2016 POSTER OF THE YEAR POLL - FINAL

[chiang mai]

I reckon anyone who posts into this thread from now on who has less than 100 posts to their name should probably be treated with great suspicion, if not ignored completely.

[Savilesghost]

Just now, chiang mai said:

I reckon anyone who posts into this thread from now on who has less than 100 posts to their name should probably be treated with great suspicion, if not ignored completely.

I think anyone who is fixated with the number of dots one has against their name needs medical intervention ASAP

[geronimo]

2 minutes ago, Savilesghost said:

I think anyone who is fixated with the number of dots one has against their name needs medical intervention ASAP

You're only saying that because you have three!

[Ace of Pop]

Bit to difficult for me, all this vote stuf im , still muddled over them dot tings that im convinced are as much use as a 90Day Report.The results, hmm... well to any fair minded person, those above are as it was intended prior to nit wits messin about.

[canuckamuck]

15 minutes ago, Will27 said:

At the end of the day, governments won't fall and the stock market won't go into meltdown.

 

Someone will just get to wear the crown for a year and get some bragging rights.

 

Really though, after the last couple of POTY's, did anyone expect anything different?

It's not a crown, more like a throne.

 

[chiang mai]

7 minutes ago, Savilesghost said:

I think anyone who is fixated with the number of dots one has against their name needs medical intervention ASAP

 

Indeed and as it happens I'm leaving for the hospital shortly, coincidently you're leaving for my ignore list now.

[oldlakey]

10 minutes ago, Savilesghost said:

I think anyone who is fixated with the number of dots one has against their name needs medical intervention ASAP

Spoken like a man with 3 Dots

I have had one consultation and opinion, but I am going for a second as I did not like the first

[transam]

1 minute ago, sipi said:

There's a confession if ever I heard one.

Yeh, talk about "bury himself"...Gawd

 

[geronimo]

1 minute ago, oldlakey said:

Spoken like a man with 3 Dots

I have had one consultation and opinion, but I am going for a second as I did not like the first

The doctor told me I am far too happy and my work rate is too high, so I'm working on being a little more gloomy and lightening up with the work. I am told that will get me my 2 dots back.

[oldlakey]

1 minute ago, geronimo said:

The doctor told me I am far too happy and my work rate is too high, so I'm working on being a little more gloomy and lightening up with the work. I am told that will get me my 2 dots back.

Not if I have got anything to do with it it wont, far too easy nose to the grindstone is the only way forward

[villagefarang]

Being convinced this year’s nominees would not cheat, I naively thought this would be a clean competition.  I just didn’t realize certain individuals would be so cynical and hateful as to step in and derail things.

[Peterw42]

Does the member reputation get considered ? otherwise, whats the point of the reputation ?

[WhamBam]

More newbies trying to make the

 

The tone of one particular newbie makes me feel quite sure he is an agitator of old.

[bannork]

Any general election requires the voters to be of an adult age, 18 usually.

Well, to prevent any newbies who naturally have no idea of the capabilities of the  TV election  candidates  from voting I suggest the organizers  only allow posters with at least 1,000 posts for example to vote.

This would eliminate second, third or fourth accounts set up to win this coveted trophy.

As an aside the appearance  of Savile's ghost  is plainly an attempt to ensure Jim will fix it as it happens guys and gals. The image of a cigar smoking peroxide long haired pervert in a shell suit stalking the corridors of TV is particularly disturbing.

[sipi]

I am a bit disappointed no-one invited me into this POTY scam.

[geronimo]

Just now, sipi said:

I am a bit disappointed no-one invited me into this POTY scam.

Insufficient dots old chap!

[NancyL]

Every year a large number of votes are cast in the final 24 hours as the "undecideds" make up their minds ahead of the deadline. Nothing suspect about this.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Thaivisa Connect mobile app

[Naam]

nomen est omen! POTY 2016 has gone "potty"

 

[sipi]

The problem now is that if Naam picks up another 8 votes in the next 6 hours (and wins), Albert has already confessed to vote rigging.

Edited December 28, 2016 by sipi
"and wins"

[JAS21]

1 hour ago, AlbertCuypstraat said:

 

I am simply stating the obvious.

What happened to the votes of the guy who dropped out ... some kid or other. Did his supporters get the votes back.

[canuckamuck]

Trans hits the century mark on the poll. 

That might get him another dot.

 

 

 

I would have voted for either of the other two, except that I felt that Trans was well overdue for  recognition and his good nature despite some very antagonizing and cheap attempts to pull him in the mud.

Edited December 28, 2016 by canuckamuck

[Naam]

1 hour ago, Will27 said:

If that wasn't a rule to begin with, it's a bit hard to move the goalposts now I think.

primary and standing rule in every election is "no cheating!" that also applies to POTY 2016. no goalposts have to be moved eliminating votes which are not eligible.

[geronimo]

11 minutes ago, JAS21 said:

What happened to the votes of the guy who dropped out ... some kid or other. Did his supporters get the votes back.

I think that when your ship goes down, your votes go with it.

[geronimo]

8 minutes ago, canuckamuck said:

Trans hits the century mark on the poll. 

That might get him another dot.

 

 

 

I would have voted for either of the other two, except that I felt that Trans was well overdue for  recognition and his good nature despite some very antagonizing and cheap attempts to pull him in the mud.

They won't give him any dots, as he already has a full repertoire, plus he has loads in his tool box, apparently they make good washers!

[Ron19]

3 hours ago, AlbertCuypstraat said:

 

 

The transam camp has nothing to do with  blatant cheating, quite a number of these late postings have links to one banned member. There have also been instances of questionable votes for the other member that is in the running.

If you haven't got the facts in front of you, please don't post such accusations with out the proof to verify such.

[JAS21]

1 minute ago, geronimo said:

I think that when your ship goes down, your votes go with it.

Yes I think you are probably correct...

[chiang mai]

56 minutes ago, NancyL said:

Every year a large number of votes are cast in the final 24 hours as the "undecideds" make up their minds ahead of the deadline. Nothing suspect about this.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Thaivisa Connect mobile app
 

 

Nope, nothing at all, not even the earlier poster admitting he and his friends opened new bogus accounts in order to sway the results, all business as usual!!!

[geronimo]

Just now, chiang mai said:

 

Nope, nothing at all, not even the earlier poster admitting he and his friends opened new bogus accounts in order to sway the results, all business as usual!!!

It's a dotty life at the top it seems!

[geronimo]

Ithinkmykeyboardhasfinallygivenuptheghostasthespacebarnolongerworks!!!

[Will27]

46 minutes ago, Naam said:

primary and standing rule in every election is "no cheating!" that also applies to POTY 2016. no goalposts have to be moved eliminating votes which are not eligible.

I wasn't saying cheating was allowed.

 

I was replying to this

"Ok so ask again for the mods to delete votes from members with less than 100 posts and less than a month"

 

That's not cheating.