Jump to content

Political opposition party blames Thai government for causing tourism collapse and economic crisis, says Test and Go must go away immediately


Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

When the concept of reopening to foreign visitors was first considered, insurance and the provision of quarantine was required. A number of well connected organisations and individuals agreed to provide these services. Having established these business links with the new "system" for entering the country they will not allow this system, and the benefits/profits it brings to lapse.

They are influential (wealthy) and are able to bring that influence to bear upon the decision makers.

 

Remember here, the various agencies and ministries are run as personal fiefdoms by their executives and ministers. Their is little common purpose or central direction. What cooperation there is centres around political loyalties, which are often fluid and driven by opportunity. The "influential", understanding and exploiting that are thus able to exert considerable influence.

 

The damage they are doing to the medium and long term interests of the tourist industry, if considered at all, are regarded as collateral damage and subordinate to the immediate benefits.

 

It is not so much a matter of pulling strings as a product of crony government; but if anyone can be said to be pulling strings it is these cronies.

https://theaseanpost.com/article/growing-gap-between-richest-and-poorest-thais 

Screenshot_2022-03-31-07-20-03-59.jpg

Posted
6 hours ago, mania said:

Yes true but the reason Test & Go ++ still exists has nothing really to do with careful or covid

 

It all has to do with keeping the protesters off the streets till after the next fixed election is completed

 

exactly all about Control C19 was a blessing for the government no army needed to subdue the masses just issue a decree..

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

When the concept of reopening to foreign visitors was first considered, insurance and the provision of quarantine was required. A number of well connected organisations and individuals agreed to provide these services. Having established these business links with the new "system" for entering the country they will not allow this system, and the benefits/profits it brings to lapse.

They are influential (wealthy) and are able to bring that influence to bear upon the decision makers.

 

Remember here, the various agencies and ministries are run as personal fiefdoms by their executives and ministers. Their is little common purpose or central direction. What cooperation there is centres around political loyalties, which are often fluid and driven by opportunity. The "influential", understanding and exploiting that are thus able to exert considerable influence.

 

The damage they are doing to the medium and long term interests of the tourist industry, if considered at all, are regarded as collateral damage and subordinate to the immediate benefits.

 

It is not so much a matter of pulling strings as a product of crony government; but if anyone can be said to be pulling strings it is these cronies.

Are you saying, for example, that the communist government of Vietnam is more flexible, caring, and responsive to its citizens employed in tourism and tourism connected industries than is the case in Thailand?

Edited by John Drake
Posted
48 minutes ago, possum1931 said:

Suppose the elected government said "no you are not, we will fight to stay here, we are the elected government"?

Would Prayut and his generals then get their armed soldiers with their guns and force them out?

I believe most of the key opposition was arrested in the middle of the night and sent to attitude readjustment centers.

  • Haha 1
Posted

Dear CNX MP, nothing would have been different if your party was in charge. The money just would go to different pockets. What about the air quality in your province. Your party has the most followers there and they don't give a f.... about clean air. Something a tourist would prefer.

  • Like 1
Posted

at the beginning i think it was ok to have restriction, as time go by thing needed to go back to norm, learn to live with it, open or pay the consequences .

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, webfact said:

Energy Minister Supattanapong Punmeechaow instead denied the statement and claimed that the domestic economy in another 100 countries were also in the same state or worse.

Whataboutism: The only tool on their belt.

Posted
7 hours ago, John Drake said:

Are you saying, for example, that the communist government of Vietnam is more flexible, caring, and responsive to its citizens employed in tourism and tourism connected industries than is the case in Thailand?

No, I  know little anything about the "Communist" government of Vietnam, but I suspect that it may be a little more responsive to the needs of its citizens. But that has little relevance to the situation here, where if my analysis is remotely accurate, the non communist government really has no interest at all in its citizens employed in tourism and tourism connected industries.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...