Kamala Harris's appointment has tied the GOP in knots and been tripping all over with contradictory statements. We have Rudy G retweeting a qoute from the National Review story on Harris's awesome and terrible powers as a former prosecutor that lend herself easily to abuse and Harris was an enthusiastic abuser. That is contradictory to Trump campaign earlier statement that she would hide her records as former prosecutors and was an anti-police radical who let crime ran rampant. No wonder Trumpers are all over with their own version of Harris's slander. Reflect poorly on the coherency of Trump's election campaign and they seem disarray. 

 

https://americanindependent.com/gop-kamala-harris-crime-joe-biden-prosecutor-police-2020-election/

7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Kamala Harris's appointment has tied the GOP in knots and been tripping all over with contradictory statements. We have Rudy G retweeting a qoute from the National Review story on Harris's awesome and terrible powers as a former prosecutor that lend herself easily to abuse and Harris was an enthusiastic abuser. That is contradictory to Trump campaign earlier statement that she would hide her records as former prosecutors and was an anti-police radical who let crime ran rampant. No wonder Trumpers are all over with their own version of Harris's slander. Reflect poorly on the coherency of Trump's election campaign and they seem disarray. 

 

https://americanindependent.com/gop-kamala-harris-crime-joe-biden-prosecutor-police-2020-election/

You need to read more than left wing garbage, to see the whole picture. The problem is much of the media is infected by the left and can't be trusted. Read widely so you can see through the haze.

32 minutes ago, rabas said:

News with fake repackaging.

 

Snopes fact check: Pence made the point smoking does not kill everyone, and "acknowledged the health risks of smoking after referencing fairly accurate statistics about them."

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mike-pence-smoking/

Complete check:

Quote

What's True

In 2000, Mike Pence publicly downplayed the risks of smoking cigarettes and stated "smoking doesn't kill."

What's False

Pence's point was that not everyone who smokes dies from smoking-related illnesses, and he acknowledged the health risks of smoking after referencing fairly accurate statistics about them.

 

So yes, he did downplay the risks.

9 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

You need to read more than left wing garbage, to see the whole picture. The problem is much of the media is infected by the left and can't be trusted. Read widely so you can see through the haze.

Don't let the haze cover up the confusion and fear in Trump's camp created by the strong Biden-Harris ticket. As Trump campaign reported that they viewed Harris 'scared them most' and will chew Pence up and spit him out.   

36 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

You need to read more than left wing garbage, to see the whole picture. The problem is much of the media is infected by the left and can't be trusted. Read widely so you can see through the haze.

Your recommended media outlets are?

2 hours ago, cmarshall said:

She dropped out, because she ran out of money.

And yet here she is running as the pick for VP.

52 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Don't let the haze cover up the confusion and fear in Trump's camp created by the strong Biden-Harris ticket. As Trump campaign reported that they viewed Harris 'scared them most' and will chew Pence up and spit him out.   

Yep, Harris scares Trump and he got himself indicted over his fear of facing Biden.

1 hour ago, simple1 said:

trump's tough stance on PRC... What has he proven to actually achieve by way of behavioural changes by PRC dictatorship?

He did make CCP show their true colors with South China Sea and Hong Kong. Before that it was all cuddly and mushy in the media, a facade constructed by political correctness and CCP propaganda. Otherwise, not much, it's up to the Chinese to pick up the pitchforks and start skewering commies.

57 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Don't let the haze cover up the confusion and fear in Trump's camp created by the strong Biden-Harris ticket. As Trump campaign reported that they viewed Harris 'scared them most' and will chew Pence up and spit him out.   

it appears Trump & the RNC/GOP hit the panic button  555

1 minute ago, DrTuner said:

He did make CCP show their true colors with South China Sea and Hong Kong. Before that it was all cuddly and mushy in the media, a facade constructed by political correctness and CCP propaganda. Otherwise, not much, it's up to the Chinese to pick up the pitchforks and start skewering commies.

"China was not included in the deal, and President Barack Obama went out of his way to remind the region that this was no accident. TPP allows America - and not countries like China - to write the rules of the road in the 21st Century, which is especially important in a region as dynamic as the Asia-Pacific.... No wonder then that Beijing saw the US pivot to Asia, and the TPP within that, as a thinly disguised plan to contain China's growing might. "

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-38060980

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

And again the same vague conjecture.

People oppose her, fine, but if the only reason is 'she claimed to smoke pot while listening to tupac', that will not really impress anyone.

 

So please, anything substantial please.

How about her own father has laid claim to being descended from Hamilton Brown, a prominent plantation and slave owner in the 1800's. He owned scores of slaves, African, creole, and even White slaves. 

Furthermore if she is such a shoe in to be the first woman president of America. 

Why did she only poll 2% nationally in the primaries, and a meagre 7% in her own state. She was out debated and  torn apart on her record by Tulsi Gabbard, dropping out of the race in December 2019 after labelling Biden a  racist. 

Seems to me her entire fan base hails from this forum. 

 

1 hour ago, stevenl said:

And again the same vague conjecture.

People oppose her, fine, but if the only reason is 'she claimed to smoke pot while listening to tupac', that will not really impress anyone.

 

So please, anything substantial please.

Vague? Your response to her lack of a response to legit questions is vague and unsubstantiated.

 

You keep asking people to post something substantial, and it continues to be iterated to you that the questions that were brought up about her record 1) never got answered by her 2) dropped her right out of the campaign. That is the meaning of substantial in politics. Your lack of retorts is what is the issue here.

 

These simple questions ended her campaign. lol And yet, they are "vague" lol You could not make this stuff up if you tried. 

 

She had no answers. That is not very vague at all. Things that are not substantial do not end candidate presidential runs. 

4 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

He did make CCP show their true colors with South China Sea and Hong Kong. Before that it was all cuddly and mushy in the media, a facade constructed by political correctness and CCP propaganda. Otherwise, not much, it's up to the Chinese to pick up the pitchforks and start skewering commies.

What true colours have Trump did with respect with SCS. Matters of the island sovereignty are still in doubts. His freedom of navigation operations have been mostly hyped. In fact, China's development of forward-operating bases on man-made SCS appears unhindered and almost completed. The National Security Act was still enacted in spite of all the noise made by Trump. His trade and travel action only harm Hong Kong, not China. The Chinese people have better standard of living and their quality of life have also been improved. Fact they look at US internal riots with amazement. They rather prefer their own country.  

1 hour ago, checkered flag said:

You need to read more than left wing garbage, to see the whole picture. The problem is much of the media is infected by the left and can't be trusted. 

And inane claims like this shows that you can't be trusted.

Fox news on Bidens Kamala Harris announcement As VP

 

 

 

16 minutes ago, DrTuner said:

He did make CCP show their true colors with South China Sea and Hong Kong. Before that it was all cuddly and mushy in the media, a facade constructed by political correctness and CCP propaganda. Otherwise, not much, it's up to the Chinese to pick up the pitchforks and start skewering commies.

 

South China Sea and H.K. potential scenarios have been known for a long time - no real surprises - just a matter of timing. Aside by some in the media, it was trump who misunderstood PRC with his 'cuddly and mushy' approaches which blew up in his face.  U-turn by trump which has cost the US tax payer billions, with so far no significant outcome/s, instead a hardening of attitudes.  One could reasonably expect no change in relations until after the elections which quite possibly could end the trump Presidency.

Edited August 13, 20206 yr by simple1

Let's say you are an average Joe and you get past her issues and abuses of power (to further her own career) as a prosecutor.

 

Ok, then you have got to realize here is a person who got asked a few tough questions, she folded 100% and had no idea what to say, then she gave up like a defeated and whipped dog because of a few questions she could not answer. 

 

Presidential? Or vice presidential in this case? 

 

She sounds like a quitter who cannot take even the slightest amount of heat to me. 

3 minutes ago, Tagged said:

Fox news on Bidens Kamala Harris announcement As VP

 

 

 

panic and wetting paints

5 minutes ago, utalkin2me said:

Vague? Your response to her lack of a response to legit questions is vague and unsubstantiated.

 

You keep asking people to post something substantial, and it continues to be iterated to you that the questions that were brought up about her record 1) never got answered by her 2) dropped her right out of the campaign. That is the meaning of substantial in politics. Your lack of retorts is what is the issue here.

 

These simple questions ended her campaign. lol And yet, they are "vague" lol You could not make this stuff up if you tried. 

 

She had no answers. That is not very vague at all. Things that are not substantial do not end candidate presidential runs. 

So you will be voting for biden then. With your moral stance you couldnt vote for trump.

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Don't let the haze cover up the confusion and fear in Trump's camp created by the strong Biden-Harris ticket. As Trump campaign reported that they viewed Harris 'scared them most' and will chew Pence up and spit him out.   

Your "agrees" are from your usual palls, but the five of you won't cost the election. It will be her record plus her demeanor that will do them in. She take over the campaign will keep Joe locked in the basement.

1 hour ago, Eric Loh said:

Don't let the haze cover up the confusion and fear in Trump's camp created by the strong Biden-Harris ticket. As Trump campaign reported that they viewed Harris 'scared them most' and will chew Pence up and spit him out.   

She scares any honest thinking person, that should help Trump.

9 minutes ago, utalkin2me said:

Vague? Your response to her lack of a response to legit questions is vague and unsubstantiated.

 

You keep asking people to post something substantial, and it continues to be iterated to you that the questions that were brought up about her record 1) never got answered by her 2) dropped her right out of the campaign. That is the meaning of substantial in politics. Your lack of retorts is what is the issue here.

 

These simple questions ended her campaign. lol And yet, they are "vague" lol You could not make this stuff up if you tried. 

 

She had no answers. That is not very vague at all. Things that are not substantial do not end candidate presidential runs. 

Yes, vague comments from your side. You say there are legit questions, please don't hesitate and post them here (not the first time this question has been asked).

 

On a forum like this it is very common that people that oppose something come up with reasons why they oppose something. And we're still waiting for the substantial reasons to oppose Harris.

2 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

Your "agrees" are from your usual palls, but the five of you won't cost the election. It will be her record plus her demeanor that will do them in. She take over the campaign will keep Joe locked in the basement.

Fear has sipped into your mangled balderdash post. Don't understand anything you say. 

29 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

And yet here she is running as the pick for VP.

She was polling 5% among the Dems. That's after Warren. 

5 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

She scares any honest thinking person, that should help Trump.

If she can scare those honest thinking person of Trump's mishandling of the pandemic and the economy, unlikely it will help Trump. Logical thinking. 

5 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Yes, vague comments from your side. You say there are legit questions, please don't hesitate and post them here (not the first time this question has been asked).

 

On a forum like this it is very common that people that oppose something come up with reasons why they oppose something. And we're still waiting for the substantial reasons to oppose Harris.

There you go again tell people what and how to do it. The statement was made and it's up to you to agree or dispute it. 

I  don't like or trust her that's good enough. I'll save may reasons for open minded people that can think.

27 minutes ago, utalkin2me said:

Let's say you are an average Joe and you get past her issues and abuses of power (to further her own career) as a prosecutor.

If you're an average Joe who has already gotten past trump's string of issues and abuses then getting past whatever baggage Harris has should be a walk in the park in an electric top tier wheelchair made by Tesla.

Edited August 13, 20206 yr by Phoenix Rising

19 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

She scares any honest thinking person, that should help Trump.

"Honest, thinking person" and "trump" in the same sentence???

16 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

She’s bright and assertive.

 

Get used to it.

Yes, stands up for what she says believes in one minute...then changes her tune to benefit herself. You to gettem girl!! Her and ole Joe gonna set the world straight!

20 minutes ago, checkered flag said:

There you go again tell people what and how to do it. The statement was made and it's up to you to agree or dispute it. 

I  don't like or trust her that's good enough. I'll save may reasons for open minded people that can think.

But you like and trust the pussy grabber liar in chief. Sounds a bit covfefe to me.