6 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

Are you actually suggesting these things don't happen?

 

Not what I suggested, of course, which is why you snipped the relevant part.

 

2 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Were civilians killed in this attack? Was it disproportionate compared with the attack preceding it? Were there any refugees 'created' by it?

 

What 'puppet master' would that be? Anything whatsoever to back that with?

 

No, 'we' don't know HRC becoming POTUS would have resulted in this or that. You claim it. Not the same thing. And, of course, she didn't win. Cooling off under Trump? As in when he pulled out of the JCPOA? Or assassinated an senior Iranian official?

 

You're expecting a lot of evidence for a speculative comment on an internet forum.  ????

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’ll remind you, Trump’s response to Russia offering bounties for the killing of Americans was, do nothing, say nothing.

 

 

Did you want bombs to drop? 

3 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

Not what I suggested, of course, which is why you snipped the relevant part.

 

 

You've lost me I'm afraid.  If they do happen, then it isn't so inconceivable that they might happen now.

 

I suggest you learn the difference between a light conversation and some sort of governmental press release.

7 minutes ago, PatOngo said:

Trump threatened to make China pay for the covid pandemic, what happened???

This is an ongoing concern, lets see what joe does.

Just now, EVENKEEL said:

This is an ongoing concern, lets see what joe does.

I hope it's positive! 

7 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You're expecting a lot of evidence for a speculative comment on an internet forum.  ????

Which is another way of saying your comment has no demonstrable rational basis.

6 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

This is an ongoing concern, lets see what joe does.

I don’t think President Joe Biden is at all compelled to act on the ramblings of his predecessor, indeed I suspect that having so roundly routed Trump in the election he’ll be more interested in following his own policy platform.

 

 

 

 

13 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You're expecting a lot of evidence for a speculative comment on an internet forum.  ????

 

I'm expecting posters to be able to back their posts and arguments. Silly of me, perhaps. You stated a series of conditions relevant to your "support" of such strikes, not exactly sure on which grounds you fault this one.

 

When you state that there's a 'puppet master', or that 'we' know what would have happened had HRC won, you've left speculation behind.

15 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

 

You've lost me I'm afraid.  If they do happen, then it isn't so inconceivable that they might happen now.

 

I suggest you learn the difference between a light conversation and some sort of governmental press release.

 

I suggested there's always someone ready to make such insinuations, regardless or not if they apply or make sense. You proved me right. As for 'might happen now' - you can't seem to actually explain what nefarious plans are afoot.

1 hour ago, Nout said:

Killing invaders, occupiers? Yeah...worked really well so far. Has America won a war since WW2?

This is gonna a be long thread. ????

2 minutes ago, Kwasaki said:

This is gonna a be long thread.

Does'nt really need to be, a thread on TV has little bearing on the outcome. 

2 minutes ago, PatOngo said:

Does'nt really need to be, a thread on TV has little bearing on the outcome. 

OK I didn't know that,  I'll cancel my call to Biden. 

45 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Which is another way of saying your comment has no demonstrable rational basis.

 

Quite the opposite.  As it is speculative or opinion based, the only rationale I need to to say "based on what has happened so far, I think the following could/might/will happen..."

 

If that's too much for you to cope with, I suggest you avoid any interaction with people and only read scientific journals for entertainment.

39 minutes ago, Morch said:

I suggested there's always someone ready to make such insinuations, regardless or not if they apply or make sense. You proved me right.

 

So you admit that they happen, but somehow know that they won't happen now?

6 hours ago, webfact said:

U.S. conducts air strikes against Iranian-backed militia facilities in Syria: Pentagon

here we go again! america is back so does its diplomacy

3 hours ago, Morch said:

 

Waffle.

Of course it is to a person with naive views regarding politics. It's a true shame when one is this way. But hey, not everyone can be saved.

*drops the mic and points to the BDS poster*

Maybe think like this instead! What is US doing in Irak? If they got their fat butt out of places they shouldn´t be in, just maybe there will not be any bombings of US facilities in places they shouldn´t be in the first place.

8 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Alternatively, return to the long-standing policy that killing Americans will have consequences.

Well, it was Obama who killed a US citizen overseas. Of course American liberties should be first and foremost (they are an example for the world) but they are not and partly due to the Israeli lobby. For example, in some states one can lose their job including teaching for being outspoken against that country.

 

If America was truly first and it's citizens focused on surely American lives would be safer along with civil liberties. I refer to history with regards to influence on governmental institutions.

8 hours ago, billd766 said:

That little "war" as you call it was going on before President Biden won the presidential election last November.

 

And who is the US going to sell more guns to?

True, but surely Biden isn't stopping it and said 'nothing will fundamentally change.' Was that a serious question about who the US is going to sale more guns to?

4 hours ago, Morch said:

 

Were civilians killed in this attack? Was it disproportionate compared with the attack preceding it? Were there any refugees 'created' by it?

 

What 'puppet master' would that be? Anything whatsoever to back that with?

 

No, 'we' don't know HRC becoming POTUS would have resulted in this or that. You claim it. Not the same thing. And, of course, she didn't win. Cooling off under Trump? As in when he pulled out of the JCPOA? Or assassinated an senior Iranian official?

@Morch This user seems to have a continued support for the war machine. They really should inspect those nuclear weapons the Zionists have eh? The Christians should shed light on it.

"Past Biden, Psaki tweets criticizing Trump resurface after new Syria airstrikes

Past Twitter posts about Trump military actions draw sharp reactions Thursday -- including from U.S. Rep. Ilhan Omar"

 

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-psaki-tweets-criticizing-trump-slammed-after-new-syria-airstrikes

2 hours ago, Pique Dard said:

here we go again! america is back so does its diplomacy

 

The strike was a response to an attack on Americans in Iraq. Not the first of its kind. What sort of diplomacy do you have in mind?

Off-topic posts and replies reported and removed.  Please stay on topic.  It's not about China or Covid.

1 hour ago, Dagfinnur Traustason said:

Maybe think like this instead! What is US doing in Irak? If they got their fat butt out of places they shouldn´t be in, just maybe there will not be any bombings of US facilities in places they shouldn´t be in the first place.

 

As far as I'm aware the US presence in Iraq was (until lately) sanctioned by the Iraqi government? Guess you missed out on all that ISIS fighting bit.

1 hour ago, Solinvictus said:

Of course it is to a person with naive views regarding politics. It's a true shame when one is this way. But hey, not everyone can be saved.

*drops the mic and points to the BDS poster*

 

Of course, other than cliche's, hollow slogans, and look-a-bird!, you've got nothing to offer.

27 minutes ago, Solinvictus said:

@Morch This user seems to have a continued support for the war machine. They really should inspect those nuclear weapons the Zionists have eh? The Christians should shed light on it.

 

Yawn.

More slogans, more nonsense personal commentary.

More deflections.

4 minutes ago, Morch said:

 

As far as I'm aware the US presence in Iraq was (until lately) sanctioned by the Iraqi government? Guess you missed out on all that ISIS fighting bit.

They were invited in 

????

6 hours ago, Nout said:

Killing invaders, occupiers? Yeah...worked really well so far. Has America won a war since WW2?

LOL ????????What Rock have you been hiding under 

5 hours ago, Sujo said:

What war was started by this.

Pay no mind to the looney behind the curtain