Migration is not a crime

[overherebc]

1 hour ago, Srikcir said:

It is the Chinese Communist government who can't live in harmony with the Uighurs in Xinjiang.

For the reasons why I covered in my response Post #27 to Xonax.

 

1 hour ago, Srikcir said:

It is the Chinese Communist government who can't live in harmony with the Uighurs in Xinjiang.

For the reasons why I covered in my response Post #27 to Xonax.

The world is over populated by people who believe their way is the only way and it's going to get worse.

Mostly based on religion which is the most stupid thing invented by the human race. 

Every religion in the world is the cause of all the worlds problems.

Too many people on too small a planet. 

Nature will have it's way and no amount of religious or political belief will have any effect on it.

Feeding the starving masses in countries where the numbers have outgrown the natural resources that can only support a certain number is, and it's not a nice thing to say, adding to the problem.

Nature is an unbeatable force and the stupid idea of religion is one of the factors that lead to over population. 

Too many people in one place so just let them move to another place and weaken that other place. 

I am obviously not religious, I'm not that stupid, and I will accept being called hard hearted or even callous.

The whole world is going to, can I use the word 'hell' in a hand cart and faster than anyone will care to admit. 

Nothing will change it, religion, bleeding heart do gooders and their ilk are the main causes.

We have no children because we didn't want them to live in what this tiny little speck of blue in the cosmos is becoming.

[lonewolf99]

Well said overherebc.

 

Religion is the root cause. Biggest scam every thought up with their mass breeding programs as well.

 

Nature will win out in the end not man and his mad borders and walls.

[observer90210]

Any country that has once colonised another, or any country that makes a military invasion (via coalition) for any reason good or bad, needs to morally accept the refugees of the related nation. 

 

On the other hand, why should a country that has never colonised or made a military invasion be required to accept refugees, if their internal socio-economical climate is not abundant ?

 

(I'm going to get bashed on this one ! )