Jump to content

Alleged Koh Tao rape victim in her first interview accuses police of suppressing truth 


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Just Weird said:

What?  Jurisdiction to investigate an alleged crime that allegedly took place in Thailand?  Yes, of course they do.

there you go

  • Like 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, duanebigsby said:

She tried reporting the rape at Koh Phangan and the RTP wouldn't accept it.

 

You seem absolutely convinced she is lying when there isn't any evidence either way.

You're convinced she got incredibly drunk, had sex consensually  with someone then passed out.

I'm not convinced one way or the other.

 

There aren't enough facts to convince anyone  one way or the other, so I resent people who claim to know "the truth."

It is entirely plausible that she is scared of the Thai judicial system. 

They're already arresting anyone who reported an "alleged" rape. 

Reporting that someone made a rape allegation isn't fake news. She made a rape allegation.

 

 

I'm only convinced that she didn't make a rape report and that she has not backed up any of her allegations with any evidence, neither has she been interviewed by the only authority that can process her alleged case, the RTP.

 

"You're convinced she got incredibly drunk, had sex consensually  with someone then passed out".

You said that, not me, don't attribute that garbage quote to me.

 

"...so I resent people who claim to know "the truth."

It is entirely plausible that she is scared of the Thai judicial system".

Ho hum, you resent me?  Do you resent yourself then, you seem to have an opinion diametrically opposite to mine, and a few other's opinions here, what makes your opinion the truth?

 

By the way if you can find where I said that I "claim to know the truth", please post it here, I'd love to see it.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Just Weird said:

I'm only convinced that she didn't make a rape report and that she has not backed up any of her allegations with any evidence, neither has she been interviewed by the only authority that can process her alleged case, the RTP.

Got to agree.

Amazed that posters on this forum (whom most western women would describe as creepy old men preying on poor farm girls) can do nothing but give them their undying support (despite being rejected, divorce raped and accused by them) with no evidence. It's 'Just Weird'.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Posted
21 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:

there you go

Jesus..no, there you don't go.  That was my response to a member who asked if the Thai police "had jurisdiction". Period.  Look at my answer...

 

22 minutes ago, AGareth2 said:
  2 hours ago, Just Weird said:

What?  Jurisdiction to investigate an alleged crime that allegedly took place in Thailand?  Yes, of course they do.

 

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
3 hours ago, JLCrab said:

“However, we’re open to new evidence. Since the victim has not even contacted the UK consul in Thailand which is in charge of the safety of British nationals in the kingdom, we urge her to submit the evidence and give statements so we can investigate further. We’re even willing to take her statements in the UK if she doesn’t feel safe here.”

 

https://www.thephuketnews.com/no-evidence-of-koh-tao-rape-say-police-68447.php#eJFLViu0GSfem97i.97

Good. Why aren't they on their way? But the shirt has to be investigated first in the UK before handling to RTP

Posted
35 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Got to agree.

Amazed that posters on this forum (whom most western women would describe as creepy old men preying on poor farm girls) can do nothing but give them their undying support (despite being rejected, divorce raped and accused by them) with no evidence. It's 'Just Weird'.

It's been reported she tried to make the rape report and RTP refused to record it.

There is no evidence for or against, I'm not forming an opinion. 

I'm questioning those who seem to be against the girl 100%.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)

The fact is that she went to the island to party , use drugs and attend the Full Moon party , even if she knew this was the "death island" . 

 

And then she do not show her face , so more like an anonymous interview with The Times.  

 

Yes she might have very well been raped,  but still she went to the Full Moon Party only hours later , according to the staff at the hostel . 

 

 

Edited by balo
Posted
4 minutes ago, jimmynewbie said:

She didn't go to the full moon party! The hostel lady was lying

And where is your source for that ?   

She met her UK friend on another island to attend a Full Moon party . This was AFTER she reported it to the police. 

 It was written in the news, do you have any other source ? 

 

Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, duanebigsby said:

It's been reported she tried to make the rape report and RTP refused to record it.

There is no evidence for or against, I'm not forming an opinion. 

I'm questioning those who seem to be against the girl 100%.

 

I'm questioning the sense of those young women who wander around in foreign 3rd world counties on their own late at night.

If she was drugged, where were her (3?) friends?

Edited by BritManToo
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, duanebigsby said:

It's the impression I'm getting from your posts which seem to blame the girl.

If my impression is wrong I apologize.

As far as I'm concerned there isn't enough information as to what she has told the Thai police or the British police

It's been reported she tried to make the rape report and RTP refused to record it.

There is no evidence for or against, I'm not forming an opinion. 

I'm questioning those who seem to be against the girl 100%with no evidence for or against. I'm not defending nor condemning her.

Your posts seem to question her validity whereas I see a possibility that she's telling the truth..

.

"Your posts seem to question her validity whereas I see a possibility that she's telling the truth.."

Let's clarify this, I am questioning her credibility, I'm not "seeming to ", I'm questioning it.  The reason?  She has not backed up anything she has alleged, through her mother, she has not even officially made a complaint.  She will not put her money where her mouth is.  What is it that you see that gives her any kind of credibility?

 

"It's been reported she tried to make the rape report and RTP refused to record it".

It's also been reported that she did not try to make a rape report and the RTP did not refuse to record it.

 

"I'm questioning those who seem to be against the girl 100%with no evidence..."

I'm questioning the girl who 100% has produced no evidence neither will she submit to being interviewed, even in London for her own safety, by RTP investigators.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, jimmynewbie said:

 

it wasn't an anonymous interview 'The Times' covered up her voice

What part of that doesn't make it anonymous, then? 

 

 

Edited by Just Weird
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, jimmynewbie said:

Yes and they happily discredit 'Big Joke' or the cops on other threads, just weird.

Come on jimmynewbie, you're clearly referring to me so show me where I have "happily discredited Big Joke on other threads".  Lets see you put your money where your mouth is, it may be time for you to pull your neck in a bit.

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 3
Posted
5 hours ago, Just Weird said:

Not at the moment as the girl has not even made an official complaint yet or taken up the RTP's offer to be interviewed in the UK!  Wonder why?

Because no such offer exists ?

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...