Just happened to me.

[johng]

3 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, not stalking. Just staring.

 

U.K. Government Backs Bill to Criminalize Street Harassment

The measure targets behavior like catcalling or persistent staring with prison sentences of up to two years, in the hopes that more people will report such occurrences.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/09/world/europe/uk-ban-street-harassment.html

 

So in the UK a woman can have a man imprisoned for looking at her. That's how far the feminists have perverted UK justice.

 

[Yagoda]

2 hours ago, boloaf said:

hat's why French men go mad when English or other western women visit there. However, each to his own.

French chicks seem to drink less that their English competition. Italian, Israel and Turkish girls are hot too, got to watch the Israeli girls though because they are tough and can kill you barehanded.

[Magictoad]

On 7/18/2025 at 8:23 PM, Will B Good said:

 

You really shouldn't post dross in this manner....you just come across as a Trump supporter.

 

Dominik Bullock of Thatcham, was not jailed solely for staring—the case escalated when his behaviour became confrontational and obstructive. According to police: he sat next to the victim on a Berkshire-bound train from Reading and stared so intently that she repeatedly asked him to stop and to move as he was blocking her exit. He refused both requests, even spreading his legs and telling her she’d have to “climb over him.” When other passengers intervened and she called the police, he still wouldn’t move. Eventually, the train manager had to remove him. Bullock was subsequently identified via CCTV and arrested.

 

I doubt you have kids, but try to imagine it was your daughter or ex Filipino he was hassling.

It's not really the point. The point is the UK is getting more and more repressive.  Including the new " Banter Bill" just passed by the HOL. It's a draconian bill which will limit freedom of speech in public places and workplaces including pubs, bars, and restaurants. 

This bill will require employer to "police" their own establishment for fear that a member of staff may "take offense" at some he/she hears.

It heralds the crushing of free speech. 

[Geoff914]

On 7/18/2025 at 2:20 PM, Cameroni said:

 

Lucky you don't live in England, men are arrested there for staring at women.

 

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2022-03-14/man-who-kept-staring-at-woman-on-a-berkshire-train-is-jailed

I thought the prisons were full of people saying hurty words.

[BusyB]

On 7/18/2025 at 3:48 PM, Cameroni said:

 

He obviously got angry because of how the girl responded and telling him not to stare at her. So he extended his legs and and refused to move when she told him to. He was not prosecuted for that, he was prosecuted for staring.

 

British transport has launched a campaign to warn men they will be prosecuted if they stare at women.

 

In the UK, a woman can now go to police and accuse  a man of staring at her and they will arrest him and he'lll be prosecuted. For looking at a woman.

 

This is not an isolated case.

 

Staring at a man is likely to get you punched in the face, never mind blocking their exit.

 

Only weaklings, incels and cowards stare at women and threaten them like that. Cowards the lot. She stuck up for herself and the filthy pig ramped up the physical threat inherent in his ignorant stare.

 

Staring at anyone is an aggressive act.

 

Try it with some guy your own size and age some time. Just stare at them. Constantly. See what happens. Where I come from you'd get your head kicked in.

 

Pathetic, mysogynist, incel posts on this thread all playing the victim card. 🤮

 

 

 

 

[Will B Good]

1 hour ago, Magictoad said:

It's not really the point. The point is the UK is getting more and more repressive.  Including the new " Banter Bill" just passed by the HOL. It's a draconian bill which will limit freedom of speech in public places and workplaces including pubs, bars, and restaurants. 

This bill will require employer to "police" their own establishment for fear that a member of staff may "take offense" at some he/she hears.

It heralds the crushing of free speech. 

 

Oh yes silly me....let's just allow women to lead potentially miserable lives because m orons like you are too s tupid to have any concept of empathy.

[Cameroni]

11 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Staring at a man is likely to get you punched in the face, never mind blocking their exit.

 

Depends what you look like. I stare at guys all the time and nobody dares do anything.

 

12 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Only weaklings, incels and cowards stare at women and threaten them like that. Cowards the lot. She stuck up for herself and the filthy pig ramped up the physical threat inherent in his ignorant stare.

 

You don't half talk some garbage. Many guys stare at a woman, just to admire the architecture. Nothing threatening at all.

 

13 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Staring at anyone is an aggressive act.

 

With gorillas. But we're evolved beings. 

 

13 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Try it with some guy your own size and age some time. Just stare at them. Constantly. See what happens. Where I come from you'd get your head kicked in.

 

Nonsense. I do it all the time. Nobody dares try it on. 

 

14 minutes ago, BusyB said:

Pathetic, mysogynist, incel posts on this thread all playing the victim card

 

Bit like you're doing with the "poor victimised" stared at victim, oh my God the agression of a look, the poor damsel!!!

[BusyB]

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Depends what you look like. I stare at guys all the time and nobody dares do anything.

 

Ooh, I am impressed. Not.

 

You don't half talk some garbage. Many guys stare at a woman, just to admire the architecture. Nothing threatening at all.

The guy in question was threatening. And he let her know it. Typical mysoginist to reverse the perp/victim roles.

 

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

 

Nonsense. I do it all the time. Nobody dares try it on. 

Oooh! You sound like a really great guy. Not. In fact your whole post sounds extremely anti-social, and you borderline sectionable and dangerous.

 

4 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

 

Bit like you're doing with the "poor victimised" stared at victim, oh my God the agression of a look, the poor damsel!!!

 

I really can't be bothered with the rest of the bilge.

[Cameroni]

Just now, BusyB said:

The guy in question was threatening. And he let her know it. Typical mysoginist to reverse the perp/victim roles.

 

After she called the police on him for looking at her. Of course he was p!ssed then. What do you expect? She was bolshy and out of order.

 

1 minute ago, BusyB said:

and you borderline sectionable and dangerous.

 

Hahahahaha...bad to the bone...

 

 

[jacko45k]

14 hours ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, not stalking. Just staring.

.

I removed your comment as really we head off topic, but I had to wonder if the UK police are pursuing those recently off the boats who are known to leer after women and girls, causing their parents grief. 

[Tazmo]

I would remove myself from sitting where I was if such behavior was being displayed before me, because a decent woman won’t behave like that and alarm bells would start ringing!

Simple problem- solving skills!

To remain seated there would indicate some form of obsessive behavior. Not a bad one to have but needs to be moderated so that you don’t get caught!

11th Commandment, thou shalt not be caught!! lol 

[Cameroni]

Now, they made a law in the UK that a woman can have you locked up for looking at her, I just feel sorry for young guys.

 

Feminism has utterly taken control in the UK. Whistling? Cat-calling, 2 years jail. Looking at a woman? Harrassment - 2 years jail.

 

What a world to live in for the young guys. The feminists have shown no mercy and went for the jugular. Total domination.

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

Now, they made a law in the UK that a woman can have you locked up for looking at her, I just feel sorry for young guys.

 

Feminism has utterly taken control in the UK. Whistling? Cat-calling, 2 years jail. Looking at a woman? Harrassment - 2 years jail.

 

What a world to live in for the young guys. The feminists have shown no mercy and went for the jugular. Total domination.

 

Oh for ***** sake put a sock in it.

[NoshowJones]

On 7/18/2025 at 8:40 PM, Cameroni said:

 

He stared at the girl which got her all riled up. So they got into an argument. He sat next to the exit and extended his legs and refused to move for her. He didn't touch her and didn't verbally abuse her. She then called police and pressed charges against him.

 

It was the staring that precipitated the prosecution. Indeed in the UK it is now clearly established that men can be prosecuted for staring at women:

 

"Det Supt Sarah White, who leads BTP’s sexual offences team, dismissed the criticism and warned that her force is receiving daily reports of individuals committing sexual offences, including staring, across the country."

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/

 

I do have kids, two daugthers in fact and I still find it distasteful that men get prosecuted for looking at a woman.

If it is true that the guy did everything that was reported here then he deserved to get jailed. What was his appearance like? Six ft tall, slim and clean shaven? I would doubt that very much, probably no more than five ft six and facial haired.

[CHdiver]

16 hours ago, johng said:

 

Pure sexism. Sounds like females can do it to males without problems. Before you tell, no no they don't do that. If you are as handsome as I am (was), they do it too, including patting your backside and more. 

[NoshowJones]

On 7/18/2025 at 8:48 PM, Cameroni said:

 

He obviously got angry because of how the girl responded and telling him not to stare at her. So he extended his legs and and refused to move when she told him to. He was not prosecuted for that, he was prosecuted for staring.

 

British transport has launched a campaign to warn men they will be prosecuted if they stare at women.

 

In the UK, a woman can now go to police and accuse  a man of staring at her and they will arrest him and he'lll be prosecuted. For looking at a woman.

 

This is not an isolated case.

He was deliberately obstructing her. Case closed.

[Cameroni]

3 minutes ago, NoshowJones said:

He was deliberately obstructing her. Case closed.

 

I don't think so, he extended his legs, ok obstruction, but he was not convicted because of that. It was the staring which prompted the woman to call police. Because they now know that they can get a man arrested whom they don't want looking at her.

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

I don't think so, he extended his legs, ok obstruction, but he was not convicted because of that. It was the staring which prompted the woman to call police. Because they now know that they can get a man arrested whom they don't want looking at her.

 

For ***** sake....even people in the carriage intervened to help her.......something people very rarely do.

 

You are one sick puppy.

[NoshowJones]

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

I don't think so, he extended his legs, ok obstruction, but he was not convicted because of that. It was the staring which prompted the woman to call police. Because they now know that they can get a man arrested whom they don't want looking at her.

I understand what you are saying, but it is 100% wrong to deliberately obstruct a stranger. If any guy who I did not know deliberately obstructed me anywhere, he would be guaranteed a very sore face.

That guy was a coward, I bet he would not do that to another guy.

[NoshowJones]

On 7/19/2025 at 10:01 AM, Will B Good said:

 

I find it staggering that you can post such an asinine and moronic statement......you are obliviously of what women have to face everyday of their lives from pig ignorant, aggressive men.

 

Many women's lives are blighted because of attitudes like you express.

 

I am thoroughly disgusted you can defend anything that causes such upset to women.

I think Spidermike meant that if some hottie in shorts walk past it is fine to look as long as it is done very discreetly, no normal man is going to fail to notice hotties walking past, and I don't think the hotties notice either, though deliberate staring is a big No! No!

[NanLaew]

16 hours ago, Yagoda said:

French chicks seem to drink less that their English competition. Italian, Israel and Turkish girls are hot too, got to watch the Israeli girls though because they are tough and can kill you barehanded.

 

Krav Maga is SO overrated.

[Cameroni]

13 minutes ago, NoshowJones said:

I understand what you are saying, but it is 100% wrong to deliberately obstruct a stranger. If any guy who I did not know deliberately obstructed me anywhere, he would be guaranteed a very sore face.

 

Sure, but she called police on him first. That can have the effect of causing some resentment in young guys. And it's not like he really obstructred her, he was sitting down and extended his legs, she could leave, she just had to clamber over him.

 

He was obviously angry because she called police very demonstratively on him.

[Will B Good]

1 minute ago, Cameroni said:

 

Sure, but she called police on him first. That can have the effect of causing some resentment in young guys. And it's not like he really obstructred her, he was sitting down and extended his legs, she could leave, she just had to clamber over him.

 

He was obviously angry because she called police very demonstratively on him.

 

......she just had to clamber over him. ......you are mental, seriously metal if you think that is acceptable anywhere other than soi 6

 

 

Oh the poor little puddin'.......he behaves like a total dick, has people in the carriage intervene, and the station manager has to become involved....why would anyone call the police......he was only having a larff.

[Cameroni]

Not saying it's "acceptable", just trying to put things into a proper context. He wasn't sealing the door with his body and keeping anyone hostage.

 

And the reason people intervened and the station manager and police came was obviously because the woman made a massive incident out of a guy looking at her for too long. If you think that is a good society and healthy rules for men and women, then perhaps you need to get out of Isaan a bit.

[NoshowJones]

9 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Sure, but she called police on him first. That can have the effect of causing some resentment in young guys. And it's not like he really obstructred her, he was sitting down and extended his legs, she could leave, she just had to clamber over him.

 

He was obviously angry because she called police very demonstratively on him.

She was right to call the police, why should any girl have to climb over a strange man just to get past?

[Cameroni]

Just now, NoshowJones said:

She was right to call the police, why should any girl have to climb over a strange man just to get past?

 

No, she called police after the guy looked at her too long.

 

The legs extension thing came after she called police.

[NoshowJones]

Just now, Cameroni said:

 

No, she called police after the guy looked at her too long.

 

The legs extension thing came after she called police.

She was probably frightened, let's just leave it at that.

[Will B Good]

3 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

No, she called police after the guy looked at her too long.

 

The legs extension thing came after she called police.

 

 

And you believe this is acceptable behaviour..............???

 

“She repeatedly asked Bullock to stop staring and to move out of her way but he refused. Other passengers in the carriage also started asking Bullock to move while the victim phoned the police but he continued to refuse. Bullock then told the victim that she would have to climb over him if she wanted to get off the train.”

[Cameroni]

22 minutes ago, NoshowJones said:

She was probably frightened, let's just leave it at that.

 

She should have left it at that. A guy looks at her too long, ok, she's not comfortable. Here's a novel idea, just ignore it. But no, she had to call police, the station manager, incite other passengers to intervene, she made an elephant out of a mole hill.

 

This snowflake culture will just cause more problems. It won't solve a thing. Guys will still look at girls. Laws will lose all respect, police will lose all respect, welll, even more so.

[NoshowJones]

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

She should have left it at that. A guy looks at her too long, ok, she's not comfortable. Here's a novel idea, just ignore it. But no, she had to call police, the station manager, incite other passengers to intervene, she made an elephant out of a mole hill.

 

This snowflake culture will just cause more problems. It won't solve a thing. Guys will still look at girls. Laws will lose all respect, police will lose all respect, welll, even more so.

We will just agree to disagree. The girl is in the right and the guy is a moron. end of debate.