true-leader-and-have-redefined-what-it-means-to-be-commander-in-chief/