In many cultures in the world it is very important that if settling down with a woman and raising a family that the woman is pure, a virgin.

In other cultures, such as western culture the women sleep around a lot before marriage and men have been brain washed into believing that this is perfectly normal and if we object we will be accused of “slut shaming” 

 

In Thailand it is more of a mixed bag with a lot of girls having many partners and starting sleeping around the village at a very young age, getting pregnant in their teens and moving into sex work.

Others are good girls and have a lot of self respect. 
 

Personally I think we have a right to know how many partners of woman has had before committing to marriage which is a significant financial burden for most, especially if it goes wrong.

 

Many studies have shown that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the more unlikely she will ask for a divorce. So it is an important financial consideration for those signing marriage documents.

1 minute ago, MalcolmB said:

Do you know your wife/girlfriend’s body count?

Yes, only one. She doesn’t have a multiple body disorder.

Let me pull up excel spreadsheet 

1 minute ago, novacova said:

Yes, only one. She doesn’t have a multiple body disorder.

Not a Siamese twin?

I think it's irrelevant to our life together.

Generally it's INCELs that fantasize about virgins.

I had some when I was younger, nothing memorable about any of them.

1 minute ago, MalcolmB said:

Not a Siamese twin?

Siamese, no twin. Solo orphan.

sometimes a high body count might work in your favor.

maybe they're tired of sleeping around now. 

 

Why bother?  I really don't care. It's just sex ffs.  Don't ask; Don't tell.  That's a good policy.  I've had very close woman friends, equivalent to a Thai "gik," with whom I've had detail discussions about my sex life.  That's the beauty of a good friendship with a woman.  Marriage tends to ruin friendships like that, and discussing past sexual encounters injects too much tension into that marriage relationship. So I don't ask, and I don't tell.  It just doesn't matter.

15 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

I think it's irrelevant to our life together.

Generally it's INCELs that fantasize about virgins.

I had some when I was younger, nothing memorable about any of them.

Been there, done that - I'd rather have a 30 year old who has been around.  

49 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

In many cultures in the world it is very important that if settling down with a woman and raising a family that the woman is pure, a virgin.

In other cultures, such as western culture the women sleep around a lot before marriage and men have been brain washed into believing that this is perfectly normal and if we object we will be accused of “slut shaming” 

 

In Thailand it is more of a mixed bag with a lot of girls having many partners and starting sleeping around the village at a very young age, getting pregnant in their teens and moving into sex work.

Others are good girls and have a lot of self respect. 
 

Personally I think we have a right to know how many partners of woman has had before committing to marriage which is a significant financial burden for most, especially if it goes wrong.

 

Many studies have shown that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the more unlikely she will ask for a divorce. So it is an important financial consideration for those signing marriage documents.

 

It's a major issue of course. You're right that studies have proven that a girl who's had more than 7 previous partners is 50% more likely to divorce. Thus loyalty is proportional to how many guys she bent over for.

 

Whilst we should do all to find out the truth that can have mixed success. One of my girls I know had only me, as I personally deflowered her and she was a virgin.

 

The other one, told me first two guys. Then it came it out it was actually 6 guys. As a generally rule you should multiply by 3 whatever a woman tells you. Six or 7 is the norm, any less than that she's either a bona fide virgin or she's lying.

 

Women are not stupid, they know that men dislike women who have high body counts (as a general rule, 80 and 90 year old posters on Asean obviously can diverge from the norm due to desperate mating strategies), so most often women lie about their body count. Much like men lie about height.

She defo has had a few miles of penis in her.

18 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

It's a major issue of course. You're right that studies have proven that a girl who's had more than 7 previous partners is 50% more likely to divorce. Thus loyalty is proportional to how many guys she bent over for.

You're wrong, loyalty is a knightly virtue, men only ........ women don't subscribe to knightly virtues.

I have had many short term sexual encounters as well as longer term. No interest to me how many sexual relations my wife had prior to us getting together, never asked.

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

You're wrong, loyalty is a knightly virtue, men only ........ women don't subscribe to knightly virtues.

 

Actually you are wrong. Already in the bible,  in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus states, "No one can serve two masters". The concept of loyalty long predates European knights.  

 

Nor is it a concept developed in Europe.

 

In the Mahabharata, the righteous King Yudhishthira appears at the gates of Heaven at the end of his life with a stray dog he had picked up along the way as a companion, having previously lost his brothers and his wife to death. The god Indra is prepared to admit him to Heaven, but refuses to admit the dog, so Yudhishthira refuses to abandon the dog, and prepares to turn away from the gates of Heaven. Then the dog is revealed to be the manifestation of Dharma, the god of righteousness and justice, and who turned out to be his deified self. Yudhishthira enters heaven in the company of his dog, the god of righteousness.[29][30]: 684–85  Yudhishthira is known by the epithet Dharmaputra, the lord of righteous duty.

 

The Samurai had loyalty as a major tenent of their code.

 

Confucius taught filial piety.

 

The origin of the word is in the Old French loialte, that is in turn rooted in the Latin lex, meaning "law". One who is loyal, in the feudal sense of fealty, is one who is lawful (as opposed to an outlaw), ie loyal to the laws. 

 

Loyalty is more than a knightly a virtue and long predates knights.

 

In any event, some women are loyal, admittedly only because they had a low body count and their man provides financially, but there can be no denying the numbers, women who've had more than 7 partners are significantly more likely to initiate divorce. Those are the facts.

Stupid question asking a woman, who was a prostitute about body counts.

 

Immature.

26 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

how many guys she bent over for.

Nicely put.

49 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

In many cultures in the world it is very important that if settling down with a woman and raising a family that the woman is pure, a virgin.

In other cultures, such as western culture the women sleep around a lot before marriage and men have been brain washed into believing that this is perfectly normal and if we object we will be accused of “slut shaming” 

 

In Thailand it is more of a mixed bag with a lot of girls having many partners and starting sleeping around the village at a very young age, getting pregnant in their teens and moving into sex work.

Others are good girls and have a lot of self respect. 
 

Personally I think we have a right to know how many partners of woman has had before committing to marriage which is a significant financial burden for most, especially if it goes wrong.

 

Many studies have shown that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the more unlikely she will ask for a divorce. So it is an important financial consideration for those signing marriage documents.

Why worry about Divorce?  Men, stop getting married and guess what, you will have a lot more of your money as you get older.  If you are marrying for sex...forget it, after 2 years, sex goes away.  If you are marrying for companionship and devotion...get a Dog and have lady friends or short term girlfriends.  Marriage is a scam, the best scam on the planet that was invented to steal resources.  If marriage is soooooooooooooo good, why is the divorce rate so high everywhere?  Why is your wife looking at every other stud when she goes on vacation with her sisters? Why is your wife sleeping or sucking the personal trainer or her 'side job"?  

 

 

1 minute ago, MalcolmB said:

Nicely put.

And swallowed....

6 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Actually you are wrong. Already in the bible,  in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus states, "No one can serve two masters". The concept of loyalty long predates European knights.  

 

Nor is it a concept developed in Europe.

 

In the Mahabharata, the righteous King Yudhishthira appears at the gates of Heaven at the end of his life with a stray dog he had picked up along the way as a companion, having previously lost his brothers and his wife to death. The god Indra is prepared to admit him to Heaven, but refuses to admit the dog, so Yudhishthira refuses to abandon the dog, and prepares to turn away from the gates of Heaven. Then the dog is revealed to be the manifestation of Dharma, the god of righteousness and justice, and who turned out to be his deified self. Yudhishthira enters heaven in the company of his dog, the god of righteousness.[29][30]: 684–85  Yudhishthira is known by the epithet Dharmaputra, the lord of righteous duty.

 

The Samurai had loyalty as a major tenent of their code.

 

Confucius taught filial piety.

 

The origin of the word is in the Old French loialte, that is in turn rooted in the Latin lex, meaning "law". One who is loyal, in the feudal sense of fealty, is one who is lawful (as opposed to an outlaw), ie loyal to the laws. 

 

Loyalty is more than a knightly a virtue and long predates knights.

 

In any event, some women are loyal, admittedly only because they had a low body count and their man provides financially, but there can be no denying the numbers, women who've had more than 7 partners are significantly more likely to initiate divorce. Those are the facts.

Men were never designed for one woman.  Women were never designed to be faithful.  

 

Deal with that you Soyboys.....

 

The more BC your GF has, she will never learn to be faithful to one man...she will always have the "itch".

4 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

Men were never designed for one woman.  Women were never designed to be faithful.  

 

That's true of course. We are all closely related to the Bonobos, the most promiscuous of apes, and promiscuity is our state of default.

 

However, as human beings, we have developed certain codes of behaviour which help us to achieve higher goals, and loyalty is one of the original, primary codes of conduct we require for this purpose.

 

Some adhere to it, others do not. Some know what is wrong and don't do it, others know it and do it anyway. It's a matter of character and integrity.

 

However, a woman can be exceptionally faithful to a man, and not even have eyes for other men....if she's convinced the man she has is the best option she could ever have. In the age of social media, that is increasingly unlikely of course.

1 hour ago, MalcolmB said:

western culture the women sleep around a lot before marriage and men have been brain washed into believing that this is perfectly normal and if we object we will be accused of “slut shaming” 

If your Thai wife/gf has a child from a father who has abandoned her and his child, most times this woman has no choice but to sleep around. 

 

Thailand will always have a high number of woman selling their bodies due to government failing to provide support for these single, abandoned mothers, they do not receive social security payments or welfare cheques, the government does not force fathers to support their child or garnish fathers wages. 

 

2 minutes ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

the government does not force fathers to support their child or garnish fathers wages. 

They do if the mother was married to the father.

 

But for girls that get themselves pregnant out of wedlock then they are solely responsible for that child. 
It is to stop gold diggers I suppose. 
 

Remember what happened to Boris Becker.

It is what it is.....does it matter what the body count is......the holes are still in working condition.....

17 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

If marriage is soooooooooooooo good, why is the divorce rate so high everywhere?

Probably because men are marrying women with high body counts.

I have no interest in knowing, nor is it any of my business.
We've been comfortably and relatively happily married for 30 years.

That's what's important to me. 

I had one raucous lady tell me she's had more semen in her than a submarine. 

 

That's something I didn't expect to hear even from a seasoned BG

21 minutes ago, Taboo2 said:

Why worry about Divorce?  Men, stop getting married and guess what, you will have a lot more of your money as you get older.  If you are marrying for sex...forget it, after 2 years, sex goes away.  If you are marrying for companionship and devotion...get a Dog and have lady friends or short term girlfriends.  Marriage is a scam, the best scam on the planet that was invented to steal resources.  If marriage is soooooooooooooo good, why is the divorce rate so high everywhere?  Why is your wife looking at every other stud when she goes on vacation with her sisters? Why is your wife sleeping or sucking the personal trainer or her 'side job"?  

 

 

Sounds like you married the wrong woman if your sex life went away after 2 years... I have been with mine for 12 years and although we don't sex the 4 or 5 times a day like when we met. i am happy with the 2 or 3 times a day i still get. Not only that but my wife does not have a pecker count. 

2 minutes ago, drgoon said:

I had one raucous lady tell me she's had more semen in her than a submarine. 

 

That's something I didn't expect to hear even from a seasoned BG

That does not seem a lot if she was selling herself for men to dive in

As the body count keeps getting more and more important by the day, its time to invent a foolproof "counter" and install it at birth. If not, never will the real figure be revealed.

Absolutely no idea and I'm not sure I really care. I'm pretty sure it's under a hundred, which in my book amounts to just a bit of sexual experience. I think we are brought up to believe that over a certain number is a form of impurity and almost hypnotized into thinking that purity is associated with raw numbers, and to think it's a very important facet of the whole thing. I do think once you get beyond 200 then it's a potential recipe for major issues, and once you get over a thousand all bets are off.

 

I think the average guy would be shocked to know what the real numbers were, and my guess is that in most circumstances it's substantially higher than they think, especially here. And especially if the girl worked previously at a bar or in massage.