Jump to content

World is going to <deleted> - where's the safest place to be?


Recommended Posts

Posted
20 hours ago, orchis said:

this kind of catastrophic thinking dates back to the cold war. 

 ... and is still viable.

 

 

Posted

Sorry, but anyone asking

"where is the safest place to be"

has fallen hook line and sinker for this hysterical media frenzy scare.

 

Id say a fascination for Thai women 

(and marrying the wrong one) will cause a lot more trouble for a young guy, than Convid ever will.

 

Actually, many have had multiple bites of the cherry and still ridden into huge train wrecks,

so i think a few of em would gladly take a dose of Covid if they could go back in time and change things. 

  • Like 2
Posted

It's either going to be somewhere on the East coast of Wales, or just stay here in Phits.

 

Leaning towards the later if truth be known.......................:thumbsup:

Posted

I'll leave the worrying to the worried noodles and get on with my life - that has served me well and I have no reason to believe it will change!

 

  • Like 1
Posted
23 hours ago, White Christmas13 said:

Yeah New Zeeland does not have any venomous snakes or spiders

I can vouch for one venomous spider in NZ . Was bitten a while back . Katipo. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Denim said:

Didn't know Wales had an East coast. 

I was only just thinking that. 

 

Has Wales detached from England in some stealthy seismic event, unreported by the media, and there is now a 'Welsh Sea' coastline??

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

For a Europeen, Azores or Madeira would be a good place to hang out. I do not find any place in Asia a safe heaven if hell broke loose with a war between China and the West. My homecountry border to Russia, so who knows when Nato get occupied on the other side of the world. 

  • Like 1
Posted
18 hours ago, talahtnut said:

If you've heaps of dosh, a big sailing boat

the size of Noah's Ark, moveable anywhere.

Cheaper alternative, ignoring rising damp,

I fancy this, with the canoe:

 

semporna.jpg

 

These seasteaders thought they were safe until the Thai navy came after them.

 

seasteading.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

My message do not think too hard, it will make you ill, yes, we are in unprecedented times and nobody knows what is ahead of us. My final message to all of you "LIFE IS NOW, DRINK IT WHILST IT IS FIZZING"

Posted
6 minutes ago, ramrod711 said:

Canada, nothing ever happens there and nobody wants to invade because of the cold.

The French are their Defence System they scare sane people away.

  • Haha 1
Posted
On 5/25/2020 at 9:36 PM, simon43 said:

going to be violent confrontation (China CCP vs Taiwan and Hong Kong, Iran vs Israel, Venezuela vs USA etc).

 Problems could be both economic and/or violent confrontation etc

For "economic problems" a safe place would be an isolated, self sustaining property away from the ensuing chaos.

 

Depending on the extent of the "violent confrontation", far away from any conflict would be the best bet. Preferably somewhere in the southern hemisphere where you would be the last to be affected.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053137/ 

 

Certainly not near the hotspots of SEA, nor the madness that is America these days.   NZ, Patagonia, outback Australia - perhaps camping near a water source hundreds of ks from the nearest town.

100_2268.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
On 5/25/2020 at 10:10 PM, Tropicalevo said:

I believe that Antartica is VERY safe.

Personally I will stay in Samui. About nine days of light rain so far this year and very hot.

Empty beaches and great food.

Sorry - advert over. 20 years and still a happy chappie.

Safe except for the intense uv radiation when the Ozone hole opens! ????

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RocketDog said:

Safe except for the intense uv radiation when the Ozone hole opens! ????

Thousands of people work outside in Antarctica and seems no problems with the UV radiation.

The real problem for anyone wanting to live there is that it's not possible without the facilities that a base has, and apart from Greenpeace only governments provide those facilities.

Posted
Just now, thaibeachlovers said:

Thousands of people work outside in Antarctica and seems no problems with the UV radiation.

The real problem for anyone wanting to live there is that it's not possible without the facilities that a base has, and apart from Greenpeace only governments provide those facilities.

Of course you are correct. 

I was making a poor attempt at humor. 

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...